Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study
To assess impact on interlaboratory agreement of 2 optional modes to convert Papanicolaou classification to Bethesda System (TBS) and demonstrate effect of verification bias correction on test performance in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS) cohort study. Conventional Pap s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta cytologica 2009-09, Vol.53 (5), p.548-557 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 557 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 548 |
container_title | Acta cytologica |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | SYRJÄNEN, Kari SHABALOVA, Irena IVANCHENKO, Olga KLJUKINA, Ludmila GRUNBERGA, Valerija SYRJÄNEN, Stina |
description | To assess impact on interlaboratory agreement of 2 optional modes to convert Papanicolaou classification to Bethesda System (TBS) and demonstrate effect of verification bias correction on test performance in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS) cohort study.
Conventional Pap smears were classified in NIS laboratories and rescreened in a reference center (RC) using modified Papanicolaou classification. Two optional methods (TBS1, TBS2) were used to convert original classification to TBS. All classifications were tested for interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators with and without verification bias correction.
Interlaboratory agreement of original classification was fair with regular kappa, but substantial with weighted kappa. TBS1 option (Class 2 in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]) did not remedy this limited reproducibility. When Class 2+ (borderline dyskaryosis) was used as cutoff for ASCUS (TBS2), interlaboratory agreement was upgraded to moderate and almost perfect. Test performance was significantly different between NIS and RC only for TBS1 option with ASCUS cutoff RC showing better sensitivity/specificity balance by area under receiver operating characteristic curve test.
In converting traditional classification to TBS, selection of appropriate equivalents to TBS categories has a major impact on interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000325383 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67681894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67681894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p239t-8cd6615918b2bce699b8a02443d8ea8daf3e87e072b8d2b147f0bc5aa1cf162f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkc1u1TAQhS0EoreFBS-AvIFdILbz47CD0EKlChChbK8mzrg1SuxgO9A8Nm-Ac7mAZHk0nk_njI4JecLyF4yVzcs8zwUvhRT3yI41Qma8KvP7ZJfeWVaWRX1CTkP4lihRVeIhOWFN3UgpxY78-oyzd8OiTG9GE1fqNG1HCMFooyAaZynYgbbOe1SHVjtPv6L_P39jINB03mJEPxkLNoZN5hP6xE5gFR5amMEa5UZwC-0mBE_bNbrR3azUWBpvkXbKI1pjb2iHMab6ip7fzckLNw3t3XTAPuBPemkHnDFdNtIuQsSD5Ta9SJ7oaed-GIz02m4rtu7W-Q1chvUReaBhDPj4WM_I9cX5l_Z9dvXx3WX7-iqbuWhiJtVQVSlcJnveK6yappeQ86IQg0SQA2iBssa85r0ceM-KWue9KgGY0qziWpyR5390U77fFwxxP5mgcBzBolvCvqoryWRTJPDpEVz6CYf97M0Eft3__aQEPDsCEBSM2qdITfjHcdYUvEyL_QbpoaYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67681894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>SYRJÄNEN, Kari ; SHABALOVA, Irena ; IVANCHENKO, Olga ; KLJUKINA, Ludmila ; GRUNBERGA, Valerija ; SYRJÄNEN, Stina</creator><creatorcontrib>SYRJÄNEN, Kari ; SHABALOVA, Irena ; IVANCHENKO, Olga ; KLJUKINA, Ludmila ; GRUNBERGA, Valerija ; SYRJÄNEN, Stina ; New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>To assess impact on interlaboratory agreement of 2 optional modes to convert Papanicolaou classification to Bethesda System (TBS) and demonstrate effect of verification bias correction on test performance in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS) cohort study.
Conventional Pap smears were classified in NIS laboratories and rescreened in a reference center (RC) using modified Papanicolaou classification. Two optional methods (TBS1, TBS2) were used to convert original classification to TBS. All classifications were tested for interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators with and without verification bias correction.
Interlaboratory agreement of original classification was fair with regular kappa, but substantial with weighted kappa. TBS1 option (Class 2 in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]) did not remedy this limited reproducibility. When Class 2+ (borderline dyskaryosis) was used as cutoff for ASCUS (TBS2), interlaboratory agreement was upgraded to moderate and almost perfect. Test performance was significantly different between NIS and RC only for TBS1 option with ASCUS cutoff RC showing better sensitivity/specificity balance by area under receiver operating characteristic curve test.
In converting traditional classification to TBS, selection of appropriate equivalents to TBS categories has a major impact on interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000325383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19798883</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACYTAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: Karger</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bias ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - classification ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology ; Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - standards ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Observer Variation ; Papanicolaou Test ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; USSR ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - classification ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Vaginal Smears - standards ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta cytologica, 2009-09, Vol.53 (5), p.548-557</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21942544$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19798883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SYRJÄNEN, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHABALOVA, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IVANCHENKO, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLJUKINA, Ludmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUNBERGA, Valerija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SYRJÄNEN, Stina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study</title><title>Acta cytologica</title><addtitle>Acta Cytol</addtitle><description>To assess impact on interlaboratory agreement of 2 optional modes to convert Papanicolaou classification to Bethesda System (TBS) and demonstrate effect of verification bias correction on test performance in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS) cohort study.
Conventional Pap smears were classified in NIS laboratories and rescreened in a reference center (RC) using modified Papanicolaou classification. Two optional methods (TBS1, TBS2) were used to convert original classification to TBS. All classifications were tested for interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators with and without verification bias correction.
