Institutional protocol improves retrievable inferior vena cava filter recovery rate

Background In the trauma population, the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters (RIVCF) is rapidly gaining acceptance in patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism. This study reports the impact of an institutional protocol on retrieval rates of RIVCF at a level I trauma center. Methods...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2009-10, Vol.146 (4), p.809-816
Hauptverfasser: Ko, Sae Hee, MD, Reynolds, Benjamin R., PA-C, Nicholas, Deidra H., RN, Zenati, Mazen, MD, Alarcon, Louis, MD, Dillavou, Ellen D., MD, Chaer, Rabih, MD, Peitzman, Andrew B., MD, Cho, Jae-Sung, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 816
container_issue 4
container_start_page 809
container_title Surgery
container_volume 146
creator Ko, Sae Hee, MD
Reynolds, Benjamin R., PA-C
Nicholas, Deidra H., RN
Zenati, Mazen, MD
Alarcon, Louis, MD
Dillavou, Ellen D., MD
Chaer, Rabih, MD
Peitzman, Andrew B., MD
Cho, Jae-Sung, MD
description Background In the trauma population, the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters (RIVCF) is rapidly gaining acceptance in patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism. This study reports the impact of an institutional protocol on retrieval rates of RIVCF at a level I trauma center. Methods A review of an institutional Trauma Registry identified 94 consecutive patients who received RIVCF between January 2004 and February 2007 (group I) before the protocol was instituted. Under the protocol, 61 consecutive trauma patients received RIVCF between August 2007 and July 2008 (group II) and were prospectively followed. Results Filter retrieval eligibility criteria were met in 81% (76/94) of patients in group I and in 61% (37/61) of patients in group II. Of those eligible, retrieval-attempt rates were 42% (32/76) in group I versus 95% (35/37) in group II ( P < .001). Clinician oversight of the filter accounted for 89% (39/44) of failure of retrieval attempts; patient noncompliance accounted for the rest in group I. In group II, the latter accounted for all such failures. Retrieval was successful in 37% (28/76) and in 84% (31/37) of the eligible patients in groups I and II, respectively ( P < .001). No retrieval procedure-related complications occurred. Conclusion An institutional protocol for prospective monitoring of RIVCF significantly increases filter retrieval rate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67675062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S003960600900378X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67675062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-96b775ea6588fd83d4a556b1317d0a0e46938a70600af781a7195efdee458c8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIn7x1W-mPfIAIsvixsOBhFbyFmnS1ZMx01iTdMP9-08yA4MFT6vC8L5WnGHvNoeHAxbtDk5b4q2kBdAOigbZ9wnZ86NpadoI_ZTuATtcCBFyxFykdoIA9V8_ZFddSaejbHbu_nVN2eckuzOirhxhysMFX7ljGlVIVKUdHK-49VW6eKLoQq5VmrCyuWE3OZ4qFsoWOpypippfs2YQ-0avLe81-fP70_eZrfffty-3Nx7va9qBzrcVeyoFQDEpNo-rGHodB7HnH5QgI1AvdKZRlfcBJKo6S64GmkagflFXYXbO3596y6p-FUjZHlyx5jzOFJRkhhRxAtAVsz6CNIaVIk3mI7ojxZDiYTaU5mE2l2VQaEKaoLKE3l_Zlf6Txb-TirgDvzwCVP66OoknW0WxpdEVHNmNw_-__8E_cejc7i_43nSgdwhLLRZLhJrUGzP12zO2WoMsk1c_uESCxm3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67675062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional protocol improves retrievable inferior vena cava filter recovery rate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ko, Sae Hee, MD ; Reynolds, Benjamin R., PA-C ; Nicholas, Deidra H., RN ; Zenati, Mazen, MD ; Alarcon, Louis, MD ; Dillavou, Ellen D., MD ; Chaer, Rabih, MD ; Peitzman, Andrew B., MD ; Cho, Jae-Sung, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ko, Sae Hee, MD ; Reynolds, Benjamin R., PA-C ; Nicholas, Deidra H., RN ; Zenati, Mazen, MD ; Alarcon, Louis, MD ; Dillavou, Ellen D., MD ; Chaer, Rabih, MD ; Peitzman, Andrew B., MD ; Cho, Jae-Sung, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background In the trauma population, the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters (RIVCF) is rapidly gaining acceptance in patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism. This study reports the impact of an institutional protocol on retrieval rates of RIVCF at a level I trauma center. Methods A review of an institutional Trauma Registry identified 94 consecutive patients who received RIVCF between January 2004 and February 2007 (group I) before the protocol was instituted. Under