Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer
Background Guidelines for the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend radical cholecystectomy, including hepatic resection and portal lymph node (LN) dissection, for patients with early stage gallbladder (GB) cancer. We sought to determine the survival benefit conferred by adequate L...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgery 2009-10, Vol.146 (4), p.706-713 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 713 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 706 |
container_title | Surgery |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Jensen, Eric H., MD Abraham, Anasooya, MD Jarosek, Stephanie, MS Habermann, Elizabeth B., PhD Al-Refaie, Waddah B., MD Vickers, Selwyn A., MD Virnig, Beth A., PhD Tuttle, Todd M., MD, MS |
description | Background Guidelines for the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend radical cholecystectomy, including hepatic resection and portal lymph node (LN) dissection, for patients with early stage gallbladder (GB) cancer. We sought to determine the survival benefit conferred by adequate LN evaluation. Methods We used the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) neoplasm registry to identify patients who had an operation for GB cancer between 1988 and 2004. Patients were classified by stage of disease, operative procedure performed (cholecystectomy alone or radical resection), number of LNs evaluated (0, 1, >1), and receipt of radiation (RT). We included patients with T1B, T2, and T3 neoplasms who were LN positive or negative. Patients with T4 neoplasms and those with metastatic disease were excluded. Multivariate analysis included adjustment for age, race, sex, neoplasm grade, stage, operation performed, receipt of RT, and neoplasm registry. Results We identified 4,614 patients who underwent operative treatment for stage 1–2B GB (including T1B–T3 and LN positive or negative) cancer between 1988 and 2004. Of 4,614 patients, 9.6% (442) had radical resection, whereas 90.4% (4,172) had cholecystectomy alone. Among patients undergoing radical resection, 56% had LNs evaluated as compared with 28% of patients after cholecystectomy. For patients with T1B and T2 neoplasms who underwent radical resection, pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN was associated with a significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) compared with those who had no LN evaluated (123 months vs 22 months; P < .0001). Radical resection with no LN evaluation provided similar OS compared with cholecystectomy alone (22 months vs 23 months; P = NS). For patients with T3 neoplasms, radical resection, including pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN, was also associated with improved OS compared with radical resection with no LN evaluation (12 months vs 7 months; P = .0014). Again, individuals who had radical resection without LN evaluation had similar OS compared with those who had cholecystectomy alone (7 months vs 6 months; P = NS). Individuals who had radical resection with LN evaluation were more likely to receive RT than those who had radical resection without LN evaluation (33.1% vs 19.1%; P = .002). In multivariate analysis (including adjustment for RT), however, LN evaluation was still associated with a decrease in mortality compared with no LN evaluated (HR = |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67676268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606009004802</els_id><sourcerecordid>21155442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b6a1930fab80a5a864a1e47e1f9f44439e635e80cf84975ac3b8560a7825cde43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2r1DAUxYMovvHpP-BCsnLXetOkaQoiyMMvGHChrsNtejsv8_oxJu1I_3tTZkBwoWQRLvzOSTjnMvZSQC5A6DfHPC7hkBcAdQ46h1I_YjtRyiKrpBaP2Q5A1pkGDTfsWYxHSKAS5im7EXVlapCwYw_7dTjd83FqidMZ-wVnP43cR44xTs7jTC3_5ed77odTmM5pSo-efUI5djOFbTxQWHk3BU4Y-pXHGQ_ED9j3TY9tmxiHo6PwnD3psI_04nrfsh8fP3y_-5ztv376cvd-nzmlYM4ajaKW0GFjAEs0WqEgVZHo6k4pJWvSsiQDrjOqrkp0sjGlBqxMUbqWlLxlry--6cM_F4qzHXx01Pc40rREq6t0Cm3-CxZClKVSRQKLC-jCFGOgzp6CHzCsVoDdurBHu-Vgty4saJu6SKJXV_elGaj9I7mGn4C3F4BSGGdPwUbnKSXV-kButu3k_-3_7i-56_3oHfYPtFI8TksYU8xW2FhYsN-2bdiWAWoAZaCQvwGU7LFK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21155442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Jensen, Eric H., MD ; Abraham, Anasooya, MD ; Jarosek, Stephanie, MS ; Habermann, Elizabeth B., PhD ; Al-Refaie, Waddah B., MD ; Vickers, Selwyn A., MD ; Virnig, Beth A., PhD ; Tuttle, Todd M., MD, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Eric H., MD ; Abraham, Anasooya, MD ; Jarosek, Stephanie, MS ; Habermann, Elizabeth B., PhD ; Al-Refaie, Waddah B., MD ; Vickers, Selwyn