Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation
Antilymphocyte antibodies have been used for the prevention or treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients since the 1960s. Both monoclonal and polyclonal agents now are available and generally are classified as either lymphocyte-depleting or nondepleting agents. Use of such antibod...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of kidney diseases 2009-11, Vol.54 (5), p.935-944 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 944 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 935 |
container_title | American journal of kidney diseases |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Padiyar, Aparna, MD Augustine, Joshua J., MD Hricik, Donald E., MD |
description | Antilymphocyte antibodies have been used for the prevention or treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients since the 1960s. Both monoclonal and polyclonal agents now are available and generally are classified as either lymphocyte-depleting or nondepleting agents. Use of such antibodies for induction therapy in the immediate postoperative period has varied over the years. Currently, induction antibodies are administered to more than 70% of kidney transplant recipients in the United States. However, the choice of specific agents and the patients for whom they are used vary substantially between and within transplant centers. Many centers use antibody induction therapy only in patients perceived to be at high risk of acute rejection or delayed graft function. Recently, induction antibody therapy also has become the standard of practice in protocols designed to facilitate minimization of such maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. The benefits of induction therapy, including a decreased incidence and delayed onset of acute rejection, must be balanced against the considerable cost and side effects of the individual agents, including risk of infection. Some, but not all, antibodies are associated with increased risk of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease and other malignancies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.06.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67695791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0272638609009378</els_id><sourcerecordid>67695791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-df2b4442b70ad3472c97a3a68cb6743746a3f962acfdcec0f0599eee8e8167463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaDZp_0APZS_tzc5I8uoDSiGENgkJ5ND0LGRpTOV45a1kF_bfR2aXFnLISTA872h4XkI-UqgpbPhFX9v-ydcMQNcgamDwhqzohvFKKK7ekhUwySrBlTglZzn3UEAuxDtySrVQTCpYkeY2-tlNYYzryziFdvT79eNvTHa3X4e4vgs-YpkkG_NusHGyC_qenHR2yPjh-J6TXz--P17dVPcP17dXl_eVa7ieKt-xtmka1kqwnjeSOS0tt0K5VsiGy0ZY3mnBrOu8QwcdbLRGRIWKFkDwc_LlsHeXxj8z5slsQ3Y4lENwnLMRUuiN1LSA7AC6NOacsDO7FLY27Q0Fs7gyvVlcmcWVAWGKqxL6dNw-t1v0_yNHOQX4fARsdnboigQX8j-OMRDAKC_c1wOHxcXfgMlkFzA69CGhm4wfw-t3fHsRd0OIofz4hHvM_TinWCwbajIzYH4urS6lgl76lIo_A_r-m7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67695791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Padiyar, Aparna, MD ; Augustine, Joshua J., MD ; Hricik, Donald E., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Padiyar, Aparna, MD ; Augustine, Joshua J., MD ; Hricik, Donald E., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Antilymphocyte antibodies have been used for the prevention or treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients since the 1960s. Both monoclonal and polyclonal agents now are available and generally are classified as either lymphocyte-depleting or nondepleting agents. Use of such antibodies for induction therapy in the immediate postoperative period has varied over the years. Currently, induction antibodies are administered to more than 70% of kidney transplant recipients in the United States. However, the choice of specific agents and the patients for whom they are used vary substantially between and within transplant centers. Many centers use antibody induction therapy only in patients perceived to be at high risk of acute rejection or delayed graft function. Recently, induction antibody therapy also has become the standard of practice in protocols designed to facilitate minimization of such maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. The benefits of induction therapy, including a decreased incidence and delayed onset of acute rejection, must be balanced against the considerable cost and side effects of the individual agents, including risk of infection. Some, but not all, antibodies are associated with increased risk of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease and other malignancies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-6386</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.06.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19682780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>acute rejection ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use ; antibody induction therapy ; Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; delayed graft function ; Graft Rejection - prevention & control ; Humans ; Kidney transplantation ; Kidney Transplantation - immunology ; Medical sciences ; Nephrology ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><ispartof>American journal of kidney diseases, 2009-11, Vol.54 (5), p.935-944</ispartof><rights>National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-df2b4442b70ad3472c97a3a68cb6743746a3f962acfdcec0f0599eee8e8167463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-df2b4442b70ad3472c97a3a68cb6743746a3f962acfdcec0f0599eee8e8167463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638609009378$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22060213$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19682780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Padiyar, Aparna, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustine, Joshua J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hricik, Donald E., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation</title><title>American journal of kidney diseases</title><addtitle>Am J Kidney Dis</addtitle><description>Antilymphocyte antibodies have been used for the prevention or treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients since the 1960s. Both monoclonal and polyclonal agents now are available and generally are