Determining the feasibility of robotic courier medication delivery in a hospital setting

The feasibility of a robotic courier medication delivery system in a hospital setting was evaluated. Robotic couriers are self-guiding, self-propelling robots that navigate hallways and elevators to pull an attached or integrated cart to a desired destination. A robotic courier medication delivery s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of health-system pharmacy 2009-10, Vol.66 (19), p.1754-1762
Hauptverfasser: Kirschling, Thomas E, Rough, Steve S, Ludwig, Brad C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1762
container_issue 19
container_start_page 1754
container_title American journal of health-system pharmacy
container_volume 66
creator Kirschling, Thomas E
Rough, Steve S
Ludwig, Brad C
description The feasibility of a robotic courier medication delivery system in a hospital setting was evaluated. Robotic couriers are self-guiding, self-propelling robots that navigate hallways and elevators to pull an attached or integrated cart to a desired destination. A robotic courier medication delivery system was pilot tested in two patient care units at a 471-bed tertiary care academic medical center. Average transit for the existing manual medication delivery system hourly hospitalwide deliveries was 32.6 minutes. Of this, 32.3% was spent at the patient care unit and 67.7% was spent pushing the cart or waiting at an elevator. The robotic courier medication delivery system traveled as fast as 1.65 ft/sec (52% speed of the manual system) in the absence of barriers but moved at an average rate of 0.84 ft/sec (26% speed of the manual system) during the study, primarily due to hallway obstacles. The robotic courier was utilized for 50% of the possible 1750 runs during the 125-day pilot due to technical or situational difficulties. Of the runs that were sent, a total of 79 runs failed, yielding an overall 91% success rate. During the final month of the pilot, the success rate reached 95.6%. Customer satisfaction with the traditional manual delivery system was high. Customer satisfaction with deliveries declined after implementation of the robotic courier medication distribution system. A robotic courier medication delivery system was implemented but was not expanded beyond the two pilot units. Challenges of implementation included ongoing education on how to properly move the robotic courier and keeping the hallway clear of obstacles.
doi_str_mv 10.2146/ajhp080184
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67657276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A209408386</galeid><sourcerecordid>A209408386</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d482836e07c783fb96fe8ebc230d4ddb3cf0fbe590d39a3726309dd67d496e033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1r3DAQhk1pyFdz6Q8oOrVQcCpLtiQfQ9qmhUAuLfQmZGm0niBbW0nbZf99FXYhzGGG4XmH4Wma9x29ZV0vvpjneUsV7VT_prnsBj60bKT0bZ2pHFtGFbtornJ-prRjiorz5qIbpZBc8cvmz1cokBZccd2QMgPxYDJOGLAcSPQkxSkWtMTGXUJIZAGH1hSMK3EQ8B-kA8GVGDLHvMViAslQSj32rjnzJmS4OfXr5vf3b7_uf7SPTw8_7-8eW8sHUVrXK6a4ACqtVNxPo_CgYLKMU9c7N3HrqZ9gGKnjo-GSCU5H54R0_VhTnF83H493tyn-3UEuesFsIQSzQtxlLaQYJJOigrdHcGMCaFx9LMnYWg4WtHEFj3V_x-jYU8XVS-DzMWBTzDmB19uEi0kH3VH9Il6_iq_wh9Mbu6k6ekVPpivw6QjMuJn3mEDnxYRQcab3-70QFdWdHHr-H2xAjOE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67657276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining the feasibility of robotic courier medication delivery in a hospital setting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Kirschling, Thomas E ; Rough, Steve S ; Ludwig, Brad C</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirschling, Thomas E ; Rough, Steve S ; Ludwig, Brad C</creatorcontrib><description>The feasibility of a robotic courier medication delivery system in a hospital setting was evaluated. Robotic couriers are self-guiding, self-propelling robots that navigate hallways and elevators to pull an attached or integrated cart to a desired destination. A robotic courier medication delivery system was pilot tested in two patient care units at a 471-bed tertiary care academic medical center. Average transit for the existing manual medication delivery system hourly hospitalwide deliveries was 32.6 minutes. Of this, 32.3% was spent at the patient care unit and 67.7% was spent pushing the cart or waiting at an elevator. The robotic courier medication delivery system traveled as fast as 1.65 ft/sec (52% speed of the manual system) in the absence of barriers but moved at an average rate of 0.84 ft/sec (26% speed of the manual system) during the study, primarily due to hallway obstacles. The robotic courier was utilized for 50% of the possible 1750 runs during the 125-day pilot due to technical or situational difficulties. Of the runs that were sent, a total of 