A., MD ; Virnig, Beth A., PhD ; Tuttle, Todd M., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Background Guidelines for the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend radical cholecystectomy, including hepatic resection and portal lymph node (LN) dissection, for patients with early stage gallbladder (GB) cancer. We sought to determine the survival benefit conferred by adequate LN evaluation. Methods We used the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) neoplasm registry to identify patients who had an operation for GB cancer between 1988 and 2004. Patients were classified by stage of disease, operative procedure performed (cholecystectomy alone or radical resection), number of LNs evaluated (0, 1, >1), and receipt of radiation (RT). We included patients with T1B, T2, and T3 neoplasms who were LN positive or negative. Patients with T4 neoplasms and those with metastatic disease were excluded. Multivariate analysis included adjustment for age, race, sex, neoplasm grade, stage, operation performed, receipt of RT, and neoplasm registry. Results We identified 4,614 patients who underwent operative treatment for stage 1–2B GB (including T1B–T3 and LN positive or negative) cancer between 1988 and 2004. Of 4,614 patients, 9.6% (442) had radical resection, whereas 90.4% (4,172) had cholecystectomy alone. Among patients undergoing radical resection, 56% had LNs evaluated as compared with 28% of patients after cholecystectomy. For patients with T1B and T2 neoplasms who underwent radical resection, pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN was associated with a significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) compared with those who had no LN evaluated (123 months vs 22 months; P < .0001). Radical resection with no LN evaluation provided similar OS compared with cholecystectomy alone (22 months vs 23 months; P = NS). For patients with T3 neoplasms, radical resection, including pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN, was also associated with improved OS compared with radical resection with no LN evaluation (12 months vs 7 months; P = .0014). Again, individuals who had radical resection without LN evaluation had similar OS compared with those who had cholecystectomy alone (7 months vs 6 months; P = NS). Individuals who had radical resection with LN evaluation were more likely to receive RT than those who had radical resection without LN evaluation (33.1% vs 19.1%; P = .002). In multivariate analysis (including adjustment for RT), however, LN evaluation was still associated with a decrease in mortality compared with no LN evaluated (HR = 0.611; 95% CI = 0.484, 0.770). The pathologic evaluation of additional LN (>1) did not provide any additional benefit compared with the evaluation of a single node (HR = 0.795; 95% CI = 0.571, 1.107). Radical resection alone (without LN evaluation) did not provide any benefit over cholecystectomy alone (HR = 1.098; 95% CI = 0.971, 1.241). Conclusion LN evaluation is a critical component of radical resection for GB cancer. In the absence of LN evaluation, radical resection provides no benefit over cholecystectomy alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19789030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Gallbladder Neoplasms - mortality ; Gallbladder Neoplasms - pathology ; Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; SEER Program ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2009-10, Vol.146 (4), p.706-713</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b6a1930fab80a5a864a1e47e1f9f44439e635e80cf84975ac3b8560a7825cde43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b6a1930fab80a5a864a1e47e1f9f44439e635e80cf84975ac3b8560a7825cde43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19789030$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Eric H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Anasooya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarosek, Stephanie, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Elizabeth B., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Refaie, Waddah B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickers, Selwyn A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virnig, Beth A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle, Todd M., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Background Guidelines for the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend radical cholecystectomy, including hepatic resection and portal lymph node (LN) dissection, for patients with early stage gallbladder (GB) cancer. We sought to determine the survival benefit conferred by adequate LN evaluation. Methods We used the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) neoplasm