classified as either lymphocyte-depleting or nondepleting agents. Use of such antibodies for induction therapy in the immediate postoperative period has varied over the years. Currently, induction antibodies are administered to more than 70% of kidney transplant recipients in the United States. However, the choice of specific agents and the patients for whom they are used vary substantially between and within transplant centers. Many centers use antibody induction therapy only in patients perceived to be at high risk of acute rejection or delayed graft function. Recently, induction antibody therapy also has become the standard of practice in protocols designed to facilitate minimization of such maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. The benefits of induction therapy, including a decreased incidence and delayed onset of acute rejection, must be balanced against the considerable cost and side effects of the individual agents, including risk of infection. Some, but not all, antibodies are associated with increased risk of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease and other malignancies.</description><subject>acute rejection</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>antibody induction therapy</subject><subject>Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>delayed graft function</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney transplantation</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - immunology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><issn>0272-6386</issn><issn>1523-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaDZp_0APZS_tzc5I8uoDSiGENgkJ5ND0LGRpTOV45a1kF_bfR2aXFnLISTA872h4XkI-UqgpbPhFX9v-ydcMQNcgamDwhqzohvFKKK7ekhUwySrBlTglZzn3UEAuxDtySrVQTCpYkeY2-tlNYYzryziFdvT79eNvTHa3X4e4vgs-YpkkG_NusHGyC_qenHR2yPjh-J6TXz--P17dVPcP17dXl_eVa7ieKt-xtmka1kqwnjeSOS0tt0K5VsiGy0ZY3mnBrOu8QwcdbLRGRIWKFkDwc_LlsHeXxj8z5slsQ3Y4lENwnLMRUuiN1LSA7AC6NOacsDO7FLY27Q0Fs7gyvVlcmcWVAWGKqxL6dNw-t1v0_yNHOQX4fARsdnboigQX8j-OMRDAKC_c1wOHxcXfgMlkFzA69CGhm4wfw-t3fHsRd0OIofz4hHvM_TinWCwbajIzYH4urS6lgl76lIo_A_r-m7A</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Padiyar, Aparna, MD</creator><creator>Augustine, Joshua J., MD</creator><creator>Hricik, Donald E., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation</title><author>Padiyar, Aparna, MD ; Augustine, Joshua J., MD ; Hricik, Donald E., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-df2b4442b70ad3472c97a3a68cb6743746a3f962acfdcec0f0599eee8e8167463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>acute rejection</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>antibody induction therapy</topic><topic>Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>delayed graft function</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney transplantation</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - immunology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Padiyar, Aparna, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustine, Joshua J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hricik, Donald E., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of kidney diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Padiyar, Aparna, MD</au><au>Augustine, Joshua J., MD</au><au>Hricik, Donald E., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of kidney diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Kidney Dis</addtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>935</spage><epage>944</epage><pages>935-944</pages><issn>0272-6386</issn><eissn>1523-6838</eissn><abstract>Antilymphocyte antibodies have been used for the prevention or treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients since the 1960s. Both monoclonal and polyclonal agents now are available and generally are classified as either lymphocyte-depleting or nondepleting agents. Use of such antibodies for induction therapy in the immediate postoperative period has varied over the years. Currently, induction antibodies are administered to more than 70% of kidney transplant recipients in the United States. However, the choice of specific agents and the patients for whom they are used vary substantially between and within transplant centers. Many centers use antibody induction therapy only in patients perceived to be at high risk of acute rejection or delayed graft function. Recently, induction antibody therapy also has become the standard of practice in protocols designed to facilitate minimization of such maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. The benefits of induction therapy, including a decreased incidence and delayed onset of acute rejection, must be balanced against the considerable cost and side effects of the individual agents, including risk of infection. Some, but not all, antibodies are associated with increased risk of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease and other malignancies.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19682780</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.06.020</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-6386 |
ispartof | American journal of kidney diseases, 2009-11, Vol.54 (5), p.935-944 |
issn | 0272-6386 1523-6838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67695791 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | acute rejection Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use antibody induction therapy Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences delayed graft function Graft Rejection - prevention & control Humans Kidney transplantation Kidney Transplantation - immunology Medical sciences Nephrology Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases |
title | Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A06%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Induction%20Antibody%20Therapy%20in%20Kidney%20Transplantation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20kidney%20diseases&rft.au=Padiyar,%20Aparna,%20MD&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=935&rft.epage=944&rft.pages=935-944&rft.issn=0272-6386&rft.eissn=1523-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.06.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67695791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67695791&rft_id=info:pmid/19682780&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0272638609009378&rfr_iscdi=true |