Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for 106 Head and Neck Lesions: Contrasts Between Oral Cavity and Cutaneous Malignancy

Objectives: The objectives of this prospective series were to present our results in 106 sequential cases of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the head and neck region and contrast the experience in oral cancer with that for cutaneous lesions. Hypotheses: SLNB has an accepta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2006-03, Vol.116 (S109), p.1-15
Hauptverfasser: Civantos, Francisco J., Moffat, Frederick L., Goodwin, William J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue S109
container_start_page 1
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 116
creator Civantos, Francisco J.
Moffat, Frederick L.
Goodwin, William J.
description Objectives: The objectives of this prospective series were to present our results in 106 sequential cases of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the head and neck region and contrast the experience in oral cancer with that for cutaneous lesions. Hypotheses: SLNB has an acceptably low complication rate in the head and neck. Lymphatic mapping and gamma probe‐guided lymphadenectomy can improve the management of malignancies of the head and neck by more accurate identification of the nodal basins at risk and more accurate staging of the lymphatics. For appropriately selected patients, radionuclide lymphatic mapping may safely allow for minimally invasive sentinel lymphadenectomy without formal completion selective lymphadenectomy. Methods: One hundred six patients underwent intralesional radionuclide injection and radiologic lymphoscintigraphy (LS) on Institutional Review Board‐approved protocols and 103 of these underwent successful SLNB. These included 35 patients with malignant melanoma, 10 cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, four lip cancers, eight Merkel cell carcinomas, two rare cutaneous lesions, and 43 oral cancers. Mean follow up was 24 months. Patients with oral cavity malignancy underwent concurrent selective neck dissection after narrow‐exposure sentinel lymph node excision. In this group, the SLNB histopathology could be correlated with the completion neck specimen histopathology. Patients with cutaneous malignancy underwent SLNB alone and only received regional lymphadenectomy based on positive histology or clinical indications. Data were tabulated for anatomic drainage patterns, complications, histopathology, and patterns of cancer recurrence. Results: Surgical complications were rare. No temporary or permanent dysfunction of facial or spinal accessory nerves occurred with sentinel node biopsy. Lymphatic drainage to areas dramatically outside of the expected lymphatic basins occurred in 13.6%. Predictive value of a negative sentinel node was 98.2% for cutaneous malignancies (based on regional recurrence) and 92% with oral cancer (based on pathologic correlation). Gross tumor replacement of lymph nodes and redirection of lymphatic flow represented a significant technical issue in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Sixteen percent of patients with oral cancer were upstaged from N0 to N1 after extended sectioning and immunohistochemistry of the sentinel node. Conclusions: LS and SLNB can be performed with technical success in the
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.mlg.0000200750.74249.79
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67753947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67753947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4841-5e1999675d302db835b51fef8fa50751f9cc38d7eb5cdffafb9d4a2ace2f7bb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhLyCLA7cEO47jdW8lol8KrcSHCr1YjjNeTBMnxF7a3PnhpJsVPeOLD_PMM_a8CL2hJKVEineEpl27Scl8MkIEJ6nIs1ymQj5BK8oZTXIp-VO0mussWfPs2wF6EcJPQqhgnDxHB7TgOZEZX6E_1dQNP3R0Bn_Uw-D8Bmvf4M_go_PQ4qXcgAcT-27Cth8xJQU-A93syEswt7iC4HofjnDZ-zjqEAN-D_EOwOOrUbe41L9dnHZ8uY3aQ78N87zWbbz2ZnqJnlndBni1vw_R15MPX8qzpLo6PS-Pq8Tk65wmHKiUshC8YSRr6jXjNacW7NpqPq-BWmkMWzcCam4aa7WtZZPrTBvIrKhrwQ7R28U7jP2vLYSoOhcMtO3yIlUIwZnMH8CjBTRjH8IIVg2j6_Q4KUrUQwaKUDVnoB4zULsMlJBz8-v9lG3dQfPYul_6DJwswJ1rYfoPtaqOP33nPKe0oIzQWZQsIhci3P8T6fF2_goTXF1fnqr84vomuykzdcH-Avo-qPU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67753947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for 106 Head and Neck Lesions: Contrasts Between Oral Cavity and Cutaneous Malignancy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Civantos, Francisco J. ; Moffat, Frederick L. ; Goodwin, William J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Civantos, Francisco J. ; Moffat, Frederick L. ; Goodwin, William J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The objectives of this prospective series were to present our results in 106 sequential cases of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the head and neck region and contrast the experience in oral cancer with that for cutaneous lesions. Hypotheses: SLNB has