Kinetic Comparison Among the Fastball, Curveball, Change-up, and Slider in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers
Background: Controversy exists about whether breaking pitches are more stressful than are fastballs. Previous biomechanical studies compared kinematics but not kinetics. Hypothesis: Elbow and shoulder forces and torques are statistically different among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sports medicine 2006-03, Vol.34 (3), p.423-430 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Controversy exists about whether breaking pitches are more stressful than are fastballs. Previous biomechanical studies compared
kinematics but not kinetics.
Hypothesis: Elbow and shoulder forces and torques are statistically different among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider.
Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study.
Methods: Twenty-one healthy collegiate pitchers were studied with a high-speed automated digitizing system. All subjects threw fastballs
(n = 21), most threw curveballs (n = 20) and change-ups (n = 19), and a few threw sliders (n = 6). Wrist, elbow, and shoulder
kinetics were calculated using inverse dynamics. Nine kinetic and 26 kinematic parameters were compared among the different
pitch types using repeated-measures analysis of variance.
Results: At the shoulder, internal rotation torque, horizontal adduction torque, abduction torque, and proximal force were significantly
less in the change-up than in the other 3 pitches. Shoulder horizontal adduction torque was greater in the fastball than in
the curveball and slider. Shoulder proximal force was greater in the slider than in the curveball. Elbow proximal force was
less in the change-up than in the other 3 pitches. Elbow varus torque was greater in the fastball and curveball than in the
change-up. Elbow flexion torque was greater in the curveball than in the change-up. The curveball and change-up demonstrated
kinematic differences from the fastball, consistent with previous studies.
Conclusion: There were significant kinematic differences between the fastball and curveball but few kinetic differences. The change-up
had lower joint kinetics, lower angular velocities, and different body positions than the other 3 pitch types had. Results
for the slider were inconclusive because of small sample size.
Clinical Relevance: Because the resultant joint loads were similar between the fastball and curveball, this study did not indicate that either
pitch was more stressful or potentially dangerous for a collegiate pitcher. The low kinetics in the change-up implies that
it is the safest.
Keywords:
elbow
shoulder
wrist
force
torque
kinematics
pitching
biomechanics |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0363546505280431 |