Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements

Background On surgical wards, body temperature is routinely measured, but there is no proof that this is useful for detecting postoperative infection. The aim of this study was to compare temperature measurements (the test) with the confirmed absence or presence of a postoperative infection (the ref...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2005-05, Vol.40 (10), p.1404-1410
Hauptverfasser: Vermeulen, Hester, Storm-Versloot, Marja N., Goossens, Astrid, Speelman, Peter, Legemate, Dink A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1410
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1404
container_title Clinical infectious diseases
container_volume 40
creator Vermeulen, Hester
Storm-Versloot, Marja N.
Goossens, Astrid
Speelman, Peter
Legemate, Dink A.
description Background On surgical wards, body temperature is routinely measured, but there is no proof that this is useful for detecting postoperative infection. The aim of this study was to compare temperature measurements (the test) with the confirmed absence or presence of a postoperative infection (the reference standard). Methods A prospective triple-blinded diagnostic study involving 308 consecutive patients was performed. A positive test result was defined as a postoperative temperature ⩾38.0°C. The reference standard was considered to indicate a postoperative infection if results of a bacterial culture were positive or if an infection was suspected on clinical grounds. Results Data for 284 of 308 patients were analyzed (2282 temperature measurements). The prevalence of infection was 7% (19 of 284 patients). The temperature curves of patients were used as units of analysis and revealed that a temperature ⩾38.0°C had a sensitivity of 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16%–0.62%) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 0.75%–0.85%). The likelihood ratio for a positive test result was 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7–4.0) and for a negative test result was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4–1.4). When all 2282 measurements were considered as independent test results, the positive predictive value was only 8% (95% CI, 5%–13%). Six of 8 patients with a severe infection had temperatures
doi_str_mv 10.1086/429621
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67765543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4484208</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1086/429621</oup_id><sourcerecordid>4484208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-fb261b3bfddb88efef706bbba420eb12c022ab4bd25b6f1774ae1eb4b21109e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFuLFDEQhYMo7rrqLxBpBX1rTaVz68d1vaw64ioriC8hSVekx-nOmHSL8-_N2sMOCD5VUefjVNUh5D7QZ0C1fM5ZKxncIMcgGlVL0cLN0lOha64bfUTu5LymFEBTcZscgdCcUwnH5N3L3n4fY556X516Pyfrd1UM1ec4T_2I1UWR4haTnfpfWL2I3a66xOHvYE5YfUCbSx1wnPJdcivYTcZ7-3pCvrx-dXl2Xq8-vnl7drqqveByqoNjElzjQtc5rTFgUFQ65yxnFB0wTxmzjruOCScDKMUtApYBA6AtsuaEPF18tyn-nDFPZuizx83GjhjnbKRSUgjeFPDxP-A6zmkstxkGbcuVYvrg5lPMOWEw29QPNu0MUHMVrVmiLeDDvdvsBuwO2D7LAjzZAzZ7uwnJjr7PB05qroQWhXu0cHHe_n_Zg4VZl_jTNcW5LildHV0vcp8n_H0t2_SjfN8oYc6_fjPy_YX-BKDMqvkDEfiiqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219947728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Vermeulen, Hester ; Storm-Versloot, Marja N. ; Goossens, Astrid ; Speelman, Peter ; Legemate, Dink A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester ; Storm-Versloot, Marja N. ; Goossens, Astrid ; Speelman, Peter ; Legemate, Dink A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background On surgical wards, body temperature is routinely measured, but there is no proof that this is useful for detecting postoperative infection. The aim of this study was to compare temperature measurements (the test) with the confirmed absence or presence of a postoperative infection (the reference standard). Methods A prospective triple-blinded diagnostic study involving 308 consecutive patients was performed. A positive test result was defined as a postoperative temperature ⩾38.0°C. The reference standard was considered to indicate a postoperative infection if results of a bacterial culture were positive or if an infection was suspected on clinical grounds. Results Data for 284 of 308 patients were analyzed (2282 temperature measurements). The prevalence of infection was 7% (19 of 284 patients). The temperature curves of patients were used as units of analysis and revealed that a temperature ⩾38.0°C had a sensitivity of 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16%–0.62%) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 0.75%–0.85%). The likelihood ratio for a positive test result was 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7–4.0) and for a negative test result was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4–1.4). When all 2282 measurements were considered as independent test results, the positive predictive value was only 8% (95% CI, 5%–13%). Six of 8 patients with a severe infection had temperatures &lt;38°C. Conclusion Routine measurement of body temperature is of limited value in the detection of infection after elective surgery for noninfectious conditions. Serious postoperative infections can even occur without an accompanying increase in temperature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/429621</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15844061</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIDIEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antibiotics ; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Temperature ; Clinical outcomes ; Female ; Fever ; General aspects ; Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Intensive care units ; Major Articles ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nurses ; Physicians ; Postoperative Period ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sepsis ; Surgery ; Surgical specialties ; Temperature ; Temperature measurement</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2005-05, Vol.40 (10), p.1404-1410</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 The Infectious Diseases Society of America</rights><rights>2005 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2005</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press May 15, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-fb261b3bfddb88efef706bbba420eb12c022ab4bd25b6f1774ae1eb4b21109e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-fb261b3bfddb88efef706bbba420eb12c022ab4bd25b6f1774ae1eb4b21109e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4484208$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4484208$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16847585$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15844061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm-Versloot, Marja N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossens, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speelman, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legemate, Dink A.