Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy

CONTEXT Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) has diffused rapidly despite limited data on outcomes and greater costs compared with open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). OBJECTIVE To determine the comparative effectiveness of MIRP vs RRP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Population-bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2009-10, Vol.302 (14), p.1557-1564
Hauptverfasser:	Hu, Jim C, Gu, Xiangmei, Lipsitz, Stuart R, Barry, Michael J, D’Amico, Anthony V, Weinberg, Aaron C, Keating, Nancy L
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Cohort Studies Comparative studies Effectiveness studies Erectile Dysfunction - epidemiology General aspects Health Services Research Humans Length of Stay Male Medical sciences Mens health Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Prostate Prostate cancer Prostatectomy - methods Surgery Transurethral Resection of Prostate Treatment Outcome United States Urinary Incontinence - epidemiology
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!