Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease using a new questionnaire

Background and Aim: An early and accurate evaluation by a general practitioner is needed to screen out non‐gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. A recent questionnaire (QUEST) highlighted problems with specificity and complexity, so the aim of the present study was to design a simplified...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2005-04, Vol.20 (4), p.643-647
Hauptverfasser: SHIMOYAMA, YASUYUKI, KUSANO, MOTOYASU, SUGIMOTO, SAYAKA, KAWAMURA, OSAMU, MAEDA, MASAKI, MINASHI, KEIKO, KURIBAYASHI, SHIKOU, HIGUCHI, TATSUYA, ZAI, HIROAKI, INO, KYOKO, HORIKOSHI, TSUTOMU, MOKI, FUMITAKA, SUGIYAMA, TADASHI, TOKI, MUNETOSHI, OHWADA, TSUNEO, MORI, MASATOMO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 647
container_issue 4
container_start_page 643
container_title Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 20
creator SHIMOYAMA, YASUYUKI
KUSANO, MOTOYASU
SUGIMOTO, SAYAKA
KAWAMURA, OSAMU
MAEDA, MASAKI
MINASHI, KEIKO
KURIBAYASHI, SHIKOU
HIGUCHI, TATSUYA
ZAI, HIROAKI
INO, KYOKO
HORIKOSHI, TSUTOMU
MOKI, FUMITAKA
SUGIYAMA, TADASHI
TOKI, MUNETOSHI
OHWADA, TSUNEO
MORI, MASATOMO
description Background and Aim: An early and accurate evaluation by a general practitioner is needed to screen out non‐gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. A recent questionnaire (QUEST) highlighted problems with specificity and complexity, so the aim of the present study was to design a simplified questionnaire. Methods: When admitted to hospital to undergo an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for suspected GERD, 333 patients completed a 50‐item questionnaire requiring ‘yes/no’ answers to different combinations of questions relating to symptoms of upper gastrointestinal tract conditions (e.g. GERD, ulcers and functional dyspepsia) and psychosomatic symptoms. The endoscopic diagnosis was then correlated with the rate of positive answers to each question. Results: Based on the analysis of the 50 items, the 8–10 questions most often answered affirmatively by each of the GERD and non‐GERD groups were chosen for the simplified questionnaire. Three draft questionnaires were compiled. After calculating the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in relation to the diagnosis of GERD and other conditions, it was found that questionnaire B (selection of persons answering ‘yes’ to at least one of questions 1–5 and exclusion of persons answering ‘yes’ to at least three of questions 7–10) had a high sensitivity, high specificity and low false positive rate. Conclusion: A novel questionnaire was developed. It was designed to detect the symptoms of GERD while simultaneously excluding non‐GERD patients. This simplified nine‐item simplified questionnaire had a sensitivity of 79.8%, a specificity of 53.6% and an accuracy of 63.4%.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03776.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67753392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67753392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4356-a51aa62ebcc03e6429ecb150129e2da88aaaaf1a9a73d4ab24fb0386c7c81ff73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PGzEQhq2qVQnQv4B8aW-72Ouv3UMPFS2BigQJterRmnW8welmN3iyIvx7vCSCK3PxSH5ee-YhhHKW81Tnq5xLyTJupM4LxlTOhDE6330gk9eLj2TCSq6ySvDqiBwjrhhjkhn1mRxxVQptuJmQy58Bll2PAWnf0CXgNvYe-809LD20NPqmHXZ0EdADejpg6JYUaOcf6cPgcRv6roMQ_Sn51ECL_svhPCF_L3_9ubjKbm6n1xc_bjInhdIZKA6gC187x4TXsqi8q7liPDXFAsoSUjUcKjBiIaEuZFMzUWpnXMmbxogT8m3_7ib2LwPYdUDn2xY63w9otTFKiKpIYLkHXewR0xp2E8Ma4pPlzI4O7cqOquyoyo4O7YtDu0vRs8MfQ732i7fgQVoCvh4AQAdtE6FzAd-4NERVGJ6473vuMbT-6d0D2N_Tq7FL-WyfD7j1u9c8xP9pT2GU_Tef2rs5n8_kbGa1eAawUp0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67753392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease using a new questionnaire</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>SHIMOYAMA, YASUYUKI ; KUSANO, MOTOYASU ; SUGIMOTO, SAYAKA ; KAWAMURA, OSAMU ; MAEDA, MASAKI ; MINASHI, KEIKO ; KURIBAYASHI, SHIKOU ; HIGUCHI, TATSUYA ; ZAI, HIROAKI ; INO, KYOKO ; HORIKOSHI, TSUTOMU ; MOKI, FUMITAKA ; SUGIYAMA, TADASHI ; TOKI, MUNETOSHI ; OHWADA, TSUNEO ; MORI, MASATOMO</creator><creatorcontrib>SHIMOYAMA, YASUYUKI ; KUSANO, MOTOYASU ; SUGIMOTO, SAYAKA ; KAWAMURA, OSAMU ; MAEDA, MASAKI ; MINASHI, KEIKO ; KURIBAYASHI, SHIKOU ; HIGUCHI, TATSUYA ; ZAI, HIROAKI ; INO, KYOKO ; HORIKOSHI, TSUTOMU ; MOKI, FUMITAKA ; SUGIYAMA, TADASHI ; TOKI, MUNETOSHI ; OHWADA, TSUNEO ; MORI, MASATOMO</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aim: An early and accurate evaluation by a general practitioner is needed to screen out non‐gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. A recent questionnaire (QUEST) highlighted problems with specificity and complexity, so the aim of the present study was to design a simplified questionnaire. Methods: When admitted to hospital to undergo an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for suspected GERD, 333 patients completed a 50‐item questionnaire requiring ‘yes/no’ answers to different combinations of questions relating to symptoms of upper gastrointestinal tract conditions (e.g. GERD, ulcers and functional dyspepsia) and psychosomatic symptoms. The endoscopic diagnosis was then correlated with the rate of positive answers to each question. Results: Based on the analysis of the 50 items, the 8–10 questions most often answered affirmatively by each of the GERD and non‐GERD groups were chosen for the simplified questionnaire. Three draft questionnaires were compiled. After calculating the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in relation to the diagnosis of GERD and other conditions, it was found that questionnaire B (selection of persons answering ‘yes’ to at least one of questions 1–5 and exclusion of persons answering ‘yes’ to at least three of questions 7–10) had a high sensitivity, high specificity and low false positive rate. Conclusion: A novel questionnaire was developed. It was designed to detect the symptoms of GERD while simultaneously excluding non‐GERD patients. This simplified nine‐item simplified questionnaire had a sensitivity of 79.8%, a specificity of 53.6% and an accuracy of 63.4%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03776.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15836717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chi-Square Distribution ; diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Esophagus ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis ; gastroesophageal reflux disease ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; psychosomatic symptoms ; QUEST ; questionnaire ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2005-04, Vol.20 (4), p.643-647</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4356-a51aa62ebcc03e6429ecb150129e2da88aaaaf1a9a73d4ab24fb0386c7c81ff73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4356-a51aa62ebcc03e6429ecb150129e2da88aaaaf1a9a73d4ab24fb0386c7c81ff73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1746.2005.03776.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1746.2005.03776.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16779271$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15836717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHIMOYAMA, YASUYUKI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KUSANO, MOTOYASU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUGIMOTO, SAYAKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAWAMURA, OSAMU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAEDA, MASAKI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MINASHI, KEIKO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KURIBAYASHI, SHIKOU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIGUCHI, TATSUYA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZAI, HIROAKI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INO, KYOKO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HORIKOSHI, TSUTOMU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOKI, FUMITAKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUGIYAMA, TADASHI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOKI, MUNETOSHI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OHWADA, TSUNEO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORI, MASATOMO</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease using a new questionnaire</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background and Aim: An early and