Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale
Despite the centrality of interpersonal communication in nursing, there are few psychometrically sound instruments to measure the communication competencies of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. This article reports on the development and testing of the Interpersonal Communication Assessme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of professional nursing 2006, Vol.22 (1), p.60-67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 67 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | Journal of professional nursing |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Klakovich, Marilyn D. dela Cruz, Felicitas A. |
description | Despite the centrality of interpersonal communication in nursing, there are few psychometrically sound instruments to measure the communication competencies of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. This article reports on the development and testing of the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale (ICAS), which was designed to assess the communication competencies of students in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs.
Retroductive triangulation, using both deductive and inductive methods, and the Model of Relational Competence guided the measure's conceptualization and development. We used responses from 531 (24%) undergraduate and graduate clinical faculty from 246 American Association of Colleges of Nursing member schools for the psychometric testing of the 54-item content-validated and pilot-tested ICAS
. Exploratory-factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution labeled as advocacy, therapeutic use of self, and validation. These factors accounted for 60% of the variance. Items that loaded .60 or higher were retained, resulting in a 23-item scale with a Cronbach's α of .96. The ICAS significantly differentiated the communication competencies of beginning and graduating students in both undergraduate and graduate programs. The ICAS was found to have construct validity and internal consistency, underscoring its potential as a formative and summative tool to assess the interpersonal communication competencies of nursing students. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.12.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67633756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S8755722305001900</els_id><sourcerecordid>67633756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6fdbdbf5d2f0b4bbaaeb579d19e8f79ff802a283dcc5b820a3c047feafab15733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMlOwzAUtBAIyvILVU7cErzUTiIuoIpNQuLAcrW8PIOrxCl2gsTf46pFHHmXObyZN28GoTnBFcFEXKyqdRxcmGKqKMa8IrTKsIdmhDNaNouG7KNZU3Ne1pSyI3Sc0grnWdT0EB0RseAtbfEMXb6pzls1-vBejB9QPIQR4hpiGoLqiuXQ91PwJu-HUFynBCn1EMbi2agOTtGBU12Csx2eoNfbm5flffn4dPewvH4sDRNiLIWz2mrHLXVYL7RWCjSvW0taaFzdOtdgqmjDrDFcNxQrZvKbDpRTmvCasRN0vr2bI39OkEbZ-2Sg61SAYUpS1IKxmotMFFuiiUNKEZxcR9-r-C0Jlpva5Er-1iY3tUlCZYYsnO8cJt2D_ZPtesqEqy0Bcs4vD1Em4yEYsD6CGaUd_H8eP99JhBs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67633756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Klakovich, Marilyn D. ; dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Klakovich, Marilyn D. ; dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the centrality of interpersonal communication in nursing, there are few psychometrically sound instruments to measure the communication competencies of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. This article reports on the development and testing of the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale (ICAS), which was designed to assess the communication competencies of students in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs.
Retroductive triangulation, using both deductive and inductive methods, and the Model of Relational Competence guided the measure's conceptualization and development. We used responses from 531 (24%) undergraduate and graduate clinical faculty from 246 American Association of Colleges of Nursing member schools for the psychometric testing of the 54-item content-validated and pilot-tested ICAS
. Exploratory-factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution labeled as advocacy, therapeutic use of self, and validation. These factors accounted for 60% of the variance. Items that loaded .60 or higher were retained, resulting in a 23-item scale with a Cronbach's α of .96. The ICAS significantly differentiated the communication competencies of beginning and graduating students in both undergraduate and graduate programs. The ICAS was found to have construct validity and internal consistency, underscoring its potential as a formative and summative tool to assess the interpersonal communication competencies of nursing students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-7223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16459290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Communication ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards ; Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Educational Measurement - standards ; Empathy ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Models, Nursing ; Models, Psychological ; Nonverbal Communication ; Nursing ; Nursing Education Research ; Patient Advocacy ; Patient Education as Topic ; Psychometrics ; Social Support ; Students, Nursing - psychology ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of professional nursing, 2006, Vol.22 (1), p.60-67</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6fdbdbf5d2f0b4bbaaeb579d19e8f79ff802a283dcc5b820a3c047feafab15733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6fdbdbf5d2f0b4bbaaeb579d19e8f79ff802a283dcc5b820a3c047feafab15733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722305001900$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16459290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klakovich, Marilyn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</creatorcontrib><title>Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale</title><title>Journal of professional nursing</title><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><description>Despite the centrality of interpersonal communication in nursing, there are few psychometrically sound instruments to measure the communication competencies of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. This article reports on the development and testing of the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale (ICAS), which was designed to assess the communication competencies of students in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs.
