An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable bulbourethral sling (Argus®, Promedon SA, Cordoba, Argentina) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 48 patients with SUI because of prostatic surgery for prosta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJU international 2006-03, Vol.97 (3), p.533-539 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 539 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 533 |
container_title | BJU international |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | ROMANO, SALOMON V. METREBIAN, SERGIO E. VAZ, FERNANDO MULLER, VALTER D’ANCONA, CARLOS A. COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A. NAKAMURA, FABIO |
description | OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable bulbourethral sling (Argus®, Promedon SA, Cordoba, Argentina) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
In all, 48 patients with SUI because of prostatic surgery for prostate cancer (39) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (nine) had a new sling implanted in a multicentre trial at six institutions between April 2003 and September 2004. All patients were fully evaluated, including a questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form, ICIQ‐SF, range 0–21), endoscopy, and urodynamic evaluation. The Argus system comprises a 4.2 × 2.6 × 0.9 cm thick silicone foam pad for soft bulbar urethral compression. The pad is attached to the silicone cone columns that, after being passed with needles from the perineum to the abdominal wall, are adjusted with silicone washers to regulate and keep the desired tension against the urethra. The pad and washers are radio‐opaque, which allows their position to be assessed during follow‐up. The surgical technique was one described previously, with some modifications.
RESULTS
At a mean (range) follow‐up of 7.5 (1–17.5) months, 35 (73%) of the 48 patients were dry, five (10%) were improved, and eight (17%) were incontinent, including four (8%) who needed sling adjustment. The mean (range) ICIQ‐SF improved from 19.2 (12–21) to 4 (0–21). There were three (6%) urethral perforations during surgery that were resolved by re‐passing the needle. The sling was removed in three men (6%) due to erosion and in two (4%) due to infection. Seven (15%) cases of acute urinary retention resolved spontaneously, except for one that needed the sling loosening. No cases of chronic retention were reported. There was perineal discomfort and mild dysuria soon after surgery that resolved spontaneously after a few weeks.
CONCLUSION
This new adjustable male sling safely and effectively controls sphincter incontinence in men after prostate surgery, with an acceptably low complication rate. The early results are encouraging; the Argus is a valid alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter, the standard therapy for this condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67651065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67651065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-589586211c6e7dcc8a21c046f7d55362a9eedcf31313a2121ffc2559bcd0b3183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PxCAQhonR-P0XDBe9bQVaaGviQY0fa0y8aOKNsHRQNpSu0Eb330vdVa9CAsPMM8PMixCmJKNpnc4zWohiUlDykjFCREYEISz73EC7v4HNH5vUYgftxTgnJDkE30Y7VBSiJozuovbCY9XMh9irmQPcqnREZ_0rNl3AfQDVj48hWK_CEluvO5884DVgZXoIeBG6lNyD7rt2eYYVXrypCHg6neJ2cL3V4FOZVMoqd4C2jHIRDtf3Pnq-uX66ups8PN5Ory4eJprTnE14VfNKMEq1gLLRulKMalIIUzac54KpGqDRJqdppxCjxmjGeT3TDZnltMr30cmqbmrufYDYy9ZGDc4pD90QpSgFp0TwBFYrUKcpYgAjF8G2aVJJiRyllnM5qihHReUotfyWWn6m1KP1H8OsheYvca1tAo7XgIpaOROU1zb-cSWnVVWKxJ2vuA_rYPnvBuTl_fNo5V8Bbpsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67651065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>ROMANO, SALOMON V. ; METREBIAN, SERGIO E. ; VAZ, FERNANDO ; MULLER, VALTER ; D’ANCONA, CARLOS A. ; COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A. ; NAKAMURA, FABIO</creator><creatorcontrib>ROMANO, SALOMON V. ; METREBIAN, SERGIO E. ; VAZ, FERNANDO ; MULLER, VALTER ; D’ANCONA, CARLOS A. ; COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A. ; NAKAMURA, FABIO</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable bulbourethral sling (Argus®, Promedon SA, Cordoba, Argentina) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
In all, 48 patients with SUI because of prostatic surgery for prostate cancer (39) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (nine) had a new sling implanted in a multicentre trial at six institutions between April 2003 and September 2004. All patients were fully evaluated, including a questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form, ICIQ‐SF, range 0–21), endoscopy, and urodynamic evaluation. The Argus system comprises a 4.2 × 2.6 × 0.9 cm thick silicone foam pad for soft bulbar urethral compression. The pad is attached to the silicone cone columns that, after being passed with needles from the perineum to the abdominal wall, are adjusted with silicone washers to regulate and keep the desired tension against the urethra. The pad and washers are radio‐opaque, which allows their position to be assessed during follow‐up. The surgical technique was one described previously, with some modifications.
