Experimental evaluation of the efficacy of sanitation procedures in operating rooms

Background There remains much debate on how to define an adequate sanitation protocol in hospital environments. Methods The efficacy of a sanitation protocol in the operating room (OR) of a modern hospital was evaluated by measuring bacterial load on different types of finishing materials of all int...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of infection control 2009-10, Vol.37 (8), p.658-664
Hauptverfasser: Frabetti, Alessia, PhD, Vandini, Alberta, BD, Balboni, Piergiorgio, BD, Triolo, Fabio, PhD, Mazzacane, Sante, Ing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 664
container_issue 8
container_start_page 658
container_title American journal of infection control
container_volume 37
creator Frabetti, Alessia, PhD
Vandini, Alberta, BD
Balboni, Piergiorgio, BD
Triolo, Fabio, PhD
Mazzacane, Sante, Ing
description Background There remains much debate on how to define an adequate sanitation protocol in hospital environments. Methods The efficacy of a sanitation protocol in the operating room (OR) of a modern hospital was evaluated by measuring bacterial load on different types of finishing materials of all internal surfaces (ie, walls, floors, and furnishings). Samples were obtained before cleaning and over the subsequent 24 hours. A total of 2124 microbiological samples were collected using RODAC plates and sterile swabs. Results The data demonstrate a very significant postsanitation reduction of bacterial load on floors and furnishings; however, no significant data on walls were obtained, because of the low levels of initial contamination (1.50 to 5.98 cfu/100 cm2 ). The increase in postsanitation bacterial load over time was greater on smooth materials than on porous materials, on which a further reduction in contamination was seen. The study outcomes were confirmed by simulation experiments in which different materials were contaminated with a predetermined bacterial load and then subjected to the sanitation protocol. These simulation experiments were carried out both in vitro and in an eddy-flux testing room that simulated a full-scale OR similar (in terms of architectonic systems) to a real setting. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that the spatial (vertical/horizontal) disposition of materials affects the initial contamination level, which is always much lower on vertical surfaces than on horizontal ones. Moreover, postsanitation bacterial load recovery is dependent on the physical properties of the surface.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67671406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0196655309005847</els_id><sourcerecordid>1973764081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-b37c82e7285cd3dd6b5d1296082e644727f049f8f1a791182ed0aeae113fb1933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt1qFDEUgIModrv6Al7IINi7GfMzSSYgBSlVC4VeWK9DNnOiGWeTNZkp7tv0WXyyZtilQi-8Csn5zuHkOwehNwQ3BBPxYWjM4G1DMVYNZg0m5BlaEU5lzagSz9EKEyVqwTk7Qac5D7iATPCX6IQornjbkRW6vfyzg-S3ECYzVnBnxtlMPoYqumr6CRU4562x--WeTfDTIbpL0UI_J8iVD3_vY6lRAuFHlWLc5lfohTNjhtfHc42-f768vfhaX998ubr4dF1bzuhUb5i0HQVJO2571vdiw3tSOsflUbStpNLhVrnOESMVIeW1xwYMEMLchijG1ujsULe083uGPOmtzxbG0QSIc9ZCCklaLAr47gk4xDmF0pvuJOWdVG1XIHqAbIo5J3B6V8SYtNcE60W4HvQiXC_CNWa6CC9Jb4-V580W-n8pR8MFeH8ETLZmdMkE6_MjRykWtC0jWqOPBw6KsDsPSWfrIRTLPoGddB_9__s4f5JuRx_K6MZfsIf8-F2iM9VYf1tWY9kMrDDmXSvZAydOs9Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>872587948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental evaluation of the efficacy of sanitation procedures in operating rooms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Frabetti, Alessia, PhD ; Vandini, Alberta, BD ; Balboni, Piergiorgio, BD ; Triolo, Fabio, PhD ; Mazzacane, Sante, Ing</creator><creatorcontrib>Frabetti, Alessia, PhD ; Vandini, Alberta, BD ; Balboni, Piergiorgio, BD ; Triolo, Fabio, PhD ; Mazzacane, Sante, Ing</creatorcontrib><description>Background There remains much debate on how to define an adequate sanitation protocol in hospital environments. Methods The efficacy of a sanitation protocol in the operating room (OR) of a modern hospital was evaluated by measuring bacterial load on different types of finishing materials of all internal surfaces (ie, walls, floors, and furnishings). Samples were obtained before cleaning and over the subsequent 24 hours. A total of 2124 microbiological samples were collected using RODAC plates and sterile swabs. Results The data demonstrate a very significant postsanitation reduction of bacterial load on floors and furnishings; however, no significant data on walls were obtained, because of the low levels of initial contamination (1.50 to 5.98 cfu/100 cm2 ). The increase in postsanitation bacterial load over time was greater on smooth materials than on porous materials, on which a further reduction in contamination was seen. The study outcomes were confirmed by simulation experiments in which different materials were contaminated with a predetermined bacterial load and then subjected to the sanitation protocol. These simulation experiments were carried out both in vitro and in an eddy-flux testing room that simulated a full-scale OR similar (in terms of architectonic systems) to a real setting. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that the spatial (vertical/horizontal) disposition of materials affects the initial contamination level, which is always much lower on vertical surfaces than on horizontal ones. Moreover, postsanitation bacterial load recovery is dependent on the physical properties of the surface.