Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: relationship between acidity and material setting phase
summary Agar diffusion testing was used with four different media to evaluate the antibacterial activity of six products (one conventional glass–ionomer cement (GIC), two light‐activated glass–ionomers, two polyacid‐modified resin composites and one resin composite) on Streptoccoccus mutans. Their...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral rehabilitation 2005-05, Vol.32 (5), p.368-374 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 374 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 368 |
| container_title | Journal of oral rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | VERMEERSCH, G. LELOUP, G. DELMÉE, M. VREVEN, J. |
| description | summary Agar diffusion testing was used with four different media to evaluate the antibacterial activity of six products (one conventional glass–ionomer cement (GIC), two light‐activated glass–ionomers, two polyacid‐modified resin composites and one resin composite) on Streptoccoccus mutans. Their respective antibacterial activities were also compared during and after setting. The relationship between product acidity and antibacterial activity was evaluated.
All the GICs demonstrated antibacterial properties in contrast to the polyacid‐modified resin composites and resin composite which did not shown any antibacterial effects. Vitrebond GIC exhibited higher antibacterial action, probably because of a cytotoxic photo‐initiator diphenyliodoniumchloride. A direct relationship between material acidity and growth inhibition of S. mutans was observed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01300.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67767471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67767471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4720-d30abf3cb90dafe113a9274b248a62493a3c13852de8da2be2595d87ea935d213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd1u1DAQhS0EokvhFZCvuCLBP8k64QKpKmwLKqwEi-id5SST1kv-8Hjb3TfgsbHJqtziG4_G53wjnyGEcpbycN5sUy6XeSKKTKSCsSxlXDKW7h-RxcPDY7JgkuUJL8T1CXmGuGWMFTJXT8kJz4NAZGpBfp8N3lam9uCs6Wgo7J31Bzq29KYziIkdh7EHR2voYfD4mtZjP8UOUjM01AHaYe6h9YBvQ6czPrjw1k60An8PMASubSI2WnpzHIbgvR1u6HRrEJ6TJ63pEF4c71PyffVhc36ZXK0vPp6fXSV1pgRLGslM1cq6KlljWuBcmlKorBJZYZYiK6WRNZdFLhooGiMqEHmZN4UCU8q8EVyeklczd3Ljrx2g173FGrrODDDuUC-VWqpMRWExC2s3Ijpo9eRsb9xBc6bjFvRWx7B1DFvHLei_W9D7YH15nLGremj-GY-xB8G7WXBvOzj8N1h_Wq-_xjIAkhlg0cP-AWDcz_ABqXL948uF_rZZrd5_lht9Lf8ACFOo7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67767471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: relationship between acidity and material setting phase</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>VERMEERSCH, G. ; LELOUP, G. ; DELMÉE, M. ; VREVEN, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>VERMEERSCH, G. ; LELOUP, G. ; DELMÉE, M. ; VREVEN, J.</creatorcontrib><description>summary Agar diffusion testing was used with four different media to evaluate the antibacterial activity of six products (one conventional glass–ionomer cement (GIC), two light‐activated glass–ionomers, two polyacid‐modified resin composites and one resin composite) on Streptoccoccus mutans. Their respective antibacterial activities were also compared during and after setting. The relationship between product acidity and antibacterial activity was evaluated.
All the GICs demonstrated antibacterial properties in contrast to the polyacid‐modified resin composites and resin composite which did not shown any antibacterial effects. Vitrebond GIC exhibited higher antibacterial action, probably because of a cytotoxic photo‐initiator diphenyliodoniumchloride. A direct relationship between material acidity and growth inhibition of S. mutans was observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-182X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01300.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15842247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>acidity ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; antibacterial ; Bacteriological Techniques ; compomer ; Compomers ; Composite Resins ; Dentistry ; Glass Ionomer Cements ; glass-ionomer ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Materials Testing ; Mouth - microbiology ; resin composite ; streptococcus</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2005-05, Vol.32 (5), p.368-374</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4720-d30abf3cb90dafe113a9274b248a62493a3c13852de8da2be2595d87ea935d213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4720-d30abf3cb90dafe113a9274b248a62493a3c13852de8da2be2595d87ea935d213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2842.2004.01300.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2842.2004.01300.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15842247$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VERMEERSCH, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LELOUP, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DELMÉE, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VREVEN, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: relationship between acidity and material setting phase</title><title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><description>summary Agar diffusion testing was used with four different media to evaluate the antibacterial activity of six products (one conventional glass–ionomer cement (GIC), two light‐activated glass–ionomers, two polyacid‐modified resin composites and one resin composite) on Streptoccoccus mutans. Their respective antibacterial activities were also compared during and after setting. The relationship between product acidity and antibacterial activity was evaluated.
