Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?
Objectives/Hypothesis: Speech perception scores using cochlear implants have ranged widely in all published series. The underlying determinants of success in word recognition are incompletely defined. Although it has been assumed that residual spiral ganglion cell population in the deaf ear may play...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 2005-04, Vol.115 (4), p.672-677 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 677 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 672 |
container_title | The Laryngoscope |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | Khan, Aayesha M. Handzel, Ophir Burgess, Barbara J. Damian, Doris Eddington, Donald K. Nadol Jr, Joseph B. |
description | Objectives/Hypothesis: Speech perception scores using cochlear implants have ranged widely in all published series. The underlying determinants of success in word recognition are incompletely defined. Although it has been assumed that residual spiral ganglion cell population in the deaf ear may play a critical role, published data from temporal bone specimens from patients have not supported this hypothesis. The depth of insertion of a multichannel cochlear implant has also been suggested as a clinical variable that may be correlated with word recognition. In the current study these correlations were evaluated in 15 human subjects.
Study Design: Retrospective review of temporal bone histopathology.
Methods: Temporal bones were fixed and prepared for histological study by standard techniques. Specimens were then serially sectioned and reconstructed by two‐dimensional methods. The spiral ganglion cells were counted, and the depth of insertion of the cochlear implant as measured from the round window was determined. Correlation analyses were then performed between the NU6 word scores and spiral ganglion cell counts and the depth of insertion.
Results: The segmental and total spiral ganglion cell counts were not significantly correlated (P > .50) with NU6 word scores for the 15 subjects. Statistically significant correlations were not achieved by separate analysis of implant types. Similarly, no significant correlation between the depth of insertion of the electrode array and postoperative NU6 word score was identified for the group.
Conclusion: Although it is unlikely that the number of residual spiral ganglion cell counts is irrelevant to the determination of word recognition following cochlear implantation, there are, clearly, other clinical variables not yet identified that play an important role in determining success with cochlear implantation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67701475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67701475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4181-4da0c2e097730bd1ae9003b6be4daa4f3eabbe54f8c82a0e889cfa778ab0c3923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkVFv0zAUhS3ExErhLyCLB94S7DhOHF7QVtauoxrSBio8WU5y03o4cbCTwX4K_xbTVOwZv1jyPee7Oj4IvaYkpqTI3xIat2YXk3BoRhnjcZZQVsSCPEEzyhmN0qLgT9GMkIRFgidfT9Fz7--CPGecPEOnlAvCRV7M0O-1x1vranwDld11etC2wwvrHBg1QI23etjjYQ_4emxLcNg2-HZ09_pedzt822unDF6pbmcOPjDGY9XV-MJANThbA153HtyB-gH6wNIdvhxb1QVMeRdEflqxsNXegHJ43fZGdYN__wKdNMp4eHm85-jL8uLz4jLafFqtF2ebqEqpCFFrRaoEwr_kjJQ1VVAQwsqshDBRacNAlSXwtBGVSBQBIYqqUXkuVEkqViRsjt5M3N7ZHyP4QbbaVyGJ6sCOXmZ5Tmia8yB8NwkrZ7130Mje6Va5B0mJ_FuMJFSGYuRjMfJQjBQkmF8dt4xlC_Wj9dhEECwnwU9t4OE_0HJzdvON85RSTtLwNkfRBNJ-gF__QMp9D1FYzuX2eiU_Mr48z65WUrA_uxewVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67701475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Khan, Aayesha M. ; Handzel, Ophir ; Burgess, Barbara J. ; Damian, Doris ; Eddington, Donald K. ; Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Aayesha M. ; Handzel, Ophir ; Burgess, Barbara J. ; Damian, Doris ; Eddington, Donald K. ; Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives/Hypothesis: Speech perception scores using cochlear implants have ranged widely in all published series. The underlying determinants of success in word recognition are incompletely defined. Although it has been assumed that residual spiral ganglion cell population in the deaf ear may play a critical role, published data from temporal bone specimens from patients have not supported this hypothesis. The depth of insertion of a multichannel cochlear implant has also been suggested as a clinical variable that may be correlated with word recognition. In the current study these correlations were evaluated in 15 human subjects.
