Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale

Despite the centrality of interpersonal communication in nursing, there are few psychometrically sound instruments to measure the communication competencies of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. This article reports on the development and testing of the Interpersonal Communication Assessme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of professional nursing 2006, Vol.22 (1), p.60-67
Hauptverfasser: Klakovich, Marilyn D., dela Cruz, Felicitas A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title Journal of professional nursing
container_volume 22
creator Klakovich, Marilyn D.
dela Cruz, Felicitas A.
description Despite the centrality of interpersonal communication in nursing, there are few psychometrically sound instruments to measure the communication competencies of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. This article reports on the development and testing of the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale (ICAS), which was designed to assess the communication competencies of students in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs. Retroductive triangulation, using both deductive and inductive methods, and the Model of Relational Competence guided the measure's conceptualization and development. We used responses from 531 (24%) undergraduate and graduate clinical faculty from 246 American Association of Colleges of Nursing member schools for the psychometric testing of the 54-item content-validated and pilot-tested ICAS . Exploratory-factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution labeled as advocacy, therapeutic use of self, and validation. These factors accounted for 60% of the variance. Items that loaded .60 or higher were retained, resulting in a 23-item scale with a Cronbach's α of .96. The ICAS significantly differentiated the communication competencies of beginning and graduating students in both undergraduate and graduate programs. The ICAS was found to have construct validity and internal consistency, underscoring its potential as a formative and summative tool to assess the interpersonal communication competencies of nursing students.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.12.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67633756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S8755722305001900</els_id><sourcerecordid>67633756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6fdbdbf5d2f0b4bbaaeb579d19e8f79ff802a283dcc5b820a3c047feafab15733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMlOwzAUtBAIyvILVU7cErzUTiIuoIpNQuLAcrW8PIOrxCl2gsTf46pFHHmXObyZN28GoTnBFcFEXKyqdRxcmGKqKMa8IrTKsIdmhDNaNouG7KNZU3Ne1pSyI3Sc0grnWdT0EB0RseAtbfEMXb6pzls1-vBejB9QPIQR4hpiGoLqiuXQ91PwJu-HUFynBCn1EMbi2agOTtGBU12Csx2eoNfbm5flffn4dPewvH4sDRNiLIWz2mrHLXVYL7RWCjSvW0taaFzdOtdgqmjDrDFcNxQrZvKbDpRTmvCasRN0vr2bI39OkEbZ-2Sg61SAYUpS1IKxmotMFFuiiUNKEZxcR9-r-C0Jlpva5Er-1iY3tUlCZYYsnO8cJt2D_ZPtesqEqy0Bcs4vD1Em4yEYsD6CGaUd_H8eP99JhBs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67633756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Klakovich, Marilyn D. ; dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Klakovich, Marilyn D. ; dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the centrality of interpersonal communication in nursing, there are few psychometrically sound instruments to measure the communication competencies of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. This article reports on the development and testing of the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale (ICAS), which was designed to assess the communication competencies of students in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs. Retroductive triangulation, using both deductive and inductive methods, and the Model of Relational Competence guided the measure's conceptualization and development. We used responses from 531 (24%) undergraduate and graduate clinical faculty from 246 American Association of Colleges of Nursing member schools for the psychometric testing of the 54-item content-validated and pilot-tested ICAS . Exploratory-factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution labeled as advocacy, therapeutic use of self, and validation. These factors accounted for 60% of the variance. Items that loaded .60 or higher were retained, resulting in a 23-item scale with a Cronbach's α of .96. The ICAS significantly differentiated the communication competencies of beginning and graduating students in both undergraduate and graduate programs. The ICAS was found to have construct validity and internal consistency, underscoring its potential as a formative and summative tool to assess the interpersonal communication competencies of nursing students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-7223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16459290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Communication ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards ; Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Educational Measurement - standards ; Empathy ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Models, Nursing ; Models, Psychological ; Nonverbal Communication ; Nursing ; Nursing Education Research ; Patient Advocacy ; Patient Education as Topic ; Psychometrics ; Social Support ; Students, Nursing - psychology ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of professional nursing, 2006, Vol.22 (1), p.60-67</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6fdbdbf5d2f0b4bbaaeb579d19e8f79ff802a283dcc5b820a3c047feafab15733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6fdbdbf5d2f0b4bbaaeb579d19e8f79ff802a283dcc5b820a3c047feafab15733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722305001900$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16459290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klakovich, Marilyn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</creatorcontrib><title>Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale</title><title>Journal of professional nursing</title><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><description>Despite the centrality of interpersonal communication in nursing, there are few psychometrically sound instruments