Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service
Whether the 80 hours per week limit on surgical residents’ work hours has reduced the number or variety of cases performed by residents is unknown. We quantified residents’ operative experience, by case category, on a pediatric surgical service. The number of senior and junior residents’ cases were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2005-05, Vol.200 (5), p.670-676 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 676 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 670 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Surgeons |
container_volume | 200 |
creator | Spencer, Ariel U. Teitelbaum, Daniel H. |
description | Whether the 80 hours per week limit on surgical residents’ work hours has reduced the number or variety of cases performed by residents is unknown.
We quantified residents’ operative experience, by case category, on a pediatric surgical service. The number of senior and junior residents’ cases were compared between residents from the year before (n = 47) and after (n = 44) the 80-hour limit. Residents also completed a questionnaire about their operative and educational experience. As an additional dimension of the educational experience, resident participation in clinic was assessed. Student’s
t-test was used.
Total number of cases performed either by senior (before, 1.58 ± 0.42 versus after, 1.84 ± 0.82 cases/day) or junior (before, 0.70 ± 0.21 versus after, 0.71 ± 0.15) residents has not changed (p = NS). Senior residents’ vascular access and endoscopy rate increased; other categories remained stable. Residents’ perception of their experience was unchanged. But residents’ participation in outpatient clinic was significantly decreased (before, 66.0% ± 14.7% versus after, 17.0% ± 19.9% of clinics covered, p < 0.005).
The 80-hour limit has had minimal impact on residents’ operative experience, in case number and variety, and residents’ perceptions of their educational experience. Residents’ reduction in duty hours may have been achieved at the expense of outpatient clinic experiences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67780689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1072751505000505</els_id><sourcerecordid>67780689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-b5cbfc06f5dad1a6d6c28747ffc0b38a0fc95f69245429939f4fa0fb84fadc743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1u1DAQgC0EoqXwCigc4JYwzsZ_R7QqtFKlSpSfo-XY48pLEgc7Wak3XoPX40nwalcqR07zo2_G44-QNxQaCpS_3zU7M9o4DHlN900LwBqgDYB8Qs6pFKqmVMHTkoNoa8EoOyMvct4BUAGKPydnlMlObhg_J-56nI1dquir7zH9qK_imqrPmJcU7BLilKs4HergcFryn1-_q9sZk1nCHqtvcVhHPACmulv7PKMNZlgeSpHugzVDdYdpHyy-JM-8GTK-OsUL8vXj5ZftVX1z--l6--Gmth2wpe6Z7b0F7pkzjhruuG2l6IQvzX4jDXirmOeq7VjXKrVRvvOl2csSnBXd5oK8O-6dU_y5lk_oMWSLw2AmjGvWXAgJXKoCqiNoU8w5oddzCqNJD5qCPijWO_2PYn1QrIHqorjMvj49svYjusfJk9MCvD0BJhcJPpnJhvzI8XIpFaxw2yOHRck-YNLZBpwsupDQLtrF8B_n_AVdfaNG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67780689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Spencer, Ariel U. ; Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Ariel U. ; Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><description>Whether the 80 hours per week limit on surgical residents’ work hours has reduced the number or variety of cases performed by residents is unknown.
We quantified residents’ operative experience, by case category, on a pediatric surgical service. The number of senior and junior residents’ cases were compared between residents from the year before (n = 47) and after (n = 44) the 80-hour limit. Residents also completed a questionnaire about their operative and educational experience. As an additional dimension of the educational experience, resident participation in clinic was assessed. Student’s
t-test was used.
Total number of cases performed either by senior (before, 1.58 ± 0.42 versus after, 1.84 ± 0.82 cases/day) or junior (before, 0.70 ± 0.21 versus after, 0.71 ± 0.15) residents has not changed (p = NS). Senior residents’ vascular access and endoscopy rate increased; other categories remained stable. Residents’ perception of their experience was unchanged. But residents’ participation in outpatient clinic was significantly decreased (before, 66.0% ± 14.7% versus after, 17.0% ± 19.9% of clinics covered, p < 0.005).
The 80-hour limit has had minimal impact on residents’ operative experience, in case number and variety, and residents’ perceptions of their educational experience. Residents’ reduction in duty hours may have been achieved at the expense of outpatient clinic experiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1072-7515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1190</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15848356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; General aspects ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine - statistics & numerical data ; Pediatrics - organization & administration ; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling ; Specialization ; Surgery Department, Hospital - organization & administration ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Workload - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2005-05, Vol.200 (5), p.670-676</ispartof><rights>2005 American College of Surgeons</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-b5cbfc06f5dad1a6d6c28747ffc0b38a0fc95f69245429939f4fa0fb84fadc743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986,70004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16743175$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15848356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Ariel U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service</title><title>Journal of the American College of Surgeons</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Surg</addtitle><description>Whether the 80 hours per week limit on surgical residents’ work hours has reduced the number or variety of cases performed by residents is unknown.
