An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable bulbourethral sling (Argus®, Promedon SA, Cordoba, Argentina) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 48 patients with SUI because of prostatic surgery for prosta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2006-03, Vol.97 (3), p.533-539
Hauptverfasser: ROMANO, SALOMON V., METREBIAN, SERGIO E., VAZ, FERNANDO, MULLER, VALTER, D’ANCONA, CARLOS A., COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A., NAKAMURA, FABIO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 539
container_issue 3
container_start_page 533
container_title BJU international
container_volume 97
creator ROMANO, SALOMON V.
METREBIAN, SERGIO E.
VAZ, FERNANDO
MULLER, VALTER
D’ANCONA, CARLOS A.
COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A.
NAKAMURA, FABIO
description OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable bulbourethral sling (Argus®, Promedon SA, Cordoba, Argentina) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 48 patients with SUI because of prostatic surgery for prostate cancer (39) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (nine) had a new sling implanted in a multicentre trial at six institutions between April 2003 and September 2004. All patients were fully evaluated, including a questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form, ICIQ‐SF, range 0–21), endoscopy, and urodynamic evaluation. The Argus system comprises a 4.2 × 2.6 × 0.9 cm thick silicone foam pad for soft bulbar urethral compression. The pad is attached to the silicone cone columns that, after being passed with needles from the perineum to the abdominal wall, are adjusted with silicone washers to regulate and keep the desired tension against the urethra. The pad and washers are radio‐opaque, which allows their position to be assessed during follow‐up. The surgical technique was one described previously, with some modifications. RESULTS At a mean (range) follow‐up of 7.5 (1–17.5) months, 35 (73%) of the 48 patients were dry, five (10%) were improved, and eight (17%) were incontinent, including four (8%) who needed sling adjustment. The mean (range) ICIQ‐SF improved from 19.2 (12–21) to 4 (0–21). There were three (6%) urethral perforations during surgery that were resolved by re‐passing the needle. The sling was removed in three men (6%) due to erosion and in two (4%) due to infection. Seven (15%) cases of acute urinary retention resolved spontaneously, except for one that needed the sling loosening. No cases of chronic retention were reported. There was perineal discomfort and mild dysuria soon after surgery that resolved spontaneously after a few weeks. CONCLUSION This new adjustable male sling safely and effectively controls sphincter incontinence in men after prostate surgery, with an acceptably low complication rate. The early results are encouraging; the Argus is a valid alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter, the standard therapy for this condition.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67651065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67651065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-589586211c6e7dcc8a21c046f7d55362a9eedcf31313a2121ffc2559bcd0b3183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PxCAQhonR-P0XDBe9bQVaaGviQY0fa0y8aOKNsHRQNpSu0Eb330vdVa9CAsPMM8PMixCmJKNpnc4zWohiUlDykjFCREYEISz73EC7v4HNH5vUYgftxTgnJDkE30Y7VBSiJozuovbCY9XMh9irmQPcqnREZ_0rNl3AfQDVj48hWK_CEluvO5884DVgZXoIeBG6lNyD7rt2eYYVXrypCHg6neJ2cL3V4FOZVMoqd4C2jHIRDtf3Pnq-uX66ups8PN5Ory4eJprTnE14VfNKMEq1gLLRulKMalIIUzac54KpGqDRJqdppxCjxmjGeT3TDZnltMr30cmqbmrufYDYy9ZGDc4pD90QpSgFp0TwBFYrUKcpYgAjF8G2aVJJiRyllnM5qihHReUotfyWWn6m1KP1H8OsheYvca1tAo7XgIpaOROU1zb-cSWnVVWKxJ2vuA_rYPnvBuTl_fNo5V8Bbpsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67651065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>ROMANO, SALOMON V. ; METREBIAN, SERGIO E. ; VAZ, FERNANDO ; MULLER, VALTER ; D’ANCONA, CARLOS A. ; COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A. ; NAKAMURA, FABIO</creator><creatorcontrib>ROMANO, SALOMON V. ; METREBIAN, SERGIO E. ; VAZ, FERNANDO ; MULLER, VALTER ; D’ANCONA, CARLOS A. ; COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A. ; NAKAMURA, FABIO</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable bulbourethral sling (Argus®, Promedon SA, Cordoba, Argentina) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 48 patients with SUI because of prostatic surgery for prostate cancer (39) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (nine) had a new sling implanted in a multicentre trial at six institutions between April 2003 and September 2004. All patients were fully evaluated, including a questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form, ICIQ‐SF, range 0–21), endoscopy, and urodynamic evaluation. The Argus system comprises a 4.2 × 2.6 × 0.9 cm thick silicone foam pad for soft bulbar urethral compression. The pad is attached to the silicone cone columns that, after being passed with needles from the perineum to the abdominal wall, are adjusted with silicone washers to regulate and keep the desired tension against the urethra. The pad and washers are radio‐opaque, which allows their position to be assessed during follow‐up. The surgical technique was one described previously, with some modifications. RESULTS At a mean (range) follow‐up of 7.5 (1–17.5) months, 