A reassessment of semiquantitative analytical procedures for DNA methylation: Comparison of bisulfite- and HpaII polymerase-chain-reaction-based methods

Two techniques in particular are used to study site-specific DNA methylation: genomic sequencing after bisulfite modification and polymerase chain reaction after digestion by a methylation-sensitive endonuclease (usually HpaII). Only the former methodology assesses the methylation status of all the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical biochemistry 2006-03, Vol.350 (1), p.24-31
Hauptverfasser: Fuso, Andrea, Scarpa, Sigfrido, Grandoni, Francesco, Strom, Roberto, Lucarelli, Marco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Analytical biochemistry
container_volume 350
creator Fuso, Andrea
Scarpa, Sigfrido
Grandoni, Francesco
Strom, Roberto
Lucarelli, Marco
description Two techniques in particular are used to study site-specific DNA methylation: genomic sequencing after bisulfite modification and polymerase chain reaction after digestion by a methylation-sensitive endonuclease (usually HpaII). Only the former methodology assesses the methylation status of all the cytosine residues in the DNA sequence, but it is so complex and time consuming that the latter procedure, though limited to the restriction sites recognized by the endonuclease(s) used, is often preferred at least for a first analysis. In this work we investigate differences between these two techniques in the assessment of DNA methylation and offer some suggestions on how to avoid uncorrected results. Although there is substantial accordance in the results obtained using these different techniques, we observed a general overestimate for methylation levels above 30% and a general underestimate for methylation levels below this value using the HpaII/PCR technique in the study of methylation of the 5′-flanking region of the mouse myogenin gene in cultured muscle cells and mouse tissues.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ab.2005.12.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67670319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003269705008833</els_id><sourcerecordid>17055791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-6185ee2fd37e5f5854ce5b992128328b77756cb9b81ad99ef421ee1d5b5f48b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCnRPyiVuCncRx3NtqC3SlCi5wtmxnonqVxKnHqbRv0sfFy67ECXGyNPr-b-T5CfnAWckZbz8fSmPLijFR8qpkrHtFNpyptmA1U6_JhjFWF1Wr5BW5Rjwwxnkj2rfkirdNI7qu2ZCXLY1gEAFxgjnRMFCEyT-tZk4-meSfgZrZjMfknRnpEoODfo2AdAiR3n3f0gnS43HMZJhv6S5Mi4kew3wyWY_rOPgERXb09H4x-z1dwnicIBqEwj0aPxd5vzulC5tn_R9f6PEdeTOYEeH95b0hv75--bm7Lx5-fNvvtg-Fq6VKRcs7AVANfS1BDKITjQNhlap41dVVZ6WUonVW2Y6bXikYmooD8F5YMTSdbeob8unszV97WgGTnjw6GEczQ1hRt7KVrObqvyCXTAipeAbZGXQxIEYY9BL9ZOJRc6ZPtemDNlafatO80rm2HPl4ca92gv5v4NJTBm7PAORTPHuIGp2HOXfhI7ik--D_bf8N3nyqPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17055791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A reassessment of semiquantitative analytical procedures for DNA methylation: Comparison of bisulfite- and HpaII polymerase-chain-reaction-based methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Fuso, Andrea ; Scarpa, Sigfrido ; Grandoni, Francesco ; Strom, Roberto ; Lucarelli, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuso, Andrea ; Scarpa, Sigfrido ; Grandoni, Francesco ; Strom, Roberto ; Lucarelli, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Two techniques in particular are used to study site-specific DNA methylation: genomic sequencing after bisulfite modification and polymerase chain reaction after digestion by a methylation-sensitive endonuclease (usually HpaII). Only the former methodology assesses the methylation status of all the cytosine residues in the DNA sequence, but it is so complex and time consuming that the latter procedure, though limited to the restriction sites recognized by the endonuclease(s) used, is often preferred at least for a first analysis. In this work we investigate differences between these two techniques in the assessment of DNA methylation and offer some suggestions on how to avoid uncorrected results. Although there is substantial accordance in the results obtained using these different techniques, we observed a general overestimate for methylation levels above 30% and a general underestimate for methylation levels below this value using the HpaII/PCR technique in the study of methylation of the 5′-flanking region of the mouse myogenin gene in cultured muscle cells and mouse tissues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.12.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16445884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bisulfite modification ; Cell Line ; DNA - chemistry ; DNA Methylation ; DNA-Cytosine Methylases - metabolism ; HpaII/PCR ; Methylation-sensitive PCR ; Mice ; Myogenin - genetics ; Nucleic Acid Denaturation ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Sulfites - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Analytical biochemistry, 2006-03, Vol.350 (1), p.24-31</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-6185ee2fd37e5f5854ce5b992128328b77756cb9b81ad99ef421ee1d5b5f48b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-6185ee2fd37e5f5854ce5b992128328b77756cb9b81ad99ef421ee1d5b5f48b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269705008833$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16445884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuso, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarpa, Sigfrido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandoni, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strom, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucarelli, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>A reassessment of semiquantitative analytical procedures for DNA methylation: Comparison of bisulfite- and HpaII polymerase-chain-reaction-based methods</title><title>Analytical biochemistry</title><addtitle>Anal Biochem</addtitle><description>Two techniques in particular are used to study site-specific DNA methylation: genomic sequencing after bisulfite modification and polymerase chain reaction after digestion by a methylation-sensitive endonuclease (usually HpaII). Only the former methodology assesses the methylation status of all the cytosine residues in the DNA sequence, but it is so complex and time consuming that the latter procedure, though limited to the restriction sites recognized by the endonuclease(s) used, is often preferred at least for a first analysis. In this work we investigate differences between these two techniques in the assessment of DNA methylation and offer some suggestions on how to avoid uncorrected results. Although there is substantial accordance in the results obtained using these different techniques, we observed a general overestimate for methylation levels above 30% and a general underestimate for methylation levels below this value using the HpaII/PCR technique in the study of methylation of the 5′-flanking region of the mouse myogenin gene in cultured muscle cells and mouse tissues.