We quantified residents’ operative experience, by case category, on a pediatric surgical service. The number of senior and junior residents’ cases were compared between residents from the year before (n = 47) and after (n = 44) the 80-hour limit. Residents also completed a questionnaire about their operative and educational experience. As an additional dimension of the educational experience, resident participation in clinic was assessed. Student’s
t-test was used.
Total number of cases performed either by senior (before, 1.58 ± 0.42 versus after, 1.84 ± 0.82 cases/day) or junior (before, 0.70 ± 0.21 versus after, 0.71 ± 0.15) residents has not changed (p = NS). Senior residents’ vascular access and endoscopy rate increased; other categories remained stable. Residents’ perception of their experience was unchanged. But residents’ participation in outpatient clinic was significantly decreased (before, 66.0% ± 14.7% versus after, 17.0% ± 19.9% of clinics covered, p < 0.005).
The 80-hour limit has had minimal impact on residents’ operative experience, in case number and variety, and residents’ perceptions of their educational experience. Residents’ reduction in duty hours may have been achieved at the expense of outpatient clinic experiences.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pediatrics - organization & administration</subject><subject>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>Surgery Department, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Workload - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>1072-7515</issn><issn>1879-1190</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1u1DAQgC0EoqXwCigc4JYwzsZ_R7QqtFKlSpSfo-XY48pLEgc7Wak3XoPX40nwalcqR07zo2_G44-QNxQaCpS_3zU7M9o4DHlN900LwBqgDYB8Qs6pFKqmVMHTkoNoa8EoOyMvct4BUAGKPydnlMlObhg_J-56nI1dquir7zH9qK_imqrPmJcU7BLilKs4HergcFryn1-_q9sZk1nCHqtvcVhHPACmulv7PKMNZlgeSpHugzVDdYdpHyy-JM-8GTK-OsUL8vXj5ZftVX1z--l6--Gmth2wpe6Z7b0F7pkzjhruuG2l6IQvzX4jDXirmOeq7VjXKrVRvvOl2csSnBXd5oK8O-6dU_y5lk_oMWSLw2AmjGvWXAgJXKoCqiNoU8w5oddzCqNJD5qCPijWO_2PYn1QrIHqorjMvj49svYjusfJk9MCvD0BJhcJPpnJhvzI8XIpFaxw2yOHRck-YNLZBpwsupDQLtrF8B_n_AVdfaNG</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Spencer, Ariel U.</creator><creator>Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service</title><author>Spencer, Ariel U. ; Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-b5cbfc06f5dad1a6d6c28747ffc0b38a0fc95f69245429939f4fa0fb84fadc743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pediatrics - organization & administration</topic><topic>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>Surgery Department, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Workload - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Ariel U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Surgeons</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spencer, Ariel U.</au><au>Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Surgeons</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Surg</addtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>200</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>676</epage><pages>670-676</pages><issn>1072-7515</issn><eissn>1879-1190</eissn><abstract>Whether the 80 hours per week limit on surgical residents’ work hours has reduced the number or variety of cases performed by residents is unknown.
We quantified residents’ operative experience, by case category, on a pediatric surgical service. The number of senior and junior residents’ cases were compared between residents from the year before (n = 47) and after (n = 44) the 80-hour limit. Residents also completed a questionnaire about their operative and educational experience. As an additional dimension of the educational experience, resident participation in clinic was assessed. Student’s
t-test was used.
Total number of cases performed either by senior (before, 1.58 ± 0.42 versus after, 1.84 ± 0.82 cases/day) or junior (before, 0.70 ± 0.21 versus after, 0.71 ± 0.15) residents has not changed (p = NS). Senior residents’ vascular access and endoscopy rate increased; other categories remained stable. Residents’ perception of their experience was unchanged. But residents’ participation in outpatient clinic was significantly decreased (before, 66.0% ± 14.7% versus after, 17.0% ± 19.9% of clinics covered, p < 0.005).
The 80-hour limit has had minimal impact on residents’ operative experience, in case number and variety, and residents’ perceptions of their educational experience. Residents’ reduction in duty hours may have been achieved at the expense of outpatient clinic experiences.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15848356</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1072-7515 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2005-05, Vol.200 (5), p.670-676 |
issn | 1072-7515 1879-1190 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67780689 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Female General aspects Humans Internship and Residency Male Medical sciences Medicine - statistics & numerical data Pediatrics - organization & administration Personnel Staffing and Scheduling Specialization Surgery Department, Hospital - organization & administration Surveys and Questionnaires Workload - statistics & numerical data |
title | Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A24%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Work-Hour%20Restrictions%20on%20Residents%E2%80%99%20Operative%20Volume%20on%20a%20Subspecialty%20Surgical%20Service&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Surgeons&rft.au=Spencer,%20Ariel%20U.&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=200&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=676&rft.pages=670-676&rft.issn=1072-7515&rft.eissn=1879-1190&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67780689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67780689&rft_id=info:pmid/15848356&rft_els_id=S1072751505000505&rfr_iscdi=true |