How well are cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills retained over time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial

The current standard for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) retraining for laypersons is a four-hour course every two years. Others have documented substantial skill deterioration during this time period. To evaluate 1) the retention of core CPR and AED sk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2006-03, Vol.13 (3), p.254-263
Hauptverfasser: Riegel, Barbara, Nafziger, Sarah D, McBurnie, Mary Ann, Powell, Judy, Ledingham, Robert, Sehra, Ruchir, Mango, LynnMarie, Henry, Mark C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 263
container_issue 3
container_start_page 254
container_title Academic emergency medicine
container_volume 13
creator Riegel, Barbara
Nafziger, Sarah D
McBurnie, Mary Ann
Powell, Judy
Ledingham, Robert
Sehra, Ruchir
Mango, LynnMarie
Henry, Mark C
description The current standard for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) retraining for laypersons is a four-hour course every two years. Others have documented substantial skill deterioration during this time period. To evaluate 1) the retention of core CPR and AED skills among volunteer laypersons and 2) the time required to retrain laypersons to proficiency as a function of time since initial training. This was an observational follow-up study evaluating CPR and AED skill retention and testing/retraining time up through 17 months after initial training. The study took place at 1,260 facilities recruited by 24 North American clinical research centers, and included 6,182 volunteer laypersons participating in the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial. Training to proficiency in either CPR only (N = 2,426) or CPR+AED (N = 3,756) was followed by testing/retraining provided three to 17 months later. Retraining was done in brief, one-on-one, individualized, interactive sessions. The outcome studied was instructors' global assessments of performance of CPR and AED skill adequacy, i.e., whether CPR actions would likely result in perfusion (yes/no) and whether AED actions would result in a shock through the heart (yes/no). For global CPR performance, 79%, 73%, and 71% of volunteers tested for the first time since initial training three to five, six to 11, and 12 to 17 months after initial training, respectively, were judged by their instructors as having adequate performance (p < 0.001, chi-square for linear trend). For global AED performance, 91%, 86%, and 84% of volunteers, respectively, were judged as having adequate performance (p < 0.001). The mean (+/- standard deviation) times required to test and retrain volunteers to proficiency were 5.7 (+/- 4.0) minutes for CPR skills and 7.7 (+/- 4.6) minutes for CPR+AED skills. Among PAD Trial volunteer laypersons participating in a simulated resuscitation, the proportions of volunteers judged by instructors to have adequate CPR and AED skills demonstrated small declines associated with longer intervals between initial training and subsequent testing. However, based on instructors' judgment, large majorities of volunteers still retained both CPR and AED core skills through 17 months after initial training. Furthermore, individual testing and retraining for CPR and AED skills were usually accomplished in less than 10 minutes per volunteer. Additional research is essential to identify
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2006.tb01688.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67716500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67716500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307x-d414abb8c109ac5e7ab6f9059e92b66b5605f11c6108c962fc35beb8f1996e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9LHDEUxYNY6p_2K0jwQezDTJOZTWbiiyxqVRAqZd9DkrlDs81M1iSj6_fpBzWDS4XmJRfuOefC-SF0SklJ8_u-LiljdVE1tCorQniZNKG8bcvtHjr8t9rPM-Gi4IzXB-goxjUhhDWi-YwOKF8ItqjYIfp751_wCziHVQBsVOis30xu8KMKrzhAnKKxSSXrR6zGDqsp-UEl6DBsE4RROdxBb3WwzqnkA45_8hSzMyk7Zpl_hoCTHeAS_8ppLkXcBz_g9Bvw46SdNXhpDMSIrz9y5mvnj8vrb3gVrHJf0KdeuQhfd_8xWv24WV3dFQ8_b--vlg-FqUmzLboFXSitW0OJUIZBozTvBWECRKU514wT1lNqOCWtEbzqTc006LanQnBg9TE6e4_dBP80QUxysNHkbtQIfoqSNw3ljJAsPP1PuPbT3EWUVUVaVnM-p128i0zwMQbo5SbYIbcqKZEzR7mWMyw5w5IzR7njKLfZfLK7MOkBug_rDlz9Bkzlne8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220853665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How well are cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills retained over time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Riegel, Barbara ; Nafziger, Sarah D ; McBurnie, Mary Ann ; Powell, Judy ; Ledingham, Robert ; Sehra, Ruchir ; Mango, LynnMarie ; Henry, Mark C</creator><creatorcontrib>Riegel, Barbara ; Nafziger, Sarah D ; McBurnie, Mary Ann ; Powell, Judy ; Ledingham, Robert ; Sehra, Ruchir ; Mango, LynnMarie ; Henry, Mark C ; PAD Trial Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>The current standard for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) retraining for laypersons is a four-hour course every two years. Others have documented substantial skill deterioration during this time period. To evaluate 1) the retention of core CPR and AED skills among volunteer laypersons and 2) the time required to retrain laypersons to proficiency as a function of time since initial training. This was an observational follow-up study evaluating CPR and AED skill retention and testing/retraining time up through 17 months after initial training. The study took place at 1,260 facilities recruited by 24 North American clinical research centers, and included 6,182 volunteer laypersons participating in the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial. Training to proficiency in either CPR only (N = 2,426) or CPR+AED (N = 3,756) was followed by testing/retraining provided three to 17 months later. Retraining was done in brief, one-on-one, individualized, interactive sessions. The outcome studied was instructors' global assessments of performance of CPR and AED skill adequacy, i.e., whether CPR actions would likely result in perfusion (yes/no) and whether AED actions would result in a shock through the heart (yes/no). For global CPR performance, 79%, 73%, and 71% of volunteers tested for the first time since initial training three to five, six to 11, and 12 to 17 months after initial training, respectively, were judged by their instructors as having adequate performance (p &lt; 0.001, chi-square for linear trend). For