All the GICs demonstrated antibacterial properties in contrast to the polyacid‐modified resin composites and resin composite which did not shown any antibacterial effects. Vitrebond GIC exhibited higher antibacterial action, probably because of a cytotoxic photo‐initiator diphenyliodoniumchloride. A direct relationship between material acidity and growth inhibition of S. mutans was observed.</description><subject>acidity</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents</subject><subject>antibacterial</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques</subject><subject>compomer</subject><subject>Compomers</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements</subject><subject>glass-ionomer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mouth - microbiology</subject><subject>resin composite</subject><subject>streptococcus</subject><issn>0305-182X</issn><issn>1365-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd1u1DAQhS0EokvhFZCvuCLBP8k64QKpKmwLKqwEi-id5SST1kv-8Hjb3TfgsbHJqtziG4_G53wjnyGEcpbycN5sUy6XeSKKTKSCsSxlXDKW7h-RxcPDY7JgkuUJL8T1CXmGuGWMFTJXT8kJz4NAZGpBfp8N3lam9uCs6Wgo7J31Bzq29KYziIkdh7EHR2voYfD4mtZjP8UOUjM01AHaYe6h9YBvQ6czPrjw1k60An8PMASubSI2WnpzHIbgvR1u6HRrEJ6TJ63pEF4c71PyffVhc36ZXK0vPp6fXSV1pgRLGslM1cq6KlljWuBcmlKorBJZYZYiK6WRNZdFLhooGiMqEHmZN4UCU8q8EVyeklczd3Ljrx2g173FGrrODDDuUC-VWqpMRWExC2s3Ijpo9eRsb9xBc6bjFvRWx7B1DFvHLei_W9D7YH15nLGremj-GY-xB8G7WXBvOzj8N1h_Wq-_xjIAkhlg0cP-AWDcz_ABqXL948uF_rZZrd5_lht9Lf8ACFOo7Q</recordid><startdate>200505</startdate><enddate>200505</enddate><creator>VERMEERSCH, G.</creator><creator>LELOUP, G.</creator><creator>DELMÉE, M.</creator><creator>VREVEN, J.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200505</creationdate><title>Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: relationship between acidity and material setting phase</title><author>VERMEERSCH, G. ; LELOUP, G. ; DELMÉE, M. ; VREVEN, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4720-d30abf3cb90dafe113a9274b248a62493a3c13852de8da2be2595d87ea935d213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>acidity</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents</topic><topic>antibacterial</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques</topic><topic>compomer</topic><topic>Compomers</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements</topic><topic>glass-ionomer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mouth - microbiology</topic><topic>resin composite</topic><topic>streptococcus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VERMEERSCH, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LELOUP, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DELMÉE, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VREVEN, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VERMEERSCH, G.</au><au>LELOUP, G.</au><au>DELMÉE, M.</au><au>VREVEN, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: relationship between acidity and material setting phase</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><date>2005-05</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>368-374</pages><issn>0305-182X</issn><eissn>1365-2842</eissn><abstract>summary Agar diffusion testing was used with four different media to evaluate the antibacterial activity of six products (one conventional glass–ionomer cement (GIC), two light‐activated glass–ionomers, two polyacid‐modified resin composites and one resin composite) on Streptoccoccus mutans. Their respective antibacterial activities were also compared during and after setting. The relationship between product acidity and antibacterial activity was evaluated.
All the GICs demonstrated antibacterial properties in contrast to the polyacid‐modified resin composites and resin composite which did not shown any antibacterial effects. Vitrebond GIC exhibited higher antibacterial action, probably because of a cytotoxic photo‐initiator diphenyliodoniumchloride. A direct relationship between material acidity and growth inhibition of S. mutans was observed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>15842247</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01300.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-182X |
| ispartof | Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2005-05, Vol.32 (5), p.368-374 |
| issn | 0305-182X 1365-2842 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67767471 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | acidity Anti-Bacterial Agents antibacterial Bacteriological Techniques compomer Compomers Composite Resins Dentistry Glass Ionomer Cements glass-ionomer Humans Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Materials Testing Mouth - microbiology resin composite streptococcus |
| title | Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: relationship between acidity and material setting phase |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T19%3A05%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibacterial%20activity%20of%20glass-ionomer%20cements,%20compomers%20and%20resin%20composites:%20relationship%20between%20acidity%20and%20material%20setting%20phase&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20rehabilitation&rft.au=VERMEERSCH,%20G.&rft.date=2005-05&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=368-374&rft.issn=0305-182X&rft.eissn=1365-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01300.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67767471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67767471&rft_id=info:pmid/15842247&rfr_iscdi=true |