Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements
Background On surgical wards, body temperature is routinely measured, but there is no proof that this is useful for detecting postoperative infection. The aim of this study was to compare temperature measurements (the test) with the confirmed absence or presence of a postoperative infection (the ref...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical infectious diseases 2005-05, Vol.40 (10), p.1404-1410 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1410 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1404 |
container_title | Clinical infectious diseases |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Vermeulen, Hester Storm-Versloot, Marja N. Goossens, Astrid Speelman, Peter Legemate, Dink A. |
description | Background On surgical wards, body temperature is routinely measured, but there is no proof that this is useful for detecting postoperative infection. The aim of this study was to compare temperature measurements (the test) with the confirmed absence or presence of a postoperative infection (the reference standard). Methods A prospective triple-blinded diagnostic study involving 308 consecutive patients was performed. A positive test result was defined as a postoperative temperature ⩾38.0°C. The reference standard was considered to indicate a postoperative infection if results of a bacterial culture were positive or if an infection was suspected on clinical grounds. Results Data for 284 of 308 patients were analyzed (2282 temperature measurements). The prevalence of infection was 7% (19 of 284 patients). The temperature curves of patients were used as units of analysis and revealed that a temperature ⩾38.0°C had a sensitivity of 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16%–0.62%) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 0.75%–0.85%). The likelihood ratio for a positive test result was 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7–4.0) and for a negative test result was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4–1.4). When all 2282 measurements were considered as independent test results, the positive predictive value was only 8% (95% CI, 5%–13%). Six of 8 patients with a severe infection had temperatures |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/429621 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67765543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4484208</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1086/429621</oup_id><sourcerecordid>4484208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-fb261b3bfddb88efef706bbba420eb12c022ab4bd25b6f1774ae1eb4b21109e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFuLFDEQhYMo7rrqLxBpBX1rTaVz68d1vaw64ioriC8hSVekx-nOmHSL8-_N2sMOCD5VUefjVNUh5D7QZ0C1fM5ZKxncIMcgGlVL0cLN0lOha64bfUTu5LymFEBTcZscgdCcUwnH5N3L3n4fY556X516Pyfrd1UM1ec4T_2I1UWR4haTnfpfWL2I3a66xOHvYE5YfUCbSx1wnPJdcivYTcZ7-3pCvrx-dXl2Xq8-vnl7drqqveByqoNjElzjQtc5rTFgUFQ65yxnFB0wTxmzjruOCScDKMUtApYBA6AtsuaEPF18tyn-nDFPZuizx83GjhjnbKRSUgjeFPDxP-A6zmkstxkGbcuVYvrg5lPMOWEw29QPNu0MUHMVrVmiLeDDvdvsBuwO2D7LAjzZAzZ7uwnJjr7PB05qroQWhXu0cHHe_n_Zg4VZl_jTNcW5LildHV0vcp8n_H0t2_SjfN8oYc6_fjPy_YX-BKDMqvkDEfiiqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219947728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Vermeulen, Hester ; Storm-Versloot, Marja N. ; Goossens, Astrid ; Speelman, Peter ; Legemate, Dink A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester ; Storm-Versloot, Marja N. ; Goossens, Astrid ; Speelman, Peter ; Legemate, Dink A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background On surgical wards, body temperature is routinely measured, but there is no proof that this is useful for detecting postoperative infection. The aim of this study was to compare temperature measurements (the test) with the confirmed absence or presence of a postoperative infection (the reference standard). Methods A prospective triple-blinded diagnostic study involving 308 consecutive patients was performed. A positive test result was defined as a postoperative temperature ⩾38.0°C. The reference standard was considered to indicate a postoperative infection if results of a bacterial culture were positive or if an infection was suspected on clinical grounds. Results Data for 284 of 308 patients were analyzed (2282 temperature measurements). The prevalence of infection was 7% (19 of 284 patients). The temperature curves of patients were used as units of analysis and revealed that a temperature ⩾38.0°C had a sensitivity of 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16%–0.62%) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 0.75%–0.85%). The likelihood ratio for a positive test result was 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7–4.0) and for a negative test result was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4–1.4). When all 2282 measurements were considered as independent test results, the positive predictive value was only 8% (95% CI, 5%–13%). Six of 8 patients with a severe infection had temperatures <38°C. Conclusion Routine measurement of body temperature is of limited value in the detection of infection after elective surgery for noninfectious conditions. Serious postoperative infections can even occur without an accompanying increase in temperature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/429621</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15844061</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIDIEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antibiotics ; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Temperature ; Clinical outcomes ; Female ; Fever ; General aspects ; Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Intensive care units ; Major Articles ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nurses ; Physicians ; Postoperative Period ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sepsis ; Surgery ; Surgical specialties ; Temperature ; Temperature measurement</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2005-05, Vol.40 (10), p.1404-1410</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 The Infectious Diseases Society of America</rights><rights>2005 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2005</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press May 15, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-fb261b3bfddb88efef706bbba420eb12c022ab4bd25b6f1774ae1eb4b21109e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-fb261b3bfddb88efef706bbba420eb12c022ab4bd25b6f1774ae1eb4b21109e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4484208$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4484208$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16847585$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15844061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm-Versloot, Marja N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossens, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speelman, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legemate, Dink A.