Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation

Antilymphocyte antibodies have been used for the prevention or treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients since the 1960s. Both monoclonal and polyclonal agents now are available and generally are classified as either lymphocyte-depleting or nondepleting agents. Use of such antibod...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of kidney diseases 2009-11, Vol.54 (5), p.935-944
Hauptverfasser: Padiyar, Aparna, MD, Augustine, Joshua J., MD, Hricik, Donald E., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 944
container_issue 5
container_start_page 935
container_title American journal of kidney diseases
container_volume 54
creator Padiyar, Aparna, MD
Augustine, Joshua J., MD
Hricik, Donald E., MD
description Antilymphocyte antibodies have been used for the prevention or treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients since the 1960s. Both monoclonal and polyclonal agents now are available and generally are classified as either lymphocyte-depleting or nondepleting agents. Use of such antibodies for induction therapy in the immediate postoperative period has varied over the years. Currently, induction antibodies are administered to more than 70% of kidney transplant recipients in the United States. However, the choice of specific agents and the patients for whom they are used vary substantially between and within transplant centers. Many centers use antibody induction therapy only in patients perceived to be at high risk of acute rejection or delayed graft function. Recently, induction antibody therapy also has become the standard of practice in protocols designed to facilitate minimization of such maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. The benefits of induction therapy, including a decreased incidence and delayed onset of acute rejection, must be balanced against the considerable cost and side effects of the individual agents, including risk of infection. Some, but not all, antibodies are associated with increased risk of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease and other malignancies.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.06.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67695791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0272638609009378</els_id><sourcerecordid>67695791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-df2b4442b70ad3472c97a3a68cb6743746a3f962acfdcec0f0599eee8e8167463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaDZp_0APZS_tzc5I8uoDSiGENgkJ5ND0LGRpTOV45a1kF_bfR2aXFnLISTA872h4XkI-UqgpbPhFX9v-ydcMQNcgamDwhqzohvFKKK7ekhUwySrBlTglZzn3UEAuxDtySrVQTCpYkeY2-tlNYYzryziFdvT79eNvTHa3X4e4vgs-YpkkG_NusHGyC_qenHR2yPjh-J6TXz--P17dVPcP17dXl_eVa7ieKt-xtmka1kqwnjeSOS0tt0K5VsiGy0ZY3mnBrOu8QwcdbLRGRIWKFkDwc_LlsHeXxj8z5slsQ3Y4lENwnLMRUuiN1LSA7AC6NOacsDO7FLY27Q0Fs7gyvVlcmcWVAWGKqxL6dNw-t1v0_yNHOQX4fARsdnboigQX8j-OMRDAKC_c1wOHxcXfgMlkFzA69CGhm4wfw-t3fHsRd0OIofz4hHvM_TinWCwbajIzYH4urS6lgl76lIo_A_r-m7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67695791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Padiyar, Aparna, MD ; Augustine, Joshua J., MD ; Hricik, Donald E., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Padiyar, Aparna, MD ; Augustine, Joshua J., MD ; Hricik, Donald E., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Antilymphocyte antibodies have been used for the prevention or treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients since the 1960s. Both monoclonal and polyclonal agents now are available and generally are classified as either lymphocyte-depleting or nondepleting agents. Use of such antibodies for induction therapy in the immediate postoperative period has varied over the years. Currently, induction antibodies are administered to more than 70% of kidney transplant recipients in the United States. However, the choice of specific agents and the patients for whom they are used vary substantially between and within transplant centers. Many centers use antibody induction therapy only in patients perceived to be at high risk of acute rejection or delayed graft function. Recently, induction antibody therapy also has become the standard of practice in protocols designed to facilitate minimization of such maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. The benefits of induction therapy, including a decreased incidence and delayed onset of acute rejection, must be balanced against the considerable cost and side effects of the individual agents, including risk of infection. Some, but not all, antibodies are associated with increased risk of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease and other malignancies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-6386</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.06.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19682780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>acute rejection ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use ; antibody induction therapy ; Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; delayed graft function ; Graft Rejection - prevention &amp; control ; Humans ; Kidney transplantation ; Kidney Transplantation - immunology ; Medical sciences ; Nephrology ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><ispartof>American journal of kidney diseases, 2009-11, Vol.54 (5), p.935-944</ispartof><rights>National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-df2b4442b70ad3472c97a3a68cb6743746a3f962acfdcec0f0599eee8e8167463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-df2b4442b70ad3472c97a3a68cb6743746a3f962acfdcec0f0599eee8e8167463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638609009378$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22060213$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19682780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Padiyar, Aparna, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustine, Joshua J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hricik, Donald E., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation</title><title>American journal of kidney diseases</title><addtitle>Am J Kidney Dis</addtitle><description>Antilymphocyte antibodies have been used for the prevention or treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients since the 1960s. Both monoclonal and polyclonal agents now are available and generally