Does vitreoretinal surgery under local anaesthesia result in missed fellow eye pathology?
Purpose There has been a significant increase in the number of vitreoretinal procedures being performed under local anaesthesia over the past few years. This trend is expected to continue. This study was performed to investigate whether by undertaking retinal detachment surgery under local anaesthes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Eye (London) 2005-04, Vol.19 (4), p.371-374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 374 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 371 |
container_title | Eye (London) |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Banerjee, S Tyagi, A K Cottrell, D G Stannard, K P |
description | Purpose
There has been a significant increase in the number of vitreoretinal procedures being performed under local anaesthesia over the past few years. This trend is expected to continue. This study was performed to investigate whether by undertaking retinal detachment surgery under local anaesthesia fellow eye examination was compromised.
Design
This was a prospective, consecutive, blind, observational study.
Methods: Setting
This study was performed at a tertiary referral vitreoretinal unit in a teaching hospital.
Study population
In all, 108 consecutive patients undergoing retinal detachment surgery under general anaesthesia were included.
Observation procedures
Patients were examined independently by different retinal surgeons pre- and intraoperatively.
Main outcome measures
The findings of the two examiners were compared and differences were analysed.
Results
There were 108 patients in this study, 57 of these were males and 51 females. The mean age was 59.01 years (range 16–91). Of these 108 eyes, 48/108 (49.08%) the preoperative examination was regarded as unsatisfactory by the examiner. Over 34% of eyes had fellow eye pathology when examined preoperatively but there were nine (8.33%) eyes in which additional lesions were found intraoperatively.
Conclusion
General anaesthesia should be considered for patients in whom preoperative fellow eye examination is unsatisfactory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sj.eye.6701523 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67703839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67703839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cbb16199cc8c2184e1dba4ea8d7ec17bd8746e022129121bb59b660a506565b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1r3DAQxUVJaTZpr701iBxy80YjWbJ9CiVfDQR6SaE9CUmeTbx4rY3Gbtn_Pgq7aSCQk0DzmzfvPca-gpiDUPUpLee4wbmpBGipPrAZlJUpdKnLPTYTjRaFlPL3PjsgWgqRh5X4xPZBKyUBYMb-XEQk_rcbE8aEYze4ntOU7jFt-DS0mHgfQ_5zg0MaH5A6xxPS1I-8G_iqI8KWL7Dv4z-ejfC1Gx9iH-83Z5_Zx4XrCb_s3kP26-ry7vxHcfvz-ub8-20RSinHIngPBpomhDpIqEuE1rsSXd1WGKDybV2VBoWUIBuQ4L1uvDHCaWG00V6rQ3ay1V2n-Dhlkza7CtmRGzBOZE2OrGrVZPD4DbiMU8qByebDqhFSqQzNt1BIkSjhwq5Tt3JpY0HY58YtLW0OaneN54WjnerkV9i-4ruKM3C6BSiPhlzs69l3Jb9tNwY3Tgn_S77MnwD1oZcB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218390233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does vitreoretinal surgery under local anaesthesia result in missed fellow eye pathology?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Banerjee, S ; Tyagi, A K ; Cottrell, D G ; Stannard, K P</creator><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, S ; Tyagi, A K ; Cottrell, D G ; Stannard, K P</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
There has been a significant increase in the number of vitreoretinal procedures being performed under local anaesthesia over the past few years. This trend is expected to continue. This study was performed to investigate whether by undertaking retinal detachment surgery under local anaesthesia fellow eye examination was compromised.
Design
This was a prospective, consecutive, blind, observational study.
Methods: Setting
This study was performed at a tertiary referral vitreoretinal unit in a teaching hospital.
Study population
In all, 108 consecutive patients undergoing retinal detachment surgery under general anaesthesia were included.
Observation procedures
Patients were examined independently by different retinal surgeons pre- and intraoperatively.
Main outcome measures
The findings of the two examiners were compared and differences were analysed.
Results
There were 108 patients in this study, 57 of these were males and 51 females. The mean age was 59.01 years (range 16–91). Of these 108 eyes, 48/108 (49.08%) the preoperative examination was regarded as unsatisfactory by the examiner. Over 34% of eyes had fellow eye pathology when examined preoperatively but there were nine (8.33%) eyes in which additional lesions were found intraoperatively.
Conclusion
General anaesthesia should be considered for patients in whom preoperative fellow eye examination is unsatisfactory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-222X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701523</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15332111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthesia, Local ; clinical-study ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; Intraoperative Care - methods ; Laboratory Medicine ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Ophthalmology ; Ophthalmoscopy ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; Retinal Detachment - pathology ; Retinal Detachment - prevention & control ; Retinal Detachment - surgery ; Retinal Diseases - diagnosis ; Retinal Perforations - diagnosis ; Single-Blind Method ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Eye (London), 2005-04, Vol.19 (4), p.371-374</ispartof><rights>Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cbb16199cc8c2184e1dba4ea8d7ec17bd8746e022129121bb59b660a506565b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cbb16199cc8c2184e1dba4ea8d7ec17bd8746e022129121bb59b660a506565b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15332111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyagi, A K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cottrell, D G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stannard, K P</creatorcontrib><title>Does vitreoretinal surgery under local anaesthesia result in missed fellow eye pathology?</title><title>Eye (London)</title><addtitle>Eye</addtitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><description>Purpose
There has been a significant increase in the number of vitreoretinal procedures being performed under local anaesthesia over the past few years. This trend is expected to continue. This study was performed to investigate whether by undertaking retinal detachment surgery under local anaesthesia fellow eye examination was compromised.
