Hospital‐Independent Organ Recovery from Deceased Donors: A Two‐Year Experience

Early experience with deceased donor (DD) organ recovery outside of the hospital setting was found to be safe, efficient and cost effective. A 2‐year experience under current practice protocols implemented to further process improvements is now reviewed. From December 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of transplantation 2005-05, Vol.5 (5), p.1105-1110
Hauptverfasser: Jendrisak, Martin D., Hruska, Keith, Wagner, Jessica, Chandler, Dianne, Kappel, Dean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1110
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1105
container_title American journal of transplantation
container_volume 5
creator Jendrisak, Martin D.
Hruska, Keith
Wagner, Jessica
Chandler, Dianne
Kappel, Dean
description Early experience with deceased donor (DD) organ recovery outside of the hospital setting was found to be safe, efficient and cost effective. A 2‐year experience under current practice protocols implemented to further process improvements is now reviewed. From December 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, 123 criteria eligible DDs were transferred from local and regional hospitals to the Mid‐America Transplant Services (MTS) facility for organ and tissue recovery. In this retrospective analysis, outcome comparisons were made with 79 conventional hospital‐based recoveries. Compared to hospital recoveries, MTS facility recoveries were associated with significantly reduced critical care unit time (819 vs. 502 min), time to cross‐clamp following brain death (966 vs. 731 min), operating room delay (54 vs. 9 min) and a trend toward reduced organ cold ischemia times which reached significance for heart and lungs when compared to regional hospital recoveries (147 vs. 221 and 192 vs. 327 min). MTS facility recovery afforded substantial cost savings over local and regional hospital recoveries ($6,690 and $5,452 per donor, respectively). The current practice of DD recovery at the MTS facility was applicable for most recoveries, improved process efficiency, and afforded substantial cost savings without donor compromise.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00804.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67717277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67717277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-eea3fe98d70aa52b7045a959617342be56c858202f19ab90acd2f86386b8ac323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOGzEUhq2KqlDaV6i8gV2mvsz4gthEQIEKCalNF11ZZzxnqokm48FOINn1EfqMPEmdJoJtvbCP5O-3z_kIoZwVPK_P84IrxiaKl7IQjFUFY4aVxfoNOXq5OHipZXVI3qc0Z4xrYcQ7csgrw5Wx8oh8vwlp7JbQP__-czs0OGLehiW9j79goN_Qh0eMG9rGsKCX6BESNvQyDCGmMzqls6eQgz8RIr1ajxg7HDx-IG9b6BN-3J_H5MeXq9nFzeTu_vr2Yno38dKqcoIIskVrGs0AKlFrVlZgK6u4lqWosVLeVEYw0XILtWXgG9EaJY2qDXgp5DE53b07xvCwwrR0iy557HsYMKySU1rngbXOoNmBPoaUIrZujN0C4sZx5rZC3dxtXbmtN7cV6v4Jdesc_bT_Y1UvsHkN7g1m4GQPQPLQtxEG36VXTmlureaZO99xT12Pm_9uwE2_znIh_wJwPpHZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67717277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hospital‐Independent Organ Recovery from Deceased Donors: A Two‐Year Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jendrisak, Martin D. ; Hruska, Keith ; Wagner, Jessica ; Chandler, Dianne ; Kappel, Dean</creator><creatorcontrib>Jendrisak, Martin D. ; Hruska, Keith ; Wagner, Jessica ; Chandler, Dianne ; Kappel, Dean</creatorcontrib><description>Early experience with deceased donor (DD) organ recovery outside of the hospital setting was found to be safe, efficient and cost effective. A 2‐year experience under current practice protocols implemented to further process improvements is now reviewed. From December 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, 123 criteria eligible DDs were transferred from local and regional hospitals to the Mid‐America Transplant Services (MTS) facility for organ and tissue recovery. In this retrospective analysis, outcome comparisons were made with 79 conventional hospital‐based recoveries. Compared to hospital recoveries, MTS facility recoveries were associated with significantly reduced critical care unit time (819 vs. 502 min), time to cross‐clamp following brain death (966 vs. 731 min), operating room delay (54 vs. 9 min) and a trend toward reduced organ cold ischemia times which reached significance for heart and lungs when compared to regional hospital recoveries (147 vs. 221 and 192 vs. 327 min). MTS facility recovery afforded substantial cost savings over local and regional hospital recoveries ($6,690 and $5,452 per donor, respectively). The current practice of DD recovery at the MTS facility was applicable for most recoveries, improved process efficiency, and afforded substantial cost savings without donor compromise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00804.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15816893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cadaver ; Cadaveric organs ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; donation ; economy ; Female ; Health Facilities ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Ischemia ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Organ Preservation - methods ; Organ Transplantation - economics ; Organ Transplantation - methods ; Organ Transplantation - standards ; procurement ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Time Factors ; Tissue and Organ Harvesting ; Tissue and Organ Procurement ; Tissue Donors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2005-05, Vol.5 (5), p.1105-1110</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-eea3fe98d70aa52b7045a959617342be56c858202f19ab90acd2f86386b8ac323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-eea3fe98d70aa52b7045a959617342be56c858202f19ab90acd2f86386b8ac323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-6143.2005.00804.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-6143.2005.00804.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16719971$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15816893$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jendrisak, Martin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hruska, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandler, Dianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kappel, Dean</creatorcontrib><title>Hospital‐Independent Organ Recovery from Deceased Donors: A Two‐Year Experience</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>Early experience with deceased donor (DD) organ recovery outside of the hospital setting was found to be safe, efficient and cost effective. A 2‐year experience under current practice protocols implemented to further process improvements is now reviewed. From December 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, 123 criteria eligible DDs were transferred from local and regional hospitals to the Mid‐America Transplant Services (MTS) facility for organ and tissue recovery. In this retrospective analysis, outcome comparisons were made with 79 conventional hospital‐based recoveries. Compared to hospital recoveries, MTS facility recoveries were associated with significantly reduced critical care unit time (819 vs. 502 min), time to cross‐clamp following brain death (966 vs. 731 min), operating room delay (54 vs. 9 min) and a trend toward reduced organ cold ischemia times which reached significance for heart and lungs when compared to regional hospital recoveries (147 vs. 221 and 192 vs. 327 min). MTS facility recovery afforded substantial cost savings over local and regional hospital recoveries ($6,690 and $5,452 per donor, respectively). The current practice of DD recovery at the MTS facility was applicable for most recoveries, improved process efficiency, and afforded substantial cost savings without donor compromise.