Are Unequal Clade Priors Problematic for Bayesian Phylogenetics?
Brandley et al believe that Bayesian phylogenetics will remain controversial until the systematics community is convinced that so-called uninformative priors do not influence estimated posterior probability values in unexpected ways. They find that phylogeneticists are just now beginning to explore...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Systematic biology 2006-02, Vol.55 (1), p.138-146 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 146 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 138 |
container_title | Systematic biology |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Brandley, Matthew C. Leaché, Adam D. Warren, Dan L. McGuire, Jimmy A. Lewis, Paul |
description | Brandley et al believe that Bayesian phylogenetics will remain controversial until the systematics community is convinced that so-called uninformative priors do not influence estimated posterior probability values in unexpected ways. They find that phylogeneticists are just now beginning to explore these issues, and that they envision that many studies will be required before the controversy is resolved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10635150500431155 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67710643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20142905</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1080/10635150500431155</oup_id><sourcerecordid>20142905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-95e673fedff748896b2c7f9f21369e9273e8269734fd859d4eadfe24ff458ca53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLJDEUhYOM-P4Bs3AoXLiyNKm8VzPa-ALBXvhiNiFddaPVU11pkyqw_71pqlFwNq5O4HznkHsQ-knwMcEKnxAsKCccc4wZJYTzNbRFsBS5ouLpx_ItaJ4AuYm2Y5xiTIjgZANtJsGSU7yF_pwGyO5beO1tk40aW0E2DrUPMYmfNDCzXV1mzofszC4g1rbNxi-Lxj9DC8mJv3fRurNNhL2V7qD7i_O70VV-c3t5PTq9yUsmRJdrDkJSB5VzkimlxaQopdOuIFRo0IWkoAqhJWWuUlxXDGzloGDOMa5Ky-kOOhx658G_9hA7M6tjCU1jW_B9NELKdC6jCTz4Ak59H9r0N0M0k4phzRJEBqgMPsYAzsxDPbNhYQg2y23Nf9umzK9VcT-ZQfWZWI2ZgKMB8P38W337Az6NnQ8fgQITVmi89PPBr2MHbx--Df_SsVRyc_X014yVYg-6eDQj-g6E5Zch</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194784094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Unequal Clade Priors Problematic for Bayesian Phylogenetics?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Brandley, Matthew C. ; Leaché, Adam D. ; Warren, Dan L. ; McGuire, Jimmy A. ; Lewis, Paul</creator><contributor>Lewis, Paul</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brandley, Matthew C. ; Leaché, Adam D. ; Warren, Dan L. ; McGuire, Jimmy A. ; Lewis, Paul ; Lewis, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Brandley et al believe that Bayesian phylogenetics will remain controversial until the systematics community is convinced that so-called uninformative priors do not influence estimated posterior probability values in unexpected ways. They find that phylogeneticists are just now beginning to explore these issues, and that they envision that many studies will be required before the controversy is resolved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-5157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10635150500431155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16507530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Society of Systematic Zoology</publisher><subject>Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Biology ; Classification - methods ; Computer Simulation ; Data analysis ; Datasets ; Experimental data ; Genetics ; Modeling ; Models, Biological ; Nucleotides ; Organisms ; Parametric models ; Parsimony ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Points of View ; Taxa ; Topology</subject><ispartof>Systematic biology, 2006-02, Vol.55 (1), p.138-146</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Society of Systematic Biologists</rights><rights>2006 Society of Systematic Biologists 2006</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Systematic Biologists Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-95e673fedff748896b2c7f9f21369e9273e8269734fd859d4eadfe24ff458ca53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-95e673fedff748896b2c7f9f21369e9273e8269734fd859d4eadfe24ff458ca53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20142905$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20142905$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16507530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Lewis, Paul</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brandley, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leaché, Adam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Dan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Jimmy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Are Unequal Clade Priors Problematic for Bayesian Phylogenetics?