Screening of EEG Referrals by Neurologists Leads to Improved Healthcare Resource Utilization
The objective of this study was to determine if screening by a neurologist of all non-neurologist electroencephalogram (EEG) referrals prior to approval reduces the number of inappropriate requests. This retrospective survey included 600 consecutive EEG requisitions referred to the Anaheim Kaiser Pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical EEG and neuroscience 2006-01, Vol.37 (1), p.30-33 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 33 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | Clinical EEG and neuroscience |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Gurbani, Neepa S. Gurbani, Suresh G. Mittal, Meenu McGuckin, Jeanne S. Tin, Sue Nwe Tehrani, Keo Chayasirisobhon, Sirichai |
description | The objective of this study was to determine if screening by a neurologist of all non-neurologist electroencephalogram (EEG) referrals prior to approval reduces the number of inappropriate requests. This retrospective survey included 600 consecutive EEG requisitions referred to the Anaheim Kaiser Permanente Neurodiagnostic Laboratory to rule out epilepsy. Patients with established epilepsy referred for a repeat EEG for management issues were excluded.
Three groups of EEG referrals were analyzed. Each group consisted of 200 EEGs (100 pediatric and 100 adult EEGs). The first group was referred directly by non-neurologists, the second group was referred by non-neurologists with scrutiny by a neurologist, and the third group was referred by a neurologist directly. In the pediatric group, the ratio of abnormal EEG vs normal EEG was 1: 3.35 in the first group, 1: 0.69 in the second group and 1: 0.33 in the third group. In the adult group, the ratio of abnormal EEGs vs normal EEGs was 1: 2.23 in the first group, 1: 0.82 in the second group and 1: 0.45 in the third group. In the combined pediatric and adult groups, the ratio of abnormal EEG vs normal EEG was 1: 2.70 in the first group, 1: 0.75 in the second group and 1: 0.39 in the third group. There was a significant difference between the results of the EEGs ordered by non-neurologists directly versus non-neurologists with scrutiny (p=.334, chi-square test).
Scrutiny by a neurologist of EEG referrals from non-neurologists led to a reduction in the number of normal EEG results. This suggests that inappropriate EEG requests for non-epileptic patients that yield normal EEG results are significantly reduced with scrutiny. This can help reduce the indiscriminate overuse of EEGs by non-neurologists thereby leading to better utilization of healthcare resources. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/155005940603700107 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67655870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_155005940603700107</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67655870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a93b20c1166264eabbbeb1396deb0553e0cd6e6ea913fbe94f77e107835286c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOj7-gAsJLtxVb5ImaZci4wMGBR87oSTp7VjpNJq0gv56M8yAoOAqm-989-QQcsjglDGtz5iUALLMQYHQAAz0BplwpspMcuCbZLIEsiWxQ3ZjfAUQiot8m-wwlWuZF3xCnh9cQOzbfk59Q6fTK3qPDYZgukjtJ73FMfjOz9s4RDpDU0c6eHqzeAv-A2t6jaYbXpwJmGLRj8EhfRrarv0yQ-v7fbLVJBEerN898nQ5fby4zmZ3VzcX57PMCVUMmSmF5eAYU4qrHI21Fi0TparRgpQCwdUKFZqSicZimTdaY_ptISQvlNNij5ysvKnW-4hxqBZtdNh1pkc_xkppJWWhIYHHv8DXVLpP3SoOSuSlKosE8RXkgo8xYFO9hXZhwmfFoFoOX_0dPoWO1ubRLrD-iayXTsDZCohmjj9n_1F-AxuWioA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206349698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening of EEG Referrals by Neurologists Leads to Improved Healthcare Resource Utilization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Gurbani, Neepa S. ; Gurbani, Suresh G. ; Mittal, Meenu ; McGuckin, Jeanne S. ; Tin, Sue Nwe ; Tehrani, Keo ; Chayasirisobhon, Sirichai</creator><creatorcontrib>Gurbani, Neepa S. ; Gurbani, Suresh G. ; Mittal, Meenu ; McGuckin, Jeanne S. ; Tin, Sue Nwe ; Tehrani, Keo ; Chayasirisobhon, Sirichai</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to determine if screening by a neurologist of all non-neurologist electroencephalogram (EEG) referrals prior to approval reduces the number of inappropriate requests. This retrospective survey included 600 consecutive EEG requisitions referred to the Anaheim Kaiser Permanente Neurodiagnostic Laboratory to rule out epilepsy. Patients with established epilepsy referred for a repeat EEG for management issues were excluded.