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bisulfite modification</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>DNA - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA Methylation</subject><subject>DNA-Cytosine Methylases - metabolism</subject><subject>HpaII/PCR</subject><subject>Methylation-sensitive PCR</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Myogenin - genetics</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Denaturation</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Sulfites - chemistry</subject><issn>0003-2697</issn><issn>1096-0309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCnRPyiVuCncRx3NtqC3SlCi5wtmxnonqVxKnHqbRv0sfFy67ECXGyNPr-b-T5CfnAWckZbz8fSmPLijFR8qpkrHtFNpyptmA1U6_JhjFWF1Wr5BW5Rjwwxnkj2rfkirdNI7qu2ZCXLY1gEAFxgjnRMFCEyT-tZk4-meSfgZrZjMfknRnpEoODfo2AdAiR3n3f0gnS43HMZJhv6S5Mi4kew3wyWY_rOPgERXb09H4x-z1dwnicIBqEwj0aPxd5vzulC5tn_R9f6PEdeTOYEeH95b0hv75--bm7Lx5-fNvvtg-Fq6VKRcs7AVANfS1BDKITjQNhlap41dVVZ6WUonVW2Y6bXikYmooD8F5YMTSdbeob8unszV97WgGTnjw6GEczQ1hRt7KVrObqvyCXTAipeAbZGXQxIEYY9BL9ZOJRc6ZPtemDNlafatO80rm2HPl4ca92gv5v4NJTBm7PAORTPHuIGp2HOXfhI7ik--D_bf8N3nyqPw</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Fuso, Andrea</creator><creator>Scarpa, Sigfrido</creator><creator>Grandoni, Francesco</creator><creator>Strom, Roberto</creator><creator>Lucarelli, Marco</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>A reassessment of semiquantitative analytical procedures for DNA methylation: Comparison of bisulfite- and HpaII polymerase-chain-reaction-based methods</title><author>Fuso, Andrea ; Scarpa, Sigfrido ; Grandoni, Francesco ; Strom, Roberto ; Lucarelli, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-6185ee2fd37e5f5854ce5b992128328b77756cb9b81ad99ef421ee1d5b5f48b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bisulfite modification</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>DNA - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA Methylation</topic><topic>DNA-Cytosine Methylases - metabolism</topic><topic>HpaII/PCR</topic><topic>Methylation-sensitive PCR</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Myogenin - genetics</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Denaturation</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Sulfites - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuso, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarpa, Sigfrido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandoni, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strom, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucarelli, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuso, Andrea</au><au>Scarpa, Sigfrido</au><au>Grandoni, Francesco</au><au>Strom, Roberto</au><au>Lucarelli, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A reassessment of semiquantitative analytical procedures for DNA methylation: Comparison of bisulfite- and HpaII polymerase-chain-reaction-based methods</atitle><jtitle>Analytical biochemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Anal Biochem</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>350</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>24-31</pages><issn>0003-2697</issn><eissn>1096-0309</eissn><abstract>Two techniques in particular are used to study site-specific DNA methylation: genomic sequencing after bisulfite modification and polymerase chain reaction after digestion by a methylation-sensitive endonuclease (usually HpaII). Only the former methodology assesses the methylation status of all the cytosine residues in the DNA sequence, but it is so complex and time consuming that the latter procedure, though limited to the restriction sites recognized by the endonuclease(s) used, is often preferred at least for a first analysis. In this work we investigate differences between these two techniques in the assessment of DNA methylation and offer some suggestions on how to avoid uncorrected results. Although there is substantial accordance in the results obtained using these different techniques, we observed a general overestimate for methylation levels above 30% and a general underestimate for methylation levels below this value using the HpaII/PCR technique in the study of methylation of the 5′-flanking region of the mouse myogenin gene in cultured muscle cells and mouse tissues.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16445884</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ab.2005.12.008</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2697
ispartof Analytical biochemistry, 2006-03, Vol.350 (1), p.24-31
issn 0003-2697
1096-0309
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67670319
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Bisulfite modification
Cell Line
DNA - chemistry
DNA Methylation
DNA-Cytosine Methylases - metabolism
HpaII/PCR
Methylation-sensitive PCR
Mice
Myogenin - genetics
Nucleic Acid Denaturation
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Sulfites - chemistry
title A reassessment of semiquantitative analytical procedures for DNA methylation: Comparison of bisulfite- and HpaII polymerase-chain-reaction-based methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A59%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20reassessment%20of%20semiquantitative%20analytical%20procedures%20for%20DNA%20methylation:%20Comparison%20of%20bisulfite-%20and%20HpaII%20polymerase-chain-reaction-based%20methods&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20biochemistry&rft.au=Fuso,%20Andrea&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=350&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=24-31&rft.issn=0003-2697&rft.eissn=1096-0309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ab.2005.12.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17055791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17055791&rft_id=info:pmid/16445884&rft_els_id=S0003269705008833&rfr_iscdi=true