Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification
Objective To compare the survival, fertilization, early embryonic development, and meiotic spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in frozen-thawed human oocytes after slow-freezing and vitrification. Design A randomized study. Setting A university-affiliated assisted reproductive center. Patient(...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2009-10, Vol.92 (4), p.1306-1311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1306 |
container_title | Fertility and sterility |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Cao, Yun-Xia, M.D., Ph.D Xing, Qiong, M.D Li, Li, M.D Cong, Lin, M.D Zhang, Zhi-Guo, M.S Wei, Zhao-Lian, M.D Zhou, Ping, M.D |
description | Objective To compare the survival, fertilization, early embryonic development, and meiotic spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in frozen-thawed human oocytes after slow-freezing and vitrification. Design A randomized study. Setting A university-affiliated assisted reproductive center. Patient(s) Donated extra eggs from women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. Intervention(s) A total of 605 mature oocytes were divided into a slow-freezing group and a vitrification group for cryopreservation. Main Outcome Measure(s) After frozen-thawing, the oocyte survival rate, spindle assembly, and chromosome alignment were compared. The surviving oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and the rate of fertilization and embryo development were also compared in two groups. Result(s) The oocyte survival rate was statistically significantly lower in the slow-freezing group (75 out of 123, 61.0%) than the vitrification group (268 out of 292, 91.8%). The fertilization rate was the same for both groups, but the cleavage rate of zygotes was statistically significantly different between two groups: (slow-freezing, 25/46 (54.4%) versus vitrification, 142 out of 182 (78.0%). There was a considerable difference in the percentage of high-quality embryos between slow-freezing and vitrification groups: 6 out of 25 (24.0%) versus 60 out of 142 (42.3%), respectively. The percentage of blastocyst development was statistically significantly higher in the vitrification group (47 out of 60, 33.1%) than in the slow-freezing group (3 out of 25, 12.0%). There was a much higher percentage of oocyte abnormalities in terms of spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in the slow-freezing group (25 out of 64, 39.1%) compared with the vitrification group (11 out of 62, 17.7%). Conclusion(s) Vitrification is superior to the slow-freezing method, leading to improved oocyte survival rate, fertilization, and embryonic development in vitro. These results may be related to vitrified human oocytes incurring less damage to spindle integrity and chromosome alignment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.069 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67677474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0015028208035565</els_id><sourcerecordid>67677474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-838cddc9fb1313237afb3cd36eb4747fe09b11b494e615ba39dbcd0dee2e9ab03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2r1DAUhoMo3rlX_4Jko7uO-WjTdiPooF7hggt1HfJxohnbZEzaSv31ps7gBVfCIdk8583hyUEIU7KnhIqXx72DNIU8lXPPCOn2W4n-AdrRphFVIxr-EO0IoU1FWMeu0HXOR0KIoC17jK5o13PCaLdD6RDHk0o-x4Cjw3lOi1_UgFWwGEad1hi8wRYWGOJphDBhH_C3eVQFj2adIGNToFOCDGkBi_WK8xB_Vi4B_PLh65-kxU_JO2_U5GN4gh45NWR4erlv0Jd3bz8fbqu7j-8_HF7fVaZp-VR1vDPWmt5pyilnvFVOc2O5AF23deuA9JpSXfc1CNpoxXurjSUWgEGvNOE36MU595TijxnyJEefDQyDChDnLEUr2hJUF7A7gybFnBM4eUp-VGmVlMjNtzzKe99y8y23En1pfXZ5Y9Yj2PvGi-ACPL8AKhs1uKSC8fkvxxihNelE4d6cOShGFg9JZuMhGLA-gZmkjf5_pnn1T4gZfPk_NXyHFfIxzikU45LKzCSRn7b92NaDdIQ32878Bl1OvQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67677474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cao, Yun-Xia, M.D., Ph.D ; Xing, Qiong, M.D ; Li, Li, M.D ; Cong, Lin, M.D ; Zhang, Zhi-Guo, M.S ; Wei, Zhao-Lian, M.D ; Zhou, Ping, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yun-Xia, M.D., Ph.D ; Xing, Qiong, M.D ; Li, Li, M.D ; Cong, Lin, M.D ; Zhang, Zhi-Guo, M.S ; Wei, Zhao-Lian, M.D ; Zhou, Ping, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare the survival, fertilization, early embryonic development, and meiotic spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in frozen-thawed human oocytes after slow-freezing and vitrification. Design A randomized study. Setting A university-affiliated assisted reproductive center. Patient(s) Donated extra eggs from women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. Intervention(s) A total of 605 mature oocytes were divided into a slow-freezing group and a vitrification group for cryopreservation. Main Outcome Measure(s) After frozen-thawing, the oocyte survival rate, spindle assembly, and chromosome alignment were compared. The surviving oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and the rate of fertilization and embryo development were also compared in two groups. Result(s) The oocyte survival rate was statistically significantly lower in the slow-freezing group (75 out of 123, 61.0%) than the vitrification group (268 out of 292, 91.8%). The fertilization rate was the same for both groups, but the cleavage rate of zygotes was statistically significantly different between two groups: (slow-freezing, 25/46 (54.4%) versus vitrification, 142 out of 182 (78.0%). There was a considerable difference in the percentage of high-quality embryos between slow-freezing and vitrification groups: 6 out of 25 (24.0%) versus 60 out of 142 (42.3%), respectively. The percentage of blastocyst development was statistically significantly higher in the vitrification group (47 out of 60, 33.1%) than in the slow-freezing group (3 out of 25, 12.0%). There was a much higher percentage of oocyte abnormalities in terms of spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in the slow-freezing group (25 out of 64, 39.1%) compared with the vitrification group (11 out of 62, 17.7%). Conclusion(s) Vitrification is superior to the slow-freezing method, leading to improved oocyte survival rate, fertilization, and embryonic development in vitro. These results may be related to vitrified human oocytes incurring less damage to spindle integrity and chromosome alignment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.069</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18930218</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Blastocyst - cytology ; Blastocyst - metabolism ; Blastocyst - physiology ; Blastocyst - ultrastructure ; Cell Survival - physiology ; chromosome ; Chromosomes, Human - metabolism ; Cryopreservation - methods ; development ; Embryo Culture Techniques ; Embryonic Development - physiology ; Female ; fertilization ; Freezing ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; human ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Internal Medicine ; Medical sciences ; meiotic spindle ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; oocyte ; Oocytes ; Pregnancy ; Random Allocation ; Slow-freezing ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic ; Spindle Apparatus - physiology ; Time Factors ; vitrification</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2009-10, Vol.92 (4), p.1306-1311</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2009 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-838cddc9fb1313237afb3cd36eb4747fe09b11b494e615ba39dbcd0dee2e9ab03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-838cddc9fb1313237afb3cd36eb4747fe09b11b494e615ba39dbcd0dee2e9ab03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028208035565$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22014086$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18930218$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yun-Xia, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Qiong, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Li, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cong, Lin, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhi-Guo, M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Zhao-Lian, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Ping, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To compare the survival, fertilization, early embryonic development, and meiotic spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in frozen-thawed human oocytes after slow-freezing and vitrification. Design A randomized study. Setting A university-affiliated assisted reproductive center. Patient(s) Donated extra eggs from women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. Intervention(s) A total of 605 mature oocytes were divided into a slow-freezing group and a vitrification group for cryopreservation. Main Outcome Measure(s) After frozen-thawing, the oocyte survival rate, spindle assembly, and chromosome alignment were compared. The surviving oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and the rate of fertilization and embryo development were also compared in two groups. Result(s) The oocyte survival rate was statistically significantly lower in the slow-freezing group (75 out of 123, 61.0%) than the vitrification group (268 out of 292, 91.8%). The fertilization rate was the same for both groups, but the cleavage rate of zygotes was statistically significantly different between two groups: (slow-freezing, 25/46 (54.4%) versus vitrification, 142 out of 182 (78.0%). There was a considerable difference in the percentage of high-quality embryos between slow-freezing and vitrification groups: 6 out of 25 (24.0%) versus 60 out of 142 (42.3%), respectively. The percentage of blastocyst development was statistically significantly higher in the vitrification group (47 out of 60, 33.1%) than in the slow-freezing group (3 out of 25, 12.0%). There was a much higher percentage of oocyte abnormalities in terms of spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in the slow-freezing group (25 out of 64, 39.1%) compared with the vitrification group (11 out of 62, 17.7%). Conclusion(s) Vitrification is superior to the slow-freezing method, leading to improved oocyte survival rate, fertilization, and embryonic development in vitro. These results may be related to vitrified human oocytes incurring less damage to spindle integrity and chromosome alignment.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blastocyst - cytology</subject><subject>Blastocyst - metabolism</subject><subject>Blastocyst - physiology</subject><subject>Blastocyst - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Cell Survival - physiology</subject><subject>chromosome</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Human - metabolism</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - methods</subject><subject>development</subject><subject>Embryo Culture Techniques</subject><subject>Embryonic Development - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fertilization</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>meiotic spindle</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>oocyte</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Slow-freezing</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><subject>Spindle Apparatus - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>vitrification</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2r1DAUhoMo3rlX_4Jko7uO-WjTdiPooF7hggt1HfJxohnbZEzaSv31ps7gBVfCIdk8583hyUEIU7KnhIqXx72DNIU8lXPPCOn2W4n-AdrRphFVIxr-EO0IoU1FWMeu0HXOR0KIoC17jK5o13PCaLdD6RDHk0o-x4Cjw3lOi1_UgFWwGEad1hi8wRYWGOJphDBhH_C3eVQFj2adIGNToFOCDGkBi_WK8xB_Vi4B_PLh65-kxU_JO2_U5GN4gh45NWR4erlv0Jd3bz8fbqu7j-8_HF7fVaZp-VR1vDPWmt5pyilnvFVOc2O5AF23deuA9JpSXfc1CNpoxXurjSUWgEGvNOE36MU595TijxnyJEefDQyDChDnLEUr2hJUF7A7gybFnBM4eUp-VGmVlMjNtzzKe99y8y23En1pfXZ5Y9Yj2PvGi-ACPL8AKhs1uKSC8fkvxxihNelE4d6cOShGFg9JZuMhGLA-gZmkjf5_pnn1T4gZfPk_NXyHFfIxzikU45LKzCSRn7b92NaDdIQ32878Bl1OvQQ</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Cao, Yun-Xia, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Xing, Qiong, M.D</creator><creator>Li, Li, M.D</creator><creator>Cong, Lin, M.D</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhi-Guo, M.S</creator><creator>Wei, Zhao-Lian, M.D</creator><creator>Zhou, Ping, M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification</title><author>Cao, Yun-Xia, M.D., Ph.D ; Xing, Qiong, M.D ; Li, Li, M.D ; Cong, Lin, M.D ; Zhang, Zhi-Guo, M.S ; Wei, Zhao-Lian, M.D ; Zhou, Ping, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-838cddc9fb1313237afb3cd36eb4747fe09b11b494e615ba39dbcd0dee2e9ab03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blastocyst - cytology</topic><topic>Blastocyst - metabolism</topic><topic>Blastocyst - physiology</topic><topic>Blastocyst - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Cell Survival - physiology</topic><topic>chromosome</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Human - metabolism</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - methods</topic><topic>development</topic><topic>Embryo Culture Techniques</topic><topic>Embryonic Development - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fertilization</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>meiotic spindle</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>oocyte</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Slow-freezing</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</topic><topic>Spindle Apparatus - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>vitrification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yun-Xia, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Qiong, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Li, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cong, Lin, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhi-Guo, M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Zhao-Lian, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Ping, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cao, Yun-Xia, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Xing, Qiong, M.D</au><au>Li, Li, M.D</au><au>Cong, Lin, M.D</au><au>Zhang, Zhi-Guo, M.S</au><au>Wei, Zhao-Lian, M.D</au><au>Zhou, Ping, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1306</spage><epage>1311</epage><pages>1306-1311</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To compare the survival, fertilization, early embryonic development, and meiotic spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in frozen-thawed human oocytes after slow-freezing and vitrification. Design A randomized study. Setting A university-affiliated assisted reproductive center. Patient(s) Donated extra eggs from women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. Intervention(s) A total of 605 mature oocytes were divided into a slow-freezing group and a vitrification group for cryopreservation. Main Outcome Measure(s) After frozen-thawing, the oocyte survival rate, spindle assembly, and chromosome alignment were compared. The surviving oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and the rate of fertilization and embryo development were also compared in two groups. Result(s) The oocyte survival rate was statistically significantly lower in the slow-freezing group (75 out of 123, 61.0%) than the vitrification group (268 out of 292, 91.8%). The fertilization rate was the same for both groups, but the cleavage rate of zygotes was statistically significantly different between two groups: (slow-freezing, 25/46 (54.4%) versus vitrification, 142 out of 182 (78.0%). There was a considerable difference in the percentage of high-quality embryos between slow-freezing and vitrification groups: 6 out of 25 (24.0%) versus 60 out of 142 (42.3%), respectively. The percentage of blastocyst development was statistically significantly higher in the vitrification group (47 out of 60, 33.1%) than in the slow-freezing group (3 out of 25, 12.0%). There was a much higher percentage of oocyte abnormalities in terms of spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in the slow-freezing group (25 out of 64, 39.1%) compared with the vitrification group (11 out of 62, 17.7%). Conclusion(s) Vitrification is superior to the slow-freezing method, leading to improved oocyte survival rate, fertilization, and embryonic development in vitro. These results may be related to vitrified human oocytes incurring less damage to spindle integrity and chromosome alignment.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18930218</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.069</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 2009-10, Vol.92 (4), p.1306-1311 |
issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67677474 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Blastocyst - cytology Blastocyst - metabolism Blastocyst - physiology Blastocyst - ultrastructure Cell Survival - physiology chromosome Chromosomes, Human - metabolism Cryopreservation - methods development Embryo Culture Techniques Embryonic Development - physiology Female fertilization Freezing Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics human Humans In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence Internal Medicine Medical sciences meiotic spindle Obstetrics and Gynecology oocyte Oocytes Pregnancy Random Allocation Slow-freezing Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic Spindle Apparatus - physiology Time Factors vitrification |
title | Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T12%3A40%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20survival%20and%20embryonic%20development%20in%20human%20oocytes%20cryopreserved%20by%20slow-freezing%20and%20vitrification&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Cao,%20Yun-Xia,%20M.D.,%20Ph.D&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1306&rft.epage=1311&rft.pages=1306-1311&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67677474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67677474&rft_id=info:pmid/18930218&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0015028208035565&rfr_iscdi=true |