Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity analysis of WT1-wild-type and WT1-mutant Wilms tumors

Wilms tumor (WT) is genetically heterogeneous, and the one known WT gene, WT1 at 11p13, is altered in only a subset of WTs. Previous loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses have revealed the existence of additional putative WT genes at 11p15, 16q, and 1p, but these analyses examined only one or a hand...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genes chromosomes & cancer 2005-06, Vol.43 (2), p.172-180
Hauptverfasser: Ruteshouser, E. Cristy, Hendrickson, Brett W., Colella, Stefano, Krahe, Ralf, Pinto, Lancelot, Huff, Vicki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 180
container_issue 2
container_start_page 172
container_title Genes chromosomes & cancer
container_volume 43
creator Ruteshouser, E. Cristy
Hendrickson, Brett W.
Colella, Stefano
Krahe, Ralf
Pinto, Lancelot
Huff, Vicki
description Wilms tumor (WT) is genetically heterogeneous, and the one known WT gene, WT1 at 11p13, is altered in only a subset of WTs. Previous loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses have revealed the existence of additional putative WT genes at 11p15, 16q, and 1p, but these analyses examined only one or a handful of chromosomes or looked at LOH at only a few markers per chromosome. We conducted a genome‐wide scan for LOH in WT by using 420 markers spaced at an average of 10 cM throughout the genome and analyzed the data for two genetically defined subsets of WTs: those with mutations in WT1 and those with no detectable WT1 alteration. Our findings indicated that the incidence of LOH throughout the genome was significantly lower in our group of WTs with WT1 mutations. In WT1–wild‐type tumors, we observed the expected LOH at 11p, 16q, and 1p, and, in addition, we localized a previously unobserved region of LOH at 9q. Using additional 9q markers within this region of interest, we sublocalized the region of 9q LOH to the 12.2 Mb between D9S283 and a simple tandem repeat in BAC RP11‐177I8, a region containing several potential tumor‐suppressor genes. As a result, we have established for the first time that WT1‐mutant and WT1–wild‐type WTs differ significantly in their patterns of LOH throughout the genome, suggesting that the genomic regions showing LOH in WT1–wild‐type tumors harbor genes whose expression is regulated by the pleiotropic effects of WT1. Our results implicate 9q22.2–q31.1 as a region containing such a gene. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/gcc.20169
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67701967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67701967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3079-34034fee6e4aa8fc4b57bf9a9f9e0e84c7fea3a5f6fdaeddfd95a3f4f636ec183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMofh_8A9KT4KGaNF_NUYpbBV0vSr2FbDtZq-12bVq0_nrjdtWTyBxmyDzzQh6Ejgg-IxhH5_M8P4swEWoD7RKs4jCKBNv8mhn3M5c7aM-5Z4yxoIpvox3CpSCxELvoMYVFU0P4VhYQVI1zQWODJ-igbT6GeePKbgjMwlSDK1er7J54tirCbliC3xSrl7rvzKILsrKqXdD1ddO6A7RlTeXgcN330cPk8j65Cm_u0uvk4ibMKZYqpAxTZgEEMGNim7MZlzOrjLIKMMQslxYMNdwKWxgoClsobqhlVlABOYnpPjoZc5dt89qD63Rduhyqyiyg6Z0WUmKihPwXJJLz2JcHT0cwb72PFqxetmVt2kETrL98a-9br3x79ngd2s9qKH7JtWAPnI-AlwbD30k6TZLvyHC8KF0H7z8Xpn3xf6GS62ya6uh2epuwKNMT-gliepox</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17558585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity analysis of WT1-wild-type and WT1-mutant Wilms tumors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ruteshouser, E. Cristy ; Hendrickson, Brett W. ; Colella, Stefano ; Krahe, Ralf ; Pinto, Lancelot ; Huff, Vicki</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruteshouser, E. Cristy ; Hendrickson, Brett W. ; Colella, Stefano ; Krahe, Ralf ; Pinto, Lancelot ; Huff, Vicki</creatorcontrib><description>Wilms tumor (WT) is genetically heterogeneous, and the one known WT gene, WT1 at 11p13, is altered in only a subset of WTs. Previous loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses have revealed the existence of additional putative WT genes at 11p15, 16q, and 1p, but these analyses examined only one or a handful of chromosomes or looked at LOH at only a few markers per chromosome. We conducted a genome‐wide scan for LOH in WT by using 420 markers spaced at an average of 10 cM throughout the genome and analyzed the data for two genetically defined subsets of WTs: those with mutations in WT1 and those with no detectable WT1 alteration. Our findings indicated that the incidence of LOH throughout the genome was significantly lower in our group of WTs with WT1 mutations. In WT1–wild‐type tumors, we observed the expected LOH at 11p, 16q, and 1p, and, in addition, we localized a previously unobserved region of LOH at 9q. Using additional 9q markers within this region of interest, we sublocalized the region of 9q LOH to the 12.2 Mb between D9S283 and a simple tandem repeat in BAC RP11‐177I8, a region containing several potential tumor‐suppressor genes. As a result, we have established for the first time that WT1‐mutant and WT1–wild‐type WTs differ significantly in their patterns of LOH throughout the genome, suggesting that the genomic regions showing LOH in WT1–wild‐type tumors harbor genes whose expression is regulated by the pleiotropic effects of WT1. Our results implicate 9q22.2–q31.1 as a region containing such a gene. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2264</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15761866</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Child ; Child, Preschool ; Genes, Wilms Tumor ; Genome ; Humans ; Infant ; Loss of Heterozygosity ; Microsatellite Repeats - genetics ; Mutation ; Wilms Tumor - genetics</subject><ispartof>Genes chromosomes &amp; cancer, 2005-06, Vol.43 (2), p.172-180</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3079-34034fee6e4aa8fc4b57bf9a9f9e0e84c7fea3a5f6fdaeddfd95a3f4f636ec183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3079-34034fee6e4aa8fc4b57bf9a9f9e0e84c7fea3a5f6fdaeddfd95a3f4f636ec183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fgcc.20169$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fgcc.20169$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15761866$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruteshouser, E. Cristy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, Brett W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colella, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krahe, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Lancelot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huff, Vicki</creatorcontrib><title>Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity analysis of WT1-wild-type and WT1-mutant Wilms tumors</title><title>Genes chromosomes &amp; cancer</title><addtitle>Genes Chromosom. Cancer</addtitle><description>Wilms tumor (WT) is genetically heterogeneous, and the one known WT gene, WT1 at 11p13, is altered in only a subset of WTs. Previous loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses have revealed the existence of additional putative WT genes at 11p15, 16q, and 1p, but these analyses examined only one or a handful of chromosomes or looked at LOH at only a few markers per chromosome. We conducted a genome‐wide scan for LOH in WT by using 420 markers spaced at an average of 10 cM throughout the genome and analyzed the data for two genetically defined subsets of WTs: those with mutations in WT1 and those with no detectable WT1 alteration. Our findings indicated that the incidence of LOH throughout the genome was significantly lower in our group of WTs with WT1 mutations. In WT1–wild‐type tumors, we observed the expected LOH at 11p, 16q, and 1p, and, in addition, we localized a previously unobserved region of LOH at 9q. Using additional 9q markers within this region of interest, we sublocalized the region of 9q LOH to the 12.2 Mb between D9S283 and a simple tandem repeat in BAC RP11‐177I8, a region containing several potential tumor‐suppressor genes. As a result, we have established for the first time that WT1‐mutant and WT1–wild‐type WTs differ significantly in their patterns of LOH throughout the genome, suggesting that the genomic regions showing LOH in WT1–wild‐type tumors harbor genes whose expression is regulated by the pleiotropic effects of WT1. Our results implicate 9q22.2–q31.1 as a region containing such a gene. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Genes, Wilms Tumor</subject><subject>Genome</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Loss of Heterozygosity</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats - genetics</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Wilms Tumor - genetics</subject><issn>1045-2257</issn><issn>1098-2264</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMofh_8A9KT4KGaNF_NUYpbBV0vSr2FbDtZq-12bVq0_nrjdtWTyBxmyDzzQh6Ejgg-IxhH5_M8P4swEWoD7RKs4jCKBNv8mhn3M5c7aM-5Z4yxoIpvox3CpSCxELvoMYVFU0P4VhYQVI1zQWODJ-igbT6GeePKbgjMwlSDK1er7J54tirCbliC3xSrl7rvzKILsrKqXdD1ddO6A7RlTeXgcN330cPk8j65Cm_u0uvk4ibMKZYqpAxTZgEEMGNim7MZlzOrjLIKMMQslxYMNdwKWxgoClsobqhlVlABOYnpPjoZc5dt89qD63Rduhyqyiyg6Z0WUmKihPwXJJLz2JcHT0cwb72PFqxetmVt2kETrL98a-9br3x79ngd2s9qKH7JtWAPnI-AlwbD30k6TZLvyHC8KF0H7z8Xpn3xf6GS62ya6uh2epuwKNMT-gliepox</recordid><startdate>200506</startdate><enddate>200506</enddate><creator>Ruteshouser, E. Cristy</creator><creator>Hendrickson, Brett W.