35 (73%) of the 48 patients were dry, five (10%) were improved, and eight (17%) were incontinent, including four (8%) who needed sling adjustment. The mean (range) ICIQ‐SF improved from 19.2 (12–21) to 4 (0–21). There were three (6%) urethral perforations during surgery that were resolved by re‐passing the needle. The sling was removed in three men (6%) due to erosion and in two (4%) due to infection. Seven (15%) cases of acute urinary retention resolved spontaneously, except for one that needed the sling loosening. No cases of chronic retention were reported. There was perineal discomfort and mild dysuria soon after surgery that resolved spontaneously after a few weeks. CONCLUSION This new adjustable male sling safely and effectively controls sphincter incontinence in men after prostate surgery, with an acceptably low complication rate. The early results are encouraging; the Argus is a valid alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter, the standard therapy for this condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16469021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; incontinence ; Male ; male sling ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; quality of life ; Silicones ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland ; Surgical Mesh ; Treatment Outcome ; urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial ; Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous ; Urinary tract. Prostate gland ; Urodynamics ; Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2006-03, Vol.97 (3), p.533-539</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-589586211c6e7dcc8a21c046f7d55362a9eedcf31313a2121ffc2559bcd0b3183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-589586211c6e7dcc8a21c046f7d55362a9eedcf31313a2121ffc2559bcd0b3183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2006.06002.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2006.06002.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17518876$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16469021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROMANO, SALOMON V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>METREBIAN, SERGIO E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAZ, FERNANDO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLER, VALTER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’ANCONA, CARLOS A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKAMURA, FABIO</creatorcontrib><title>An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable bulbourethral sling (Argus®, Promedon SA, Cordoba, Argentina) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 48 patients with SUI because of prostatic surgery for prostate cancer (39) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (nine) had a new sling implanted in a multicentre trial at six institutions between April 2003 and September 2004. All patients were fully evaluated, including a questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form, ICIQ‐SF, range 0–21), endoscopy, and urodynamic evaluation. The Argus system comprises a 4.2 × 2.6 × 0.9 cm thick silicone foam pad for soft bulbar urethral compression. The pad is attached to the silicone cone columns that, after being passed with needles from the perineum to the abdominal wall, are adjusted with silicone washers to regulate and keep the desired tension against the urethra. The pad and washers are radio‐opaque, which allows their position to be assessed during follow‐up. The surgical technique was one described previously, with some modifications. RESULTS At a mean (range) follow‐up of 7.5 (1–17.5) months, 35 (73%) of the 48 patients were dry, five (10%) were improved, and eight (17%) were incontinent, including four (8%) who needed sling adjustment. The mean (range) ICIQ‐SF improved from 19.2 (12–21) to 4 (0–21). There were three (6%) urethral perforations during surgery that were resolved by re‐passing the needle. The sling was removed in three men (6%) due to erosion and in two (4%) due to infection. Seven (15%) cases of acute urinary retention resolved spontaneously, except for one that needed the sling loosening. No cases of chronic retention were reported. There was perineal discomfort and mild dysuria soon after surgery that resolved spontaneously after a few weeks. CONCLUSION This new adjustable male sling safely and effectively controls sphincter incontinence in men after prostate surgery, with an acceptably low complication rate. The early results are encouraging; the Argus is a valid alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter, the standard therapy for this condition.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>incontinence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>male sling</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Sphincter, Artificial</subject><subject>Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><subject>Urodynamics</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1PxCAQhonR-P0XDBe9bQVaaGviQY0fa0y8aOKNsHRQNpSu0Eb330vdVa9CAsPMM8PMixCmJKNpnc4zWohiUlDykjFCREYEISz73EC7v4HNH5vUYgftxTgnJDkE30Y7VBSiJozuovbCY9XMh9irmQPcqnREZ_0rNl3AfQDVj48hWK_CEluvO5884DVgZXoIeBG6lNyD7rt2eYYVXrypCHg6neJ2cL3V4FOZVMoqd4C2jHIRDtf3Pnq-uX66ups8PN5Ory4eJprTnE14VfNKMEq1gLLRulKMalIIUzac54KpGqDRJqdppxCjxmjGeT3TDZnltMr30cmqbmrufYDYy9ZGDc4pD90QpSgFp0TwBFYrUKcpYgAjF8G2aVJJiRyllnM5qihHReUotfyWWn6m1KP1H8OsheYvca1tAo7XgIpaOROU1zb-cSWnVVWKxJ2vuA_rYPnvBuTl_fNo5V8Bbpsc</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>ROMANO, SALOMON V.