Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?

Objectives/Hypothesis: Speech perception scores using cochlear implants have ranged widely in all published series. The underlying determinants of success in word recognition are incompletely defined. Although it has been assumed that residual spiral ganglion cell population in the deaf ear may play...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2005-04, Vol.115 (4), p.672-677
Hauptverfasser: Khan, Aayesha M., Handzel, Ophir, Burgess, Barbara J., Damian, Doris, Eddington, Donald K., Nadol Jr, Joseph B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 677
container_issue 4
container_start_page 672
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 115
creator Khan, Aayesha M.
Handzel, Ophir
Burgess, Barbara J.
Damian, Doris
Eddington, Donald K.
Nadol Jr, Joseph B.
description Objectives/Hypothesis: Speech perception scores using cochlear implants have ranged widely in all published series. The underlying determinants of success in word recognition are incompletely defined. Although it has been assumed that residual spiral ganglion cell population in the deaf ear may play a critical role, published data from temporal bone specimens from patients have not supported this hypothesis. The depth of insertion of a multichannel cochlear implant has also been suggested as a clinical variable that may be correlated with word recognition. In the current study these correlations were evaluated in 15 human subjects. Study Design: Retrospective review of temporal bone histopathology. Methods: Temporal bones were fixed and prepared for histological study by standard techniques. Specimens were then serially sectioned and reconstructed by two‐dimensional methods. The spiral ganglion cells were counted, and the depth of insertion of the cochlear implant as measured from the round window was determined. Correlation analyses were then performed between the NU6 word scores and spiral ganglion cell counts and the depth of insertion. Results: The segmental and total spiral ganglion cell counts were not significantly correlated (P > .50) with NU6 word scores for the 15 subjects. Statistically significant correlations were not achieved by separate analysis of implant types. Similarly, no significant correlation between the depth of insertion of the electrode array and postoperative NU6 word score was identified for the group. Conclusion: Although it is unlikely that the number of residual spiral ganglion cell counts is irrelevant to the determination of word recognition following cochlear implantation, there are, clearly, other clinical variables not yet identified that play an important role in determining success with cochlear implantation.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67701475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67701475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4181-4da0c2e097730bd1ae9003b6be4daa4f3eabbe54f8c82a0e889cfa778ab0c3923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkVFv0zAUhS3ExErhLyCLB94S7DhOHF7QVtauoxrSBio8WU5y03o4cbCTwX4K_xbTVOwZv1jyPee7Oj4IvaYkpqTI3xIat2YXk3BoRhnjcZZQVsSCPEEzyhmN0qLgT9GMkIRFgidfT9Fz7--CPGecPEOnlAvCRV7M0O-1x1vranwDld11etC2wwvrHBg1QI23etjjYQ_4emxLcNg2-HZ09_pedzt822unDF6pbmcOPjDGY9XV-MJANThbA153HtyB-gH6wNIdvhxb1QVMeRdEflqxsNXegHJ43fZGdYN__wKdNMp4eHm85-jL8uLz4jLafFqtF2ebqEqpCFFrRaoEwr_kjJQ1VVAQwsqshDBRacNAlSXwtBGVSBQBIYqqUXkuVEkqViRsjt5M3N7ZHyP4QbbaVyGJ6sCOXmZ5Tmia8yB8NwkrZ7130Mje6Va5B0mJ_FuMJFSGYuRjMfJQjBQkmF8dt4xlC_Wj9dhEECwnwU9t4OE_0HJzdvON85RSTtLwNkfRBNJ-gF__QMp9D1FYzuX2eiU_Mr48z65WUrA_uxewVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67701475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Khan, Aayesha M. ; Handzel, Ophir ; Burgess, Barbara J. ; Damian, Doris ; Eddington, Donald K. ; Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Aayesha M. ; Handzel, Ophir ; Burgess, Barbara J. ; Damian, Doris ; Eddington, Donald K. ; Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives/Hypothesis: Speech perception scores using cochlear implants have ranged widely in all published series. The underlying determinants of success in word recognition are incompletely defined. Although it has been assumed that residual spiral ganglion cell population in the deaf ear may play a critical role, published data from temporal bone specimens from patients have not supported this hypothesis. The depth of insertion of a multichannel cochlear implant has also been suggested as a clinical variable that may be correlated with word recognition. In the current study these correlations were evaluated in 15 human subjects. Study Design: Retrospective review of temporal bone histopathology. Methods: Temporal bones were fixed and prepared for histological study by standard techniques. Specimens were then serially sectioned and reconstructed by two‐dimensional methods. The spiral ganglion cells were counted, and the depth of insertion of the cochlear implant