an acceptably low complication rate in the head and neck. Lymphatic mapping and gamma probe‐guided lymphadenectomy can improve the management of malignancies of the head and neck by more accurate identification of the nodal basins at risk and more accurate staging of the lymphatics. For appropriately selected patients, radionuclide lymphatic mapping may safely allow for minimally invasive sentinel lymphadenectomy without formal completion selective lymphadenectomy. Methods: One hundred six patients underwent intralesional radionuclide injection and radiologic lymphoscintigraphy (LS) on Institutional Review Board‐approved protocols and 103 of these underwent successful SLNB. These included 35 patients with malignant melanoma, 10 cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, four lip cancers, eight Merkel cell carcinomas, two rare cutaneous lesions, and 43 oral cancers. Mean follow up was 24 months. Patients with oral cavity malignancy underwent concurrent selective neck dissection after narrow‐exposure sentinel lymph node excision. In this group, the SLNB histopathology could be correlated with the completion neck specimen histopathology. Patients with cutaneous malignancy underwent SLNB alone and only received regional lymphadenectomy based on positive histology or clinical indications. Data were tabulated for anatomic drainage patterns, complications, histopathology, and patterns of cancer recurrence. Results: Surgical complications were rare. No temporary or permanent dysfunction of facial or spinal accessory nerves occurred with sentinel node biopsy. Lymphatic drainage to areas dramatically outside of the expected lymphatic basins occurred in 13.6%. Predictive value of a negative sentinel node was 98.2% for cutaneous malignancies (based on regional recurrence) and 92% with oral cancer (based on pathologic correlation). Gross tumor replacement of lymph nodes and redirection of lymphatic flow represented a significant technical issue in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Sixteen percent of patients with oral cancer were upstaged from N0 to N1 after extended sectioning and immunohistochemistry of the sentinel node. Conclusions: LS and SLNB can be performed with technical success in the head and neck region. Complications are minimal. More accurate staging and mapping of lymphatic drainage may improve the quality of standard lymphadenectomy. The potential for minimally invasive surgery based on this technology exists, but there is a small risk of missing positive disease. Whether the failure rate is greater than that of standard lymphadenectomy without gamma probe guidance is not known. New studies need to focus on refinements of technique and validation of accuracy as well as biologic correlates for the prediction of metastases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000200750.74249.79</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16540925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; carcinoma ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; head and neck cancer ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; lymphatic metastases ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; melanoma ; Middle Aged ; Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Mouth Neoplasms - surgery ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prospective Studies ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; skin neoplasms ; Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Skin Neoplasms - surgery ; squamous cell ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2006-03, Vol.116 (S109), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 The Triological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4841-5e1999675d302db835b51fef8fa50751f9cc38d7eb5cdffafb9d4a2ace2f7bb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4841-5e1999675d302db835b51fef8fa50751f9cc38d7eb5cdffafb9d4a2ace2f7bb73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1097%2F01.mlg.0000200750.74249.79$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1097%2F01.mlg.0000200750.74249.79$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16540925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Civantos, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moffat, Frederick L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, William J.