BI-RADS Lesion Characteristics Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Breast MRI for Masses But Not for Nonmasslike Enhancement

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the predictive features of BI-RADS lesion characteristics and the risk of malignancy for mammographically and clinically occult lesions detected initially on breast MRI. We reviewed 1,523 consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from January 1, 2003, to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2009-10, Vol.193 (4), p.994-1000
Hauptverfasser: Gutierrez, Robert L, DeMartini, Wendy B, Eby, Peter R, Kurland, Brenda F, Peacock, Sue, Lehman, Constance D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1000
container_issue 4
container_start_page 994
container_title American journal of roentgenology (1976)
container_volume 193
creator Gutierrez, Robert L
DeMartini, Wendy B
Eby, Peter R
Kurland, Brenda F
Peacock, Sue
Lehman, Constance D
description The purpose of our study was to evaluate the predictive features of BI-RADS lesion characteristics and the risk of malignancy for mammographically and clinically occult lesions detected initially on breast MRI. We reviewed 1,523 consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2005, to identify all lesions initially detected on MRI and assessed as BI-RADS 4 or 5 for which the patient underwent subsequent imaging-guided needle or excisional biopsy. BI-RADS lesion features were recorded for each case, and the risk of malignancy was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Separate multivariate models were constructed for lesions classified as masses. Included in the analysis were 258 suspicious lesions in 196 women. Among all lesions, those of 1 cm or greater were significantly more often malignant (50/147, 34%) than lesions of less than 1 cm (22/111, 20%; odds ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.13-3.83). For masses, size, BI-RADS margin, and enhancement pattern predicted malignancy. In multivariate analysis of combinations of features, masses of 1 cm or greater with heterogeneous enhancement and irregular margins had a 68% probability of malignancy. Masses of 1 cm or greater with smooth margins and homogeneous enhancement had the lowest predicted probability of malignancy of 3%. BI-RADS descriptors and size were not significant predictors of malignancy for nonmasslike enhancement (NMLE). Combinations of BI-RADS lesion descriptors can predict the probability of malignancy for breast MRI masses but not for NMLE. If our model is validated, masses with a low probability of malignancy may be eligible for short-interval follow-up rather than biopsy. Further research focused on predictive features of NMLE is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.2214/AJR.08.1983
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67663130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67663130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ad7c504cfa612d2ab9407cb40de2fa10b0a85a83206247086735322afe47e1553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1vEzEQhi0EoqFw4o58oRe0YfyxtveYhFKC0oICSNwsx-vtGnbXxXYUVeLH16URcBpp5plHMy9CLwnMKSX87eLjdg5qThrFHqEZqbmoGOHkMZoBE6RSwL6foGcp_QAAqRr5FJ2QRkpglMzQ7-W62i7efcEbl3yY8Ko30djsok_Z24Q_R9d6m_HG_3SD70NocejwpRn89WQme4v9hJfRmZTx5XaNuxDLMCWX8HKf8VXIf1pXYRpLdygSfD71ZdGNbsrP0ZPODMm9ONZT9O39-dfVh2rz6WK9Wmwqy7jKlWmlrYHbzghCW2p2DQdpdxxaRztDYAdG1UYxCoJyCUpIVjNKTee4dKSu2Sk6e_DexPBr71LWo0_WDYOZXNgnLaQQjDAo4JsH0MaQUnSdvol-NPFWE9D3YesStgal78Mu9Kujdr8bXfuPPaZbgNdHwCRrhi6Wx336y9EC1oL-d1_vr_uDj06n0QxD0RJ9OBxIwzTXTcPZHbXck3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67663130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>BI-RADS Lesion Characteristics Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Breast MRI for Masses But Not for Nonmasslike Enhancement</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gutierrez, Robert L ; DeMartini, Wendy B ; Eby, Peter R ; Kurland, Brenda F ; Peacock, Sue ; Lehman, Constance D</creator><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Robert L ; DeMartini, Wendy B ; Eby, Peter R ; Kurland, Brenda F ; Peacock, Sue ; Lehman, Constance D</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of our study was to evaluate the predictive features of BI-RADS lesion characteristics and the risk of malignancy for mammographically and clinically occult lesions detected initially on breast MRI. We reviewed 1,523 consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2005, to identify all lesions initially detected on MRI and assessed as BI-RADS 4 or 5 for which the patient underwent subsequent imaging-guided needle or excisional biopsy. BI-RADS lesion features were recorded for each case, and the risk of malignancy was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Separate multivariate models were constructed for