as measured from the round window was determined. Correlation analyses were then performed between the NU6 word scores and spiral ganglion cell counts and the depth of insertion. Results: The segmental and total spiral ganglion cell counts were not significantly correlated (P &gt; .50) with NU6 word scores for the 15 subjects. Statistically significant correlations were not achieved by separate analysis of implant types. Similarly, no significant correlation between the depth of insertion of the electrode array and postoperative NU6 word score was identified for the group. Conclusion: Although it is unlikely that the number of residual spiral ganglion cell counts is irrelevant to the determination of word recognition following cochlear implantation, there are, clearly, other clinical variables not yet identified that play an important role in determining success with cochlear implantation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15805879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cell Count ; Cell Survival ; Cochlear implant ; Cochlear Implantation - methods ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - pathology ; Deafness - therapy ; depth of insertion ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; speech perception ; Speech Perception - physiology ; spiral ganglion ; Spiral Ganglion - pathology ; Temporal Bone - pathology</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2005-04, Vol.115 (4), p.672-677</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 The Triological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4181-4da0c2e097730bd1ae9003b6be4daa4f3eabbe54f8c82a0e889cfa778ab0c3923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4181-4da0c2e097730bd1ae9003b6be4daa4f3eabbe54f8c82a0e889cfa778ab0c3923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1097%2F01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1097%2F01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15805879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Aayesha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handzel, Ophir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damian, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eddington, Donald K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objectives/Hypothesis: Speech perception scores using cochlear implants have ranged widely in all published series. The underlying determinants of success in word recognition are incompletely defined. Although it has been assumed that residual spiral ganglion cell population in the deaf ear may play a critical role, published data from temporal bone specimens from patients have not supported this hypothesis. The depth of insertion of a multichannel cochlear implant has also been suggested as a clinical variable that may be correlated with word recognition. In the current study these correlations were evaluated in 15 human subjects. Study Design: Retrospective review of temporal bone histopathology. Methods: Temporal bones were fixed and prepared for histological study by standard techniques. Specimens were then serially sectioned and reconstructed by two‐dimensional methods. The spiral ganglion cells were counted, and the depth of insertion of the cochlear implant as measured from the round window was determined. Correlation analyses were then performed between the NU6 word scores and spiral ganglion cell counts and the depth of insertion. Results: The segmental and total spiral ganglion cell counts were not significantly correlated (P &gt; .50) with NU6 word scores for the 15 subjects. Statistically significant correlations were not achieved by separate analysis of implant types. Similarly, no significant correlation between the depth of insertion of the electrode array and postoperative NU6 word score was identified for the group. Conclusion: Although it is unlikely that the number of residual spiral ganglion cell counts is irrelevant to the determination of word recognition following cochlear implantation, there are, clearly, other clinical variables not yet identified that play an important role in determining success with cochlear implantation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cochlear implant</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - pathology</subject><subject>Deafness - therapy</subject><subject>depth of insertion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>speech perception</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>spiral ganglion</subject><subject>Spiral Ganglion - pathology</subject><subject>Temporal Bone - pathology</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkVFv0zAUhS3ExErhLyCLB94S7DhOHF7QVtauoxrSBio8WU5y03o4cbCTwX4K_xbTVOwZv1jyPee7Oj4IvaYkpqTI3xIat2YXk3BoRhnjcZZQVsSCPEEzyhmN0qLgT9GMkIRFgidfT9Fz7--CPGecPEOnlAvCRV7M0O-1x1vranwDld11etC2wwvrHBg1QI23etjjYQ_4emxLcNg2-HZ09_pedzt822unDF6pbmcOPjDGY9XV-MJANThbA153HtyB-gH6wNIdvhxb1QVMeRdEflqxsNXegHJ43fZGdYN__wKdNMp4eHm85-jL8uLz4jLafFqtF2ebqEqpCFFrRaoEwr_kjJQ1VVAQwsqshDBRacNAlSXwtBGVSBQBIYqqUXkuVEkqViRsjt5M3N7ZHyP4QbbaVyGJ6sCOXmZ5Tmia8yB8NwkrZ7130Mje6Va5B0mJ_FuMJFSGYuRjMfJQjBQkmF8dt4xlC_Wj9dhEECwnwU9t4OE_0HJzdvON85RSTtLwNkfRBNJ-gF__QMp9D1FYzuX2eiU_Mr48z65WUrA_uxewVg</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>Khan, Aayesha M.