Study Design: Retrospective review of temporal bone histopathology.
Methods: Temporal bones were fixed and prepared for histological study by standard techniques. Specimens were then serially sectioned and reconstructed by two‐dimensional methods. The spiral ganglion cells were counted, and the depth of insertion of the cochlear implant as measured from the round window was determined. Correlation analyses were then performed between the NU6 word scores and spiral ganglion cell counts and the depth of insertion.
Results: The segmental and total spiral ganglion cell counts were not significantly correlated (P > .50) with NU6 word scores for the 15 subjects. Statistically significant correlations were not achieved by separate analysis of implant types. Similarly, no significant correlation between the depth of insertion of the electrode array and postoperative NU6 word score was identified for the group.
Conclusion: Although it is unlikely that the number of residual spiral ganglion cell counts is irrelevant to the determination of word recognition following cochlear implantation, there are, clearly, other clinical variables not yet identified that play an important role in determining success with cochlear implantation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15805879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cell Count ; Cell Survival ; Cochlear implant ; Cochlear Implantation - methods ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - pathology ; Deafness - therapy ; depth of insertion ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; speech perception ; Speech Perception - physiology ; spiral ganglion ; Spiral Ganglion - pathology ; Temporal Bone - pathology</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2005-04, Vol.115 (4), p.672-677</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 The Triological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4181-4da0c2e097730bd1ae9003b6be4daa4f3eabbe54f8c82a0e889cfa778ab0c3923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4181-4da0c2e097730bd1ae9003b6be4daa4f3eabbe54f8c82a0e889cfa778ab0c3923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1097%2F01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1097%2F01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15805879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Aayesha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handzel, Ophir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damian, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eddington, Donald K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objectives/Hypothesis: Speech perception scores using cochlear implants have ranged widely in all published series. The underlying determinants of success in word recognition are incompletely defined. Although it has been assumed that residual spiral ganglion cell population in the deaf ear may play a critical role, published data from temporal bone specimens from patients have not supported this hypothesis. The depth of insertion of a multichannel cochlear implant has also been suggested as a clinical variable that may be correlated with word recognition. In the current study these correlations were evaluated in 15 human subjects.
Study Design: Retrospective review of temporal bone histopathology.
Methods: Temporal bones were fixed and prepared for histological study by standard techniques. Specimens were then serially sectioned and reconstructed by two‐dimensional methods. The spiral ganglion cells were counted, and the depth of insertion of the cochlear implant as measured from the round window was determined. Correlation analyses were then performed between the NU6 word scores and spiral ganglion cell counts and the depth of insertion.
Results: The segmental and total spiral ganglion cell counts were not significantly correlated (P > .50) with NU6 word scores for the 15 subjects. Statistically significant correlations were not achieved by separate analysis of implant types. Similarly, no significant correlation between the depth of insertion of the electrode array and postoperative NU6 word score was identified for the group.
