Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service

Whether the 80 hours per week limit on surgical residents’ work hours has reduced the number or variety of cases performed by residents is unknown. We quantified residents’ operative experience, by case category, on a pediatric surgical service. The number of senior and junior residents’ cases were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2005-05, Vol.200 (5), p.670-676
Hauptverfasser: Spencer, Ariel U., Teitelbaum, Daniel H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 676
container_issue 5
container_start_page 670
container_title Journal of the American College of Surgeons
container_volume 200
creator Spencer, Ariel U.
Teitelbaum, Daniel H.
description Whether the 80 hours per week limit on surgical residents’ work hours has reduced the number or variety of cases performed by residents is unknown. We quantified residents’ operative experience, by case category, on a pediatric surgical service. The number of senior and junior residents’ cases were compared between residents from the year before (n = 47) and after (n = 44) the 80-hour limit. Residents also completed a questionnaire about their operative and educational experience. As an additional dimension of the educational experience, resident participation in clinic was assessed. Student’s t-test was used. Total number of cases performed either by senior (before, 1.58 ± 0.42 versus after, 1.84 ± 0.82 cases/day) or junior (before, 0.70 ± 0.21 versus after, 0.71 ± 0.15) residents has not changed (p = NS). Senior residents’ vascular access and endoscopy rate increased; other categories remained stable. Residents’ perception of their experience was unchanged. But residents’ participation in outpatient clinic was significantly decreased (before, 66.0% ± 14.7% versus after, 17.0% ± 19.9% of clinics covered, p < 0.005). The 80-hour limit has had minimal impact on residents’ operative experience, in case number and variety, and residents’ perceptions of their educational experience. Residents’ reduction in duty hours may have been achieved at the expense of outpatient clinic experiences.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67780689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1072751505000505</els_id><sourcerecordid>67780689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-b5cbfc06f5dad1a6d6c28747ffc0b38a0fc95f69245429939f4fa0fb84fadc743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1u1DAQgC0EoqXwCigc4JYwzsZ_R7QqtFKlSpSfo-XY48pLEgc7Wak3XoPX40nwalcqR07zo2_G44-QNxQaCpS_3zU7M9o4DHlN900LwBqgDYB8Qs6pFKqmVMHTkoNoa8EoOyMvct4BUAGKPydnlMlObhg_J-56nI1dquir7zH9qK_imqrPmJcU7BLilKs4HergcFryn1-_q9sZk1nCHqtvcVhHPACmulv7PKMNZlgeSpHugzVDdYdpHyy-JM-8GTK-OsUL8vXj5ZftVX1z--l6--Gmth2wpe6Z7b0F7pkzjhruuG2l6IQvzX4jDXirmOeq7VjXKrVRvvOl2csSnBXd5oK8O-6dU_y5lk_oMWSLw2AmjGvWXAgJXKoCqiNoU8w5oddzCqNJD5qCPijWO_2PYn1QrIHqorjMvj49svYjusfJk9MCvD0BJhcJPpnJhvzI8XIpFaxw2yOHRck-YNLZBpwsupDQLtrF8B_n_AVdfaNG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67780689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Spencer, Ariel U. ; Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Ariel U. ; Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><description>Whether the 80 hours per week limit on surgical residents’ work hours has reduced the number or variety of cases performed by residents is unknown. We quantified residents’ operative experience, by case category, on a pediatric surgical service. The number of senior and junior residents’ cases were compared between residents from the year before (n = 47) and after (n = 44) the 80-hour limit. Residents also completed a questionnaire about their operative and educational experience. As an additional dimension of the educational experience, resident participation in clinic was assessed. Student’s t-test was used. Total number of cases performed either by senior (before, 1.58 ± 0.42 versus after, 1.84 ± 0.82 cases/day) or junior (before, 0.70 ± 0.21 versus after, 0.71 ± 0.15) residents has not changed (p = NS). Senior residents’ vascular access and endoscopy rate increased; other categories remained stable. Residents’ perception of their experience was unchanged. But residents’ participation in outpatient clinic was significantly decreased (before, 66.0% ± 14.7% versus after, 17.0% ± 19.9% of clinics covered, p &lt; 0.005). The 80-hour limit has had minimal impact on residents’ operative experience, in case number and variety, and residents’ perceptions of their educational experience. Residents’ reduction in duty hours may have been achieved at the expense of outpatient clinic experiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1072-7515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1190</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15848356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; General aspects ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pediatrics - organization &amp; administration ; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling ; Specialization ; Surgery Department, Hospital - organization &amp; administration ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Workload - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2005-05, Vol.200 (5), p.670-676</ispartof><rights>2005 American College of Surgeons</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-b5cbfc06f5dad1a6d6c28747ffc0b38a0fc95f69245429939f4fa0fb84fadc743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986,70004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16743175$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15848356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Ariel U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service</title><title>Journal of the American College of Surgeons</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Surg</addtitle><description>Whether the 80 hours per week limit on surgical residents’ work hours has reduced the number or variety of cases performed by residents is unknown. We