to measure the communication competencies of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. This article reports on the development and testing of the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale (ICAS), which was designed to assess the communication competencies of students in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs. Retroductive triangulation, using both deductive and inductive methods, and the Model of Relational Competence guided the measure's conceptualization and development. We used responses from 531 (24%) undergraduate and graduate clinical faculty from 246 American Association of Colleges of Nursing member schools for the psychometric testing of the 54-item content-validated and pilot-tested ICAS . Exploratory-factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution labeled as advocacy, therapeutic use of self, and validation. These factors accounted for 60% of the variance. Items that loaded .60 or higher were retained, resulting in a 23-item scale with a Cronbach's α of .96. The ICAS significantly differentiated the communication competencies of beginning and graduating students in both undergraduate and graduate programs. The ICAS was found to have construct validity and internal consistency, underscoring its potential as a formative and summative tool to assess the interpersonal communication competencies of nursing students.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Models, Nursing</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Nonverbal Communication</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Education Research</subject><subject>Patient Advocacy</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - psychology</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>8755-7223</issn><issn>1532-8481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMlOwzAUtBAIyvILVU7cErzUTiIuoIpNQuLAcrW8PIOrxCl2gsTf46pFHHmXObyZN28GoTnBFcFEXKyqdRxcmGKqKMa8IrTKsIdmhDNaNouG7KNZU3Ne1pSyI3Sc0grnWdT0EB0RseAtbfEMXb6pzls1-vBejB9QPIQR4hpiGoLqiuXQ91PwJu-HUFynBCn1EMbi2agOTtGBU12Csx2eoNfbm5flffn4dPewvH4sDRNiLIWz2mrHLXVYL7RWCjSvW0taaFzdOtdgqmjDrDFcNxQrZvKbDpRTmvCasRN0vr2bI39OkEbZ-2Sg61SAYUpS1IKxmotMFFuiiUNKEZxcR9-r-C0Jlpva5Er-1iY3tUlCZYYsnO8cJt2D_ZPtesqEqy0Bcs4vD1Em4yEYsD6CGaUd_H8eP99JhBs</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Klakovich, Marilyn D.</creator><creator>dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale</title><author>Klakovich, Marilyn D. ; dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6fdbdbf5d2f0b4bbaaeb579d19e8f79ff802a283dcc5b820a3c047feafab15733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Models, Nursing</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Nonverbal Communication</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Education Research</topic><topic>Patient Advocacy</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - psychology</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klakovich, Marilyn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klakovich, Marilyn D.</au><au>dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale</atitle><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>60-67</pages><issn>8755-7223</issn><eissn>1532-8481</eissn><abstract>Despite the centrality of interpersonal communication in nursing, there are few psychometrically sound instruments to measure the communication competencies of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. This article reports on the development and testing of the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale (ICAS), which was designed to assess the communication competencies of students in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs. Retroductive triangulation, using both deductive and inductive methods, and the Model of Relational Competence guided the measure's conceptualization and development. We used responses from 531 (24%) undergraduate and graduate clinical faculty from 246 American Association of Colleges of Nursing member schools for the psychometric testing of the 54-item content-validated and pilot-tested ICAS . Exploratory-factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution labeled as advocacy, therapeutic use of self, and validation. These factors accounted for 60% of the variance. Items that loaded .60 or higher were retained, resulting in a 23-item scale with a Cronbach's α of .96. The ICAS significantly differentiated the communication competencies of beginning and graduating students in both undergraduate and graduate programs. The ICAS was found to have construct validity and internal consistency, underscoring its potential as a formative and summative tool to assess the interpersonal communication competencies of nursing students.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16459290</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.12.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8755-7223
ispartof Journal of professional nursing, 2006, Vol.22 (1), p.60-67
issn 8755-7223
1532-8481
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67633756
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Analysis of Variance
Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Competence - standards
Communication
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards
Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards
Educational Measurement - methods
Educational Measurement - standards
Empathy
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Interprofessional Relations
Models, Nursing
Models, Psychological
Nonverbal Communication
Nursing
Nursing Education Research
Patient Advocacy
Patient Education as Topic
Psychometrics
Social Support
Students, Nursing - psychology
United States
title Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T18%3A57%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20the%20Interpersonal%20Communication%20Assessment%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20professional%20nursing&rft.au=Klakovich,%20Marilyn%20D.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=60-67&rft.issn=8755-7223&rft.eissn=1532-8481&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67633756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67633756&rft_id=info:pmid/16459290&rft_els_id=S8755722305001900&rfr_iscdi=true