</creator><creator>Handzel, Ophir</creator><creator>Burgess, Barbara J.</creator><creator>Damian, Doris</creator><creator>Eddington, Donald K.</creator><creator>Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?</title><author>Khan, Aayesha M. ; Handzel, Ophir ; Burgess, Barbara J. ; Damian, Doris ; Eddington, Donald K. ; Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4181-4da0c2e097730bd1ae9003b6be4daa4f3eabbe54f8c82a0e889cfa778ab0c3923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cochlear implant</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - pathology</topic><topic>Deafness - therapy</topic><topic>depth of insertion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>speech perception</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>spiral ganglion</topic><topic>Spiral Ganglion - pathology</topic><topic>Temporal Bone - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Aayesha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handzel, Ophir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damian, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eddington, Donald K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Aayesha M.</au><au>Handzel, Ophir</au><au>Burgess, Barbara J.</au><au>Damian, Doris</au><au>Eddington, Donald K.</au><au>Nadol Jr, Joseph B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>672</spage><epage>677</epage><pages>672-677</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives/Hypothesis: Speech perception scores using cochlear implants have ranged widely in all published series. The underlying determinants of success in word recognition are incompletely defined. Although it has been assumed that residual spiral ganglion cell population in the deaf ear may play a critical role, published data from temporal bone specimens from patients have not supported this hypothesis. The depth of insertion of a multichannel cochlear implant has also been suggested as a clinical variable that may be correlated with word recognition. In the current study these correlations were evaluated in 15 human subjects. Study Design: Retrospective review of temporal bone histopathology. Methods: Temporal bones were fixed and prepared for histological study by standard techniques. Specimens were then serially sectioned and reconstructed by two‐dimensional methods. The spiral ganglion cells were counted, and the depth of insertion of the cochlear implant as measured from the round window was determined. Correlation analyses were then performed between the NU6 word scores and spiral ganglion cell counts and the depth of insertion. Results: The segmental and total spiral ganglion cell counts were not significantly correlated (P &gt; .50) with NU6 word scores for the 15 subjects. Statistically significant correlations were not achieved by separate analysis of implant types. Similarly, no significant correlation between the depth of insertion of the electrode array and postoperative NU6 word score was identified for the group. Conclusion: Although it is unlikely that the number of residual spiral ganglion cell counts is irrelevant to the determination of word recognition following cochlear implantation, there are, clearly, other clinical variables not yet identified that play an important role in determining success with cochlear implantation.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>15805879</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 2005-04, Vol.115 (4), p.672-677
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67701475
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cell Count
Cell Survival
Cochlear implant
Cochlear Implantation - methods
Cochlear Implants
Deafness - pathology
Deafness - therapy
depth of insertion
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
speech perception
Speech Perception - physiology
spiral ganglion
Spiral Ganglion - pathology
Temporal Bone - pathology
title Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A22%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Word%20Recognition%20Correlated%20With%20the%20Number%20of%20Surviving%20Spiral%20Ganglion%20Cells%20and%20Electrode%20Insertion%20Depth%20in%20Human%20Subjects%20With%20Cochlear%20Implants?&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Khan,%20Aayesha%20M.&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=672&rft.epage=677&rft.pages=672-677&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.mlg.0000161335.62139.80&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67701475%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67701475&rft_id=info:pmid/15805879&rfr_iscdi=true