Factor solution of the BPRS-expanded version in schizophrenic outpatients living in five European countries
The expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-E) has improved the instrument's coverage and interrater reliability, but there is little knowledge on its subsyndromes. To assess: (1) whether there are common underlying BPRS-E subscales in patients living in different countries...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Schizophrenia research 2005-06, Vol.75 (1), p.107-117 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 107 |
container_title | Schizophrenia research |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Ruggeri, Mirella Koeter, Maarten Schene, Aart Bonetto, Chiara Vàzquez-Barquero, Josè Luis Becker, Thomas Knapp, Martin Knudsen, Helle Charlotte Tansella, Michele Thornicroft, Graham |
description | The expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-E) has improved the instrument's coverage and interrater reliability, but there is little knowledge on its subsyndromes.
To assess: (1) whether there are common underlying BPRS-E subscales in patients living in different countries and (2) if this is the case, whether these subscales behave the same in all populations and, if not, what are the differences over these populations.
Data are part of the EPSILON study, a collaborative project carried out in Denmark, England, Holland, Italy and Spain. A random representative sample of 404 adult patients with a ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia who have been in contact with mental health services of a defined catchment area in each site were assessed. Simultaneous component analysis (SCA) was used to find component weights that optimally explain the variance of the variables in different populations simultaneously.
Symptom severity differed significantly among the five EPSILON sites in 12 out of 24 BPRS-E items, but a common component solution could be found. It explained 48.8% of the variance and gave four well-interpretable components: manic excitement/disorganization, depression/anxiety, negative and positive symptoms. Each component's internal consistency and intercomponent correlation matrix differed significantly among sites. The four components mean score differed significantly among sites for negative symptoms and depression/anxiety.
In spite of the heterogeneity of symptom's severity in the various countries, the way symptoms cluster in schizophrenia is rather stable cross-culturally. Data demonstrate that to explore schizophrenia a third component, including mania/disorganization items, is necessary beside the positive–negative symptom dimensions. The subscales derived from these analyses can be readily used in clinical trials and epidemiological studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67721958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0920996404001835</els_id><sourcerecordid>67721958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-c90be4455a86a1419c54062f70c175e57c66504bcda5b70c977bb6a8e8b3e4113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6D0Ry0Vu3lZ58dC6CLrsqLCh-nEM6Xe1m7EnaJD2ov94MM7A3TwVVT9VbPIQ8Z9AyYPL1rs3uLmFuOwDegmiBqQdkw4TaNp0A_ZBsQHfQaC35BXmS8w4AmAD1mFww0Xew7fSG_LyxrsREc5zX4mOgcaLlDum7z1--Nvh7sWHEkR4w5ePQB1pD_d-41OTgHY1rWWzxGEqmsz_48OPITP6A9HpNcUEbqItrKMljfkoeTXbO-OxcL8n3m-tvVx-a20_vP169vW0cF7I0TsOAnAthe2kZZ9oJDrKbFDimBArlpBTABzdaMdSmVmoYpO2xH7bIGdteklenu0uKv1bMxex9djjPNmBcs5FKdUyLvoL8BLoUc044mSX5vU1_DANzlGx25iTZHCUbEKZKrmsvzvfXYY_j_dLZagVengGbnZ2nZIPz-Z6TsqZrXrk3Jw6rjYPHVNOqS4ejT-iKGaP__yf_AFjyneY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67721958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factor solution of the BPRS-expanded version in schizophrenic outpatients living in five European countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ruggeri, Mirella ; Koeter, Maarten ; Schene, Aart ; Bonetto, Chiara ; Vàzquez-Barquero, Josè Luis ; Becker, Thomas ; Knapp, Martin ; Knudsen, Helle Charlotte ; Tansella, Michele ; Thornicroft, Graham</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruggeri, Mirella ; Koeter, Maarten ; Schene, Aart ; Bonetto, Chiara ; Vàzquez-Barquero, Josè Luis ; Becker, Thomas ; Knapp, Martin ; Knudsen, Helle Charlotte ; Tansella, Michele ; Thornicroft, Graham ; the EPSILON Study Group ; EPSILON Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>The expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-E) has improved the instrument's coverage and interrater reliability, but there is little knowledge on its subsyndromes.