lesions classified as masses. Included in the analysis were 258 suspicious lesions in 196 women. Among all lesions, those of 1 cm or greater were significantly more often malignant (50/147, 34%) than lesions of less than 1 cm (22/111, 20%; odds ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.13-3.83). For masses, size, BI-RADS margin, and enhancement pattern predicted malignancy. In multivariate analysis of combinations of features, masses of 1 cm or greater with heterogeneous enhancement and irregular margins had a 68% probability of malignancy. Masses of 1 cm or greater with smooth margins and homogeneous enhancement had the lowest predicted probability of malignancy of 3%. BI-RADS descriptors and size were not significant predictors of malignancy for nonmasslike enhancement (NMLE). Combinations of BI-RADS lesion descriptors can predict the probability of malignancy for breast MRI masses but not for NMLE. If our model is validated, masses with a low probability of malignancy may be eligible for short-interval follow-up rather than biopsy. Further research focused on predictive features of NMLE is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1983</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19770321</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJRDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: Am Roentgen Ray Soc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Female ; Gadolinium DTPA ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Likelihood Functions ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2009-10, Vol.193 (4), p.994-1000</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ad7c504cfa612d2ab9407cb40de2fa10b0a85a83206247086735322afe47e1553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ad7c504cfa612d2ab9407cb40de2fa10b0a85a83206247086735322afe47e1553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,4106,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21975625$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19770321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMartini, Wendy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eby, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurland, Brenda F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehman, Constance D</creatorcontrib><title>BI-RADS Lesion Characteristics Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Breast MRI for Masses But Not for Nonmasslike Enhancement</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>The purpose of our study was to evaluate the predictive features of BI-RADS lesion characteristics and the risk of malignancy for mammographically and clinically occult lesions detected initially on breast MRI. We reviewed 1,523 consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2005, to identify all lesions initially detected on MRI and assessed as BI-RADS 4 or 5 for which the patient underwent subsequent imaging-guided needle or excisional biopsy. BI-RADS lesion features were recorded for each case, and the risk of malignancy was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Separate multivariate models were constructed for lesions classified as masses. Included in the analysis were 258 suspicious lesions in 196 women. Among all lesions, those of 1 cm or greater were significantly more often malignant (50/147, 34%) than lesions of less than 1 cm (22/111, 20%; odds ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.13-3.83). For masses, size, BI-RADS margin, and enhancement pattern predicted malignancy. In multivariate analysis of combinations of features, masses of 1 cm or greater with heterogeneous enhancement and irregular margins had a 68% probability of malignancy. Masses of 1 cm or greater with smooth margins and homogeneous enhancement had the lowest predicted probability of malignancy of 3%. BI-RADS descriptors and size were not significant predictors of malignancy for nonmasslike enhancement (NMLE). Combinations of BI-RADS lesion descriptors can predict the probability of malignancy for breast MRI masses but not for NMLE. If our model is validated, masses with a low probability of malignancy may be eligible for short-interval follow-up rather than biopsy. Further research focused on predictive features of NMLE is needed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1vEzEQhi0EoqFw4o58oRe0YfyxtveYhFKC0oICSNwsx-vtGnbXxXYUVeLH16URcBpp5plHMy9CLwnMKSX87eLjdg5qThrFHqEZqbmoGOHkMZoBE6RSwL6foGcp_QAAqRr5FJ2QRkpglMzQ7-W62i7efcEbl3yY8Ko30djsok_Z24Q_R9d6m_HG_3SD70NocejwpRn89WQme4v9hJfRmZTx5XaNuxDLMCWX8HKf8VXIf1pXYRpLdygSfD71ZdGNbsrP0ZPODMm9ONZT9O39-dfVh2rz6WK9Wmwqy7jKlWmlrYHbzghCW2p2DQdpdxxaRztDYAdG1UYxCoJyCUpIVjNKTee4dKSu2Sk6e_DexPBr71LWo0_WDYOZXNgnLaQQjDAo4JsH0MaQUnSdvol-NPFWE9D3YesStgal78Mu9Kujdr8bXfuPPaZbgNdHwCRrhi6Wx336y9EC1oL-d1_vr_uDj06n0QxD0RJ9OBxIwzTXTcPZHbXck3g</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Gutierrez, Robert