Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data

Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. Ho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanics 2006-01, Vol.39 (6), p.981-989
Hauptverfasser: Rohlmann, Antonius, Bauer, Lars, Zander, Thomas, Bergmann, Georg, Wilke, Hans-Joachim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 989
container_issue 6
container_start_page 981
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 39
creator Rohlmann, Antonius
Bauer, Lars
Zander, Thomas
Bergmann, Georg
Wilke, Hans-Joachim
description Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. However, for flexion the agreement between in vitro and in vivo measurements was insufficient. In order to improve the determination of trunk muscle forces, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine with an internal fixation device was created and the same loads were applied as in a previous in vitro experiment. An extensive adaptation process of the model was performed for flexion and extension angles up to 20° and −15°, respectively. With this validated computer model intra-abdominal pressure, preload in the fixators, and a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion angle were varied until a good agreement between analytical and in vivo results was reached for both, intradiscal pressure and bending moments in the fixators. Finally, the fixators were removed and the muscle forces for the intact lumbar spine calculated. A good agreement with the in vivo results could only be achieved at a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion. For the intact spine, forces of 170, 100 and 600 N are predicted in the m. erector spinae for standing, 5° extension and 30° flexion, respectively. The force in the m. rectus abdominus for these body positions is less than 25 N. For more than 10° extension the m. erector spinae is unloaded. The finite element method together with in vivo data allows the estimation of trunk muscle forces for different upper body positions in the sagittal plane. In our patients, flexion of the upper body was most likely a combination of hip- and lumbar spine bending.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67770550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929005001259</els_id><sourcerecordid>2744062461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-7da272a08ce1d7da20e47622feb42e9179f47facdf178c2fcce9357e404c62bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuKFDEUhoMoTjv6CkNAcFflSeqSrp0yXmHAja5DKjlxUlaSNqlqZl7E5zU13SK4cXU48P1_wvkIuWJQM2D966meRhc96tuaA3Q18BrY8Ijs2F40FW_28JjsADirBj7ABXmW8wQAohXDU3LB-q4dYGA78usdLpi8C2pxMdBo6ZLW8IP6NesZqY1JY94GtTPebYgKhuLdgiFv23hP1-zCd6roUc3OqAUNtS64BSnO6DEs1EeD80P1LdJ59aNKNB9cwIcujyqvqaRcoEd3jLR0qOfkiVVzxhfneUm-fXj_9fpTdfPl4-frtzeVbntYKmEUF1zBXiMz2wLYip5zi2PLcWBisK2wShvLxF5zqzUOTSewhVb3fBybS_Lq1HtI8eeKeZHeZY3zrALGNcteCAFdBwV8-Q84xTWF8jfJoGkHzlveF6o_UTrFnBNaeUjOq3RfILl5k5P8401u3iRwWbyV4NW5fh09mr-xs6gCvDkBWK5xdJhk1g6DRuMS6kWa6P73xm-poa9-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034922426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rohlmann, Antonius ; Bauer, Lars ; Zander, Thomas ; Bergmann, Georg ; Wilke, Hans-Joachim</creator><creatorcontrib>Rohlmann, Antonius ; Bauer, Lars ; Zander, Thomas ; Bergmann, Georg ; Wilke, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><description>Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. However, for flexion the agreement between in vitro and in vivo measurements was insufficient. In order to improve the determination of trunk muscle forces, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine with an internal fixation device was created and the same loads were applied as in a previous in vitro experiment. An extensive adaptation process of the model was performed for flexion and extension angles up to 20° and −15°, respectively. With this validated computer model intra-abdominal pressure, preload in the fixators, and a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion angle were varied until a good agreement between analytical and in vivo results was reached for both, intradiscal pressure and bending moments in the fixators. Finally, the fixators were removed and the muscle forces for the intact lumbar spine calculated. A good agreement with the in vivo results could only be achieved at a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion. For the intact spine, forces of 170, 100 and 600 N are predicted in the m. erector spinae for standing, 5° extension and 30° flexion, respectively. The force in the m. rectus abdominus for these body positions is less than 25 N. For more than 10° extension the m. erector spinae is unloaded. The finite element method together with in vivo data allows the estimation of trunk muscle forces for different upper body positions in the sagittal plane. In our patients, flexion of the upper body was most likely a combination of hip- and lumbar spine bending.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16549091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cadavers ; Computer Simulation ; Experiments ; External Fixators ; Finite Element Analysis ; Finite element method ; Humans ; Ligaments ; Lumbar spine ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology ; Middle Aged ; Muscle forces ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Pliability ; Posture ; Posture - physiology ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tensile Strength - physiology ; Vertebrae ; Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2006-01, Vol.39 (6), p.981-989</ispartof><rights>2005</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-7da272a08ce1d7da20e47622feb42e9179f47facdf178c2fcce9357e404c62bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-7da272a08ce1d7da20e47622feb42e9179f47facdf178c2fcce9357e404c62bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929005001259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16549091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rohlmann, Antonius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. However, for flexion the agreement between in vitro and in vivo measurements was insufficient. In order to improve the determination of trunk muscle forces, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine with an internal fixation device was created and the same loads were applied as in a