Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data
Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. Ho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2006-01, Vol.39 (6), p.981-989 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 989 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 981 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Rohlmann, Antonius Bauer, Lars Zander, Thomas Bergmann, Georg Wilke, Hans-Joachim |
description | Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. However, for flexion the agreement between in vitro and in vivo measurements was insufficient. In order to improve the determination of trunk muscle forces, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine with an internal fixation device was created and the same loads were applied as in a previous in vitro experiment. An extensive adaptation process of the model was performed for flexion and extension angles up to 20° and −15°, respectively. With this validated computer model intra-abdominal pressure, preload in the fixators, and a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion angle were varied until a good agreement between analytical and in vivo results was reached for both, intradiscal pressure and bending moments in the fixators. Finally, the fixators were removed and the muscle forces for the intact lumbar spine calculated. A good agreement with the in vivo results could only be achieved at a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion. For the intact spine, forces of 170, 100 and 600
N are predicted in the m. erector spinae for standing, 5° extension and 30° flexion, respectively. The force in the m. rectus abdominus for these body positions is less than 25
N. For more than 10° extension the m. erector spinae is unloaded. The finite element method together with in vivo data allows the estimation of trunk muscle forces for different upper body positions in the sagittal plane. In our patients, flexion of the upper body was most likely a combination of hip- and lumbar spine bending. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67770550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929005001259</els_id><sourcerecordid>2744062461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-7da272a08ce1d7da20e47622feb42e9179f47facdf178c2fcce9357e404c62bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuKFDEUhoMoTjv6CkNAcFflSeqSrp0yXmHAja5DKjlxUlaSNqlqZl7E5zU13SK4cXU48P1_wvkIuWJQM2D966meRhc96tuaA3Q18BrY8Ijs2F40FW_28JjsADirBj7ABXmW8wQAohXDU3LB-q4dYGA78usdLpi8C2pxMdBo6ZLW8IP6NesZqY1JY94GtTPebYgKhuLdgiFv23hP1-zCd6roUc3OqAUNtS64BSnO6DEs1EeD80P1LdJ59aNKNB9cwIcujyqvqaRcoEd3jLR0qOfkiVVzxhfneUm-fXj_9fpTdfPl4-frtzeVbntYKmEUF1zBXiMz2wLYip5zi2PLcWBisK2wShvLxF5zqzUOTSewhVb3fBybS_Lq1HtI8eeKeZHeZY3zrALGNcteCAFdBwV8-Q84xTWF8jfJoGkHzlveF6o_UTrFnBNaeUjOq3RfILl5k5P8401u3iRwWbyV4NW5fh09mr-xs6gCvDkBWK5xdJhk1g6DRuMS6kWa6P73xm-poa9-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034922426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rohlmann, Antonius ; Bauer, Lars ; Zander, Thomas ; Bergmann, Georg ; Wilke, Hans-Joachim</creator><creatorcontrib>Rohlmann, Antonius ; Bauer, Lars ; Zander, Thomas ; Bergmann, Georg ; Wilke, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><description>Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. However, for flexion the agreement between in vitro and in vivo measurements was insufficient. In order to improve the determination of trunk muscle forces, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine with an internal fixation device was created and the same loads were applied as in a previous in vitro experiment. An extensive adaptation process of the model was performed for flexion and extension angles up to 20° and −15°, respectively. With this validated computer model intra-abdominal pressure, preload in the fixators, and a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion angle were varied until a good agreement between analytical and in vivo results was reached for both, intradiscal pressure and bending moments in the fixators. Finally, the fixators were removed and the muscle forces for the intact lumbar spine calculated. A good agreement with the in vivo results could only be achieved at a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion. For the intact spine, forces of 170, 100 and 600
N are predicted in the m. erector spinae for standing, 5° extension and 30° flexion, respectively. The force in the m. rectus abdominus for these body positions is less than 25
N. For more than 10° extension the m. erector spinae is unloaded. The finite element method together with in vivo data allows the estimation of trunk muscle forces for different upper body positions in the sagittal plane. In our patients, flexion of the upper body was most likely a combination of hip- and lumbar spine bending.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16549091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cadavers ; Computer Simulation ; Experiments ; External Fixators ; Finite Element Analysis ; Finite element method ; Humans ; Ligaments ; Lumbar spine ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology ; Middle Aged ; Muscle forces ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Pliability ; Posture ; Posture - physiology ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tensile Strength - physiology ; Vertebrae ; Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2006-01, Vol.39 (6), p.981-989</ispartof><rights>2005</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-7da272a08ce1d7da20e47622feb42e9179f47facdf178c2fcce9357e404c62bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-7da272a08ce1d7da20e47622feb42e9179f47facdf178c2fcce9357e404c62bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929005001259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16549091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rohlmann, Antonius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. However, for flexion the agreement between in vitro and in vivo measurements was insufficient. In order to improve the determination of trunk muscle forces, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine with an internal fixation device was created and the same loads were applied as in a previous in vitro experiment. An extensive adaptation process of the model was performed for flexion and extension angles up to 20° and −15°, respectively. With this validated computer model intra-abdominal pressure, preload in the fixators, and a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion angle were varied until a good agreement between analytical and in vivo results was reached for both, intradiscal pressure and bending moments in the fixators. Finally, the fixators were removed and the muscle forces for the intact lumbar spine calculated. A good agreement with the in vivo results could only be achieved at a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion. For the intact spine, forces of 170, 100 and 600