quantified residents’ operative experience, by case category, on a pediatric surgical service. The number of senior and junior residents’ cases were compared between residents from the year before (n = 47) and after (n = 44) the 80-hour limit. Residents also completed a questionnaire about their operative and educational experience. As an additional dimension of the educational experience, resident participation in clinic was assessed. Student’s t-test was used. Total number of cases performed either by senior (before, 1.58 ± 0.42 versus after, 1.84 ± 0.82 cases/day) or junior (before, 0.70 ± 0.21 versus after, 0.71 ± 0.15) residents has not changed (p = NS). Senior residents’ vascular access and endoscopy rate increased; other categories remained stable. Residents’ perception of their experience was unchanged. But residents’ participation in outpatient clinic was significantly decreased (before, 66.0% ± 14.7% versus after, 17.0% ± 19.9% of clinics covered, p &lt; 0.005). The 80-hour limit has had minimal impact on residents’ operative experience, in case number and variety, and residents’ perceptions of their educational experience. Residents’ reduction in duty hours may have been achieved at the expense of outpatient clinic experiences.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pediatrics - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>Surgery Department, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Workload - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>1072-7515</issn><issn>1879-1190</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1u1DAQgC0EoqXwCigc4JYwzsZ_R7QqtFKlSpSfo-XY48pLEgc7Wak3XoPX40nwalcqR07zo2_G44-QNxQaCpS_3zU7M9o4DHlN900LwBqgDYB8Qs6pFKqmVMHTkoNoa8EoOyMvct4BUAGKPydnlMlObhg_J-56nI1dquir7zH9qK_imqrPmJcU7BLilKs4HergcFryn1-_q9sZk1nCHqtvcVhHPACmulv7PKMNZlgeSpHugzVDdYdpHyy-JM-8GTK-OsUL8vXj5ZftVX1z--l6--Gmth2wpe6Z7b0F7pkzjhruuG2l6IQvzX4jDXirmOeq7VjXKrVRvvOl2csSnBXd5oK8O-6dU_y5lk_oMWSLw2AmjGvWXAgJXKoCqiNoU8w5oddzCqNJD5qCPijWO_2PYn1QrIHqorjMvj49svYjusfJk9MCvD0BJhcJPpnJhvzI8XIpFaxw2yOHRck-YNLZBpwsupDQLtrF8B_n_AVdfaNG</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Spencer, Ariel U.</creator><creator>Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service</title><author>Spencer, Ariel U. ; Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-b5cbfc06f5dad1a6d6c28747ffc0b38a0fc95f69245429939f4fa0fb84fadc743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pediatrics - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>Surgery Department, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Workload - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Ariel U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Surgeons</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spencer, Ariel U.</au><au>Teitelbaum, Daniel H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Surgeons</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Surg</addtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>200</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>676</epage><pages>670-676</pages><issn>1072-7515</issn><eissn>1879-1190</eissn><abstract>Whether the 80 hours per week limit on surgical residents’ work hours has reduced the number or variety of cases performed by residents is unknown. We quantified residents’ operative experience, by case category, on a pediatric surgical service. The number of senior and junior residents’ cases were compared between residents from the year before (n = 47) and after (n = 44) the 80-hour limit. Residents also completed a questionnaire about their operative and educational experience. As an additional dimension of the educational experience, resident participation in clinic was assessed. Student’s t-test was used. Total number of cases performed either by senior (before, 1.58 ± 0.42 versus after, 1.84 ± 0.82 cases/day) or junior (before, 0.70 ± 0.21 versus after, 0.71 ± 0.15) residents has not changed (p = NS). Senior residents’ vascular access and endoscopy rate increased; other categories remained stable. Residents’ perception of their experience was unchanged. But residents’ participation in outpatient clinic was significantly decreased (before, 66.0% ± 14.7% versus after, 17.0% ± 19.9% of clinics covered, p &lt; 0.005). The 80-hour limit has had minimal impact on residents’ operative experience, in case number and variety, and residents’ perceptions of their educational experience. Residents’ reduction in duty hours may have been achieved at the expense of outpatient clinic experiences.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15848356</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1072-7515
ispartof Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2005-05, Vol.200 (5), p.670-676
issn 1072-7515
1879-1190
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67780689
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Female
General aspects
Humans
Internship and Residency
Male
Medical sciences
Medicine - statistics & numerical data
Pediatrics - organization & administration
Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
Specialization
Surgery Department, Hospital - organization & administration
Surveys and Questionnaires
Workload - statistics & numerical data
title Impact of Work-Hour Restrictions on Residents’ Operative Volume on a Subspecialty Surgical Service
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A24%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Work-Hour%20Restrictions%20on%20Residents%E2%80%99%20Operative%20Volume%20on%20a%20Subspecialty%20Surgical%20Service&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Surgeons&rft.au=Spencer,%20Ariel%20U.&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=200&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=676&rft.pages=670-676&rft.issn=1072-7515&rft.eissn=1879-1190&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67780689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67780689&rft_id=info:pmid/15848356&rft_els_id=S1072751505000505&rfr_iscdi=true