Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study

To assess impact on interlaboratory agreement of 2 optional modes to convert Papanicolaou classification to Bethesda System (TBS) and demonstrate effect of verification bias correction on test performance in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS) cohort study. Conventional Pap s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta cytologica 2009-09, Vol.53 (5), p.548-557
Hauptverfasser: SYRJÄNEN, Kari, SHABALOVA, Irena, IVANCHENKO, Olga, KLJUKINA, Ludmila, GRUNBERGA, Valerija, SYRJÄNEN, Stina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 557
container_issue 5
container_start_page 548
container_title Acta cytologica
container_volume 53
creator SYRJÄNEN, Kari
SHABALOVA, Irena
IVANCHENKO, Olga
KLJUKINA, Ludmila
GRUNBERGA, Valerija
SYRJÄNEN, Stina
description To assess impact on interlaboratory agreement of 2 optional modes to convert Papanicolaou classification to Bethesda System (TBS) and demonstrate effect of verification bias correction on test performance in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS) cohort study. Conventional Pap smears were classified in NIS laboratories and rescreened in a reference center (RC) using modified Papanicolaou classification. Two optional methods (TBS1, TBS2) were used to convert original classification to TBS. All classifications were tested for interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators with and without verification bias correction. Interlaboratory agreement of original classification was fair with regular kappa, but substantial with weighted kappa. TBS1 option (Class 2 in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]) did not remedy this limited reproducibility. When Class 2+ (borderline dyskaryosis) was used as cutoff for ASCUS (TBS2), interlaboratory agreement was upgraded to moderate and almost perfect. Test performance was significantly different between NIS and RC only for TBS1 option with ASCUS cutoff RC showing better sensitivity/specificity balance by area under receiver operating characteristic curve test. In converting traditional classification to TBS, selection of appropriate equivalents to TBS categories has a major impact on interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000325383
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67681894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67681894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p239t-8cd6615918b2bce699b8a02443d8ea8daf3e87e072b8d2b147f0bc5aa1cf162f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkc1u1TAQhS0EoreFBS-AvIFdILbz47CD0EKlChChbK8mzrg1SuxgO9A8Nm-Ac7mAZHk0nk_njI4JecLyF4yVzcs8zwUvhRT3yI41Qma8KvP7ZJfeWVaWRX1CTkP4lihRVeIhOWFN3UgpxY78-oyzd8OiTG9GE1fqNG1HCMFooyAaZynYgbbOe1SHVjtPv6L_P39jINB03mJEPxkLNoZN5hP6xE5gFR5amMEa5UZwC-0mBE_bNbrR3azUWBpvkXbKI1pjb2iHMab6ip7fzckLNw3t3XTAPuBPemkHnDFdNtIuQsSD5Ta9SJ7oaed-GIz02m4rtu7W-Q1chvUReaBhDPj4WM_I9cX5l_Z9dvXx3WX7-iqbuWhiJtVQVSlcJnveK6yappeQ86IQg0SQA2iBssa85r0ceM-KWue9KgGY0qziWpyR5390U77fFwxxP5mgcBzBolvCvqoryWRTJPDpEVz6CYf97M0Eft3__aQEPDsCEBSM2qdITfjHcdYUvEyL_QbpoaYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67681894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>SYRJÄNEN, Kari ; SHABALOVA, Irena ; IVANCHENKO, Olga ; KLJUKINA, Ludmila ; GRUNBERGA, Valerija ; SYRJÄNEN, Stina</creator><creatorcontrib>SYRJÄNEN, Kari ; SHABALOVA, Irena ; IVANCHENKO, Olga ; KLJUKINA, Ludmila ; GRUNBERGA, Valerija ; SYRJÄNEN, Stina ; New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>To assess impact on interlaboratory agreement of 2 optional modes to convert Papanicolaou classification to Bethesda System (TBS) and demonstrate effect of verification bias correction on test performance in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS) cohort study. Conventional Pap smears were classified in NIS laboratories and rescreened in a reference center (RC) using modified Papanicolaou classification. Two optional methods (TBS1, TBS2) were used to convert original classification to TBS. All classifications were tested for interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators with and without verification bias correction. Interlaboratory agreement of original classification was fair with regular kappa, but substantial with weighted kappa. TBS1 option (Class 2 in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]) did not remedy this limited reproducibility. When Class 2+ (borderline dyskaryosis) was used as cutoff for ASCUS (TBS2), interlaboratory agreement was upgraded to moderate and almost perfect. Test performance was significantly different between NIS and RC only for TBS1 option with ASCUS cutoff RC showing better sensitivity/specificity balance by area under receiver operating characteristic curve test. In converting traditional classification to TBS, selection of appropriate equivalents to TBS categories has a major impact on interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000325383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19798883</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACYTAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: Karger</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bias ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - classification ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology ; Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - standards ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Observer Variation ; Papanicolaou Test ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; USSR ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - classification ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Vaginal Smears - standards ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta cytologica, 2009-09, Vol.53 (5), p.548-557</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21942544$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19798883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SYRJÄNEN, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHABALOVA, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IVANCHENKO, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLJUKINA, Ludmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUNBERGA, Valerija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SYRJÄNEN, Stina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study</title><title>Acta cytologica</title><addtitle>Acta Cytol</addtitle><description>To assess impact on interlaboratory agreement of 2 optional modes to convert Papanicolaou classification to Bethesda System (TBS) and demonstrate effect of verification bias correction on test performance in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS) cohort study. Conventional Pap smears were