N are predicted in the m. erector spinae for standing, 5° extension and 30° flexion, respectively. The force in the m. rectus abdominus for these body positions is less than 25
N. For more than 10° extension the m. erector spinae is unloaded. The finite element method together with in vivo data allows the estimation of trunk muscle forces for different upper body positions in the sagittal plane. In our patients, flexion of the upper body was most likely a combination of hip- and lumbar spine bending.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cadavers</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>External Fixators</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Lumbar spine</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle forces</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Pliability</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tensile Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuKFDEUhoMoTjv6CkNAcFflSeqSrp0yXmHAja5DKjlxUlaSNqlqZl7E5zU13SK4cXU48P1_wvkIuWJQM2D966meRhc96tuaA3Q18BrY8Ijs2F40FW_28JjsADirBj7ABXmW8wQAohXDU3LB-q4dYGA78usdLpi8C2pxMdBo6ZLW8IP6NesZqY1JY94GtTPebYgKhuLdgiFv23hP1-zCd6roUc3OqAUNtS64BSnO6DEs1EeD80P1LdJ59aNKNB9cwIcujyqvqaRcoEd3jLR0qOfkiVVzxhfneUm-fXj_9fpTdfPl4-frtzeVbntYKmEUF1zBXiMz2wLYip5zi2PLcWBisK2wShvLxF5zqzUOTSewhVb3fBybS_Lq1HtI8eeKeZHeZY3zrALGNcteCAFdBwV8-Q84xTWF8jfJoGkHzlveF6o_UTrFnBNaeUjOq3RfILl5k5P8401u3iRwWbyV4NW5fh09mr-xs6gCvDkBWK5xdJhk1g6DRuMS6kWa6P73xm-poa9-</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Rohlmann, Antonius</creator><creator>Bauer, Lars</creator><creator>Zander, Thomas</creator><creator>Bergmann, Georg</creator><creator>Wilke, Hans-Joachim</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data</title><author>Rohlmann, Antonius ; Bauer, Lars ; Zander, Thomas ; Bergmann, Georg ; Wilke, Hans-Joachim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-7da272a08ce1d7da20e47622feb42e9179f47facdf178c2fcce9357e404c62bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cadavers</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>External Fixators</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Lumbar spine</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle forces</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Pliability</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tensile Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rohlmann, Antonius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rohlmann, Antonius</au><au>Bauer, Lars</au><au>Zander, Thomas</au><au>Bergmann, Georg</au><au>Wilke, Hans-Joachim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>989</epage><pages>981-989</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. However, for flexion the agreement between in vitro and in vivo measurements was insufficient. In order to improve the determination of trunk muscle forces, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine with an internal fixation device was created and the same loads were applied as in a previous in vitro experiment. An extensive adaptation process of the model was performed for flexion and extension angles up to 20° and −15°, respectively. With this validated computer model intra-abdominal pressure, preload in the fixators, and a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion angle were varied until a good agreement between analytical and in vivo results was reached for both, intradiscal pressure and bending moments in the fixators. Finally, the fixators were removed and the muscle forces for the intact lumbar spine calculated. A good agreement with the in vivo results could only be achieved at a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion. For the intact spine, forces of 170, 100 and 600
N are predicted in the m. erector spinae for standing, 5° extension and 30° flexion, respectively. The force in the m. rectus abdominus for these body positions is less than 25
N. For more than 10° extension the m. erector spinae is unloaded. The finite element method together with in vivo data allows the estimation of trunk muscle forces for different upper body positions in the sagittal plane. In our patients, flexion of the upper body was most likely a combination of hip- and lumbar spine bending.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16549091</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2006-01, Vol.39 (6), p.981-989 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67770550 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Abdomen Adolescent Adult Aged Biomechanical Phenomena Cadavers Computer Simulation Experiments External Fixators Finite Element Analysis Finite element method Humans Ligaments Lumbar spine Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology Middle Aged Muscle forces Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Pliability Posture Posture - physiology Stress, Mechanical Tensile Strength - physiology Vertebrae Weight-Bearing - physiology |
title | Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A51%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20trunk%20muscle%20forces%20for%20flexion%20and%20extension%20by%20using%20a%20validated%20finite%20element%20model%20of%20the%20lumbar%20spine%20and%20measured%20in%20vivo%20data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Rohlmann,%20Antonius&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=989&rft.pages=981-989&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2744062461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034922426&rft_id=info:pmid/16549091&rft_els_id=S0021929005001259&rfr_iscdi=true |