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><description>Background On surgical wards, body temperature is routinely measured, but there is no proof that this is useful for detecting postoperative infection. The aim of this study was to compare temperature measurements (the test) with the confirmed absence or presence of a postoperative infection (the reference standard). Methods A prospective triple-blinded diagnostic study involving 308 consecutive patients was performed. A positive test result was defined as a postoperative temperature ⩾38.0°C. The reference standard was considered to indicate a postoperative infection if results of a bacterial culture were positive or if an infection was suspected on clinical grounds. Results Data for 284 of 308 patients were analyzed (2282 temperature measurements). The prevalence of infection was 7% (19 of 284 patients). The temperature curves of patients were used as units of analysis and revealed that a temperature ⩾38.0°C had a sensitivity of 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16%–0.62%) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 0.75%–0.85%). The likelihood ratio for a positive test result was 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7–4.0) and for a negative test result was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4–1.4). When all 2282 measurements were considered as independent test results, the positive predictive value was only 8% (95% CI, 5%–13%). Six of 8 patients with a severe infection had temperatures &lt;38°C. Conclusion Routine measurement of body temperature is of limited value in the detection of infection after elective surgery for noninfectious conditions. Serious postoperative infections can even occur without an accompanying increase in temperature.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Temperature</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Major Articles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical specialties</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature measurement</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFuLFDEQhYMo7rrqLxBpBX1rTaVz68d1vaw64ioriC8hSVekx-nOmHSL8-_N2sMOCD5VUefjVNUh5D7QZ0C1fM5ZKxncIMcgGlVL0cLN0lOha64bfUTu5LymFEBTcZscgdCcUwnH5N3L3n4fY556X516Pyfrd1UM1ec4T_2I1UWR4haTnfpfWL2I3a66xOHvYE5YfUCbSx1wnPJdcivYTcZ7-3pCvrx-dXl2Xq8-vnl7drqqveByqoNjElzjQtc5rTFgUFQ65yxnFB0wTxmzjruOCScDKMUtApYBA6AtsuaEPF18tyn-nDFPZuizx83GjhjnbKRSUgjeFPDxP-A6zmkstxkGbcuVYvrg5lPMOWEw29QPNu0MUHMVrVmiLeDDvdvsBuwO2D7LAjzZAzZ7uwnJjr7PB05qroQWhXu0cHHe_n_Zg4VZl_jTNcW5LildHV0vcp8n_H0t2_SjfN8oYc6_fjPy_YX-BKDMqvkDEfiiqw</recordid><startdate>20050515</startdate><enddate>20050515</enddate><creator>Vermeulen, Hester</creator><creator>Storm-Versloot, Marja N.</creator><creator>Goossens, Astrid</creator><creator>Speelman, Peter</creator><creator>Legemate, Dink A.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050515</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements</title><author>Vermeulen, Hester ; Storm-Versloot, Marja N. ; Goossens, Astrid ; Speelman, Peter ; Legemate, Dink A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-fb261b3bfddb88efef706bbba420eb12c022ab4bd25b6f1774ae1eb4b21109e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Temperature</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Major Articles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical specialties</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm-Versloot, Marja N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossens, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speelman, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legemate, Dink A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vermeulen, Hester</au><au>Storm-Versloot, Marja N.</au><au>Goossens, Astrid</au><au>Speelman, Peter</au><au>Legemate, Dink A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</stitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><date>2005-05-15</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1404</spage><epage>1410</epage><pages>1404-1410</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><coden>CIDIEL</coden><abstract>Background On surgical wards, body temperature is routinely measured, but there is no proof that this is useful for detecting postoperative infection. The aim of this study was to compare temperature measurements (the test) with the confirmed absence or presence of a postoperative infection (the reference standard). Methods A prospective triple-blinded diagnostic study involving 308 consecutive patients was performed. A positive test result was defined as a postoperative temperature ⩾38.0°C. The reference standard was considered to indicate a postoperative infection if results of a bacterial culture were positive or if an infection was suspected on clinical grounds. Results Data for 284 of 308 patients were analyzed (2282 temperature measurements). The prevalence of infection was 7% (19 of 284 patients). The temperature curves of patients were used as units of analysis and revealed that a temperature ⩾38.0°C had a sensitivity of 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16%–0.62%) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 0.75%–0.85%). The likelihood ratio for a positive test result was 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7–4.0) and for a negative test result was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.4–1.4). When all 2282 measurements were considered as independent test results, the positive predictive value was only 8% (95% CI, 5%–13%). Six of 8 patients with a severe infection had temperatures &lt;38°C. Conclusion Routine measurement of body temperature is of limited value in the detection of infection after elective surgery for noninfectious conditions. Serious postoperative infections can even occur without an accompanying increase in temperature.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>15844061</pmid><doi>10.1086/429621</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-4838
ispartof Clinical infectious diseases, 2005-05, Vol.40 (10), p.1404-1410
issn 1058-4838
1537-6591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67765543
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Antibiotics
Bacterial Infections - diagnosis
Biological and medical sciences
Body Temperature
Clinical outcomes
Female
Fever
General aspects
Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models
Humans
Infections
Infectious diseases
Intensive care units
Major Articles
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nurses
Physicians
Postoperative Period
Predictive Value of Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sepsis
Surgery
Surgical specialties
Temperature
Temperature measurement
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Routine Postoperative Body Temperature Measurements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A42%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Accuracy%20of%20Routine%20Postoperative%20Body%20Temperature%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Vermeulen,%20Hester&rft.date=2005-05-15&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1404&rft.epage=1410&rft.pages=1404-1410&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft.coden=CIDIEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/429621&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4484208%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219947728&rft_id=info:pmid/15844061&rft_jstor_id=4484208&rft_oup_id=10.1086/429621&rfr_iscdi=true