Human Peritoneal Membrane Controls Adhesion Formation and Host Tissue Response Following Intra-Abdominal Placement in a Porcine Model

Background Even with the advent of bioresorbable barriers, complications due to visceral adhesions following surgery continue to occur. The use of a homologous adhesive barrier such as human peritoneal membrane (HPM) could prevent adhesions formation and enhance wound healing. This study evaluates H...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2009-10, Vol.156 (2), p.297-304
Hauptverfasser: Jin, Judy, M.D, Voskerician, Gabriela, Ph.D, Hunter, Shawn A., Ph.D, McGee, Michael F., M.D, Cavazzola, Leandro T., M.D., Ph.D, Schomisch, Steve, B.S, Harth, Karem, M.P.H., M.D, Rosen, Michael J., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 304
container_issue 2
container_start_page 297
container_title The Journal of surgical research
container_volume 156
creator Jin, Judy, M.D
Voskerician, Gabriela, Ph.D
Hunter, Shawn A., Ph.D
McGee, Michael F., M.D
Cavazzola, Leandro T., M.D., Ph.D
Schomisch, Steve, B.S
Harth, Karem, M.P.H., M.D
Rosen, Michael J., M.D
description Background Even with the advent of bioresorbable barriers, complications due to visceral adhesions following surgery continue to occur. The use of a homologous adhesive barrier such as human peritoneal membrane (HPM) could prevent adhesions formation and enhance wound healing. This study evaluates HPM as an effective adhesive barrier in a porcine model simulating a ventral hernia procedure. Materials and Methods Through a midline laparotomy, meshes (10 cm × 10 cm) were sewn onto the intact peritoneum of a pig, on each side of a midline incision in superior and inferior positions (4 randomized meshes/pig, n = 9 pigs). The pigs were survived for 90 d. The meshes used were: HPM, compressed polytetrafluoro-ethylene (cPTFE), cPTFE + HPM, and polyester-collagen composite (PX). Exploratory laparoscopy was performed at 30 and 90 d to evaluate the extent of visceral adhesions. At necropsy, the extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions as well as material-abdominal wall integration were evaluated. Finally, host tissue response was assessed through scoring of inflammation, foreign body reaction, and mesothelialization. Results HPM and PX led to the least extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions compared to cPTFE and cPTFE + HPM, but integrated less strongly within the adjacent abdominal wall. PX displayed the most robust foreign body reaction among all prosthetic materials, while HPM scored similarly to the native peritoneum. The extent of mesothelialization was similar throughout the materials tested. Conclusions The HPM barrier which promotes long-term peritoneal remodeling could diminish postsurgical intraperitoneal adhesions following hernia repair.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67666970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002248040900198X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67666970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-efec4fa10e032be0b81d4d8fa6138f13b60e1c82690751b59d4fa727bfafb8263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt-K1DAUxoso7uzqA3gjudG71pO0k7YIwjC4Owu7OOgK3oU0PdWMaTKb0yr7AL63GWZQ8MKr_OH3fefky8myFxwKDly-2RU7okIAtAVUBXB4lC04tMu8kXX5OFsACJFXDVRn2TnRDtK5rcun2RlvpWiEqBfZr808as-2GO0UPGrHbnHsovbI1sFPMThiq_4bkg2eXYY46umw075nm0ATu7NEM7KPSPvgCRPiXPhp_Vd2ndQ6X3V9GK1PvlunDY7oJ2aTnm1DNDZVuQ09umfZk0E7wuen9SL7fPn-br3Jbz5cXa9XN7mpSjnlOKCpBs0BoRQdQtfwvuqbQUteNgMvOwnITSNkC_WSd8u2T3Qt6m7QQ5euy4vs9dF3H8P9jDSp0ZJB59J7w0xK1lLKtoYE8iNoYiCKOKh9tKOOD4qDOmSvdiplrw7ZK6hUyj5pXp7M527E_q_iFHYCXp0ATUa7IaVsLP3hhEguouGJe3vkMEXxw2JUZCx6g72NaCbVB_vfNt79ozbOepsKfscHpF2YY_oOUlyRUKA-HYbkMCPQAvC2-VL-Bnk4uF0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67666970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human Peritoneal Membrane Controls Adhesion Formation and Host Tissue Response Following Intra-Abdominal Placement in a Porcine Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Jin, Judy, M.D ; Voskerician, Gabriela, Ph.D ; Hunter, Shawn A., Ph.D ; McGee, Michael F., M.D ; Cavazzola, Leandro T., M.D., Ph.D ; Schomisch, Steve, B.S ; Harth, Karem, M.P.H., M.D ; Rosen, Michael J., M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Jin, Judy, M.D ; Voskerician, Gabriela, Ph.D ; Hunter, Shawn A., Ph.D ; McGee, Michael F., M.D ; Cavazzola, Leandro T., M.D., Ph.D ; Schomisch, Steve, B.S ; Harth, Karem, M.P.H., M.D ; Rosen, Michael J., M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Background Even with the advent of bioresorbable barriers, complications due to visceral adhesions following surgery continue to occur. The use of a homologous adhesive barrier such as human peritoneal membrane (HPM) could prevent adhesions formation and enhance wound healing. This study evaluates HPM as an effective adhesive barrier in a porcine model simulating a ventral hernia procedure. Materials and Methods Through a midline laparotomy, meshes (10 cm × 10 cm) were sewn onto the intact peritoneum of a pig, on each side of a midline incision in superior and inferior positions (4 randomized meshes/pig, n = 9 pigs). The pigs were survived for 90 d. The meshes used were: HPM, compressed polytetrafluoro-ethylene (cPTFE), cPTFE + HPM, and polyester-collagen composite (PX). Exploratory laparoscopy was performed at 30 and 90 d to evaluate the extent of visceral adhesions. At necropsy, the extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions as well as material-abdominal wall integration were evaluated. Finally, host tissue response was assessed through scoring of inflammation, foreign body reaction, and mesothelialization. Results HPM and PX led to the least extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions compared to cPTFE and cPTFE + HPM, but integrated less strongly within the adjacent abdominal wall. PX displayed the most robust foreign body reaction among all prosthetic materials, while HPM scored similarly to the native peritoneum. The extent of mesothelialization was similar throughout the materials tested. Conclusions The HPM barrier which promotes long-term peritoneal remodeling could diminish postsurgical intraperitoneal adhesions following hernia repair.