79 runs failed, yielding an overall 91% success rate. During the final month of the pilot, the success rate reached 95.6%. Customer satisfaction with the traditional manual delivery system was high. Customer satisfaction with deliveries declined after implementation of the robotic courier medication distribution system. A robotic courier medication delivery system was implemented but was not expanded beyond the two pilot units. Challenges of implementation included ongoing education on how to properly move the robotic courier and keeping the hallway clear of obstacles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-2082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-2900</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2146/ajhp080184</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19767383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers - methods ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Consumer Behavior ; Drug delivery systems ; Drugs ; Feasibility Studies ; Health care industry ; Humans ; Management ; Medication Systems, Hospital - organization &amp; administration ; Pharmacy Service, Hospital - methods ; Robotics ; Robotics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Time and Motion Studies ; Vehicles</subject><ispartof>American journal of health-system pharmacy, 2009-10, Vol.66 (19), p.1754-1762</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d482836e07c783fb96fe8ebc230d4ddb3cf0fbe590d39a3726309dd67d496e033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d482836e07c783fb96fe8ebc230d4ddb3cf0fbe590d39a3726309dd67d496e033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19767383$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirschling, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rough, Steve S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Brad C</creatorcontrib><title>Determining the feasibility of robotic courier medication delivery in a hospital setting</title><title>American journal of health-system pharmacy</title><addtitle>Am J Health Syst Pharm</addtitle><description>The feasibility of a robotic courier medication delivery system in a hospital setting was evaluated. Robotic couriers are self-guiding, self-propelling robots that navigate hallways and elevators to pull an attached or integrated cart to a desired destination. A robotic courier medication delivery system was pilot tested in two patient care units at a 471-bed tertiary care academic medical center. Average transit for the existing manual medication delivery system hourly hospitalwide deliveries was 32.6 minutes. Of this, 32.3% was spent at the patient care unit and 67.7% was spent pushing the cart or waiting at an elevator. The robotic courier medication delivery system traveled as fast as 1.65 ft/sec (52% speed of the manual system) in the absence of barriers but moved at an average rate of 0.84 ft/sec (26% speed of the manual system) during the study, primarily due to hallway obstacles. The robotic courier was utilized for 50% of the possible 1750 runs during the 125-day pilot due to technical or situational difficulties. Of the runs that were sent, a total of 79 runs failed, yielding an overall 91% success rate. During the final month of the pilot, the success rate reached 95.6%. Customer satisfaction with the traditional manual delivery system was high. Customer satisfaction with deliveries declined after implementation of the robotic courier medication distribution system. A robotic courier medication delivery system was implemented but was not expanded beyond the two pilot units. Challenges of implementation included ongoing education on how to properly move the robotic courier and keeping the hallway clear of obstacles.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers - methods</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medication Systems, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Pharmacy Service, Hospital - methods</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robotics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Time and Motion Studies</subject><subject>Vehicles</subject><issn>1079-2082</issn><issn>1535-2900</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1r3DAQhk1pyFdz6Q8oOrVQcCpLtiQfQ9qmhUAuLfQmZGm0niBbW0nbZf99FXYhzGGG4XmH4Wma9x29ZV0vvpjneUsV7VT_prnsBj60bKT0bZ2pHFtGFbtornJ-prRjiorz5qIbpZBc8cvmz1cokBZccd2QMgPxYDJOGLAcSPQkxSkWtMTGXUJIZAGH1hSMK3EQ8B-kA8GVGDLHvMViAslQSj32rjnzJmS4OfXr5vf3b7_uf7SPTw8_7-8eW8sHUVrXK6a4ACqtVNxPo_CgYLKMU9c7N3HrqZ9gGKnjo-GSCU5H54R0_VhTnF83H493tyn-3UEuesFsIQSzQtxlLaQYJJOigrdHcGMCaFx9LMnYWg4WtHEFj3V_x-jYU8XVS-DzMWBTzDmB19uEi0kH3VH9Il6_iq_wh9Mbu6k6ekVPpivw6QjMuJn3mEDnxYRQcab3-70QFdWdHHr-H2xAjOE</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Kirschling, Thomas E</creator><creator>Rough, Steve