RESULTS
At a mean (range) follow‐up of 7.5 (1–17.5) months, 35 (73%) of the 48 patients were dry, five (10%) were improved, and eight (17%) were incontinent, including four (8%) who needed sling adjustment. The mean (range) ICIQ‐SF improved from 19.2 (12–21) to 4 (0–21). There were three (6%) urethral perforations during surgery that were resolved by re‐passing the needle. The sling was removed in three men (6%) due to erosion and in two (4%) due to infection. Seven (15%) cases of acute urinary retention resolved spontaneously, except for one that needed the sling loosening. No cases of chronic retention were reported. There was perineal discomfort and mild dysuria soon after surgery that resolved spontaneously after a few weeks.
CONCLUSION
This new adjustable male sling safely and effectively controls sphincter incontinence in men after prostate surgery, with an acceptably low complication rate. The early results are encouraging; the Argus is a valid alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter, the standard therapy for this condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16469021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; incontinence ; Male ; male sling ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; quality of life ; Silicones ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland ; Surgical Mesh ; Treatment Outcome ; urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial ; Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous ; Urinary tract. Prostate gland ; Urodynamics ; Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2006-03, Vol.97 (3), p.533-539</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-589586211c6e7dcc8a21c046f7d55362a9eedcf31313a2121ffc2559bcd0b3183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-589586211c6e7dcc8a21c046f7d55362a9eedcf31313a2121ffc2559bcd0b3183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2006.06002.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2006.06002.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17518876$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16469021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROMANO, SALOMON V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>METREBIAN, SERGIO E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAZ, FERNANDO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLER, VALTER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’ANCONA, CARLOS A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKAMURA, FABIO</creatorcontrib><title>An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable bulbourethral sling (Argus®, Promedon SA, Cordoba, Argentina) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
In all, 48 patients with SUI because of prostatic surgery for prostate cancer (39) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (nine) had a new sling implanted in a multicentre trial at six institutions between April 2003 and September 2004. All patients were fully evaluated, including a questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form, ICIQ‐SF, range 0–21), endoscopy, and urodynamic evaluation. The Argus system comprises a 4.2 × 2.6 × 0.9 cm thick silicone foam pad for soft bulbar urethral compression. The pad is attached to the silicone cone columns that, after being passed with needles from the perineum to the abdominal wall, are adjusted with silicone washers to regulate and keep the desired tension against the urethra. The pad and washers are radio‐opaque, which allows their position to be assessed during follow‐up. The surgical technique was one described previously, with some modifications.
RESULTS
At a mean (range) follow‐up of 7.5 (1–17.5) months, 35 (73%) of the 48 patients were dry, five (10%) were improved, and eight (17%) were incontinent, including four (8%) who needed sling adjustment. The mean (range) ICIQ‐SF improved from 19.2 (12–21) to 4 (0–21). There were three (6%) urethral perforations during surgery that were resolved by re‐passing the needle. The sling was removed in three men (6%) due to erosion and in two (4%) due to infection. Seven (15%) cases of acute urinary retention resolved spontaneously, except for one that needed the sling loosening. No cases of chronic retention were reported. There was perineal discomfort and mild dysuria soon after surgery that resolved spontaneously after a few weeks.