L</creator><creator>DeMartini, Wendy B</creator><creator>Eby, Peter R</creator><creator>Kurland, Brenda F</creator><creator>Peacock, Sue</creator><creator>Lehman, Constance D</creator><general>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</general><general>American Roentgen Ray Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>BI-RADS Lesion Characteristics Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Breast MRI for Masses But Not for Nonmasslike Enhancement</title><author>Gutierrez, Robert L ; DeMartini, Wendy B ; Eby, Peter R ; Kurland, Brenda F ; Peacock, Sue ; Lehman, Constance D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ad7c504cfa612d2ab9407cb40de2fa10b0a85a83206247086735322afe47e1553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMartini, Wendy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eby, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurland, Brenda F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehman, Constance D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gutierrez, Robert L</au><au>DeMartini, Wendy B</au><au>Eby, Peter R</au><au>Kurland, Brenda F</au><au>Peacock, Sue</au><au>Lehman, Constance D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>BI-RADS Lesion Characteristics Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Breast MRI for Masses But Not for Nonmasslike Enhancement</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>193</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>994</spage><epage>1000</epage><pages>994-1000</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><coden>AAJRDX</coden><abstract>The purpose of our study was to evaluate the predictive features of BI-RADS lesion characteristics and the risk of malignancy for mammographically and clinically occult lesions detected initially on breast MRI. We reviewed 1,523 consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2005, to identify all lesions initially detected on MRI and assessed as BI-RADS 4 or 5 for which the patient underwent subsequent imaging-guided needle or excisional biopsy. BI-RADS lesion features were recorded for each case, and the risk of malignancy was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Separate multivariate models were constructed for lesions classified as masses. Included in the analysis were 258 suspicious lesions in 196 women. Among all lesions, those of 1 cm or greater were significantly more often malignant (50/147, 34%) than lesions of less than 1 cm (22/111, 20%; odds ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.13-3.83). For masses, size, BI-RADS margin, and enhancement pattern predicted malignancy. In multivariate analysis of combinations of features, masses of 1 cm or greater with heterogeneous enhancement and irregular margins had a 68% probability of malignancy. Masses of 1 cm or greater with smooth margins and homogeneous enhancement had the lowest predicted probability of malignancy of 3%. BI-RADS descriptors and size were not significant predictors of malignancy for nonmasslike enhancement (NMLE). Combinations of BI-RADS lesion descriptors can predict the probability of malignancy for breast MRI masses but not for NMLE. If our model is validated, masses with a low probability of malignancy may be eligible for short-interval follow-up rather than biopsy. Further research focused on predictive features of NMLE is needed.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</pub><pmid>19770321</pmid><doi>10.2214/AJR.08.1983</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2009-10, Vol.193 (4), p.994-1000
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67663130
source American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Algorithms
Biological and medical sciences
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Female
Gadolinium DTPA
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Likelihood Functions
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
title BI-RADS Lesion Characteristics Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Breast MRI for Masses But Not for Nonmasslike Enhancement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T12%3A02%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=BI-RADS%20Lesion%20Characteristics%20Predict%20Likelihood%20of%20Malignancy%20in%20Breast%20MRI%20for%20Masses%20But%20Not%20for%20Nonmasslike%20Enhancement&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Gutierrez,%20Robert%20L&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=994&rft.epage=1000&rft.pages=994-1000&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.coden=AAJRDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1983&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67663130%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67663130&rft_id=info:pmid/19770321&rfr_iscdi=true