</creatorcontrib><title>Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for 106 Head and Neck Lesions: Contrasts Between Oral Cavity and Cutaneous Malignancy</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objectives: The objectives of this prospective series were to present our results in 106 sequential cases of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the head and neck region and contrast the experience in oral cancer with that for cutaneous lesions. Hypotheses: SLNB has an acceptably low complication rate in the head and neck. Lymphatic mapping and gamma probe‐guided lymphadenectomy can improve the management of malignancies of the head and neck by more accurate identification of the nodal basins at risk and more accurate staging of the lymphatics. For appropriately selected patients, radionuclide lymphatic mapping may safely allow for minimally invasive sentinel lymphadenectomy without formal completion selective lymphadenectomy. Methods: One hundred six patients underwent intralesional radionuclide injection and radiologic lymphoscintigraphy (LS) on Institutional Review Board‐approved protocols and 103 of these underwent successful SLNB. These included 35 patients with malignant melanoma, 10 cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, four lip cancers, eight Merkel cell carcinomas, two rare cutaneous lesions, and 43 oral cancers. Mean follow up was 24 months. Patients with oral cavity malignancy underwent concurrent selective neck dissection after narrow‐exposure sentinel lymph node excision. In this group, the SLNB histopathology could be correlated with the completion neck specimen histopathology. Patients with cutaneous malignancy underwent SLNB alone and only received regional lymphadenectomy based on positive histology or clinical indications. Data were tabulated for anatomic drainage patterns, complications, histopathology, and patterns of cancer recurrence. Results: Surgical complications were rare. No temporary or permanent dysfunction of facial or spinal accessory nerves occurred with sentinel node biopsy. Lymphatic drainage to areas dramatically outside of the expected lymphatic basins occurred in 13.6%. Predictive value of a negative sentinel node was 98.2% for cutaneous malignancies (based on regional recurrence) and 92% with oral cancer (based on pathologic correlation). Gross tumor replacement of lymph nodes and redirection of lymphatic flow represented a significant technical issue in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Sixteen percent of patients with oral cancer were upstaged from N0 to N1 after extended sectioning and immunohistochemistry of the sentinel node. Conclusions: LS and SLNB can be performed with technical success in the head and neck region. Complications are minimal. More accurate staging and mapping of lymphatic drainage may improve the quality of standard lymphadenectomy. The potential for minimally invasive surgery based on this technology exists, but there is a small risk of missing positive disease. Whether the failure rate is greater than that of standard lymphadenectomy without gamma probe guidance is not known. New studies need to focus on refinements of technique and validation of accuracy as well as biologic correlates for the prediction of metastases.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>carcinoma</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>head and neck cancer</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>lymphatic metastases</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>melanoma</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>skin neoplasms</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>squamous cell</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhLyCLA7cEO47jdW8lol8KrcSHCr1YjjNeTBMnxF7a3PnhpJsVPeOLD_PMM_a8CL2hJKVEineEpl27Scl8MkIEJ6nIs1ymQj5BK8oZTXIp-VO0mussWfPs2wF6EcJPQqhgnDxHB7TgOZEZX6E_1dQNP3R0Bn_Uw-D8Bmvf4M_go_PQ4qXcgAcT-27Cth8xJQU-A93syEswt7iC4HofjnDZ-zjqEAN-D_EOwOOrUbe41L9dnHZ8uY3aQ78N87zWbbz2ZnqJnlndBni1vw_R15MPX8qzpLo6PS-Pq8Tk65wmHKiUshC8YSRr6jXjNacW7NpqPq-BWmkMWzcCam4aa7WtZZPrTBvIrKhrwQ7R28U7jP2vLYSoOhcMtO3yIlUIwZnMH8CjBTRjH8IIVg2j6_Q4KUrUQwaKUDVnoB4zULsMlJBz8-v9lG3dQfPYul_6DJwswJ1rYfoPtaqOP33nPKe0oIzQWZQsIhci3P8T6fF2_goTXF1fnqr84vomuykzdcH-Avo-qPU</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Civantos, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Moffat, Frederick L.</creator><creator>Goodwin, William J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for 106 Head and Neck Lesions: Contrasts Between Oral Cavity and Cutaneous Malignancy</title><author>Civantos, Francisco J. ; Moffat, Frederick L. ; Goodwin, William J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4841-5e1999675d302db835b51fef8fa50751f9cc38d7eb5cdffafb9d4a2ace2f7bb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>carcinoma</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>head and neck cancer</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>lymphatic metastases</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>melanoma</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>skin neoplasms</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>squamous cell</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Civantos, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moffat, Frederick L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, William J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Civantos, Francisco J.</au><au>Moffat, Frederick L.