global AED performance, 91%, 86%, and 84% of volunteers, respectively, were judged as having adequate performance (p &lt; 0.001). The mean (+/- standard deviation) times required to test and retrain volunteers to proficiency were 5.7 (+/- 4.0) minutes for CPR skills and 7.7 (+/- 4.6) minutes for CPR+AED skills. Among PAD Trial volunteer laypersons participating in a simulated resuscitation, the proportions of volunteers judged by instructors to have adequate CPR and AED skills demonstrated small declines associated with longer intervals between initial training and subsequent testing. However, based on instructors' judgment, large majorities of volunteers still retained both CPR and AED core skills through 17 months after initial training. Furthermore, individual testing and retraining for CPR and AED skills were usually accomplished in less than 10 minutes per volunteer. Additional research is essential to identify training and evaluation techniques that predict adequate CPR and AED skill performance of laypersons when applied to an actual cardiac arrest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-6563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-2712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2006.tb01688.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16495425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - education ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Clinical Competence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Defibrillators - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Educational Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; North America ; Retention (Psychology) ; Time Factors ; Volunteers - education</subject><ispartof>Academic emergency medicine, 2006-03, Vol.13 (3), p.254-263</ispartof><rights>Copyright Hanley &amp; Belfus, Inc. Mar 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307x-d414abb8c109ac5e7ab6f9059e92b66b5605f11c6108c962fc35beb8f1996e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307x-d414abb8c109ac5e7ab6f9059e92b66b5605f11c6108c962fc35beb8f1996e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16495425$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riegel, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nafziger, Sarah D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBurnie, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledingham, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sehra, Ruchir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mango, LynnMarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Mark C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAD Trial Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>How well are cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills retained over time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial</title><title>Academic emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Acad Emerg Med</addtitle><description>The current standard for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) retraining for laypersons is a four-hour course every two years. Others have documented substantial skill deterioration during this time period. To evaluate 1) the retention of core CPR and AED skills among volunteer laypersons and 2) the time required to retrain laypersons to proficiency as a function of time since initial training. This was an observational follow-up study evaluating CPR and AED skill retention and testing/retraining time up through 17 months after initial training. The study took place at 1,260 facilities recruited by 24 North American clinical research centers, and included 6,182 volunteer laypersons participating in the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial. Training to proficiency in either CPR only (N = 2,426) or CPR+AED (N = 3,756) was followed by testing/retraining provided three to 17 months later. Retraining was done in brief, one-on-one, individualized, interactive sessions. The outcome studied was instructors' global assessments of performance of CPR and AED skill adequacy, i.e., whether CPR actions would likely result in perfusion (yes/no) and whether AED actions would result in a shock through the heart (yes/no). For global CPR performance, 79%, 73%, and 71% of volunteers tested for the first time since initial training three to five, six to 11, and 12 to 17 months after initial training, respectively, were judged by their instructors as having adequate performance (p &lt; 0.001, chi-square for linear trend). For global AED performance, 91%, 86%, and 84% of volunteers, respectively, were judged as having adequate performance (p &lt; 0.001). The mean (+/- standard deviation) times required to test and retrain volunteers to proficiency were 5.7 (+/- 4.0) minutes for CPR skills and 7.7 (+/- 4.6) minutes for CPR+AED skills. Among PAD Trial volunteer laypersons participating in a simulated resuscitation, the proportions of volunteers judged by instructors to have adequate CPR and AED skills demonstrated small declines associated with longer intervals between initial training and subsequent testing. However, based on instructors' judgment, large majorities of volunteers still retained both CPR and AED core skills through 17 months after initial training. Furthermore, individual testing and retraining for CPR and AED skills were usually accomplished in less than 10 minutes per volunteer. Additional research is essential to identify training and evaluation techniques that predict adequate CPR and AED skill performance of laypersons when applied to an actual cardiac arrest.