To assess: (1) whether there are common underlying BPRS-E subscales in patients living in different countries and (2) if this is the case, whether these subscales behave the same in all populations and, if not, what are the differences over these populations.
Data are part of the EPSILON study, a collaborative project carried out in Denmark, England, Holland, Italy and Spain. A random representative sample of 404 adult patients with a ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia who have been in contact with mental health services of a defined catchment area in each site were assessed. Simultaneous component analysis (SCA) was used to find component weights that optimally explain the variance of the variables in different populations simultaneously.
Symptom severity differed significantly among the five EPSILON sites in 12 out of 24 BPRS-E items, but a common component solution could be found. It explained 48.8% of the variance and gave four well-interpretable components: manic excitement/disorganization, depression/anxiety, negative and positive symptoms. Each component's internal consistency and intercomponent correlation matrix differed significantly among sites. The four components mean score differed significantly among sites for negative symptoms and depression/anxiety.
In spite of the heterogeneity of symptom's severity in the various countries, the way symptoms cluster in schizophrenia is rather stable cross-culturally. Data demonstrate that to explore schizophrenia a third component, including mania/disorganization items, is necessary beside the positive–negative symptom dimensions. The subscales derived from these analyses can be readily used in clinical trials and epidemiological studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15820329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Europe ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Models, Psychological ; Outcome assessment ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia - diagnosis ; Schizophrenic Psychology ; Simultaneous component analysis ; Techniques and methods</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2005-06, Vol.75 (1), p.107-117</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-c90be4455a86a1419c54062f70c175e57c66504bcda5b70c977bb6a8e8b3e4113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-c90be4455a86a1419c54062f70c175e57c66504bcda5b70c977bb6a8e8b3e4113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16695894$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15820329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruggeri, Mirella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koeter, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schene, Aart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonetto, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vàzquez-Barquero, Josè Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudsen, Helle Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansella, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the EPSILON Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EPSILON Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Factor solution of the BPRS-expanded version in schizophrenic outpatients living in five European countries</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>The expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-E) has improved the instrument's coverage and interrater reliability, but there is little knowledge on its subsyndromes.
To assess: (1) whether there are common underlying BPRS-E subscales in patients living in different countries and (2) if this is the case, whether these subscales behave the same in all populations and, if not, what are the differences over these populations.
Data are part of the EPSILON study, a collaborative project carried out in Denmark, England, Holland, Italy and Spain. A random representative sample of 404 adult patients with a ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia who have been in contact with mental health services of a defined catchment area in each site were assessed. Simultaneous component analysis (SCA) was used to find component weights that optimally explain the variance of the variables in different populations simultaneously.
Symptom severity differed significantly among the five EPSILON sites in 12 out of 24 BPRS-E items, but a common component solution could be found. It explained 48.8% of the variance and gave four well-interpretable components: manic excitement/disorganization, depression/anxiety, negative and positive symptoms. Each component's internal consistency and intercomponent correlation matrix differed significantly among sites. The four components mean score differed significantly among sites for negative symptoms and depression/anxiety.
In spite of the heterogeneity of symptom's severity in the various countries, the way symptoms cluster in schizophrenia is rather stable cross-culturally. Data demonstrate that to explore schizophrenia a third component, including mania/disorganization items, is necessary beside the positive–negative symptom dimensions. The subscales derived from these analyses can be readily used in clinical trials and epidemiological studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Outcome assessment</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Psychology</subject><subject>Simultaneous component analysis</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6D0Ry0Vu3lZ58dC6CLrsqLCh-nEM6Xe1m7EnaJD2ov94MM7A3TwVVT9VbPIQ8Z9AyYPL1rs3uLmFuOwDegmiBqQdkw4TaNp0A_ZBsQHfQaC35BXmS8w4AmAD1mFww0Xew7fSG_LyxrsREc5zX4mOgcaLlDum7z1--Nvh7sWHEkR4w5ePQB1pD_d-41OTgHY1rWWzxGEqmsz_48OPITP6A9HpNcUEbqItrKMljfkoeTXbO-OxcL8n3m-tvVx-a20_vP169vW0cF7I0TsOAnAthe2kZZ9oJDrKbFDimBArlpBTABzdaMdSmVmoYpO2xH7bIGdteklenu0uKv1bMxex9djjPNmBcs5FKdUyLvoL8BLoUc044mSX5vU1_DANzlGx25iTZHCUbEKZKrmsvzvfXYY_j_dLZagVengGbnZ2nZIPz-Z6TsqZrXrk3Jw6rjYPHVNOqS4ejT-iKGaP__yf_AFjyneY</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>Ruggeri, Mirella</creator><creator>Koeter, Maarten</creator><creator>Schene, Aart</creator><creator>Bonetto, Chiara</creator><creator>Vàzquez-Barquero, Josè