Retroductive triangulation, using both deductive and inductive methods, and the Model of Relational Competence guided the measure's conceptualization and development. We used responses from 531 (24%) undergraduate and graduate clinical faculty from 246 American Association of Colleges of Nursing member schools for the psychometric testing of the 54-item content-validated and pilot-tested ICAS
. Exploratory-factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution labeled as advocacy, therapeutic use of self, and validation. These factors accounted for 60% of the variance. Items that loaded .60 or higher were retained, resulting in a 23-item scale with a Cronbach's α of .96. The ICAS significantly differentiated the communication competencies of beginning and graduating students in both undergraduate and graduate programs. The ICAS was found to have construct validity and internal consistency, underscoring its potential as a formative and summative tool to assess the interpersonal communication competencies of nursing students.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Models, Nursing</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Nonverbal Communication</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Education Research</subject><subject>Patient Advocacy</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - psychology</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>8755-7223</issn><issn>1532-8481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMlOwzAUtBAIyvILVU7cErzUTiIuoIpNQuLAcrW8PIOrxCl2gsTf46pFHHmXObyZN28GoTnBFcFEXKyqdRxcmGKqKMa8IrTKsIdmhDNaNouG7KNZU3Ne1pSyI3Sc0grnWdT0EB0RseAtbfEMXb6pzls1-vBejB9QPIQR4hpiGoLqiuXQ91PwJu-HUFynBCn1EMbi2agOTtGBU12Csx2eoNfbm5flffn4dPewvH4sDRNiLIWz2mrHLXVYL7RWCjSvW0taaFzdOtdgqmjDrDFcNxQrZvKbDpRTmvCasRN0vr2bI39OkEbZ-2Sg61SAYUpS1IKxmotMFFuiiUNKEZxcR9-r-C0Jlpva5Er-1iY3tUlCZYYsnO8cJt2D_ZPtesqEqy0Bcs4vD1Em4yEYsD6CGaUd_H8eP99JhBs</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Klakovich, Marilyn D.</creator><creator>dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale</title><author>Klakovich, Marilyn D. ; dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6fdbdbf5d2f0b4bbaaeb579d19e8f79ff802a283dcc5b820a3c047feafab15733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Models, Nursing</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Nonverbal Communication</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Education Research</topic><topic>Patient Advocacy</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - psychology</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klakovich, Marilyn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klakovich, Marilyn D.</au><au>dela Cruz, Felicitas A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale</atitle><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>60-67</pages><issn>8755-7223</issn><eissn>1532-8481</eissn><abstract>Despite the centrality of interpersonal communication in nursing, there are few psychometrically sound instruments to measure the communication competencies of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. This article reports on the development and testing of the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale (ICAS), which was designed to assess the communication competencies of students in undergraduate and graduate nursing programs.
Retroductive triangulation, using both deductive and inductive methods, and the Model of Relational Competence guided the measure's conceptualization and development. We used responses from 531 (24%) undergraduate and graduate clinical faculty from 246 American Association of Colleges of Nursing member schools for the psychometric testing of the 54-item content-validated and pilot-tested ICAS
. Exploratory-factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution labeled as advocacy, therapeutic use of self, and validation. These factors accounted for 60% of the variance. Items that loaded .60 or higher were retained, resulting in a 23-item scale with a Cronbach's α of .96. The ICAS significantly differentiated the communication competencies of beginning and graduating students in both undergraduate and graduate programs. The ICAS was found to have construct validity and internal consistency, underscoring its potential as a formative and summative tool to assess the interpersonal communication competencies of nursing students.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16459290</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.12.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8755-7223 |
ispartof | Journal of professional nursing, 2006, Vol.22 (1), p.60-67 |
issn | 8755-7223 1532-8481 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67633756 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Attitude of Health Personnel Clinical Competence - standards Communication Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards Educational Measurement - methods Educational Measurement - standards Empathy Factor Analysis, Statistical Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Interprofessional Relations Models, Nursing Models, Psychological Nonverbal Communication Nursing Nursing Education Research Patient Advocacy Patient Education as Topic Psychometrics Social Support Students, Nursing - psychology United States |
title | Validating the Interpersonal Communication Assessment Scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T18%3A57%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20the%20Interpersonal%20Communication%20Assessment%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20professional%20nursing&rft.au=Klakovich,%20Marilyn%20D.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=60-67&rft.issn=8755-7223&rft.eissn=1532-8481&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67633756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67633756&rft_id=info:pmid/16459290&rft_els_id=S8755722305001900&rfr_iscdi=true |