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-6553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19595481</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Contamination ; Cross Infection - microbiology ; Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Disinfectants - pharmacology ; disinfection ; Emergency medical care ; Environmental Microbiology ; environmental pollution ; Epidemiology. Vaccinations ; Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control ; finishing materials ; Floors and Floorcoverings ; General aspects ; Humans ; Infection Control ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Interior Design and Furnishings ; Medical sciences ; Microbiology ; Operating rooms ; Operating Rooms - standards ; Operating Rooms - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Protocol ; Sanitation ; Sanitation - methods ; Sanitation - standards</subject><ispartof>American journal of infection control, 2009-10, Vol.37 (8), p.658-664</ispartof><rights>Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Mosby-Year Book, Inc. Oct 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-b37c82e7285cd3dd6b5d1296082e644727f049f8f1a791182ed0aeae113fb1933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-b37c82e7285cd3dd6b5d1296082e644727f049f8f1a791182ed0aeae113fb1933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655309005847$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22062455$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19595481$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frabetti, Alessia, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandini, Alberta, BD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balboni, Piergiorgio, BD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triolo, Fabio, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzacane, Sante, Ing</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental evaluation of the efficacy of sanitation procedures in operating rooms</title><title>American journal of infection control</title><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><description>Background There remains much debate on how to define an adequate sanitation protocol in hospital environments. Methods The efficacy of a sanitation protocol in the operating room (OR) of a modern hospital was evaluated by measuring bacterial load on different types of finishing materials of all internal surfaces (ie, walls, floors, and furnishings). Samples were obtained before cleaning and over the subsequent 24 hours. A total of 2124 microbiological samples were collected using RODAC plates and sterile swabs. Results The data demonstrate a very significant postsanitation reduction of bacterial load on floors and furnishings; however, no significant data on walls were obtained, because of the low levels of initial contamination (1.50 to 5.98 cfu/100 cm2 ). The increase in postsanitation bacterial load over time was greater on smooth materials than on porous materials, on which a further reduction in contamination was seen. The study outcomes were confirmed by simulation experiments in which different materials were contaminated with a predetermined bacterial load and then subjected to the sanitation protocol. These simulation experiments were carried out both in vitro and in an eddy-flux testing room that simulated a full-scale OR similar (in terms of architectonic systems) to a real setting. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that the spatial (vertical/horizontal) disposition of materials affects the initial contamination level, which is always much lower on vertical surfaces than on horizontal ones. Moreover, postsanitation bacterial load recovery is dependent on the physical properties of the surface.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Cross Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Disinfectants - pharmacology</subject><subject>disinfection</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Environmental Microbiology</subject><subject>environmental pollution</subject><subject>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>finishing materials</subject><subject>Floors and Floorcoverings</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Interior Design and Furnishings</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Operating rooms</subject><subject>Operating Rooms - standards</subject><subject>Operating Rooms - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Sanitation</subject><subject>Sanitation - methods</subject><subject>Sanitation - standards</subject><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt1qFDEUgIModrv6Al7IINi7GfMzSSYgBSlVC4VeWK9DNnOiGWeTNZkp7tv0WXyyZtilQi-8Csn5zuHkOwehNwQ3BBPxYWjM4G1DMVYNZg0m5BlaEU5lzagSz9EKEyVqwTk7Qac5D7iATPCX6IQornjbkRW6vfyzg-S3ECYzVnBnxtlMPoYqumr6CRU4562x--WeTfDTIbpL0UI_J8iVD3_vY6lRAuFHlWLc5lfohTNjhtfHc42-f768vfhaX998ubr4dF1bzuhUb5i0HQVJO2571vdiw3tSOsflUbStpNLhVrnOESMVIeW1xwYMEMLchijG1ujsULe083uGPOmtzxbG0QSIc9ZCCklaLAr47gk4xDmF0pvuJOWdVG1XIHqAbIo5J3B6V8SYtNcE60W4HvQiXC_CNWa6CC9Jb4-V580W-n8pR8MFeH8ETLZmdMkE6_MjRykWtC0jWqOPBw6KsDsPSWfrIRTLPoGddB_9__s4f5JuRx_K6MZfsIf8-F2iM9VYf1tWY9kMrDDmXSvZAydOs9Y</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Frabetti, Alessia, PhD</creator><creator>Vandini, Alberta, BD</creator><creator>Balboni, Piergiorgio, BD</creator><creator>Triolo, Fabio, PhD</creator><creator>Mazzacane, Sante, Ing</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Mosby-Year