Design
This was a prospective, consecutive, blind, observational study.
Methods: Setting
This study was performed at a tertiary referral vitreoretinal unit in a teaching hospital.
Study population
In all, 108 consecutive patients undergoing retinal detachment surgery under general anaesthesia were included.
Observation procedures
Patients were examined independently by different retinal surgeons pre- and intraoperatively.
Main outcome measures
The findings of the two examiners were compared and differences were analysed.
Results
There were 108 patients in this study, 57 of these were males and 51 females. The mean age was 59.01 years (range 16–91). Of these 108 eyes, 48/108 (49.08%) the preoperative examination was regarded as unsatisfactory by the examiner. Over 34% of eyes had fellow eye pathology when examined preoperatively but there were nine (8.33%) eyes in which additional lesions were found intraoperatively.
Conclusion
General anaesthesia should be considered for patients in whom preoperative fellow eye examination is unsatisfactory.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Local</subject><subject>clinical-study</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Ophthalmoscopy</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - pathology</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - prevention & control</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - surgery</subject><subject>Retinal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Retinal Perforations - diagnosis</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1r3DAQxUVJaTZpr701iBxy80YjWbJ9CiVfDQR6SaE9CUmeTbx4rY3Gbtn_Pgq7aSCQk0DzmzfvPca-gpiDUPUpLee4wbmpBGipPrAZlJUpdKnLPTYTjRaFlPL3PjsgWgqRh5X4xPZBKyUBYMb-XEQk_rcbE8aEYze4ntOU7jFt-DS0mHgfQ_5zg0MaH5A6xxPS1I-8G_iqI8KWL7Dv4z-ejfC1Gx9iH-83Z5_Zx4XrCb_s3kP26-ry7vxHcfvz-ub8-20RSinHIngPBpomhDpIqEuE1rsSXd1WGKDybV2VBoWUIBuQ4L1uvDHCaWG00V6rQ3ay1V2n-Dhlkza7CtmRGzBOZE2OrGrVZPD4DbiMU8qByebDqhFSqQzNt1BIkSjhwq5Tt3JpY0HY58YtLW0OaneN54WjnerkV9i-4ruKM3C6BSiPhlzs69l3Jb9tNwY3Tgn_S77MnwD1oZcB</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Banerjee, S</creator><creator>Tyagi, A K</creator><creator>Cottrell, D G</creator><creator>Stannard, K P</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Does vitreoretinal surgery under local anaesthesia result in missed fellow eye pathology?</title><author>Banerjee, S ; Tyagi, A K ; Cottrell, D G ; Stannard, K P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cbb16199cc8c2184e1dba4ea8d7ec17bd8746e022129121bb59b660a506565b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Local</topic><topic>clinical-study</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Ophthalmoscopy</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - pathology</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - prevention & control</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - surgery</topic><topic>Retinal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Retinal Perforations - diagnosis</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyagi, A K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cottrell, D G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stannard, K P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Banerjee, S</au><au>Tyagi, A K</au><au>Cottrell, D G</au><au>Stannard, K P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does vitreoretinal surgery under local anaesthesia result in missed fellow eye pathology?</atitle><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle><stitle>Eye</stitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>371-374</pages><issn>0950-222X</issn><eissn>1476-5454</eissn><abstract>Purpose
There has been a significant increase in the number of vitreoretinal procedures being performed under local anaesthesia over the past few years. This trend is expected to continue. This study was performed to investigate whether by undertaking retinal detachment surgery under local anaesthesia fellow eye examination was compromised.
Design
This was a prospective, consecutive, blind, observational study.
Methods: Setting
This study was performed at a tertiary referral vitreoretinal unit in a teaching hospital.
Study population
In all, 108 consecutive patients undergoing retinal detachment surgery under general anaesthesia were included.
Observation procedures
Patients were examined independently by different retinal surgeons pre- and intraoperatively.
Main outcome measures
The findings of the two examiners were compared and differences were analysed.
Results
There were 108 patients in this study, 57 of these were males and 51 females. The mean age was 59.01 years (range 16–91). Of these 108 eyes, 48/108 (49.08%) the preoperative examination was regarded as unsatisfactory by the examiner. Over 34% of eyes had fellow eye pathology when examined preoperatively but there were nine (8.33%) eyes in which additional lesions were found intraoperatively.
Conclusion
General anaesthesia should be considered for patients in whom preoperative fellow eye examination is unsatisfactory.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>15332111</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.eye.6701523</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-222X |
ispartof | Eye (London), 2005-04, Vol.19 (4), p.371-374 |
issn | 0950-222X 1476-5454 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67703839 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthesia, General Anesthesia, Local clinical-study False Negative Reactions Female Humans Intraoperative Care - methods Laboratory Medicine Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Observer Variation Ophthalmology Ophthalmoscopy Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology Preoperative Care Prospective Studies Retinal Detachment - pathology Retinal Detachment - prevention & control Retinal Detachment - surgery Retinal Diseases - diagnosis Retinal Perforations - diagnosis Single-Blind Method Surgery Surgical Oncology |
title | Does vitreoretinal surgery under local anaesthesia result in missed fellow eye pathology? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A06%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20vitreoretinal%20surgery%20under%20local%20anaesthesia%20result%20in%20missed%20fellow%20eye%20pathology?&rft.jtitle=Eye%20(London)&rft.au=Banerjee,%20S&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=371-374&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.eye.6701523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67703839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218390233&rft_id=info:pmid/15332111&rfr_iscdi=true |