accurate evaluation by a general practitioner is needed to screen out non‐gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. A recent questionnaire (QUEST) highlighted problems with specificity and complexity, so the aim of the present study was to design a simplified questionnaire. Methods: When admitted to hospital to undergo an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for suspected GERD, 333 patients completed a 50‐item questionnaire requiring ‘yes/no’ answers to different combinations of questions relating to symptoms of upper gastrointestinal tract conditions (e.g. GERD, ulcers and functional dyspepsia) and psychosomatic symptoms. The endoscopic diagnosis was then correlated with the rate of positive answers to each question. Results: Based on the analysis of the 50 items, the 8–10 questions most often answered affirmatively by each of the GERD and non‐GERD groups were chosen for the simplified questionnaire. Three draft questionnaires were compiled. After calculating the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in relation to the diagnosis of GERD and other conditions, it was found that questionnaire B (selection of persons answering ‘yes’ to at least one of questions 1–5 and exclusion of persons answering ‘yes’ to at least three of questions 7–10) had a high sensitivity, high specificity and low false positive rate. Conclusion: A novel questionnaire was developed. It was designed to detect the symptoms of GERD while simultaneously excluding non‐GERD patients. This simplified nine‐item simplified questionnaire had a sensitivity of 79.8%, a specificity of 53.6% and an accuracy of 63.4%.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis</subject><subject>gastroesophageal reflux disease</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>psychosomatic symptoms</subject><subject>QUEST</subject><subject>questionnaire</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1PGzEQhq2qVQnQv4B8aW-72Ouv3UMPFS2BigQJterRmnW8welmN3iyIvx7vCSCK3PxSH5ee-YhhHKW81Tnq5xLyTJupM4LxlTOhDE6330gk9eLj2TCSq6ySvDqiBwjrhhjkhn1mRxxVQptuJmQy58Bll2PAWnf0CXgNvYe-809LD20NPqmHXZ0EdADejpg6JYUaOcf6cPgcRv6roMQ_Sn51ECL_svhPCF_L3_9ubjKbm6n1xc_bjInhdIZKA6gC187x4TXsqi8q7liPDXFAsoSUjUcKjBiIaEuZFMzUWpnXMmbxogT8m3_7ib2LwPYdUDn2xY63w9otTFKiKpIYLkHXewR0xp2E8Ma4pPlzI4O7cqOquyoyo4O7YtDu0vRs8MfQ732i7fgQVoCvh4AQAdtE6FzAd-4NERVGJ6473vuMbT-6d0D2N_Tq7FL-WyfD7j1u9c8xP9pT2GU_Tef2rs5n8_kbGa1eAawUp0A</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>SHIMOYAMA, YASUYUKI</creator><creator>KUSANO, MOTOYASU</creator><creator>SUGIMOTO, SAYAKA</creator><creator>KAWAMURA, OSAMU</creator><creator>MAEDA, MASAKI</creator><creator>MINASHI, KEIKO</creator><creator>KURIBAYASHI, SHIKOU</creator><creator>HIGUCHI, TATSUYA</creator><creator>ZAI, HIROAKI</creator><creator>INO, KYOKO</creator><creator>HORIKOSHI, TSUTOMU</creator><creator>MOKI, FUMITAKA</creator><creator>SUGIYAMA, TADASHI</creator><creator>TOKI, MUNETOSHI</creator><creator>OHWADA, TSUNEO</creator><creator>MORI, MASATOMO</creator><general>Blackwell Science Pty</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease using a new questionnaire</title><author>SHIMOYAMA, YASUYUKI ; KUSANO, MOTOYASU ; SUGIMOTO, SAYAKA ; KAWAMURA, OSAMU ; MAEDA, MASAKI ; MINASHI, KEIKO ; KURIBAYASHI, SHIKOU ; HIGUCHI, TATSUYA ; ZAI, HIROAKI ; INO, KYOKO ; HORIKOSHI, TSUTOMU ; MOKI, FUMITAKA ; SUGIYAMA, TADASHI ; TOKI, MUNETOSHI ; OHWADA, TSUNEO ; MORI, MASATOMO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4356-a51aa62ebcc03e6429ecb150129e2da88aaaaf1a9a73d4ab24fb0386c7c81ff73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis</topic><topic>gastroesophageal reflux disease</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>psychosomatic