Three groups of EEG referrals were analyzed. Each group consisted of 200 EEGs (100 pediatric and 100 adult EEGs). The first group was referred directly by non-neurologists, the second group was referred by non-neurologists with scrutiny by a neurologist, and the third group was referred by a neurologist directly. In the pediatric group, the ratio of abnormal EEG vs normal EEG was 1: 3.35 in the first group, 1: 0.69 in the second group and 1: 0.33 in the third group. In the adult group, the ratio of abnormal EEGs vs normal EEGs was 1: 2.23 in the first group, 1: 0.82 in the second group and 1: 0.45 in the third group. In the combined pediatric and adult groups, the ratio of abnormal EEG vs normal EEG was 1: 2.70 in the first group, 1: 0.75 in the second group and 1: 0.39 in the third group. There was a significant difference between the results of the EEGs ordered by non-neurologists directly versus non-neurologists with scrutiny (p=.334, chi-square test).
Scrutiny by a neurologist of EEG referrals from non-neurologists led to a reduction in the number of normal EEG results. This suggests that inappropriate EEG requests for non-epileptic patients that yield normal EEG results are significantly reduced with scrutiny. This can help reduce the indiscriminate overuse of EEGs by non-neurologists thereby leading to better utilization of healthcare resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-0594</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/155005940603700107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16475482</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>California - epidemiology ; Electroencephalography - utilization ; Epilepsy - diagnosis ; Epilepsy - epidemiology ; Health Care Surveys ; Health Services - utilization ; Humans ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Neurology - statistics & numerical data ; Prevalence ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2006-01, Vol.37 (1), p.30-33</ispartof><rights>2006 EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society</rights><rights>Copyright EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society (ECNS) Jan 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a93b20c1166264eabbbeb1396deb0553e0cd6e6ea913fbe94f77e107835286c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a93b20c1166264eabbbeb1396deb0553e0cd6e6ea913fbe94f77e107835286c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/206349698/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/206349698?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21378,21808,27913,27914,33519,33520,43610,43611,43648,64372,64374,64376,72228,73863</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16475482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gurbani, Neepa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurbani, Suresh G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Meenu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuckin, Jeanne S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tin, Sue Nwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tehrani, Keo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chayasirisobhon, Sirichai</creatorcontrib><title>Screening of EEG Referrals by Neurologists Leads to Improved Healthcare Resource Utilization</title><title>Clinical EEG and neuroscience</title><addtitle>Clin EEG Neurosci</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to determine if screening by a neurologist of all non-neurologist electroencephalogram (EEG) referrals prior to approval reduces the number of inappropriate requests. This retrospective survey included 600 consecutive EEG requisitions referred to the Anaheim Kaiser Permanente Neurodiagnostic Laboratory to rule out epilepsy. Patients with established epilepsy referred for a repeat EEG for management issues were excluded.
Three groups of EEG referrals were analyzed. Each group consisted of 200 EEGs (100 pediatric and 100 adult EEGs). The first group was referred directly by non-neurologists, the second group was referred by non-neurologists with scrutiny by a neurologist, and the third group was referred by a neurologist directly. In the pediatric group, the ratio of abnormal EEG vs normal EEG was 1: 3.35 in the first group, 1: 0.69 in the second group and 1: 0.33 in the third group. In the adult group, the ratio of abnormal EEGs vs normal EEGs was 1: 2.23 in the first group, 1: 0.82 in the second group and 1: 0.45 in the third group. In the combined pediatric and adult groups, the ratio of abnormal EEG vs normal EEG was 1: 2.70 in the first group, 1: 0.75 in the second group and 1: 0.39 in the third group. There was a significant difference between the results of the EEGs ordered by non-neurologists directly versus non-neurologists with scrutiny (p=.334, chi-square test).