the protocol, 61 consecutive trauma patients received RIVCF between August 2007 and July 2008 (group II) and were prospectively followed. Results Filter retrieval eligibility criteria were met in 81% (76/94) of patients in group I and in 61% (37/61) of patients in group II. Of those eligible, retrieval-attempt rates were 42% (32/76) in group I versus 95% (35/37) in group II ( P &lt; .001). Clinician oversight of the filter accounted for 89% (39/44) of failure of retrieval attempts; patient noncompliance accounted for the rest in group I. In group II, the latter accounted for all such failures. Retrieval was successful in 37% (28/76) and in 84% (31/37) of the eligible patients in groups I and II, respectively ( P &lt; .001). No retrieval procedure-related complications occurred. Conclusion An institutional protocol for prospective monitoring of RIVCF significantly increases filter retrieval rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19789042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Device Removal ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control ; Surgery ; Vena Cava Filters ; Venous Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2009-10, Vol.146 (4), p.809-816</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-96b775ea6588fd83d4a556b1317d0a0e46938a70600af781a7195efdee458c8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-96b775ea6588fd83d4a556b1317d0a0e46938a70600af781a7195efdee458c8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003960600900378X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19789042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ko, Sae Hee, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Benjamin R., PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholas, Deidra H., RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenati, Mazen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alarcon, Louis, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillavou, Ellen D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaer, Rabih, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peitzman, Andrew B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jae-Sung, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional protocol improves retrievable inferior vena cava filter recovery rate</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Background In the trauma population, the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters (RIVCF) is rapidly gaining acceptance in patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism. This study reports the impact of an institutional protocol on retrieval rates of RIVCF at a level I trauma center. Methods A review of an institutional Trauma Registry identified 94 consecutive patients who received RIVCF between January 2004 and February 2007 (group I) before the protocol was instituted. Under the protocol, 61 consecutive trauma patients received RIVCF between August 2007 and July 2008 (group II) and were prospectively followed. Results Filter retrieval eligibility criteria were met in 81% (76/94) of patients in group I and in 61% (37/61) of patients in group II. Of those eligible, retrieval-attempt rates were 42% (32/76) in group I versus 95% (35/37) in group II ( P &lt; .001). Clinician oversight of the filter accounted for 89% (39/44) of failure of retrieval attempts; patient noncompliance accounted for the rest in group I. In group II, the latter accounted for all such failures. Retrieval was successful in 37% (28/76) and in 84% (31/37) of the eligible patients in groups I and II, respectively ( P &lt; .001). No retrieval procedure-related complications occurred. Conclusion An institutional protocol for prospective monitoring of RIVCF significantly increases filter retrieval rate.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vena Cava Filters</subject><subject>Venous Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIn7x1W-mPfIAIsvixsOBhFbyFmnS1ZMx01iTdMP9-08yA4MFT6vC8L5WnGHvNoeHAxbtDk5b4q2kBdAOigbZ9wnZ86NpadoI_ZTuATtcCBFyxFykdoIA9V8_ZFddSaejbHbu_nVN2eckuzOirhxhysMFX7ljGlVIVKUdHK-49VW6eKLoQq5VmrCyuWE3OZ4qFsoWOpypippfs2YQ-0avLe81-fP70_eZrfffty-3Nx7va9qBzrcVeyoFQDEpNo-rGHodB7HnH5QgI1AvdKZRlfcBJKo6S64GmkagflFXYXbO3596y6p-FUjZHlyx5jzOFJRkhhRxAtAVsz6CNIaVIk3mI7ojxZDiYTaU5mE2l2VQaEKaoLKE3l_Zlf6Txb-TirgDvzwCVP66OoknW0WxpdEVHNmNw_-__8E_cejc7i_43nSgdwhLLRZLhJrUGzP12zO2WoMsk1c_uESCxm3w</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Ko, Sae Hee, MD</creator><creator>Reynolds, Benjamin R., PA-C</creator><creator>Nicholas, Deidra