previous in vitro experiment. An extensive adaptation process of the model was performed for flexion and extension angles up to 20° and −15°, respectively. With this validated computer model intra-abdominal pressure, preload in the fixators, and a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion angle were varied until a good agreement between analytical and in vivo results was reached for both, intradiscal pressure and bending moments in the fixators. Finally, the fixators were removed and the muscle forces for the intact lumbar spine calculated. A good agreement with the in vivo results could only be achieved at a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion. For the intact spine, forces of 170, 100 and 600 N are predicted in the m. erector spinae for standing, 5° extension and 30° flexion, respectively. The force in the m. rectus abdominus for these body positions is less than 25 N. For more than 10° extension the m. erector spinae is unloaded. The finite element method together with in vivo data allows the estimation of trunk muscle forces for different upper body positions in the sagittal plane. In our patients, flexion of the upper body was most likely a combination of hip- and lumbar spine bending.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cadavers</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>External Fixators</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Lumbar spine</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle forces</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Pliability</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tensile Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuKFDEUhoMoTjv6CkNAcFflSeqSrp0yXmHAja5DKjlxUlaSNqlqZl7E5zU13SK4cXU48P1_wvkIuWJQM2D966meRhc96tuaA3Q18BrY8Ijs2F40FW_28JjsADirBj7ABXmW8wQAohXDU3LB-q4dYGA78usdLpi8C2pxMdBo6ZLW8IP6NesZqY1JY94GtTPebYgKhuLdgiFv23hP1-zCd6roUc3OqAUNtS64BSnO6DEs1EeD80P1LdJ59aNKNB9cwIcujyqvqaRcoEd3jLR0qOfkiVVzxhfneUm-fXj_9fpTdfPl4-frtzeVbntYKmEUF1zBXiMz2wLYip5zi2PLcWBisK2wShvLxF5zqzUOTSewhVb3fBybS_Lq1HtI8eeKeZHeZY3zrALGNcteCAFdBwV8-Q84xTWF8jfJoGkHzlveF6o_UTrFnBNaeUjOq3RfILl5k5P8401u3iRwWbyV4NW5fh09mr-xs6gCvDkBWK5xdJhk1g6DRuMS6kWa6P73xm-poa9-</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Rohlmann, Antonius</creator><creator>Bauer, Lars</creator><creator>Zander, Thomas</creator><creator>Bergmann, Georg</creator><creator>Wilke, Hans-Joachim</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data</title><author>Rohlmann, Antonius ; Bauer, Lars ; Zander, Thomas ; Bergmann, Georg ; Wilke, Hans-Joachim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-7da272a08ce1d7da20e47622feb42e9179f47facdf178c2fcce9357e404c62bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cadavers</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>External Fixators</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Lumbar spine</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle forces</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Pliability</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tensile Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rohlmann, Antonius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zander, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rohlmann, Antonius</au><au>Bauer, Lars</au><au>Zander, Thomas</au><au>Bergmann, Georg</au><au>Wilke, Hans-Joachim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>989</epage><pages>981-989</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. However, for flexion the agreement between in vitro and in vivo measurements was insufficient. In order to improve the determination of trunk muscle forces, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine with an internal fixation device was created and the same loads were applied as in a previous in vitro experiment. An extensive adaptation process of the model was performed for flexion and extension angles up to 20° and −15°, respectively. With this validated computer model intra-abdominal pressure, preload in the fixators, and a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion angle were varied until a good agreement between analytical and in vivo results was reached for both, intradiscal pressure and bending moments in the fixators. Finally, the fixators were removed and the muscle forces for the intact lumbar spine calculated. A good agreement with the in vivo results could only be achieved at a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion. For the intact spine, forces of 170, 100 and 600 N are predicted in the m. erector spinae for standing, 5° extension and 30° flexion, respectively. The force in the m. rectus abdominus for these body positions is less than 25 N. For more than 10° extension the m. erector spinae is unloaded. The finite element method together with in vivo data allows the estimation of trunk muscle forces for different upper body positions in the sagittal plane. In our patients, flexion of the upper body was most likely a combination of hip- and lumbar spine bending.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16549091</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2006-01, Vol.39 (6), p.981-989
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67770550
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abdomen
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cadavers
Computer Simulation
Experiments
External Fixators
Finite Element Analysis
Finite element method
Humans
Ligaments
Lumbar spine
Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology
Middle Aged
Muscle forces
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Pliability
Posture
Posture - physiology
Stress, Mechanical
Tensile Strength - physiology
Vertebrae
Weight-Bearing - physiology
title Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A51%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20trunk%20muscle%20forces%20for%20flexion%20and%20extension%20by%20using%20a%20validated%20finite%20element%20model%20of%20the%20lumbar%20spine%20and%20measured%20in%20vivo%20data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Rohlmann,%20Antonius&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=989&rft.pages=981-989&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2744062461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034922426&rft_id=info:pmid/16549091&rft_els_id=S0021929005001259&rfr_iscdi=true