Book, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Experimental evaluation of the efficacy of sanitation procedures in operating rooms</title><author>Frabetti, Alessia, PhD ; Vandini, Alberta, BD ; Balboni, Piergiorgio, BD ; Triolo, Fabio, PhD ; Mazzacane, Sante, Ing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-b37c82e7285cd3dd6b5d1296082e644727f049f8f1a791182ed0aeae113fb1933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Cross Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Disinfectants - pharmacology</topic><topic>disinfection</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Environmental Microbiology</topic><topic>environmental pollution</topic><topic>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>finishing materials</topic><topic>Floors and Floorcoverings</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Interior Design and Furnishings</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Operating rooms</topic><topic>Operating Rooms - standards</topic><topic>Operating Rooms - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Sanitation</topic><topic>Sanitation - methods</topic><topic>Sanitation - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frabetti, Alessia, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandini, Alberta, BD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balboni, Piergiorgio, BD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triolo, Fabio, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzacane, Sante, Ing</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frabetti, Alessia, PhD</au><au>Vandini, Alberta, BD</au><au>Balboni, Piergiorgio, BD</au><au>Triolo, Fabio, PhD</au><au>Mazzacane, Sante, Ing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental evaluation of the efficacy of sanitation procedures in operating rooms</atitle><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>658</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>658-664</pages><issn>0196-6553</issn><eissn>1527-3296</eissn><abstract>Background There remains much debate on how to define an adequate sanitation protocol in hospital environments. Methods The efficacy of a sanitation protocol in the operating room (OR) of a modern hospital was evaluated by measuring bacterial load on different types of finishing materials of all internal surfaces (ie, walls, floors, and furnishings). Samples were obtained before cleaning and over the subsequent 24 hours. A total of 2124 microbiological samples were collected using RODAC plates and sterile swabs. Results The data demonstrate a very significant postsanitation reduction of bacterial load on floors and furnishings; however, no significant data on walls were obtained, because of the low levels of initial contamination (1.50 to 5.98 cfu/100 cm2 ). The increase in postsanitation bacterial load over time was greater on smooth materials than on porous materials, on which a further reduction in contamination was seen. The study outcomes were confirmed by simulation experiments in which different materials were contaminated with a predetermined bacterial load and then subjected to the sanitation protocol. These simulation experiments were carried out both in vitro and in an eddy-flux testing room that simulated a full-scale OR similar (in terms of architectonic systems) to a real setting. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that the spatial (vertical/horizontal) disposition of materials affects the initial contamination level, which is always much lower on vertical surfaces than on horizontal ones. Moreover, postsanitation bacterial load recovery is dependent on the physical properties of the surface.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>19595481</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-6553
ispartof American journal of infection control, 2009-10, Vol.37 (8), p.658-664
issn 0196-6553
1527-3296
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67671406
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bacteria
Bacteria - drug effects
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Biological and medical sciences
Colony Count, Microbial
Contamination
Cross Infection - microbiology
Cross Infection - prevention & control
Disinfectants - pharmacology
disinfection
Emergency medical care
Environmental Microbiology
environmental pollution
Epidemiology. Vaccinations
Equipment Contamination - prevention & control
finishing materials
Floors and Floorcoverings
General aspects
Humans
Infection Control
Infectious Disease
Infectious diseases
Interior Design and Furnishings
Medical sciences
Microbiology
Operating rooms
Operating Rooms - standards
Operating Rooms - statistics & numerical data
Protocol
Sanitation
Sanitation - methods
Sanitation - standards
title Experimental evaluation of the efficacy of sanitation procedures in operating rooms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T00%3A11%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20evaluation%20of%20the%20efficacy%20of%20sanitation%20procedures%20in%C2%A0operating%20rooms&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20infection%20control&rft.au=Frabetti,%20Alessia,%20PhD&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=658&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=658-664&rft.issn=0196-6553&rft.eissn=1527-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1973764081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=872587948&rft_id=info:pmid/19595481&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0196655309005847&rfr_iscdi=true