H., RN</creator><creator>Zenati, Mazen, MD</creator><creator>Alarcon, Louis, MD</creator><creator>Dillavou, Ellen D., MD</creator><creator>Chaer, Rabih, MD</creator><creator>Peitzman, Andrew B., MD</creator><creator>Cho, Jae-Sung, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Institutional protocol improves retrievable inferior vena cava filter recovery rate</title><author>Ko, Sae Hee, MD ; Reynolds, Benjamin R., PA-C ; Nicholas, Deidra H., RN ; Zenati, Mazen, MD ; Alarcon, Louis, MD ; Dillavou, Ellen D., MD ; Chaer, Rabih, MD ; Peitzman, Andrew B., MD ; Cho, Jae-Sung, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-96b775ea6588fd83d4a556b1317d0a0e46938a70600af781a7195efdee458c8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vena Cava Filters</topic><topic>Venous Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ko, Sae Hee, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Benjamin R., PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholas, Deidra H., RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenati, Mazen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alarcon, Louis, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillavou, Ellen D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaer, Rabih, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peitzman, Andrew B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jae-Sung, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ko, Sae Hee, MD</au><au>Reynolds, Benjamin R., PA-C</au><au>Nicholas, Deidra H., RN</au><au>Zenati, Mazen, MD</au><au>Alarcon, Louis, MD</au><au>Dillavou, Ellen D., MD</au><au>Chaer, Rabih, MD</au><au>Peitzman, Andrew B., MD</au><au>Cho, Jae-Sung, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional protocol improves retrievable inferior vena cava filter recovery rate</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>809</spage><epage>816</epage><pages>809-816</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>Background In the trauma population, the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters (RIVCF) is rapidly gaining acceptance in patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism. This study reports the impact of an institutional protocol on retrieval rates of RIVCF at a level I trauma center. Methods A review of an institutional Trauma Registry identified 94 consecutive patients who received RIVCF between January 2004 and February 2007 (group I) before the protocol was instituted. Under the protocol, 61 consecutive trauma patients received RIVCF between August 2007 and July 2008 (group II) and were prospectively followed. Results Filter retrieval eligibility criteria were met in 81% (76/94) of patients in group I and in 61% (37/61) of patients in group II. Of those eligible, retrieval-attempt rates were 42% (32/76) in group I versus 95% (35/37) in group II ( P &lt; .001). Clinician oversight of the filter accounted for 89% (39/44) of failure of retrieval attempts; patient noncompliance accounted for the rest in group I. In group II, the latter accounted for all such failures. Retrieval was successful in 37% (28/76) and in 84% (31/37) of the eligible patients in groups I and II, respectively ( P &lt; .001). No retrieval procedure-related complications occurred. Conclusion An institutional protocol for prospective monitoring of RIVCF significantly increases filter retrieval rate.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>19789042</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.022</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2009-10, Vol.146 (4), p.809-816
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67675062
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Device Removal
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pulmonary Embolism - prevention & control
Surgery
Vena Cava Filters
Venous Thromboembolism - prevention & control
title Institutional protocol improves retrievable inferior vena cava filter recovery rate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A31%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20protocol%20improves%20retrievable%20inferior%20vena%20cava%20filter%20recovery%20rate&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Ko,%20Sae%20Hee,%20MD&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=809&rft.epage=816&rft.pages=809-816&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67675062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67675062&rft_id=info:pmid/19789042&rft_els_id=S003960600900378X&rfr_iscdi=true