</title><title>Systematic biology</title><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><description>Brandley et al believe that Bayesian phylogenetics will remain controversial until the systematics community is convinced that so-called uninformative priors do not influence estimated posterior probability values in unexpected ways. They find that phylogeneticists are just now beginning to explore these issues, and that they envision that many studies will be required before the controversy is resolved.</description><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Classification - methods</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Experimental data</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nucleotides</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Parsimony</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Points of View</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Topology</subject><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtLJDEUhYOM-P4Bs3AoXLiyNKm8VzPa-ALBXvhiNiFddaPVU11pkyqw_71pqlFwNq5O4HznkHsQ-knwMcEKnxAsKCccc4wZJYTzNbRFsBS5ouLpx_ItaJ4AuYm2Y5xiTIjgZANtJsGSU7yF_pwGyO5beO1tk40aW0E2DrUPMYmfNDCzXV1mzofszC4g1rbNxi-Lxj9DC8mJv3fRurNNhL2V7qD7i_O70VV-c3t5PTq9yUsmRJdrDkJSB5VzkimlxaQopdOuIFRo0IWkoAqhJWWuUlxXDGzloGDOMa5Ky-kOOhx658G_9hA7M6tjCU1jW_B9NELKdC6jCTz4Ak59H9r0N0M0k4phzRJEBqgMPsYAzsxDPbNhYQg2y23Nf9umzK9VcT-ZQfWZWI2ZgKMB8P38W337Az6NnQ8fgQITVmi89PPBr2MHbx--Df_SsVRyc_X014yVYg-6eDQj-g6E5Zch</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Brandley, Matthew C.</creator><creator>Leaché, Adam D.</creator><creator>Warren, Dan L.</creator><creator>McGuire, Jimmy A.</creator><creator>Lewis, Paul</creator><general>Society of Systematic Zoology</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>Are Unequal Clade Priors Problematic for Bayesian Phylogenetics?</title><author>Brandley, Matthew C. ; Leaché, Adam D. ; Warren, Dan L. ; McGuire, Jimmy A. ; Lewis, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-95e673fedff748896b2c7f9f21369e9273e8269734fd859d4eadfe24ff458ca53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Classification - methods</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Experimental data</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nucleotides</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Parsimony</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Points of View</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Topology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brandley, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leaché, Adam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Dan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Jimmy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brandley, Matthew C.</au><au>Leaché, Adam D.</au><au>Warren, Dan L.</au><au>McGuire, Jimmy A.</au><au>Lewis, Paul</au><au>Lewis, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Unequal Clade Priors Problematic for Bayesian Phylogenetics?</atitle><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>138-146</pages><issn>1063-5157</issn><eissn>1076-836X</eissn><abstract>Brandley et al believe that Bayesian phylogenetics will remain controversial until the systematics community is convinced that so-called uninformative priors do not influence estimated posterior probability values in unexpected ways. They find that phylogeneticists are just now beginning to explore these issues, and that they envision that many studies will be required before the controversy is resolved.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Society of Systematic Zoology</pub><pmid>16507530</pmid><doi>10.1080/10635150500431155</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1063-5157 |
ispartof | Systematic biology, 2006-02, Vol.55 (1), p.138-146 |
issn | 1063-5157 1076-836X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67710643 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Biology Classification - methods Computer Simulation Data analysis Datasets Experimental data Genetics Modeling Models, Biological Nucleotides Organisms Parametric models Parsimony Phylogenetics Phylogeny Points of View Taxa Topology |
title | Are Unequal Clade Priors Problematic for Bayesian Phylogenetics? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A41%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Unequal%20Clade%20Priors%20Problematic%20for%20Bayesian%20Phylogenetics?&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20biology&rft.au=Brandley,%20Matthew%20C.&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=138-146&rft.issn=1063-5157&rft.eissn=1076-836X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10635150500431155&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20142905%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194784094&rft_id=info:pmid/16507530&rft_jstor_id=20142905&rft_oup_id=10.1080/10635150500431155&rfr_iscdi=true |