registry to identify patients who had an operation for GB cancer between 1988 and 2004. Patients were classified by stage of disease, operative procedure performed (cholecystectomy alone or radical resection), number of LNs evaluated (0, 1, >1), and receipt of radiation (RT). We included patients with T1B, T2, and T3 neoplasms who were LN positive or negative. Patients with T4 neoplasms and those with metastatic disease were excluded. Multivariate analysis included adjustment for age, race, sex, neoplasm grade, stage, operation performed, receipt of RT, and neoplasm registry. Results We identified 4,614 patients who underwent operative treatment for stage 1–2B GB (including T1B–T3 and LN positive or negative) cancer between 1988 and 2004. Of 4,614 patients, 9.6% (442) had radical resection, whereas 90.4% (4,172) had cholecystectomy alone. Among patients undergoing radical resection, 56% had LNs evaluated as compared with 28% of patients after cholecystectomy. For patients with T1B and T2 neoplasms who underwent radical resection, pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN was associated with a significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) compared with those who had no LN evaluated (123 months vs 22 months; P < .0001). Radical resection with no LN evaluation provided similar OS compared with cholecystectomy alone (22 months vs 23 months; P = NS). For patients with T3 neoplasms, radical resection, including pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN, was also associated with improved OS compared with radical resection with no LN evaluation (12 months vs 7 months; P = .0014). Again, individuals who had radical resection without LN evaluation had similar OS compared with those who had cholecystectomy alone (7 months vs 6 months; P = NS). Individuals who had radical resection with LN evaluation were more likely to receive RT than those who had radical resection without LN evaluation (33.1% vs 19.1%; P = .002). In multivariate analysis (including adjustment for RT), however, LN evaluation was still associated with a decrease in mortality compared with no LN evaluated (HR = 0.611; 95% CI = 0.484, 0.770). The pathologic evaluation of additional LN (>1) did not provide any additional benefit compared with the evaluation of a single node (HR = 0.795; 95% CI = 0.571, 1.107). Radical resection alone (without LN evaluation) did not provide any benefit over cholecystectomy alone (HR = 1.098; 95% CI = 0.971, 1.241). Conclusion LN evaluation is a critical component of radical resection for GB cancer. In the absence of LN evaluation, radical resection provides no benefit over cholecystectomy alone.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallbladder Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Gallbladder Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks2r1DAUxYMovvHpP-BCsnLXetOkaQoiyMMvGHChrsNtejsv8_oxJu1I_3tTZkBwoWQRLvzOSTjnMvZSQC5A6DfHPC7hkBcAdQ46h1I_YjtRyiKrpBaP2Q5A1pkGDTfsWYxHSKAS5im7EXVlapCwYw_7dTjd83FqidMZ-wVnP43cR44xTs7jTC3_5ed77odTmM5pSo-efUI5djOFbTxQWHk3BU4Y-pXHGQ_ED9j3TY9tmxiHo6PwnD3psI_04nrfsh8fP3y_-5ztv376cvd-nzmlYM4ajaKW0GFjAEs0WqEgVZHo6k4pJWvSsiQDrjOqrkp0sjGlBqxMUbqWlLxlry--6cM_F4qzHXx01Pc40rREq6t0Cm3-CxZClKVSRQKLC-jCFGOgzp6CHzCsVoDdurBHu-Vgty4saJu6SKJXV_elGaj9I7mGn4C3F4BSGGdPwUbnKSXV-kButu3k_-3_7i-56_3oHfYPtFI8TksYU8xW2FhYsN-2bdiWAWoAZaCQvwGU7LFK</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Jensen, Eric H., MD</creator><creator>Abraham, Anasooya, MD</creator><creator>Jarosek, Stephanie, MS</creator><creator>Habermann, Elizabeth B., PhD</creator><creator>Al-Refaie, Waddah B., MD</creator><creator>Vickers, Selwyn A., MD</creator><creator>Virnig, Beth A., PhD</creator><creator>Tuttle, Todd M., MD, MS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer</title><author>Jensen, Eric H., MD ; Abraham, Anasooya, MD ; Jarosek, Stephanie, MS ; Habermann, Elizabeth B., PhD ; Al-Refaie, Waddah B., MD ; Vickers, Selwyn A., MD ; Virnig, Beth A., PhD ; Tuttle, Todd M., MD, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b6a1930fab80a5a864a1e47e1f9f44439e635e80cf84975ac3b8560a7825cde43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallbladder Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Gallbladder Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Eric H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Anasooya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarosek, Stephanie, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Elizabeth B., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Refaie, Waddah B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickers, Selwyn A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virnig, Beth