S</creator><creator>Ludwig, Brad C</creator><general>American Society of Health-System Pharmacists</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Determining the feasibility of robotic courier medication delivery in a hospital setting</title><author>Kirschling, Thomas E ; Rough, Steve S ; Ludwig, Brad C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d482836e07c783fb96fe8ebc230d4ddb3cf0fbe590d39a3726309dd67d496e033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers - methods</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medication Systems, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Pharmacy Service, Hospital - methods</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robotics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Time and Motion Studies</topic><topic>Vehicles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirschling, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rough, Steve S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Brad C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of health-system pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirschling, Thomas E</au><au>Rough, Steve S</au><au>Ludwig, Brad C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining the feasibility of robotic courier medication delivery in a hospital setting</atitle><jtitle>American journal of health-system pharmacy</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Health Syst Pharm</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>1754</spage><epage>1762</epage><pages>1754-1762</pages><issn>1079-2082</issn><eissn>1535-2900</eissn><abstract>The feasibility of a robotic courier medication delivery system in a hospital setting was evaluated. Robotic couriers are self-guiding, self-propelling robots that navigate hallways and elevators to pull an attached or integrated cart to a desired destination. A robotic courier medication delivery system was pilot tested in two patient care units at a 471-bed tertiary care academic medical center. Average transit for the existing manual medication delivery system hourly hospitalwide deliveries was 32.6 minutes. Of this, 32.3% was spent at the patient care unit and 67.7% was spent pushing the cart or waiting at an elevator. The robotic courier medication delivery system traveled as fast as 1.65 ft/sec (52% speed of the manual system) in the absence of barriers but moved at an average rate of 0.84 ft/sec (26% speed of the manual system) during the study, primarily due to hallway obstacles. The robotic courier was utilized for 50% of the possible 1750 runs during the 125-day pilot due to technical or situational difficulties. Of the runs that were sent, a total of 79 runs failed, yielding an overall 91% success rate. During the final month of the pilot, the success rate reached 95.6%. Customer satisfaction with the traditional manual delivery system was high. Customer satisfaction with deliveries declined after implementation of the robotic courier medication distribution system. A robotic courier medication delivery system was implemented but was not expanded beyond the two pilot units. Challenges of implementation included ongoing education on how to properly move the robotic courier and keeping the hallway clear of obstacles.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>American Society of Health-System Pharmacists</pub><pmid>19767383</pmid><doi>10.2146/ajhp080184</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-2082
ispartof American journal of health-system pharmacy, 2009-10, Vol.66 (19), p.1754-1762
issn 1079-2082
1535-2900
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67657276
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Academic Medical Centers - methods
Attitude of Health Personnel
Consumer Behavior
Drug delivery systems
Drugs
Feasibility Studies
Health care industry
Humans
Management
Medication Systems, Hospital - organization & administration
Pharmacy Service, Hospital - methods
Robotics
Robotics - statistics & numerical data
Time and Motion Studies
Vehicles
title Determining the feasibility of robotic courier medication delivery in a hospital setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A46%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20the%20feasibility%20of%20robotic%20courier%20medication%20delivery%20in%20a%20hospital%20setting&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20health-system%20pharmacy&rft.au=Kirschling,%20Thomas%20E&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=1754&rft.epage=1762&rft.pages=1754-1762&rft.issn=1079-2082&rft.eissn=1535-2900&rft_id=info:doi/10.2146/ajhp080184&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA209408386%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67657276&rft_id=info:pmid/19767383&rft_galeid=A209408386&rfr_iscdi=true