Conclusion: Although it is unlikely that the number of residual spiral ganglion cell counts is irrelevant to the determination of word recognition following cochlear implantation, there are, clearly, other clinical variables not yet identified that play an important role in determining success with cochlear implantation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cochlear implant</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - pathology</subject><subject>Deafness - therapy</subject><subject>depth of insertion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>speech perception</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>spiral ganglion</subject><subject>Spiral Ganglion - pathology</subject><subject>Temporal Bone - pathology</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkVFv0zAUhS3ExErhLyCLB94S7DhOHF7QVtauoxrSBio8WU5y03o4cbCTwX4K_xbTVOwZv1jyPee7Oj4IvaYkpqTI3xIat2YXk3BoRhnjcZZQVsSCPEEzyhmN0qLgT9GMkIRFgidfT9Fz7--CPGecPEOnlAvCRV7M0O-1x1vranwDld11etC2wwvrHBg1QI23etjjYQ_4emxLcNg2-HZ09_pedzt822unDF6pbmcOPjDGY9XV-MJANThbA153HtyB-gH6wNIdvhxb1QVMeRdEflqxsNXegHJ43fZGdYN__wKdNMp4eHm85-jL8uLz4jLafFqtF2ebqEqpCFFrRaoEwr_kjJQ1VVAQwsqshDBRacNAlSXwtBGVSBQBIYqqUXkuVEkqViRsjt5M3N7ZHyP4QbbaVyGJ6sCOXmZ5Tmia8yB8NwkrZ7130Mje6Va5B0mJ_FuMJFSGYuRjMfJQjBQkmF8dt4xlC_Wj9dhEECwnwU9t4OE_0HJzdvON85RSTtLwNkfRBNJ-gF__QMp9D1FYzuX2eiU_Mr48z65WUrA_uxewVg</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>Khan, Aayesha M.</creator><creator>Handzel, Ophir</creator><creator>Burgess, Barbara J.</creator><creator>Damian, Doris</creator><creator>Eddington, Donald K.</creator><creator>Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?</title><author>Khan, Aayesha M. ; Handzel, Ophir ; Burgess, Barbara J. ; Damian, Doris ; Eddington, Donald K. ; Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4181-4da0c2e097730bd1ae9003b6be4daa4f3eabbe54f8c82a0e889cfa778ab0c3923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cochlear implant</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - pathology</topic><topic>Deafness - therapy</topic><topic>depth of insertion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>speech perception</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>spiral ganglion</topic><topic>Spiral Ganglion - pathology</topic><topic>Temporal Bone - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Aayesha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handzel, Ophir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damian, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eddington, Donald K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Aayesha M.</au><au>Handzel, Ophir</au><au>Burgess, Barbara J.</au><au>Damian, Doris</au><au>Eddington, Donald K.</au><au>Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>672</spage><epage>677</epage><pages>672-677</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives/Hypothesis: Speech perception scores using cochlear implants have ranged widely in all published series. The underlying determinants of success in word recognition are incompletely defined. Although it has been assumed that residual spiral ganglion cell population in the deaf ear may play a critical role, published data from temporal bone specimens from patients have not supported this hypothesis. The depth of insertion of a multichannel cochlear implant has also been suggested as a clinical variable that may be correlated with word recognition. In the current study these correlations were evaluated in 15 human subjects.
Study Design: Retrospective review of temporal bone histopathology.
Methods: Temporal bones were fixed and prepared for histological study by standard techniques. Specimens were then serially sectioned and reconstructed by two‐dimensional methods. The spiral ganglion cells were counted, and the depth of insertion of the cochlear implant as measured from the round window was determined. Correlation analyses were then performed between the NU6 word scores and spiral ganglion cell counts and the depth of insertion.
Results: The segmental and total spiral ganglion cell counts were not significantly correlated (P > .50) with NU6 word scores for the 15 subjects. Statistically significant correlations were not achieved by separate analysis of implant types. Similarly, no significant correlation between the depth of insertion of the electrode array and postoperative NU6 word score was identified for the group.
Conclusion: Although it is unlikely that the number of residual spiral ganglion cell counts is irrelevant to the determination of word recognition following cochlear implantation, there are, clearly, other clinical variables not yet identified that play an important role in determining success with cochlear implantation.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>15805879</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 2005-04, Vol.115 (4), p.672-677 |
issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67701475 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Cell Count Cell Survival Cochlear implant Cochlear Implantation - methods Cochlear Implants Deafness - pathology Deafness - therapy depth of insertion Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Male Middle Aged Retrospective Studies speech perception Speech Perception - physiology spiral ganglion Spiral Ganglion - pathology Temporal Bone - pathology |
title | Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A22%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Word%20Recognition%20Correlated%20With%20the%20Number%20of%20Surviving%20Spiral%20Ganglion%20Cells%20and%20Electrode%20Insertion%20Depth%20in%20Human%20Subjects%20With%20Cochlear%20Implants?&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Khan,%20Aayesha%20M.&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=672&rft.epage=677&rft.pages=672-677&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67701475%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67701475&rft_id=info:pmid/15805879&rfr_iscdi=true |