</creator><creator>METREBIAN, SERGIO E.</creator><creator>VAZ, FERNANDO</creator><creator>MULLER, VALTER</creator><creator>D’ANCONA, CARLOS A.</creator><creator>COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A.</creator><creator>NAKAMURA, FABIO</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial</title><author>ROMANO, SALOMON V. ; METREBIAN, SERGIO E. ; VAZ, FERNANDO ; MULLER, VALTER ; D’ANCONA, CARLOS A. ; COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A. ; NAKAMURA, FABIO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-589586211c6e7dcc8a21c046f7d55362a9eedcf31313a2121ffc2559bcd0b3183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>incontinence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>male sling</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Sphincter, Artificial</topic><topic>Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</topic><topic>Urodynamics</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROMANO, SALOMON V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>METREBIAN, SERGIO E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAZ, FERNANDO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLER, VALTER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’ANCONA, CARLOS A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKAMURA, FABIO</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROMANO, SALOMON V.</au><au>METREBIAN, SERGIO E.</au><au>VAZ, FERNANDO</au><au>MULLER, VALTER</au><au>D’ANCONA, CARLOS A.</au><au>COSTA DE SOUZA, EUGENIO A.</au><au>NAKAMURA, FABIO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>539</epage><pages>533-539</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new adjustable bulbourethral sling (Argus®, Promedon SA, Cordoba, Argentina) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 48 patients with SUI because of prostatic surgery for prostate cancer (39) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (nine) had a new sling implanted in a multicentre trial at six institutions between April 2003 and September 2004. All patients were fully evaluated, including a questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Short Form, ICIQ‐SF, range 0–21), endoscopy, and urodynamic evaluation. The Argus system comprises a 4.2 × 2.6 × 0.9 cm thick silicone foam pad for soft bulbar urethral compression. The pad is attached to the silicone cone columns that, after being passed with needles from the perineum to the abdominal wall, are adjusted with silicone washers to regulate and keep the desired tension against the urethra. The pad and washers are radio‐opaque, which allows their position to be assessed during follow‐up. The surgical technique was one described previously, with some modifications. RESULTS At a mean (range) follow‐up of 7.5 (1–17.5) months, 35 (73%) of the 48 patients were dry, five (10%) were improved, and eight (17%) were incontinent, including four (8%) who needed sling adjustment. The mean (range) ICIQ‐SF improved from 19.2 (12–21) to 4 (0–21). There were three (6%) urethral perforations during surgery that were resolved by re‐passing the needle. The sling was removed in three men (6%) due to erosion and in two (4%) due to infection. Seven (15%) cases of acute urinary retention resolved spontaneously, except for one that needed the sling loosening. No cases of chronic retention were reported. There was perineal discomfort and mild dysuria soon after surgery that resolved spontaneously after a few weeks. CONCLUSION This new adjustable male sling safely and effectively controls sphincter incontinence in men after prostate surgery, with an acceptably low complication rate. The early results are encouraging; the Argus is a valid alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter, the standard therapy for this condition.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16469021</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4096
ispartof BJU international, 2006-03, Vol.97 (3), p.533-539
issn 1464-4096
1464-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67651065
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
incontinence
Male
male sling
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
prostatectomy
Prostatectomy - adverse effects
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
quality of life
Silicones
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland
Surgical Mesh
Treatment Outcome
urinary incontinence
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery
Urinary Sphincter, Artificial
Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous
Urinary tract. Prostate gland
Urodynamics
Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods
title An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A28%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20adjustable%20male%20sling%20for%20treating%20urinary%20incontinence%20after%20prostatectomy:%20a%20phase%20III%20multicentre%20trial&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=ROMANO,%20SALOMON%20V.&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=539&rft.pages=533-539&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67651065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67651065&rft_id=info:pmid/16469021&rfr_iscdi=true