Analysis of Ambulance Transports and Diversions Among US Emergency Departments

We describe emergency department (ED) visits in which the patient arrived by ambulance and estimate the frequency of and reasons for ambulance diversion. Using information on volume of transports and probabilities of being in diversion status, we estimate the number of patients for whom ED care was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of emergency medicine 2006-04, Vol.47 (4), p.317-326
Hauptverfasser: Burt, Catharine W., McCaig, Linda F., Valverde, Roberto H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 326
container_issue 4
container_start_page 317
container_title Annals of emergency medicine
container_volume 47
creator Burt, Catharine W.
McCaig, Linda F.
Valverde, Roberto H.
description We describe emergency department (ED) visits in which the patient arrived by ambulance and estimate the frequency of and reasons for ambulance diversion. Using information on volume of transports and probabilities of being in diversion status, we estimate the number of patients for whom ED care was delayed because of diversion practices. Data from the 2003 ED component of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual sample survey of visits to US hospital EDs, were used for the analysis. Data were provided by 405 participating EDs on 40,253 visits. Data from supplemental questionnaires to the hospital staff were used to describe volume and frequency of ambulance diversions. In 2003, patients arrived by ambulance for 16.2 million ED visits (14.2%). About 31 ambulances arrived at a US ED every minute. Of ambulance-related visits, 39% were made by seniors, 68% were triaged as emergent or urgent, and 37% resulted in hospital-admission. About 45% of EDs reported diverting ambulances at some point during the previous year. Among EDs that had any diversion, approximately 3% of operating time was spent in diversion status. In 2003, an estimated 501,000 ambulances were diverted, ie, 1 ambulance diversion per minute. Large EDs represent 12% of all EDs, 35% of all ambulance arrivals, 18% of all EDs that went on diversion, 47% of all hours spent in diversion status, and 70% of all ambulances diverted to another ED. Description of current use of ED ambulance transports and likelihood of diversions should help policymakers plan for demographic changes in the population during the next 15 years.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67761857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S019606440501989X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67761857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5c8a3efa11820709ccfe5dd20234cdf960675d50c44e70ead028e49de1cd2443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFuEzEQhi0EomnhFdBygNsuM47Xzh6jtBSkCg6Es-Xas5WjXW_wbCrl7XGUCDhymsN8__yjT4j3CA0C6k-7xqVEI-WnkUIjAdoGZQOAL8QCoTO1NhpeigVgp2vQSl2Ja-YdAHRK4mtxhbpVWmO7EN_WyQ1HjlxNfbUeHw-DS56qbXaJ91OeuXIpVLfxmTLHKXFhpvRU_fxR3Z36KfljdUt7l-eR0sxvxKveDUxvL_NGbD_fbTdf6ofv918364faK4Nz3fqVW1LvEFcSDHTe99SGIEEulQ99p0GbNrTglSID5ALIFakuEPoglVreiI_ns_s8_ToQz3aM7Gkoz9N0YKuN0bhqTQG7M-jzxJypt_scR5ePFsGeXNqd_celPbm0KG1xWbLvLiWHx9PuT_IirwAfLoBj74a-OPOR_3JGa2X0snCbM0fFyHOkbNnHYo5CzORnG6b4H-_8BobBmKE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67761857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Ambulance Transports and Diversions Among US Emergency Departments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Burt, Catharine W. ; McCaig, Linda F. ; Valverde, Roberto H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burt, Catharine W. ; McCaig, Linda F. ; Valverde, Roberto H.</creatorcontrib><description>We describe emergency department (ED) visits in which the patient arrived by ambulance and estimate the frequency of and reasons for ambulance diversion. Using information on volume of transports and probabilities of being in diversion status, we estimate the number of patients for whom ED care was delayed because of diversion practices. Data from the 2003 ED component of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual sample survey of visits to US hospital EDs, were used for the analysis. Data were provided by 405 participating EDs on 40,253 visits. Data from supplemental questionnaires to the hospital staff were used to describe volume and frequency of ambulance diversions. In 2003, patients arrived by ambulance for 16.2 million ED visits (14.2%). About 31 ambulances arrived at a US ED every minute. Of ambulance-related visits, 39% were made by seniors, 68% were triaged as emergent or urgent, and 37% resulted in hospital-admission. About 45% of EDs reported diverting ambulances at some point during the previous year. Among EDs that had any diversion, approximately 3% of operating time was spent in diversion status. In 2003, an estimated 501,000 ambulances were diverted, ie, 1 ambulance diversion per minute. Large EDs represent 12% of all EDs, 35% of all ambulance arrivals, 18% of all EDs that went on diversion, 47% of all hours spent in diversion status, and 70% of all ambulances diverted to another ED. Description of current use of ED ambulance transports and likelihood of diversions should help policymakers plan for demographic changes in the population during the next 15 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16546615</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEMED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Ambulances - utilization ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Data Collection ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death ; Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics ; Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Intensive care unit. Emergency transport systems. Emergency, hospital ward ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Patient Admission ; Patient Transfer ; Referral and Consultation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Triage ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 2006-04, Vol.47 (4), p.317-326</ispartof><rights>2006 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5c8a3efa11820709ccfe5dd20234cdf960675d50c44e70ead028e49de1cd2443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5c8a3efa11820709ccfe5dd20234cdf960675d50c44e70ead028e49de1cd2443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17664763$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16546615$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burt, Catharine W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCaig, Linda F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde, Roberto H.