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19628227</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSGRA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>active remodeling ; adhesive barrier ; allograft ; Animals ; Biocompatible Materials ; Biological and medical sciences ; Collagen ; Disease Models, Animal ; General aspects ; hernia repair ; Hernia, Ventral - surgery ; human peritoneal membrane ; Medical sciences ; Membranes ; Peritoneum ; Polyesters ; Polytetrafluoroethylene ; Surgery ; Surgical Mesh ; Swine ; Tissue Adhesions - physiopathology ; Tissue Adhesions - prevention &amp; control ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2009-10, Vol.156 (2), p.297-304</ispartof><rights>2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-efec4fa10e032be0b81d4d8fa6138f13b60e1c82690751b59d4fa727bfafb8263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-efec4fa10e032be0b81d4d8fa6138f13b60e1c82690751b59d4fa727bfafb8263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002248040900198X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22010281$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19628227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jin, Judy, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voskerician, Gabriela, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Shawn A., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGee, Michael F., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavazzola, Leandro T., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schomisch, Steve, B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harth, Karem, M.P.H., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Michael J., M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Human Peritoneal Membrane Controls Adhesion Formation and Host Tissue Response Following Intra-Abdominal Placement in a Porcine Model</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>Background Even with the advent of bioresorbable barriers, complications due to visceral adhesions following surgery continue to occur. The use of a homologous adhesive barrier such as human peritoneal membrane (HPM) could prevent adhesions formation and enhance wound healing. This study evaluates HPM as an effective adhesive barrier in a porcine model simulating a ventral hernia procedure. Materials and Methods Through a midline laparotomy, meshes (10 cm × 10 cm) were sewn onto the intact peritoneum of a pig, on each side of a midline incision in superior and inferior positions (4 randomized meshes/pig, n = 9 pigs). The pigs were survived for 90 d. The meshes used were: HPM, compressed polytetrafluoro-ethylene (cPTFE), cPTFE + HPM, and polyester-collagen composite (PX). Exploratory laparoscopy was performed at 30 and 90 d to evaluate the extent of visceral adhesions. At necropsy, the extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions as well as material-abdominal wall integration were evaluated. Finally, host tissue response was assessed through scoring of inflammation, foreign body reaction, and mesothelialization. Results HPM and PX led to the least extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions compared to cPTFE and cPTFE + HPM, but integrated less strongly within the adjacent abdominal wall. PX displayed the most robust foreign body reaction among all prosthetic materials, while HPM scored similarly to the native peritoneum. The extent of mesothelialization was similar throughout the materials tested. Conclusions The HPM barrier which promotes long-term peritoneal remodeling could diminish postsurgical intraperitoneal adhesions following hernia repair.</description><subject>active remodeling</subject><subject>adhesive barrier</subject><subject>allograft</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>hernia repair</subject><subject>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</subject><subject>human peritoneal membrane</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Peritoneum</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Polytetrafluoroethylene</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt-K1DAUxoso7uzqA3gjudG71pO0k7YIwjC4Owu7OOgK3oU0PdWMaTKb0yr7AL63GWZQ8MKr_OH3fefky8myFxwKDly-2RU7okIAtAVUBXB4lC04tMu8kXX5OFsACJFXDVRn2TnRDtK5rcun2RlvpWiEqBfZr808as-2GO0UPGrHbnHsovbI1sFPMThiq_4bkg2eXYY46umw075nm0ATu7NEM7KPSPvgCRPiXPhp_Vd2ndQ6X3V9GK1PvlunDY7oJ2aTnm1DNDZVuQ09umfZk0E7wuen9SL7fPn-br3Jbz5cXa9XN7mpSjnlOKCpBs0BoRQdQtfwvuqbQUteNgMvOwnITSNkC_WSd8u2T3Qt6m7QQ5euy4vs9dF3H8P9jDSp0ZJB59J7w0xK1lLKtoYE8iNoYiCKOKh9tKOOD4qDOmSvdiplrw7ZK6hUyj5pXp7M527E_q_iFHYCXp0ATUa7IaVsLP3hhEguouGJe3vkMEXxw2JUZCx6g72NaCbVB_vfNt79ozbOepsKfscHpF2YY_oOUlyRUKA-HYbkMCPQAvC2-VL-Bnk4uF0</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Jin, Judy, M.D</creator><creator>Voskerician, Gabriela, Ph.D</creator><creator>Hunter, Shawn A., Ph.D</creator><creator>McGee, Michael F., M.D</creator><creator>Cavazzola, Leandro T., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Schomisch, Steve, B.S</creator><creator>Harth, Karem, M.P.H., M.D</creator><creator>Rosen, Michael