Ethnic differences in stage of presentation of adults newly diagnosed with HIV‐1 infection in south London

Objectives To establish whether there were ethnic differences in demographic characteristics, the stage at HIV diagnosis and reasons for and location of HIV testing between 1998 and 2000 in a large ethnically diverse HIV‐1‐infected clinic population in south London in the era of highly active antire...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HIV medicine 2005-03, Vol.6 (2), p.59-65
Hauptverfasser: Boyd, AE, Murad, S, O'Shea, S, De Ruiter, A, Watson, C, Easterbrook, PJ
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 2
container_start_page 59
container_title HIV medicine
container_volume 6
creator Boyd, AE
Murad, S
O'Shea, S
De Ruiter, A
Watson, C
Easterbrook, PJ
description Objectives To establish whether there were ethnic differences in demographic characteristics, the stage at HIV diagnosis and reasons for and location of HIV testing between 1998 and 2000 in a large ethnically diverse HIV‐1‐infected clinic population in south London in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Methods A retrospective review was carried out of all persons >18 years old attending King's College Hospital with a first positive HIV‐1 test between 1 January 1998 and 31 October 2000, and of a random sample of patients attending St Thomas' hospital with a first positive HIV‐1 test in the same period. Demographic data, details of reasons for and site of HIV test, clinical stage, CD4 lymphocyte count and HIV‐1 viral load at HIV diagnosis were ed from the local database and medical records. Comparisons were made according to ethnic group (white, black African and black Caribbean) and over time (1998, 1999 and 2000). Results Of the 494 patients with new HIV‐1 diagnoses between January 1998 and December 2000, 179 (36.2%) were white, 270 (54.7%) were black African and 45 (9.1%) were black Caribbean. There were significant differences across the ethnic groups in HIV risk group, reasons for and site of HIV testing, and clinical and CD4 stage at diagnosis. Among whites, 72.6% were men who had sex with men, 3.4% injecting drug users and 21.2% heterosexuals, compared to 2.2%, 0.4% and 93.3% among black Africans, and 28.9%, 0% and 68.9% among black Caribbeans (P
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2005.00267.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67703127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67703127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4477-5466eeec6d4e1902809a0ac21d0c3104e577560ca6632b231f6635d598613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUctq5DAQFCFLXru_EHTKzU63bEs25BJCXjCwLCx7FYrcTjx4pIllM5lbPiHfmC-JPDMkx2xfukRXlaCKMY6QYpzzeYq5LBMUVZYKgCIFEFKlL3vs6POwv8F5IqQUh-w4hDkAqqyCA3aIRQlKIR6x7np4cq3ldds01JOzFHjreBjMI3Hf8GVPgdxghta76W3qsRsCd7Tq1lFkHp0PVPNVOzzxu_t_769vGPUN2Y1gcvJjPM28q737yX40pgv0a7dP2J-b679Xd8ns9-391eUssXmuVFLkUhKRlXVOWIEooTJgrMAabIaQU6FUIcEaKTPxIDJsIijqoiolZifsbOu57P3zSGHQizZY6jrjyI9BS6UgQ6G-JaIqEaGASCy3RNv7EHpq9LJvF6ZfawQ91aHnekpdT6nrqQ69qUO_ROnp7o_xYUH1l3CXfyRcbAmrtqP1fxvrGHUE2QeZZJkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17811050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethnic differences in stage of presentation of adults newly diagnosed with HIV‐1 infection in south London</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Boyd, AE ; Murad, S ; O'Shea, S ; De Ruiter, A ; Watson, C ; Easterbrook, PJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyd, AE ; Murad, S ; O'Shea, S ; De Ruiter, A ; Watson, C ; Easterbrook, PJ</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To establish whether there were ethnic differences in demographic characteristics, the stage at HIV diagnosis and reasons for and location of HIV testing between 1998 and 2000 in a large ethnically diverse HIV‐1‐infected clinic population in south London in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Methods A retrospective review was carried out of all persons &gt;18 years old attending King's College Hospital with a first positive HIV‐1 test between 1 January 1998 and 31 October 2000, and of a random sample of patients attending St Thomas' hospital with a first positive HIV‐1 test in the same period. Demographic data, details of reasons for and site of HIV test, clinical stage, CD4 lymphocyte count and HIV‐1 viral load at HIV diagnosis were ed from the local database and medical records. Comparisons were made according to ethnic group (white, black African and black Caribbean) and over time (1998, 1999 and 2000). Results Of the 494 patients with new HIV‐1 diagnoses between January 1998 and December 2000, 179 (36.2%) were white, 270 (54.7%) were black African and 45 (9.1%) were black Caribbean. There were significant differences across the ethnic groups in HIV risk group, reasons for and site of HIV testing, and clinical and CD4 stage at diagnosis. Among whites, 72.6% were men who had sex with men, 3.4% injecting drug users and 21.2% heterosexuals, compared to 2.2%, 0.4% and 93.3% among black Africans, and 28.9%, 0% and 68.9% among black Caribbeans (P&lt;0.001). Black Africans were more likely to present with an AIDS diagnosis (21.3%) and a lower CD4 cell count [223 cells/μL; interquartile range (IQR) 88–348] compared to both whites (9.9%; 358 cells/μL; IQR 151–508) and black Caribbeans (17.9%; 294 cells/μL; IQR 113–380), who were intermediate between whites and black Africans in their stage of presentation. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend with time, between 1998 and 2000, towards earlier diagnosis based on the CD4 cell count in whites (323 and 403 cells/μL) and black Caribbeans (232 and 333 cells/μL), but a later diagnosis in black Africans (233 and 175 cells/μL). The majority of black Africans were HIV‐tested as a result of suggestive symptoms or antenatal screening (58.4%) rather than because of perceived risk (40.5%), in contrast to the situation in whites (24.1% vs. 71.7%, respectively) or black Caribbeans (34.5% vs. 65.5%, respectively) (P&lt;0.001). We found no significant differences across ethnic groups in age, HIV‐1 viral load or year of HIV diagnosis. Conclusions Black Africans continue to present with more advanced HIV disease than whites or black Caribbeans, with no evidence of any trend towards earlier diagnosis. Future educational campaigns designed to promote the uptake of HIV testing among black Africans and black Caribbeans will need to address the multiple barriers to testing, including misperception of risk, stigma and ready access to testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-2662</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-1293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2005.00267.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15807711</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Africa ; African Continental Ancestry Group ; AIDS Serodiagnosis ; Caribbean ; Caribbean Region ; CD4 Lymphocyte Count ; Ethnic Groups ; ethnicity ; European Continental Ancestry Group ; Female ; HIV infection ; HIV Seropositivity - diagnosis ; HIV Seropositivity - ethnology ; HIV Seropositivity - immunology ; HIV-1 ; Homosexuality, Male ; Human immunodeficiency virus 1 ; Humans ; London ; Male ; Nigeria - ethnology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk-Taking ; Uganda - ethnology ; Viral Load ; Zambia - ethnology ; Zimbabwe - ethnology</subject><ispartof>HIV medicine, 2005-03, Vol.6 (2), p.59-65</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4477-5466eeec6d4e1902809a0ac21d0c3104e577560ca6632b231f6635d598613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4477-5466eeec6d4e1902809a0ac21d0c3104e577560ca6632b231f6635d598613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1468-1293.2005.00267.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1468-1293.2005.00267.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15807711$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyd, AE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murad, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Shea, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Ruiter, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easterbrook, PJ</creatorcontrib><title>Ethnic differences in stage of presentation of adults newly diagnosed with HIV‐1 infection in south London</title><title>HIV medicine</title><addtitle>HIV Med</addtitle><description>Objectives To establish whether there were ethnic differences in demographic characteristics, the stage at HIV diagnosis and reasons for and location of HIV testing between 1998 and 2000 in a large ethnically diverse HIV‐1‐infected clinic population in south London in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Methods A retrospective review was carried out of all persons &gt;18 years old attending King's College Hospital with a first positive HIV‐1 test between 1 January 1998 and 31 October 2000, and of a random sample of patients attending St Thomas' hospital with a first positive HIV‐1 test in the same period. Demographic data, details of reasons for and site of HIV test, clinical stage, CD4 lymphocyte count and HIV‐1 viral load at HIV diagnosis were ed from the local database and medical records. Comparisons were made according to ethnic group (white, black African and black Caribbean) and over time (1998, 1999 and 2000). Results Of the 494 patients with new HIV‐1 diagnoses between January 1998 and December 2000, 179 (36.2%) were white, 270 (54.7%) were black African and 45 (9.1%) were black Caribbean. There were significant differences across the ethnic groups in HIV risk group, reasons for and site of HIV testing, and clinical and CD4 stage at diagnosis. Among whites, 72.6% were men who had sex with men, 3.4% injecting drug users and 21.2% heterosexuals, compared to 2.2%, 0.4% and 93.3% among black Africans, and 28.9%, 0% and 68.9% among black Caribbeans (P&lt;0.001). Black Africans were more likely to present with an AIDS diagnosis (21.3%) and a lower CD4 cell count [223 cells/μL; interquartile range (IQR) 88–348] compared to both whites (9.9%; 358 cells/μL; IQR 151–508) and black Caribbeans (17.9%; 294 cells/μL; IQR 113–380), who were intermediate between whites and black Africans in their stage of presentation. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend with time, between 1998 and 2000, towards earlier diagnosis based on the CD4 cell count in whites (323 and 403 cells/μL) and black Caribbeans (232 and 333 cells/μL), but a later diagnosis in black Africans (233 and 175 cells/μL). The majority of black Africans were HIV‐tested as a result of suggestive symptoms or antenatal screening (58.4%) rather than because of perceived risk (40.5%), in contrast to the situation in whites (24.1% vs. 71.7%, respectively) or black Caribbeans (34.5% vs. 65.5%, respectively) (P&lt;0.001). We found no significant differences across ethnic groups in age, HIV‐1 viral load or year of HIV diagnosis. Conclusions Black Africans continue to present with more advanced HIV disease than whites or black Caribbeans, with no evidence of any trend towards earlier diagnosis. Future educational campaigns designed to promote the uptake of HIV testing among black Africans and black Caribbeans will need to address the multiple barriers to testing, including misperception of risk, stigma and ready access to testing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Africa</subject><subject>African Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>AIDS Serodiagnosis</subject><subject>Caribbean</subject><subject>Caribbean Region</subject><subject>CD4 Lymphocyte Count</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>ethnicity</subject><subject>European Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>HIV infection</subject><subject>HIV Seropositivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>HIV Seropositivity - ethnology</subject><subject>HIV Seropositivity - immunology</subject><subject>HIV-1</subject><subject>Homosexuality, Male</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus 1</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nigeria - ethnology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Uganda - ethnology</subject><subject>Viral Load</subject><subject>Zambia - ethnology</subject><subject>Zimbabwe - ethnology</subject><issn>1464-2662</issn><issn>1468-1293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUctq5DAQFCFLXru_EHTKzU63bEs25BJCXjCwLCx7FYrcTjx4pIllM5lbPiHfmC-JPDMkx2xfukRXlaCKMY6QYpzzeYq5LBMUVZYKgCIFEFKlL3vs6POwv8F5IqQUh-w4hDkAqqyCA3aIRQlKIR6x7np4cq3ldds01JOzFHjreBjMI3Hf8GVPgdxghta76W3qsRsCd7Tq1lFkHp0PVPNVOzzxu_t_769vGPUN2Y1gcvJjPM28q737yX40pgv0a7dP2J-b679Xd8ns9-391eUssXmuVFLkUhKRlXVOWIEooTJgrMAabIaQU6FUIcEaKTPxIDJsIijqoiolZifsbOu57P3zSGHQizZY6jrjyI9BS6UgQ6G-JaIqEaGASCy3RNv7EHpq9LJvF6ZfawQ91aHnekpdT6nrqQ69qUO_ROnp7o_xYUH1l3CXfyRcbAmrtqP1fxvrGHUE2QeZZJkQ</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Boyd, AE</creator><creator>Murad, S</creator><creator>O'Shea, S</creator><creator>De Ruiter, A</creator><creator>Watson, C</creator><creator>Easterbrook, PJ</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Ethnic differences in stage of presentation of adults newly diagnosed with HIV‐1 infection in south London</title><author>Boyd, AE ; Murad, S ; O'Shea, S ; De Ruiter, A ; Watson, C ; Easterbrook, PJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4477-5466eeec6d4e1902809a0ac21d0c3104e577560ca6632b231f6635d598613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Africa</topic><topic>African Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>AIDS Serodiagnosis</topic><topic>Caribbean</topic><topic>Caribbean Region</topic><topic>CD4 Lymphocyte Count</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>ethnicity</topic><topic>European Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>HIV infection</topic><topic>HIV Seropositivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>HIV Seropositivity - ethnology</topic><topic>HIV Seropositivity - immunology</topic><topic>HIV-1</topic><topic>Homosexuality, Male</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus 1</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nigeria - ethnology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Uganda - ethnology</topic><topic>Viral Load</topic><topic>Zambia - ethnology</topic><topic>Zimbabwe - ethnology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyd, AE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murad, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Shea, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Ruiter, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easterbrook, PJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>HIV medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyd, AE</au><au>Murad, S</au><au>O'Shea, S</au><au>De