</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Ambulance Transports and Diversions Among US Emergency Departments</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>We describe emergency department (ED) visits in which the patient arrived by ambulance and estimate the frequency of and reasons for ambulance diversion. Using information on volume of transports and probabilities of being in diversion status, we estimate the number of patients for whom ED care was delayed because of diversion practices. Data from the 2003 ED component of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual sample survey of visits to US hospital EDs, were used for the analysis. Data were provided by 405 participating EDs on 40,253 visits. Data from supplemental questionnaires to the hospital staff were used to describe volume and frequency of ambulance diversions. In 2003, patients arrived by ambulance for 16.2 million ED visits (14.2%). About 31 ambulances arrived at a US ED every minute. Of ambulance-related visits, 39% were made by seniors, 68% were triaged as emergent or urgent, and 37% resulted in hospital-admission. About 45% of EDs reported diverting ambulances at some point during the previous year. Among EDs that had any diversion, approximately 3% of operating time was spent in diversion status. In 2003, an estimated 501,000 ambulances were diverted, ie, 1 ambulance diversion per minute. Large EDs represent 12% of all EDs, 35% of all ambulance arrivals, 18% of all EDs that went on diversion, 47% of all hours spent in diversion status, and 70% of all ambulances diverted to another ED. Description of current use of ED ambulance transports and likelihood of diversions should help policymakers plan for demographic changes in the population during the next 15 years.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulances - utilization</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Intensive care unit. Emergency transport systems. Emergency, hospital ward</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>Patient Transfer</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Triage</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFuEzEQhi0EomnhFdBygNsuM47Xzh6jtBSkCg6Es-Xas5WjXW_wbCrl7XGUCDhymsN8__yjT4j3CA0C6k-7xqVEI-WnkUIjAdoGZQOAL8QCoTO1NhpeigVgp2vQSl2Ja-YdAHRK4mtxhbpVWmO7EN_WyQ1HjlxNfbUeHw-DS56qbXaJ91OeuXIpVLfxmTLHKXFhpvRU_fxR3Z36KfljdUt7l-eR0sxvxKveDUxvL_NGbD_fbTdf6ofv918364faK4Nz3fqVW1LvEFcSDHTe99SGIEEulQ99p0GbNrTglSID5ALIFakuEPoglVreiI_ns_s8_ToQz3aM7Gkoz9N0YKuN0bhqTQG7M-jzxJypt_scR5ePFsGeXNqd_celPbm0KG1xWbLvLiWHx9PuT_IirwAfLoBj74a-OPOR_3JGa2X0snCbM0fFyHOkbNnHYo5CzORnG6b4H-_8BobBmKE</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Burt, Catharine W.</creator><creator>McCaig, Linda F.</creator><creator>Valverde, Roberto H.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Analysis of Ambulance Transports and Diversions Among US Emergency Departments</title><author>Burt, Catharine W. ; McCaig, Linda F. ; Valverde, Roberto H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5c8a3efa11820709ccfe5dd20234cdf960675d50c44e70ead028e49de1cd2443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulances - utilization</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Intensive care unit. Emergency transport systems. Emergency, hospital ward</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>Patient Transfer</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Triage</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burt, Catharine W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCaig, Linda F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde, Roberto H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burt, Catharine W.</au><au>McCaig, Linda F.</au><au>Valverde, Roberto H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Ambulance Transports and Diversions Among US Emergency Departments</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>317-326</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><coden>AEMED3</coden><abstract>We describe emergency department (ED) visits in which the patient arrived by ambulance and estimate the frequency of and reasons for ambulance diversion. Using information on volume of transports and probabilities of being in diversion status, we estimate the number of patients for whom ED care was delayed because of diversion practices. Data from the 2003 ED component of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual sample survey of visits to US hospital EDs, were used for the analysis. Data were provided by 405 participating EDs on 40,253 visits. Data from supplemental questionnaires to the hospital staff were used to describe volume and frequency of ambulance diversions. In 2003, patients arrived by ambulance for 16.2 million ED visits (14.2%). About 31 ambulances arrived at a US ED every minute. Of ambulance-related visits, 39% were made by seniors, 68% were triaged as emergent or urgent, and 37% resulted in hospital-admission. About 45% of EDs reported diverting ambulances at some point during the previous year. Among EDs that had any diversion, approximately 3% of operating time was spent in diversion status. In 2003, an estimated 501,000 ambulances were diverted, ie, 1 ambulance diversion per minute. Large EDs represent 12% of all EDs, 35% of all ambulance arrivals, 18% of all EDs that went on diversion, 47% of all hours spent in diversion status, and 70% of all ambulances diverted to another ED. Description of current use of ED ambulance transports and likelihood of diversions should help policymakers plan for demographic changes in the population during the next 15 years.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>16546615</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0644
ispartof Annals of emergency medicine, 2006-04, Vol.47 (4), p.317-326
issn 0196-0644
1097-6760
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67761857
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Ambulances - utilization
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Data Collection
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death
Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics
Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization
Female
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Intensive care unit. Emergency transport systems. Emergency, hospital ward
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Patient Admission
Patient Transfer
Referral and Consultation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Triage
United States
title Analysis of Ambulance Transports and Diversions Among US Emergency Departments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A19%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Ambulance%20Transports%20and%20Diversions%20Among%20US%20Emergency%20Departments&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Burt,%20Catharine%20W.&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=317-326&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft.coden=AEMED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67761857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67761857&rft_id=info:pmid/16546615&rft_els_id=S019606440501989X&rfr_iscdi=true