</au><au>Goodwin, William J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for 106 Head and Neck Lesions: Contrasts Between Oral Cavity and Cutaneous Malignancy</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>S109</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives: The objectives of this prospective series were to present our results in 106 sequential cases of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the head and neck region and contrast the experience in oral cancer with that for cutaneous lesions. Hypotheses: SLNB has an acceptably low complication rate in the head and neck. Lymphatic mapping and gamma probe‐guided lymphadenectomy can improve the management of malignancies of the head and neck by more accurate identification of the nodal basins at risk and more accurate staging of the lymphatics. For appropriately selected patients, radionuclide lymphatic mapping may safely allow for minimally invasive sentinel lymphadenectomy without formal completion selective lymphadenectomy. Methods: One hundred six patients underwent intralesional radionuclide injection and radiologic lymphoscintigraphy (LS) on Institutional Review Board‐approved protocols and 103 of these underwent successful SLNB. These included 35 patients with malignant melanoma, 10 cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, four lip cancers, eight Merkel cell carcinomas, two rare cutaneous lesions, and 43 oral cancers. Mean follow up was 24 months. Patients with oral cavity malignancy underwent concurrent selective neck dissection after narrow‐exposure sentinel lymph node excision. In this group, the SLNB histopathology could be correlated with the completion neck specimen histopathology. Patients with cutaneous malignancy underwent SLNB alone and only received regional lymphadenectomy based on positive histology or clinical indications. Data were tabulated for anatomic drainage patterns, complications, histopathology, and patterns of cancer recurrence. Results: Surgical complications were rare. No temporary or permanent dysfunction of facial or spinal accessory nerves occurred with sentinel node biopsy. Lymphatic drainage to areas dramatically outside of the expected lymphatic basins occurred in 13.6%. Predictive value of a negative sentinel node was 98.2% for cutaneous malignancies (based on regional recurrence) and 92% with oral cancer (based on pathologic correlation). Gross tumor replacement of lymph nodes and redirection of lymphatic flow represented a significant technical issue in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Sixteen percent of patients with oral cancer were upstaged from N0 to N1 after extended sectioning and immunohistochemistry of the sentinel node. Conclusions: LS and SLNB can be performed with technical success in the head and neck region. Complications are minimal. More accurate staging and mapping of lymphatic drainage may improve the quality of standard lymphadenectomy. The potential for minimally invasive surgery based on this technology exists, but there is a small risk of missing positive disease. Whether the failure rate is greater than that of standard lymphadenectomy without gamma probe guidance is not known. New studies need to focus on refinements of technique and validation of accuracy as well as biologic correlates for the prediction of metastases.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>16540925</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.mlg.0000200750.74249.79</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 2006-03, Vol.116 (S109), p.1-15
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67753947
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
carcinoma
Female
Follow-Up Studies
head and neck cancer
Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery
Humans
Lymph Node Excision - methods
Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging
lymphatic metastases
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
melanoma
Middle Aged
Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Mouth Neoplasms - surgery
Neoplasm Staging
Prospective Studies
Radionuclide Imaging
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
skin neoplasms
Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Skin Neoplasms - surgery
squamous cell
Treatment Outcome
title Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for 106 Head and Neck Lesions: Contrasts Between Oral Cavity and Cutaneous Malignancy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A41%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lymphatic%20Mapping%20and%20Sentinel%20Lymphadenectomy%20for%20106%20Head%20and%20Neck%20Lesions:%20Contrasts%20Between%20Oral%20Cavity%20and%20Cutaneous%20Malignancy&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Civantos,%20Francisco%20J.&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=S109&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.mlg.0000200750.74249.79&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67753947%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67753947&rft_id=info:pmid/16540925&rfr_iscdi=true