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><description>Background On surgical wards, body temperature is routinely measured, but there is no proof that this is useful for detecting postoperative infection. The aim of this study was to compare temperature measurements (the test) with the confirmed absence or presence of a postoperative infection (the reference standard). Methods A prospective triple-blinded diagnostic study involving 308 consecutive patients was performed. A positive test result was defined as a postoperative temperature ⩾38.0°C. The reference standard was considered to indicate a postoperative infection if results of a bacterial culture were positive or if an infection was suspected on clinical grounds. Results Data for 284 of 308 patients were analyzed (2282 temperature measurements). The prevalence of infection was 7% (19 of 284 patients). The temperature curves of patients were used as units of analysis and revealed that a temperature ⩾38.0°C had a sensitivity of 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16%–0.62%) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 0.75%–0.85%). The likelihood ratio for a positive test result was 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7–4.0) and for a negative test result was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4–1.4). When all 2282 measurements were considered as independent test results, the positive predictive value was only 8% (95% CI, 5%–13%). Six of 8 patients with a severe infection had temperatures <38°C. Conclusion Routine measurement of body temperature is of limited value in the detection of infection after elective surgery for noninfectious conditions. Serious postoperative infections can even occur without an accompanying increase in temperature.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Temperature</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Major Articles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical specialties</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature measurement</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFuLFDEQhYMo7rrqLxBpBX1rTaVz68d1vaw64ioriC8hSVekx-nOmHSL8-_N2sMOCD5VUefjVNUh5D7QZ0C1fM5ZKxncIMcgGlVL0cLN0lOha64bfUTu5LymFEBTcZscgdCcUwnH5N3L3n4fY556X516Pyfrd1UM1ec4T_2I1UWR4haTnfpfWL2I3a66xOHvYE5YfUCbSx1wnPJdcivYTcZ7-3pCvrx-dXl2Xq8-vnl7drqqveByqoNjElzjQtc5rTFgUFQ65yxnFB0wTxmzjruOCScDKMUtApYBA6AtsuaEPF18tyn-nDFPZuizx83GjhjnbKRSUgjeFPDxP-A6zmkstxkGbcuVYvrg5lPMOWEw29QPNu0MUHMVrVmiLeDDvdvsBuwO2D7LAjzZAzZ7uwnJjr7PB05qroQWhXu0cHHe_n_Zg4VZl_jTNcW5LildHV0vcp8n_H0t2_SjfN8oYc6_fjPy_YX-BKDMqvkDEfiiqw</recordid><startdate>20050515</startdate><enddate>20050515</enddate><creator>Vermeulen, Hester</creator><creator>Storm-Versloot, Marja N.</creator><creator>Goossens, Astrid</creator><creator>Speelman, Peter</creator><creator>Legemate, Dink A.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050515</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements</title><author>Vermeulen, Hester ; Storm-Versloot, Marja N. ; Goossens, Astrid ; Speelman, Peter ; Legemate, Dink A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-fb261b3bfddb88efef706bbba420eb12c022ab4bd25b6f1774ae1eb4b21109e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Temperature</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Major Articles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical specialties</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm-Versloot, Marja N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossens, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speelman, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legemate, Dink A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vermeulen, Hester</au><au>Storm-Versloot, Marja N.</au><au>Goossens, Astrid</au><au>Speelman, Peter</au><au>Legemate, Dink A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</stitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><date>2005-05-15</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1404</spage><epage>1410</epage><pages>1404-1410</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><coden>CIDIEL</coden><abstract>Background On surgical wards, body temperature is routinely measured, but there is no proof that this is useful for detecting postoperative infection. The aim of this study was to compare temperature measurements (the test) with the confirmed absence or presence of a postoperative infection (the reference standard). Methods A prospective triple-blinded diagnostic study involving 308 consecutive patients was performed. A positive test result was defined as a postoperative temperature ⩾38.0°C. The reference standard was considered to indicate a postoperative infection if results of a bacterial culture were positive or if an infection was suspected on clinical grounds. Results Data for 284 of 308 patients were analyzed (2282 temperature measurements). The prevalence of infection was 7% (19 of 284 patients). The temperature curves of patients were used as units of analysis and revealed that a temperature ⩾38.0°C had a sensitivity of 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16%–0.62%) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 0.75%–0.85%). The likelihood ratio for a positive test result was 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7–4.0) and for a negative test result was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4–1.4). When all 2282 measurements were considered as independent test results, the positive predictive value was only 8% (95% CI, 5%–13%). Six of 8 patients with a severe infection had temperatures <38°C. Conclusion Routine measurement of body temperature is of limited value in the detection of infection after elective surgery for noninfectious conditions. Serious postoperative infections can even occur without an accompanying increase in temperature.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>15844061</pmid><doi>10.1086/429621</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-4838 |
ispartof | Clinical infectious diseases, 2005-05, Vol.40 (10), p.1404-1410 |
issn | 1058-4838 1537-6591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67765543 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Antibiotics Bacterial Infections - diagnosis Biological and medical sciences Body Temperature Clinical outcomes Female Fever General aspects Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models Humans Infections Infectious diseases Intensive care units Major Articles Male Medical diagnosis Medical sciences Middle Aged Nurses Physicians Postoperative Period Predictive Value of Tests Sensitivity and Specificity Sepsis Surgery Surgical specialties Temperature Temperature measurement |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A42%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Accuracy%20of%20Routine%20Postoperative%20Body%20Temperature%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Vermeulen,%20Hester&rft.date=2005-05-15&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1404&rft.epage=1410&rft.pages=1404-1410&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft.coden=CIDIEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/429621&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4484208%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219947728&rft_id=info:pmid/15844061&rft_jstor_id=4484208&rft_oup_id=10.1086/429621&rfr_iscdi=true |