symptoms</topic><topic>QUEST</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHIMOYAMA, YASUYUKI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KUSANO, MOTOYASU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUGIMOTO, SAYAKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAWAMURA, OSAMU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAEDA, MASAKI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MINASHI, KEIKO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KURIBAYASHI, SHIKOU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIGUCHI, TATSUYA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZAI, HIROAKI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INO, KYOKO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HORIKOSHI, TSUTOMU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOKI, FUMITAKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUGIYAMA, TADASHI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOKI, MUNETOSHI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OHWADA, TSUNEO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORI, MASATOMO</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHIMOYAMA, YASUYUKI</au><au>KUSANO, MOTOYASU</au><au>SUGIMOTO, SAYAKA</au><au>KAWAMURA, OSAMU</au><au>MAEDA, MASAKI</au><au>MINASHI, KEIKO</au><au>KURIBAYASHI, SHIKOU</au><au>HIGUCHI, TATSUYA</au><au>ZAI, HIROAKI</au><au>INO, KYOKO</au><au>HORIKOSHI, TSUTOMU</au><au>MOKI, FUMITAKA</au><au>SUGIYAMA, TADASHI</au><au>TOKI, MUNETOSHI</au><au>OHWADA, TSUNEO</au><au>MORI, MASATOMO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease using a new questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>643</spage><epage>647</epage><pages>643-647</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Background and Aim: An early and accurate evaluation by a general practitioner is needed to screen out non‐gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. A recent questionnaire (QUEST) highlighted problems with specificity and complexity, so the aim of the present study was to design a simplified questionnaire. Methods: When admitted to hospital to undergo an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for suspected GERD, 333 patients completed a 50‐item questionnaire requiring ‘yes/no’ answers to different combinations of questions relating to symptoms of upper gastrointestinal tract conditions (e.g. GERD, ulcers and functional dyspepsia) and psychosomatic symptoms. The endoscopic diagnosis was then correlated with the rate of positive answers to each question. Results: Based on the analysis of the 50 items, the 8–10 questions most often answered affirmatively by each of the GERD and non‐GERD groups were chosen for the simplified questionnaire. Three draft questionnaires were compiled. After calculating the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in relation to the diagnosis of GERD and other conditions, it was found that questionnaire B (selection of persons answering ‘yes’ to at least one of questions 1–5 and exclusion of persons answering ‘yes’ to at least three of questions 7–10) had a high sensitivity, high specificity and low false positive rate. Conclusion: A novel questionnaire was developed. It was designed to detect the symptoms of GERD while simultaneously excluding non‐GERD patients. This simplified nine‐item simplified questionnaire had a sensitivity of 79.8%, a specificity of 53.6% and an accuracy of 63.4%.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Pty</pub><pmid>15836717</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03776.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0815-9319
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2005-04, Vol.20 (4), p.643-647
issn 0815-9319
1440-1746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67753392
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Chi-Square Distribution
diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Esophagus
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis
gastroesophageal reflux disease
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Other diseases. Semiology
psychosomatic symptoms
QUEST
questionnaire
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease using a new questionnaire
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A12%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20of%20gastroesophageal%20reflux%20disease%20using%20a%20new%20questionnaire&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=SHIMOYAMA,%20YASUYUKI&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=643&rft.epage=647&rft.pages=643-647&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03776.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67753392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67753392&rft_id=info:pmid/15836717&rfr_iscdi=true