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Cadaveric organs</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>donation</subject><subject>economy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Facilities</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Organ Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation - economics</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation - standards</subject><subject>procurement</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Harvesting</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Procurement</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOGzEUhq2KqlDaV6i8gV2mvsz4gthEQIEKCalNF11ZZzxnqokm48FOINn1EfqMPEmdJoJtvbCP5O-3z_kIoZwVPK_P84IrxiaKl7IQjFUFY4aVxfoNOXq5OHipZXVI3qc0Z4xrYcQ7csgrw5Wx8oh8vwlp7JbQP__-czs0OGLehiW9j79goN_Qh0eMG9rGsKCX6BESNvQyDCGmMzqls6eQgz8RIr1ajxg7HDx-IG9b6BN-3J_H5MeXq9nFzeTu_vr2Yno38dKqcoIIskVrGs0AKlFrVlZgK6u4lqWosVLeVEYw0XILtWXgG9EaJY2qDXgp5DE53b07xvCwwrR0iy557HsYMKySU1rngbXOoNmBPoaUIrZujN0C4sZx5rZC3dxtXbmtN7cV6v4Jdesc_bT_Y1UvsHkN7g1m4GQPQPLQtxEG36VXTmlureaZO99xT12Pm_9uwE2_znIh_wJwPpHZ</recordid><startdate>200505</startdate><enddate>200505</enddate><creator>Jendrisak, Martin D.</creator><creator>Hruska, Keith</creator><creator>Wagner, Jessica</creator><creator>Chandler, Dianne</creator><creator>Kappel, Dean</creator><general>Munksgaard International Publishers</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200505</creationdate><title>Hospital‐Independent Organ Recovery from Deceased Donors: A Two‐Year Experience</title><author>Jendrisak, Martin D. ; Hruska, Keith ; Wagner, Jessica ; Chandler, Dianne ; Kappel, Dean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-eea3fe98d70aa52b7045a959617342be56c858202f19ab90acd2f86386b8ac323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Cadaveric organs</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>donation</topic><topic>economy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Facilities</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Organ Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation - economics</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation - standards</topic><topic>procurement</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Harvesting</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Procurement</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jendrisak, Martin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hruska, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandler, Dianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kappel, Dean</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jendrisak, Martin D.</au><au>Hruska, Keith</au><au>Wagner, Jessica</au><au>Chandler, Dianne</au><au>Kappel, Dean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hospital‐Independent Organ Recovery from Deceased Donors: A Two‐Year Experience</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2005-05</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1105</spage><epage>1110</epage><pages>1105-1110</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>Early experience with deceased donor (DD) organ recovery outside of the hospital setting was found to be safe, efficient and cost effective. A 2‐year experience under current practice protocols implemented to further process improvements is now reviewed. From December 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, 123 criteria eligible DDs were transferred from local and regional hospitals to the Mid‐America Transplant Services (MTS) facility for organ and tissue recovery. In this retrospective analysis, outcome comparisons were made with 79 conventional hospital‐based recoveries. Compared to hospital recoveries, MTS facility recoveries were associated with significantly reduced critical care unit time (819 vs. 502 min), time to cross‐clamp following brain death (966 vs. 731 min), operating room delay (54 vs. 9 min) and a trend toward reduced organ cold ischemia times which reached significance for heart and lungs when compared to regional hospital recoveries (147 vs. 221 and 192 vs. 327 min). MTS facility recovery afforded substantial cost savings over local and regional hospital recoveries ($6,690 and $5,452 per donor, respectively). The current practice of DD recovery at the MTS facility was applicable for most recoveries, improved process efficiency, and afforded substantial cost savings without donor compromise.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Munksgaard International Publishers</pub><pmid>15816893</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00804.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1600-6135
ispartof American journal of transplantation, 2005-05, Vol.5 (5), p.1105-1110
issn 1600-6135
1600-6143
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67717277
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cadaver
Cadaveric organs
Costs and Cost Analysis
donation
economy
Female
Health Facilities
Hospitals
Humans
Ischemia
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Organ Preservation - methods
Organ Transplantation - economics
Organ Transplantation - methods
Organ Transplantation - standards
procurement
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Time Factors
Tissue and Organ Harvesting
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Tissue Donors
Treatment Outcome
title Hospital‐Independent Organ Recovery from Deceased Donors: A Two‐Year Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A43%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hospital%E2%80%90Independent%20Organ%20Recovery%20from%20Deceased%20Donors:%20A%20Two%E2%80%90Year%20Experience&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Jendrisak,%20Martin%20D.&rft.date=2005-05&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1105&rft.epage=1110&rft.pages=1105-1110&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00804.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67717277%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67717277&rft_id=info:pmid/15816893&rfr_iscdi=true