Interlaboratory agreement of original classification was fair with regular kappa, but substantial with weighted kappa. TBS1 option (Class 2 in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]) did not remedy this limited reproducibility. When Class 2+ (borderline dyskaryosis) was used as cutoff for ASCUS (TBS2), interlaboratory agreement was upgraded to moderate and almost perfect. Test performance was significantly different between NIS and RC only for TBS1 option with ASCUS cutoff RC showing better sensitivity/specificity balance by area under receiver operating characteristic curve test.
In converting traditional classification to TBS, selection of appropriate equivalents to TBS categories has a major impact on interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - classification</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>USSR</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - standards</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-5547</issn><issn>1938-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkc1u1TAQhS0EoreFBS-AvIFdILbz47CD0EKlChChbK8mzrg1SuxgO9A8Nm-Ac7mAZHk0nk_njI4JecLyF4yVzcs8zwUvhRT3yI41Qma8KvP7ZJfeWVaWRX1CTkP4lihRVeIhOWFN3UgpxY78-oyzd8OiTG9GE1fqNG1HCMFooyAaZynYgbbOe1SHVjtPv6L_P39jINB03mJEPxkLNoZN5hP6xE5gFR5amMEa5UZwC-0mBE_bNbrR3azUWBpvkXbKI1pjb2iHMab6ip7fzckLNw3t3XTAPuBPemkHnDFdNtIuQsSD5Ta9SJ7oaed-GIz02m4rtu7W-Q1chvUReaBhDPj4WM_I9cX5l_Z9dvXx3WX7-iqbuWhiJtVQVSlcJnveK6yappeQ86IQg0SQA2iBssa85r0ceM-KWue9KgGY0qziWpyR5390U77fFwxxP5mgcBzBolvCvqoryWRTJPDpEVz6CYf97M0Eft3__aQEPDsCEBSM2qdITfjHcdYUvEyL_QbpoaYA</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>SYRJÄNEN, Kari</creator><creator>SHABALOVA, Irena</creator><creator>IVANCHENKO, Olga</creator><creator>KLJUKINA, Ludmila</creator><creator>GRUNBERGA, Valerija</creator><creator>SYRJÄNEN, Stina</creator><general>Karger</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study</title><author>SYRJÄNEN, Kari ; SHABALOVA, Irena ; IVANCHENKO, Olga ; KLJUKINA, Ludmila ; GRUNBERGA, Valerija ; SYRJÄNEN, Stina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p239t-8cd6615918b2bce699b8a02443d8ea8daf3e87e072b8d2b147f0bc5aa1cf162f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - classification</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>USSR</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - standards</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SYRJÄNEN, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHABALOVA, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IVANCHENKO, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLJUKINA, Ludmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUNBERGA, Valerija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SYRJÄNEN, Stina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SYRJÄNEN, Kari</au><au>SHABALOVA, Irena</au><au>IVANCHENKO, Olga</au><au>KLJUKINA, Ludmila</au><au>GRUNBERGA, Valerija</au><au>SYRJÄNEN, Stina</au><aucorp>New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Cytol</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>548</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>548-557</pages><issn>0001-5547</issn><eissn>1938-2650</eissn><coden>ACYTAN</coden><abstract>To assess impact on interlaboratory agreement of 2 optional modes to convert Papanicolaou classification to Bethesda System (TBS) and demonstrate effect of verification bias correction on test performance in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS) cohort study.
Conventional Pap smears were classified in NIS laboratories and rescreened in a reference center (RC) using modified Papanicolaou classification. Two optional methods (TBS1, TBS2) were used to convert original classification to TBS. All classifications were tested for interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators with and without verification bias correction.
Interlaboratory agreement of original classification was fair with regular kappa, but substantial with weighted kappa. TBS1 option (Class 2 in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]) did not remedy this limited reproducibility. When Class 2+ (borderline dyskaryosis) was used as cutoff for ASCUS (TBS2), interlaboratory agreement was upgraded to moderate and almost perfect. Test performance was significantly different between NIS and RC only for TBS1 option with ASCUS cutoff RC showing better sensitivity/specificity balance by area under receiver operating characteristic curve test.
In converting traditional classification to TBS, selection of appropriate equivalents to TBS categories has a major impact on interlaboratory agreement and performance indicators.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>Karger</pub><pmid>19798883</pmid><doi>10.1159/000325383</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-5547 |
ispartof | Acta cytologica, 2009-09, Vol.53 (5), p.548-557 |
issn | 0001-5547 1938-2650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67681894 |
source | MEDLINE; Karger Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Bias Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - classification Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology Cohort Studies Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - standards Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Observer Variation Papanicolaou Test Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity USSR Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - classification Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Vaginal Smears - standards Young Adult |
title | Reproducibility of Classification and Correction for Verification Bias as Determinants of Performance of Papanicolaou Smear Cytology in the Screening Setting: Experience from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Cohort Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A45%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproducibility%20of%20Classification%20and%20Correction%20for%20Verification%20Bias%20as%20Determinants%20of%20Performance%20of%20Papanicolaou%20Smear%20Cytology%20in%20the%20Screening%20Setting:%20Experience%20from%20the%20New%20Independent%20States%20of%20the%20Former%20Soviet%20Union%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20cytologica&rft.au=SYRJ%C3%84NEN,%20Kari&rft.aucorp=New%20Independent%20States%20of%20the%20Former%20Soviet%20Union%20Cohort%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=548&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=548-557&rft.issn=0001-5547&rft.eissn=1938-2650&rft.coden=ACYTAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000325383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67681894%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67681894&rft_id=info:pmid/19798883&rfr_iscdi=true |