CONCLUSION
This new adjustable male sling safely and effectively controls sphincter incontinence in men after prostate surgery, with an acceptably low complication rate. The early results are encouraging; the Argus is a valid alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter, the standard therapy for this condition.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>incontinence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>male sling</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Sphincter, Artificial</subject><subject>Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><subject>Urodynamics</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1PxCAQhonR-P0XDBe9bQVaaGviQY0fa0y8aOKNsHRQNpSu0Eb330vdVa9CAsPMM8PMixCmJKNpnc4zWohiUlDykjFCREYEISz73EC7v4HNH5vUYgftxTgnJDkE30Y7VBSiJozuovbCY9XMh9irmQPcqnREZ_0rNl3AfQDVj48hWK_CEluvO5884DVgZXoIeBG6lNyD7rt2eYYVXrypCHg6neJ2cL3V4FOZVMoqd4C2jHIRDtf3Pnq-uX66ups8PN5Ory4eJprTnE14VfNKMEq1gLLRulKMalIIUzac54KpGqDRJqdppxCjxmjGeT3TDZnltMr30cmqbmrufYDYy9ZGDc4pD90QpSgFp0TwBFYrUKcpYgAjF8G2aVJJiRyllnM5qihHReUotfyWWn6m1KP1H8OsheYvca1tAo7XgIpaOROU1zb-cSWnVVWKxJ2vuA_rYPnvBuTl_fNo5V8Bbpsc</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>ROMANO, SALOMON V.</creator><creator>METREBIAN, SERGIO E.</creator><creator>VAZ, FERNANDO</creator><creator>MULLER, VALTER</creator><creator>D’ANCONA, CARLOS A.</creator><creator>COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A.</creator><creator>NAKAMURA, FABIO</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial</title><author>ROMANO, SALOMON V. ; METREBIAN, SERGIO E. ; VAZ, FERNANDO ; MULLER, VALTER ; D’ANCONA, CARLOS A. ; COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A. ; NAKAMURA, FABIO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-589586211c6e7dcc8a21c046f7d55362a9eedcf31313a2121ffc2559bcd0b3183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>incontinence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>male sling</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Sphincter, Artificial</topic><topic>Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</topic><topic>Urodynamics</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROMANO, SALOMON V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>METREBIAN, SERGIO E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAZ, FERNANDO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLER, VALTER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’ANCONA, CARLOS A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKAMURA, FABIO</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROMANO, SALOMON V.</au><au>METREBIAN, SERGIO E.</au><au>VAZ, FERNANDO</au><au>MULLER, VALTER</au><au>D’ANCONA, CARLOS A.</au><au>COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A.</au><au>NAKAMURA, FABIO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>539</epage><pages>533-539</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable bulbourethral sling (Argus®, Promedon SA, Cordoba, Argentina) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
In all, 48 patients with SUI because of prostatic surgery for prostate cancer (39) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (nine) had a new sling implanted in a multicentre trial at six institutions between April 2003 and September 2004. All patients were fully evaluated, including a questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form, ICIQ‐SF, range 0–21), endoscopy, and urodynamic evaluation. The Argus system comprises a 4.2 × 2.6 × 0.9 cm thick silicone foam pad for soft bulbar urethral compression. The pad is attached to the silicone cone columns that, after being passed with needles from the perineum to the abdominal wall, are adjusted with silicone washers to regulate and keep the desired tension against the urethra. The pad and washers are radio‐opaque, which allows their position to be assessed during follow‐up. The surgical technique was one described previously, with some modifications.
RESULTS
At a mean (range) follow‐up of 7.5 (1–17.5) months, 35 (73%) of the 48 patients were dry, five (10%) were improved, and eight (17%) were incontinent, including four (8%) who needed sling adjustment. The mean (range) ICIQ‐SF improved from 19.2 (12–21) to 4 (0–21). There were three (6%) urethral perforations during surgery that were resolved by re‐passing the needle. The sling was removed in three men (6%) due to erosion and in two (4%) due to infection. Seven (15%) cases of acute urinary retention resolved spontaneously, except for one that needed the sling loosening. No cases of chronic retention were reported. There was perineal discomfort and mild dysuria soon after surgery that resolved spontaneously after a few weeks.
CONCLUSION
This new adjustable male sling safely and effectively controls sphincter incontinence in men after prostate surgery, with an acceptably low complication rate. The early results are encouraging; the Argus is a valid alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter, the standard therapy for this condition.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16469021</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-4096 |
ispartof | BJU international, 2006-03, Vol.97 (3), p.533-539 |
issn | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67651065 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Follow-Up Studies Humans incontinence Male male sling Medical sciences Middle Aged Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases prostatectomy Prostatectomy - adverse effects Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery quality of life Silicones Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland Surgical Mesh Treatment Outcome urinary incontinence Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery Urinary Sphincter, Artificial Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous Urinary tract. Prostate gland Urodynamics Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods |
title | An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A28%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20adjustable%20male%20sling%20for%20treating%20urinary%20incontinence%20after%20prostatectomy:%20a%20phase%20III%20multicentre%20trial&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=ROMANO,%20SALOMON%20V.&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=539&rft.pages=533-539&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67651065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67651065&rft_id=info:pmid/16469021&rfr_iscdi=true |