Luis</creator><creator>Becker, Thomas</creator><creator>Knapp, Martin</creator><creator>Knudsen, Helle Charlotte</creator><creator>Tansella, Michele</creator><creator>Thornicroft, Graham</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>Factor solution of the BPRS-expanded version in schizophrenic outpatients living in five European countries</title><author>Ruggeri, Mirella ; Koeter, Maarten ; Schene, Aart ; Bonetto, Chiara ; Vàzquez-Barquero, Josè Luis ; Becker, Thomas ; Knapp, Martin ; Knudsen, Helle Charlotte ; Tansella, Michele ; Thornicroft, Graham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-c90be4455a86a1419c54062f70c175e57c66504bcda5b70c977bb6a8e8b3e4113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Outcome assessment</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Psychology</topic><topic>Simultaneous component analysis</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruggeri, Mirella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koeter, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schene, Aart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonetto, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vàzquez-Barquero, Josè Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudsen, Helle Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansella, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the EPSILON Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EPSILON Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruggeri, Mirella</au><au>Koeter, Maarten</au><au>Schene, Aart</au><au>Bonetto, Chiara</au><au>Vàzquez-Barquero, Josè Luis</au><au>Becker, Thomas</au><au>Knapp, Martin</au><au>Knudsen, Helle Charlotte</au><au>Tansella, Michele</au><au>Thornicroft, Graham</au><aucorp>the EPSILON Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>EPSILON Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factor solution of the BPRS-expanded version in schizophrenic outpatients living in five European countries</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>107-117</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>The expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-E) has improved the instrument's coverage and interrater reliability, but there is little knowledge on its subsyndromes.
To assess: (1) whether there are common underlying BPRS-E subscales in patients living in different countries and (2) if this is the case, whether these subscales behave the same in all populations and, if not, what are the differences over these populations.
Data are part of the EPSILON study, a collaborative project carried out in Denmark, England, Holland, Italy and Spain. A random representative sample of 404 adult patients with a ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia who have been in contact with mental health services of a defined catchment area in each site were assessed. Simultaneous component analysis (SCA) was used to find component weights that optimally explain the variance of the variables in different populations simultaneously.
Symptom severity differed significantly among the five EPSILON sites in 12 out of 24 BPRS-E items, but a common component solution could be found. It explained 48.8% of the variance and gave four well-interpretable components: manic excitement/disorganization, depression/anxiety, negative and positive symptoms. Each component's internal consistency and intercomponent correlation matrix differed significantly among sites. The four components mean score differed significantly among sites for negative symptoms and depression/anxiety.
In spite of the heterogeneity of symptom's severity in the various countries, the way symptoms cluster in schizophrenia is rather stable cross-culturally. Data demonstrate that to explore schizophrenia a third component, including mania/disorganization items, is necessary beside the positive–negative symptom dimensions. The subscales derived from these analyses can be readily used in clinical trials and epidemiological studies.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15820329</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.017</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0920-9964 |
ispartof | Schizophrenia research, 2005-06, Vol.75 (1), p.107-117 |
issn | 0920-9964 1573-2509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67721958 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Biological and medical sciences Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Cross-Cultural Comparison Europe Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Humans Male Medical sciences Models, Psychological Outcome assessment Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychoses Schizophrenia Schizophrenia - diagnosis Schizophrenic Psychology Simultaneous component analysis Techniques and methods |
title | Factor solution of the BPRS-expanded version in schizophrenic outpatients living in five European countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A43%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factor%20solution%20of%20the%20BPRS-expanded%20version%20in%20schizophrenic%20outpatients%20living%20in%20five%20European%20countries&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Ruggeri,%20Mirella&rft.aucorp=the%20EPSILON%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=107-117&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67721958%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67721958&rft_id=info:pmid/15820329&rft_els_id=S0920996404001835&rfr_iscdi=true |