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - education</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Defibrillators - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Volunteers - education</subject><issn>1069-6563</issn><issn>1553-2712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9LHDEUxYNY6p_2K0jwQezDTJOZTWbiiyxqVRAqZd9DkrlDs81M1iSj6_fpBzWDS4XmJRfuOefC-SF0SklJ8_u-LiljdVE1tCorQniZNKG8bcvtHjr8t9rPM-Gi4IzXB-goxjUhhDWi-YwOKF8ItqjYIfp751_wCziHVQBsVOis30xu8KMKrzhAnKKxSSXrR6zGDqsp-UEl6DBsE4RROdxBb3WwzqnkA45_8hSzMyk7Zpl_hoCTHeAS_8ppLkXcBz_g9Bvw46SdNXhpDMSIrz9y5mvnj8vrb3gVrHJf0KdeuQhfd_8xWv24WV3dFQ8_b--vlg-FqUmzLboFXSitW0OJUIZBozTvBWECRKU514wT1lNqOCWtEbzqTc006LanQnBg9TE6e4_dBP80QUxysNHkbtQIfoqSNw3ljJAsPP1PuPbT3EWUVUVaVnM-p128i0zwMQbo5SbYIbcqKZEzR7mWMyw5w5IzR7njKLfZfLK7MOkBug_rDlz9Bkzlne8</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Riegel, Barbara</creator><creator>Nafziger, Sarah D</creator><creator>McBurnie, Mary Ann</creator><creator>Powell, Judy</creator><creator>Ledingham, Robert</creator><creator>Sehra, Ruchir</creator><creator>Mango, LynnMarie</creator><creator>Henry, Mark C</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>How well are cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills retained over time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial</title><author>Riegel, Barbara ; Nafziger, Sarah D ; McBurnie, Mary Ann ; Powell, Judy ; Ledingham, Robert ; Sehra, Ruchir ; Mango, LynnMarie ; Henry, Mark C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307x-d414abb8c109ac5e7ab6f9059e92b66b5605f11c6108c962fc35beb8f1996e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - education</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Defibrillators - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Volunteers - education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riegel, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nafziger, Sarah D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBurnie, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledingham, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sehra, Ruchir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mango, LynnMarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Mark C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAD Trial Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riegel, Barbara</au><au>Nafziger, Sarah D</au><au>McBurnie, Mary Ann</au><au>Powell, Judy</au><au>Ledingham, Robert</au><au>Sehra, Ruchir</au><au>Mango, LynnMarie</au><au>Henry, Mark C</au><aucorp>PAD Trial Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How well are cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills retained over time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial</atitle><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>254</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>254-263</pages><issn>1069-6563</issn><eissn>1553-2712</eissn><abstract>The current standard for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) retraining for laypersons is a four-hour course every two years. Others have documented substantial skill deterioration during this time period. To evaluate 1) the retention of core CPR and AED skills among volunteer laypersons and 2) the time required to retrain laypersons to proficiency as a function of time since initial training. This was an observational follow-up study evaluating CPR and AED skill retention and testing/retraining time up through 17 months after initial training. The study took place at 1,260 facilities recruited by 24 North American clinical research centers, and included 6,182 volunteer laypersons participating in the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial. Training to proficiency in either CPR only (N = 2,426) or CPR+AED (N = 3,756) was followed by testing/retraining provided three to 17 months later. Retraining was done in brief, one-on-one, individualized, interactive sessions. The outcome studied was instructors' global assessments of performance of CPR and AED skill adequacy, i.e., whether CPR actions would likely result in perfusion (yes/no) and whether AED actions would result in a shock through the heart (yes/no). For global CPR performance, 79%, 73%, and 71% of volunteers tested for the first time since initial training three to five, six to 11, and 12 to 17 months after initial training, respectively, were judged by their instructors as having adequate performance (p &lt; 0.001, chi-square for linear trend). For global AED performance, 91%, 86%, and 84% of volunteers, respectively, were judged as having adequate performance (p &lt; 0.001). The mean (+/- standard deviation) times required to test and retrain volunteers to proficiency were 5.7 (+/- 4.0) minutes for CPR skills and 7.7 (+/- 4.6) minutes for CPR+AED skills. Among PAD Trial volunteer laypersons participating in a simulated resuscitation, the proportions of volunteers judged by instructors to have adequate CPR and AED skills demonstrated small declines associated with longer intervals between initial training and subsequent testing. However, based on instructors' judgment, large majorities of volunteers still retained both CPR and AED core skills through 17 months after initial training. Furthermore, individual testing and retraining for CPR and AED skills were usually accomplished in less than 10 minutes per volunteer. Additional research is essential to identify training and evaluation techniques that predict adequate CPR and AED skill performance of laypersons when applied to an actual cardiac arrest.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>16495425</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1553-2712.2006.tb01688.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-6563
ispartof Academic emergency medicine, 2006-03, Vol.13 (3), p.254-263
issn 1069-6563
1553-2712
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67716500
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content
subjects Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - education
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - statistics & numerical data
Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data
Defibrillators - statistics & numerical data
Educational Measurement - statistics & numerical data
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
North America
Retention (Psychology)
Time Factors
Volunteers - education
title How well are cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills retained over time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A43%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20well%20are%20cardiopulmonary%20resuscitation%20and%20automated%20external%20defibrillator%20skills%20retained%20over%20time?%20Results%20from%20the%20Public%20Access%20Defibrillation%20(PAD)%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Academic%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Riegel,%20Barbara&rft.aucorp=PAD%20Trial%20Investigators&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=254&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=254-263&rft.issn=1069-6563&rft.eissn=1553-2712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2006.tb01688.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67716500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220853665&rft_id=info:pmid/16495425&rfr_iscdi=true