Ruiter, A</au><au>Watson, C</au><au>Easterbrook, PJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethnic differences in stage of presentation of adults newly diagnosed with HIV‐1 infection in south London</atitle><jtitle>HIV medicine</jtitle><addtitle>HIV Med</addtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>59-65</pages><issn>1464-2662</issn><eissn>1468-1293</eissn><abstract>Objectives To establish whether there were ethnic differences in demographic characteristics, the stage at HIV diagnosis and reasons for and location of HIV testing between 1998 and 2000 in a large ethnically diverse HIV‐1‐infected clinic population in south London in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Methods A retrospective review was carried out of all persons &gt;18 years old attending King's College Hospital with a first positive HIV‐1 test between 1 January 1998 and 31 October 2000, and of a random sample of patients attending St Thomas' hospital with a first positive HIV‐1 test in the same period. Demographic data, details of reasons for and site of HIV test, clinical stage, CD4 lymphocyte count and HIV‐1 viral load at HIV diagnosis were ed from the local database and medical records. Comparisons were made according to ethnic group (white, black African and black Caribbean) and over time (1998, 1999 and 2000). Results Of the 494 patients with new HIV‐1 diagnoses between January 1998 and December 2000, 179 (36.2%) were white, 270 (54.7%) were black African and 45 (9.1%) were black Caribbean. There were significant differences across the ethnic groups in HIV risk group, reasons for and site of HIV testing, and clinical and CD4 stage at diagnosis. Among whites, 72.6% were men who had sex with men, 3.4% injecting drug users and 21.2% heterosexuals, compared to 2.2%, 0.4% and 93.3% among black Africans, and 28.9%, 0% and 68.9% among black Caribbeans (P&lt;0.001). Black Africans were more likely to present with an AIDS diagnosis (21.3%) and a lower CD4 cell count [223 cells/μL; interquartile range (IQR) 88–348] compared to both whites (9.9%; 358 cells/μL; IQR 151–508) and black Caribbeans (17.9%; 294 cells/μL; IQR 113–380), who were intermediate between whites and black Africans in their stage of presentation. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend with time, between 1998 and 2000, towards earlier diagnosis based on the CD4 cell count in whites (323 and 403 cells/μL) and black Caribbeans (232 and 333 cells/μL), but a later diagnosis in black Africans (233 and 175 cells/μL). The majority of black Africans were HIV‐tested as a result of suggestive symptoms or antenatal screening (58.4%) rather than because of perceived risk (40.5%), in contrast to the situation in whites (24.1% vs. 71.7%, respectively) or black Caribbeans (34.5% vs. 65.5%, respectively) (P&lt;0.001). We found no significant differences across ethnic groups in age, HIV‐1 viral load or year of HIV diagnosis. Conclusions Black Africans continue to present with more advanced HIV disease than whites or black Caribbeans, with no evidence of any trend towards earlier diagnosis. Future educational campaigns designed to promote the uptake of HIV testing among black Africans and black Caribbeans will need to address the multiple barriers to testing, including misperception of risk, stigma and ready access to testing.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>15807711</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1468-1293.2005.00267.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-2662
ispartof HIV medicine, 2005-03, Vol.6 (2), p.59-65
issn 1464-2662
1468-1293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67703127
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Africa
African Continental Ancestry Group
AIDS Serodiagnosis
Caribbean
Caribbean Region
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
Ethnic Groups
ethnicity
European Continental Ancestry Group
Female
HIV infection
HIV Seropositivity - diagnosis
HIV Seropositivity - ethnology
HIV Seropositivity - immunology
HIV-1
Homosexuality, Male
Human immunodeficiency virus 1
Humans
London
Male
Nigeria - ethnology
Retrospective Studies
Risk-Taking
Uganda - ethnology
Viral Load
Zambia - ethnology
Zimbabwe - ethnology
title Ethnic differences in stage of presentation of adults newly diagnosed with HIV‐1 infection in south London
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A46%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethnic%20differences%20in%20stage%20of%20presentation%20of%20adults%20newly%20diagnosed%20with%20HIV%E2%80%901%20infection%20in%20south%20London&rft.jtitle=HIV%20medicine&rft.au=Boyd,%20AE&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=59-65&rft.issn=1464-2662&rft.eissn=1468-1293&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2005.00267.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67703127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17811050&rft_id=info:pmid/15807711&rfr_iscdi=true