J., M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Human Peritoneal Membrane Controls Adhesion Formation and Host Tissue Response Following Intra-Abdominal Placement in a Porcine Model</title><author>Jin, Judy, M.D ; Voskerician, Gabriela, Ph.D ; Hunter, Shawn A., Ph.D ; McGee, Michael F., M.D ; Cavazzola, Leandro T., M.D., Ph.D ; Schomisch, Steve, B.S ; Harth, Karem, M.P.H., M.D ; Rosen, Michael J., M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-efec4fa10e032be0b81d4d8fa6138f13b60e1c82690751b59d4fa727bfafb8263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>active remodeling</topic><topic>adhesive barrier</topic><topic>allograft</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>hernia repair</topic><topic>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</topic><topic>human peritoneal membrane</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Peritoneum</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Polytetrafluoroethylene</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jin, Judy, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voskerician, Gabriela, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Shawn A., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGee, Michael F., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavazzola, Leandro T., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schomisch, Steve, B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harth, Karem, M.P.H., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Michael J., M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jin, Judy, M.D</au><au>Voskerician, Gabriela, Ph.D</au><au>Hunter, Shawn A., Ph.D</au><au>McGee, Michael F., M.D</au><au>Cavazzola, Leandro T., M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Schomisch, Steve, B.S</au><au>Harth, Karem, M.P.H., M.D</au><au>Rosen, Michael J., M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human Peritoneal Membrane Controls Adhesion Formation and Host Tissue Response Following Intra-Abdominal Placement in a Porcine Model</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>156</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>297-304</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><coden>JSGRA2</coden><abstract>Background Even with the advent of bioresorbable barriers, complications due to visceral adhesions following surgery continue to occur. The use of a homologous adhesive barrier such as human peritoneal membrane (HPM) could prevent adhesions formation and enhance wound healing. This study evaluates HPM as an effective adhesive barrier in a porcine model simulating a ventral hernia procedure. Materials and Methods Through a midline laparotomy, meshes (10 cm × 10 cm) were sewn onto the intact peritoneum of a pig, on each side of a midline incision in superior and inferior positions (4 randomized meshes/pig, n = 9 pigs). The pigs were survived for 90 d. The meshes used were: HPM, compressed polytetrafluoro-ethylene (cPTFE), cPTFE + HPM, and polyester-collagen composite (PX). Exploratory laparoscopy was performed at 30 and 90 d to evaluate the extent of visceral adhesions. At necropsy, the extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions as well as material-abdominal wall integration were evaluated. Finally, host tissue response was assessed through scoring of inflammation, foreign body reaction, and mesothelialization. Results HPM and PX led to the least extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions compared to cPTFE and cPTFE + HPM, but integrated less strongly within the adjacent abdominal wall. PX displayed the most robust foreign body reaction among all prosthetic materials, while HPM scored similarly to the native peritoneum. The extent of mesothelialization was similar throughout the materials tested. Conclusions The HPM barrier which promotes long-term peritoneal remodeling could diminish postsurgical intraperitoneal adhesions following hernia repair.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19628227</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4804
ispartof The Journal of surgical research, 2009-10, Vol.156 (2), p.297-304
issn 0022-4804
1095-8673
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67666970
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects active remodeling
adhesive barrier
allograft
Animals
Biocompatible Materials
Biological and medical sciences
Collagen
Disease Models, Animal
General aspects
hernia repair
Hernia, Ventral - surgery
human peritoneal membrane
Medical sciences
Membranes
Peritoneum
Polyesters
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Surgery
Surgical Mesh
Swine
Tissue Adhesions - physiopathology
Tissue Adhesions - prevention & control
Wound Healing - physiology
title Human Peritoneal Membrane Controls Adhesion Formation and Host Tissue Response Following Intra-Abdominal Placement in a Porcine Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T19%3A35%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20Peritoneal%20Membrane%20Controls%20Adhesion%20Formation%20and%20Host%20Tissue%20Response%20Following%20Intra-Abdominal%20Placement%20in%20a%20Porcine%20Model&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Jin,%20Judy,%20M.D&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=156&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=297-304&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft.coden=JSGRA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67666970%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67666970&rft_id=info:pmid/19628227&rft_els_id=S002248040900198X&rfr_iscdi=true