A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle, Todd M., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jensen, Eric H., MD</au><au>Abraham, Anasooya, MD</au><au>Jarosek, Stephanie, MS</au><au>Habermann, Elizabeth B., PhD</au><au>Al-Refaie, Waddah B., MD</au><au>Vickers, Selwyn A., MD</au><au>Virnig, Beth A., PhD</au><au>Tuttle, Todd M., MD, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>706</spage><epage>713</epage><pages>706-713</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>Background Guidelines for the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend radical cholecystectomy, including hepatic resection and portal lymph node (LN) dissection, for patients with early stage gallbladder (GB) cancer. We sought to determine the survival benefit conferred by adequate LN evaluation. Methods We used the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) neoplasm registry to identify patients who had an operation for GB cancer between 1988 and 2004. Patients were classified by stage of disease, operative procedure performed (cholecystectomy alone or radical resection), number of LNs evaluated (0, 1, >1), and receipt of radiation (RT). We included patients with T1B, T2, and T3 neoplasms who were LN positive or negative. Patients with T4 neoplasms and those with metastatic disease were excluded. Multivariate analysis included adjustment for age, race, sex, neoplasm grade, stage, operation performed, receipt of RT, and neoplasm registry. Results We identified 4,614 patients who underwent operative treatment for stage 1–2B GB (including T1B–T3 and LN positive or negative) cancer between 1988 and 2004. Of 4,614 patients, 9.6% (442) had radical resection, whereas 90.4% (4,172) had cholecystectomy alone. Among patients undergoing radical resection, 56% had LNs evaluated as compared with 28% of patients after cholecystectomy. For patients with T1B and T2 neoplasms who underwent radical resection, pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN was associated with a significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) compared with those who had no LN evaluated (123 months vs 22 months; P < .0001). Radical resection with no LN evaluation provided similar OS compared with cholecystectomy alone (22 months vs 23 months; P = NS). For patients with T3 neoplasms, radical resection, including pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN, was also associated with improved OS compared with radical resection with no LN evaluation (12 months vs 7 months; P = .0014). Again, individuals who had radical resection without LN evaluation had similar OS compared with those who had cholecystectomy alone (7 months vs 6 months; P = NS). Individuals who had radical resection with LN evaluation were more likely to receive RT than those who had radical resection without LN evaluation (33.1% vs 19.1%; P = .002). In multivariate analysis (including adjustment for RT), however, LN evaluation was still associated with a decrease in mortality compared with no LN evaluated (HR = 0.611; 95% CI = 0.484, 0.770). The pathologic evaluation of additional LN (>1) did not provide any additional benefit compared with the evaluation of a single node (HR = 0.795; 95% CI = 0.571, 1.107). Radical resection alone (without LN evaluation) did not provide any benefit over cholecystectomy alone (HR = 1.098; 95% CI = 0.971, 1.241). Conclusion LN evaluation is a critical component of radical resection for GB cancer. In the absence of LN evaluation, radical resection provides no benefit over cholecystectomy alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>19789030</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.056</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-6060 |
ispartof | Surgery, 2009-10, Vol.146 (4), p.706-713 |
issn | 0039-6060 1532-7361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67676268 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Female Gallbladder Neoplasms - mortality Gallbladder Neoplasms - pathology Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery Humans Lymph Nodes - pathology Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging SEER Program Surgery |
title | Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lymph%20node%20evaluation%20is%20associated%20with%20improved%20survival%20after%20surgery%20for%20early%20stage%20gallbladder%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Jensen,%20Eric%20H.,%20MD&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=706&rft.epage=713&rft.pages=706-713&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21155442%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21155442&rft_id=info:pmid/19789030&rft_els_id=S0039606009004802&rfr_iscdi=true |