are classified as either lymphocyte-depleting or nondepleting agents. Use of such antibodies for induction therapy in the immediate postoperative period has varied over the years. Currently, induction antibodies are administered to more than 70% of kidney transplant recipients in the United States. However, the choice of specific agents and the patients for whom they are used vary substantially between and within transplant centers. Many centers use antibody induction therapy only in patients perceived to be at high risk of acute rejection or delayed graft function. Recently, induction antibody therapy also has become the standard of practice in protocols designed to facilitate minimization of such maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. The benefits of induction therapy, including a decreased incidence and delayed onset of acute rejection, must be balanced against the considerable cost and side effects of the individual agents, including risk of infection. Some, but not all, antibodies are associated with increased risk of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease and other malignancies.</description><subject>acute rejection</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>antibody induction therapy</subject><subject>Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>delayed graft function</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney transplantation</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - immunology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><issn>0272-6386</issn><issn>1523-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaDZp_0APZS_tzc5I8uoDSiGENgkJ5ND0LGRpTOV45a1kF_bfR2aXFnLISTA872h4XkI-UqgpbPhFX9v-ydcMQNcgamDwhqzohvFKKK7ekhUwySrBlTglZzn3UEAuxDtySrVQTCpYkeY2-tlNYYzryziFdvT79eNvTHa3X4e4vgs-YpkkG_NusHGyC_qenHR2yPjh-J6TXz--P17dVPcP17dXl_eVa7ieKt-xtmka1kqwnjeSOS0tt0K5VsiGy0ZY3mnBrOu8QwcdbLRGRIWKFkDwc_LlsHeXxj8z5slsQ3Y4lENwnLMRUuiN1LSA7AC6NOacsDO7FLY27Q0Fs7gyvVlcmcWVAWGKqxL6dNw-t1v0_yNHOQX4fARsdnboigQX8j-OMRDAKC_c1wOHxcXfgMlkFzA69CGhm4wfw-t3fHsRd0OIofz4hHvM_TinWCwbajIzYH4urS6lgl76lIo_A_r-m7A</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Padiyar, Aparna, MD</creator><creator>Augustine, Joshua J., MD</creator><creator>Hricik, Donald E., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation</title><author>Padiyar, Aparna, MD ; Augustine, Joshua J., MD ; Hricik, Donald E., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-df2b4442b70ad3472c97a3a68cb6743746a3f962acfdcec0f0599eee8e8167463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>acute rejection</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>antibody induction therapy</topic><topic>Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>delayed graft function</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney transplantation</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - immunology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Padiyar, Aparna, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustine, Joshua J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hricik, Donald E., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of kidney diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Padiyar, Aparna, MD</au><au>Augustine, Joshua J., MD</au><au>Hricik, Donald E., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of kidney diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Kidney Dis</addtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>935</spage><epage>944</epage><pages>935-944</pages><issn>0272-6386</issn><eissn>1523-6838</eissn><abstract>Antilymphocyte antibodies have been used for the prevention or treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients since the 1960s. Both monoclonal and polyclonal agents now are available and generally are classified as either lymphocyte-depleting or nondepleting agents. Use of such antibodies for induction therapy in the immediate postoperative period has varied over the years. Currently, induction antibodies are administered to more than 70% of kidney transplant recipients in the United States. However, the choice of specific agents and the patients for whom they are used vary substantially between and within transplant centers. Many centers use antibody induction therapy only in patients perceived to be at high risk of acute rejection or delayed graft function. Recently, induction antibody therapy also has become the standard of practice in protocols designed to facilitate minimization of such maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. The benefits of induction therapy, including a decreased incidence and delayed onset of acute rejection, must be balanced against the considerable cost and side effects of the individual agents, including risk of infection. Some, but not all, antibodies are associated with increased risk of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease and other malignancies.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19682780</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.06.020</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-6386
ispartof American journal of kidney diseases, 2009-11, Vol.54 (5), p.935-944
issn 0272-6386
1523-6838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67695791
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects acute rejection
Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use
antibody induction therapy
Antilymphocyte Serum - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
delayed graft function
Graft Rejection - prevention & control
Humans
Kidney transplantation
Kidney Transplantation - immunology
Medical sciences
Nephrology
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
title Induction Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A06%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Induction%20Antibody%20Therapy%20in%20Kidney%20Transplantation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20kidney%20diseases&rft.au=Padiyar,%20Aparna,%20MD&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=935&rft.epage=944&rft.pages=935-944&rft.issn=0272-6386&rft.eissn=1523-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.06.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67695791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67695791&rft_id=info:pmid/19682780&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0272638609009378&rfr_iscdi=true