classified in NIS laboratories and rescreened in a reference center (RC) using modified Papanicolaou classification. Two optional methods (TBS1, TBS2) were used to convert original classification to TBS. All classifications were tested for interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators with and without verification bias correction. Interlaboratory agreement of original classification was fair with regular kappa, but substantial with weighted kappa. TBS1 option (Class 2 in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]) did not remedy this limited reproducibility. When Class 2+ (borderline dyskaryosis) was used as cutoff for ASCUS (TBS2), interlaboratory agreement was upgraded to moderate and almost perfect. Test performance was significantly different between NIS and RC only for TBS1 option with ASCUS cutoff RC showing better sensitivity/specificity balance by area under receiver operating characteristic curve test. In converting traditional classification to TBS, selection of appropriate equivalents to TBS categories has a major impact on interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - classification</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>USSR</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - standards</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-5547</issn><issn>1938-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkc1u1TAQhS0EoreFBS-AvIFdILbz47CD0EKlChChbK8mzrg1SuxgO9A8Nm-Ac7mAZHk0nk_njI4JecLyF4yVzcs8zwUvhRT3yI41Qma8KvP7ZJfeWVaWRX1CTkP4lihRVeIhOWFN3UgpxY78-oyzd8OiTG9GE1fqNG1HCMFooyAaZynYgbbOe1SHVjtPv6L_P39jINB03mJEPxkLNoZN5hP6xE5gFR5amMEa5UZwC-0mBE_bNbrR3azUWBpvkXbKI1pjb2iHMab6ip7fzckLNw3t3XTAPuBPemkHnDFdNtIuQsSD5Ta9SJ7oaed-GIz02m4rtu7W-Q1chvUReaBhDPj4WM_I9cX5l_Z9dvXx3WX7-iqbuWhiJtVQVSlcJnveK6yappeQ86IQg0SQA2iBssa85r0ceM-KWue9KgGY0qziWpyR5390U77fFwxxP5mgcBzBolvCvqoryWRTJPDpEVz6CYf97M0Eft3__aQEPDsCEBSM2qdITfjHcdYUvEyL_QbpoaYA</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>SYRJÄNEN, Kari</creator><creator>SHABALOVA, Irena</creator><creator>IVANCHENKO, Olga</creator><creator>KLJUKINA, Ludmila</creator><creator>GRUNBERGA, Valerija</creator><creator>SYRJÄNEN, Stina</creator><general>Karger</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study</title><author>SYRJÄNEN, Kari ; SHABALOVA, Irena ; IVANCHENKO, Olga ; KLJUKINA, Ludmila ; GRUNBERGA, Valerija ; SYRJÄNEN, Stina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p239t-8cd6615918b2bce699b8a02443d8ea8daf3e87e072b8d2b147f0bc5aa1cf162f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - classification</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>USSR</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - standards</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SYRJÄNEN, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHABALOVA, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IVANCHENKO, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLJUKINA, Ludmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUNBERGA, Valerija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SYRJÄNEN, Stina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SYRJÄNEN, Kari</au><au>SHABALOVA, Irena</au><au>IVANCHENKO, Olga</au><au>KLJUKINA, Ludmila</au><au>GRUNBERGA, Valerija</au><au>SYRJÄNEN, Stina</au><aucorp>New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Cytol</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>548</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>548-557</pages><issn>0001-5547</issn><eissn>1938-2650</eissn><coden>ACYTAN</coden><abstract>To assess impact on interlaboratory agreement of 2 optional modes to convert Papanicolaou classification to Bethesda System (TBS) and demonstrate effect of verification bias correction on test performance in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS) cohort study. Conventional Pap smears were classified in NIS laboratories and rescreened in a reference center (RC) using modified Papanicolaou classification. Two optional methods (TBS1, TBS2) were used to convert original classification to TBS. All classifications were tested for interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators with and without verification bias correction. Interlaboratory agreement of original classification was fair with regular kappa, but substantial with weighted kappa. TBS1 option (Class 2 in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]) did not remedy this limited reproducibility. When Class 2+ (borderline dyskaryosis) was used as cutoff for ASCUS (TBS2), interlaboratory agreement was upgraded to moderate and almost perfect. Test performance was significantly different between NIS and RC only for TBS1 option with ASCUS cutoff RC showing better sensitivity/specificity balance by area under receiver operating characteristic curve test. In converting traditional classification to TBS, selection of appropriate equivalents to TBS categories has a major impact on interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>Karger</pub><pmid>19798883</pmid><doi>10.1159/000325383</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-5547
ispartof Acta cytologica, 2009-09, Vol.53 (5), p.548-557
issn 0001-5547
1938-2650
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67681894
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bias
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - classification
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Mass Screening - methods
Mass Screening - standards
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Observer Variation
Papanicolaou Test
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
USSR
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - classification
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Vaginal Smears - standards
Young Adult
title Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A45%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproducibility%20of%20Classification%20and%20Correction%20for%20Verification%20Bias%20as%20Determinants%20of%20Performance%20of%20Papanicolaou%20Smear%20Cytology%20in%20the%20Screening%20Setting:%20Experience%20from%20the%20New%20Independent%20States%20of%20the%20Former%20Soviet%20Union%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20cytologica&rft.au=SYRJ%C3%84NEN,%20Kari&rft.aucorp=New%20Independent%20States%20of%20the%20Former%20Soviet%20Union%20Cohort%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=548&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=548-557&rft.issn=0001-5547&rft.eissn=1938-2650&rft.coden=ACYTAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000325383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67681894%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67681894&rft_id=info:pmid/19798883&rfr_iscdi=true