</creator><creator>Colella, Stefano</creator><creator>Krahe, Ralf</creator><creator>Pinto, Lancelot</creator><creator>Huff, Vicki</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200506</creationdate><title>Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity analysis of WT1-wild-type and WT1-mutant Wilms tumors</title><author>Ruteshouser, E. Cristy ; Hendrickson, Brett W. ; Colella, Stefano ; Krahe, Ralf ; Pinto, Lancelot ; Huff, Vicki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3079-34034fee6e4aa8fc4b57bf9a9f9e0e84c7fea3a5f6fdaeddfd95a3f4f636ec183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Genes, Wilms Tumor</topic><topic>Genome</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Loss of Heterozygosity</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats - genetics</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Wilms Tumor - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruteshouser, E. Cristy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, Brett W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colella, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krahe, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Lancelot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huff, Vicki</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Genes chromosomes &amp; cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruteshouser, E. Cristy</au><au>Hendrickson, Brett W.</au><au>Colella, Stefano</au><au>Krahe, Ralf</au><au>Pinto, Lancelot</au><au>Huff, Vicki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity analysis of WT1-wild-type and WT1-mutant Wilms tumors</atitle><jtitle>Genes chromosomes &amp; cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Genes Chromosom. Cancer</addtitle><date>2005-06</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>172-180</pages><issn>1045-2257</issn><eissn>1098-2264</eissn><abstract>Wilms tumor (WT) is genetically heterogeneous, and the one known WT gene, WT1 at 11p13, is altered in only a subset of WTs. Previous loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses have revealed the existence of additional putative WT genes at 11p15, 16q, and 1p, but these analyses examined only one or a handful of chromosomes or looked at LOH at only a few markers per chromosome. We conducted a genome‐wide scan for LOH in WT by using 420 markers spaced at an average of 10 cM throughout the genome and analyzed the data for two genetically defined subsets of WTs: those with mutations in WT1 and those with no detectable WT1 alteration. Our findings indicated that the incidence of LOH throughout the genome was significantly lower in our group of WTs with WT1 mutations. In WT1–wild‐type tumors, we observed the expected LOH at 11p, 16q, and 1p, and, in addition, we localized a previously unobserved region of LOH at 9q. Using additional 9q markers within this region of interest, we sublocalized the region of 9q LOH to the 12.2 Mb between D9S283 and a simple tandem repeat in BAC RP11‐177I8, a region containing several potential tumor‐suppressor genes. As a result, we have established for the first time that WT1‐mutant and WT1–wild‐type WTs differ significantly in their patterns of LOH throughout the genome, suggesting that the genomic regions showing LOH in WT1–wild‐type tumors harbor genes whose expression is regulated by the pleiotropic effects of WT1. Our results implicate 9q22.2–q31.1 as a region containing such a gene. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15761866</pmid><doi>10.1002/gcc.20169</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-2257
ispartof Genes chromosomes & cancer, 2005-06, Vol.43 (2), p.172-180
issn 1045-2257
1098-2264
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67701967
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Child
Child, Preschool
Genes, Wilms Tumor
Genome
Humans
Infant
Loss of Heterozygosity
Microsatellite Repeats - genetics
Mutation
Wilms Tumor - genetics
title Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity analysis of WT1-wild-type and WT1-mutant Wilms tumors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A03%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genome-wide%20loss%20of%20heterozygosity%20analysis%20of%20WT1-wild-type%20and%20WT1-mutant%20Wilms%20tumors&rft.jtitle=Genes%20chromosomes%20&%20cancer&rft.au=Ruteshouser,%20E.%20Cristy&rft.date=2005-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=172-180&rft.issn=1045-2257&rft.eissn=1098-2264&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gcc.20169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67701967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17558585&rft_id=info:pmid/15761866&rfr_iscdi=true