Scrutiny by a neurologist of EEG referrals from non-neurologists led to a reduction in the number of normal EEG results. This suggests that inappropriate EEG requests for non-epileptic patients that yield normal EEG results are significantly reduced with scrutiny. This can help reduce the indiscriminate overuse of EEGs by non-neurologists thereby leading to better utilization of healthcare resources.</description><subject>California - epidemiology</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - utilization</subject><subject>Epilepsy - diagnosis</subject><subject>Epilepsy - epidemiology</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Neurology - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1550-0594</issn><issn>2169-5202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOj7-gAsJLtxVb5ImaZci4wMGBR87oSTp7VjpNJq0gv56M8yAoOAqm-989-QQcsjglDGtz5iUALLMQYHQAAz0BplwpspMcuCbZLIEsiWxQ3ZjfAUQiot8m-wwlWuZF3xCnh9cQOzbfk59Q6fTK3qPDYZgukjtJ73FMfjOz9s4RDpDU0c6eHqzeAv-A2t6jaYbXpwJmGLRj8EhfRrarv0yQ-v7fbLVJBEerN898nQ5fby4zmZ3VzcX57PMCVUMmSmF5eAYU4qrHI21Fi0TparRgpQCwdUKFZqSicZimTdaY_ptISQvlNNij5ysvKnW-4hxqBZtdNh1pkc_xkppJWWhIYHHv8DXVLpP3SoOSuSlKosE8RXkgo8xYFO9hXZhwmfFoFoOX_0dPoWO1ubRLrD-iayXTsDZCohmjj9n_1F-AxuWioA</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Gurbani, Neepa S.</creator><creator>Gurbani, Suresh G.</creator><creator>Mittal, Meenu</creator><creator>McGuckin, Jeanne S.</creator><creator>Tin, Sue Nwe</creator><creator>Tehrani, Keo</creator><creator>Chayasirisobhon, Sirichai</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Screening of EEG Referrals by Neurologists Leads to Improved Healthcare Resource Utilization</title><author>Gurbani, Neepa S. ; Gurbani, Suresh G. ; Mittal, Meenu ; McGuckin, Jeanne S. ; Tin, Sue Nwe ; Tehrani, Keo ; Chayasirisobhon, Sirichai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a93b20c1166264eabbbeb1396deb0553e0cd6e6ea913fbe94f77e107835286c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>California - epidemiology</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - utilization</topic><topic>Epilepsy - diagnosis</topic><topic>Epilepsy - epidemiology</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Neurology - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gurbani, Neepa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurbani, Suresh G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Meenu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuckin, Jeanne S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tin, Sue Nwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tehrani, Keo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chayasirisobhon, Sirichai</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical EEG and neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gurbani, Neepa S.</au><au>Gurbani, Suresh G.</au><au>Mittal, Meenu</au><au>McGuckin, Jeanne S.</au><au>Tin, Sue Nwe</au><au>Tehrani, Keo</au><au>Chayasirisobhon, Sirichai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening of EEG Referrals by Neurologists Leads to Improved Healthcare Resource Utilization</atitle><jtitle>Clinical EEG and neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Clin EEG Neurosci</addtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>30-33</pages><issn>1550-0594</issn><eissn>2169-5202</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to determine if screening by a neurologist of all non-neurologist electroencephalogram (EEG) referrals prior to approval reduces the number of inappropriate requests. This retrospective survey included 600 consecutive EEG requisitions referred to the Anaheim Kaiser Permanente Neurodiagnostic Laboratory to rule out epilepsy. Patients with established epilepsy referred for a repeat EEG for management issues were excluded.
Three groups of EEG referrals were analyzed. Each group consisted of 200 EEGs (100 pediatric and 100 adult EEGs). The first group was referred directly by non-neurologists, the second group was referred by non-neurologists with scrutiny by a neurologist, and the third group was referred by a neurologist directly. In the pediatric group, the ratio of abnormal EEG vs normal EEG was 1: 3.35 in the first group, 1: 0.69 in the second group and 1: 0.33 in the third group. In the adult group, the ratio of abnormal EEGs vs normal EEGs was 1: 2.23 in the first group, 1: 0.82 in the second group and 1: 0.45 in the third group. In the combined pediatric and adult groups, the ratio of abnormal EEG vs normal EEG was 1: 2.70 in the first group, 1: 0.75 in the second group and 1: 0.39 in the third group. There was a significant difference between the results of the EEGs ordered by non-neurologists directly versus non-neurologists with scrutiny (p=.334, chi-square test).
Scrutiny by a neurologist of EEG referrals from non-neurologists led to a reduction in the number of normal EEG results. This suggests that inappropriate EEG requests for non-epileptic patients that yield normal EEG results are significantly reduced with scrutiny. This can help reduce the indiscriminate overuse of EEGs by non-neurologists thereby leading to better utilization of healthcare resources.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>16475482</pmid><doi>10.1177/155005940603700107</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1550-0594 |
ispartof | Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2006-01, Vol.37 (1), p.30-33 |
issn | 1550-0594 2169-5202 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67655870 |
source | MEDLINE; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); SAGE Complete A-Z List; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | California - epidemiology Electroencephalography - utilization Epilepsy - diagnosis Epilepsy - epidemiology Health Care Surveys Health Services - utilization Humans Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Neurology - statistics & numerical data Prevalence Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Screening of EEG Referrals by Neurologists Leads to Improved Healthcare Resource Utilization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A19%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20of%20EEG%20Referrals%20by%20Neurologists%20Leads%20to%20Improved%20Healthcare%20Resource%20Utilization&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20EEG%20and%20neuroscience&rft.au=Gurbani,%20Neepa%20S.&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=30-33&rft.issn=1550-0594&rft.eissn=2169-5202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/155005940603700107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67655870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206349698&rft_id=info:pmid/16475482&rft_sage_id=10.1177_155005940603700107&rfr_iscdi=true |