Statistical investigation of the double random phase encoding technique

The amplitude-encoding case of the double random phase encoding technique is examined by defining a cost function as a metric to compare an attempted decryption against the corresponding original input image. For the case when a cipher-text pair has been obtained and the correct decryption key is un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision Optics, image science, and vision, 2009-09, Vol.26 (9), p.2033-2042
Hauptverfasser: MONAGHAN, David S, GOPINATHAN, Unnikrishnan, SITU, Guohai, NAUGHTON, Thomas J, SHERIDAN, John T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2042
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2033
container_title Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision
container_volume 26
creator MONAGHAN, David S
GOPINATHAN, Unnikrishnan
SITU, Guohai
NAUGHTON, Thomas J
SHERIDAN, John T
description The amplitude-encoding case of the double random phase encoding technique is examined by defining a cost function as a metric to compare an attempted decryption against the corresponding original input image. For the case when a cipher-text pair has been obtained and the correct decryption key is unknown, an iterative attack technique can be employed to ascertain the key. During such an attack the noise in the output field for an attempted decryption can be used as a measure of a possible decryption key's correctness. For relatively small systems, i.e., systems involving fewer than 5x5 pixels, the output decryption of every possible key can be examined to evaluate the distribution of the keys in key space in relation to their relative performance when carrying out decryption. However, in order to do this for large systems, checking every single key is currently impractical. One metric used to quantify the correctness of a decryption key is the normalized root mean squared (NRMS) error. The NRMS is a measure of the cumulative intensity difference between the input and decrypted images. We identify a core term in the NRMS, which we refer to as the difference parameter, d. Expressions for the expected value (or mean) and variance of d are derived in terms of the mean and variance of the output field noise, which is shown to be circular Gaussian. These expressions assume a large sample set (number of pixels and keys). We show that as we increase the number of samples used, the decryption error obeys the statistically predicted characteristic values. Finally, we corroborate previously reported simulations in the literature by using the statistically derived expressions.
doi_str_mv 10.1364/JOSAA.26.002033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67623251</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67623251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a3df0ef7b47dcba267e3f9fa6ad975a85a4242877f9fcc6bc4ae587cf1e035163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDtPwzAURi0EouUxsyEvsKX128lYVVBAlToUZstx7NYoiUucIPHvMTSC6X66Ove70gHgBqMZpoLNXzbbxWJGxAwhgig9AVPMCcpyTslpyihnmeSkmICLGN8RQkzk8hxMcCEJFnkxBattr3sfe290DX37aVPcpU1oYXCw31tYhaGsLex0W4UGHvY6WmhbEyrf7mBvzb71H4O9AmdO19Fej_MSvD0-vC6fsvVm9bxcrDNDhegzTSuHrJMlk5UpNRHSUlc4LXRVSK5zrhlhJJcyLY0RpWHa8lwahy2iHAt6Ce6PvYcupLexV42Pxta1bm0YohJSEEo4TuD8CJouxNhZpw6db3T3pTBSP-7UrztFhDq6Sxe3Y_VQNrb650dZCbgbAR2TLpeUGB__OJLAIieMfgPwNng0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67623251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Statistical investigation of the double random phase encoding technique</title><source>Optica Publishing Group Journals</source><creator>MONAGHAN, David S ; GOPINATHAN, Unnikrishnan ; SITU, Guohai ; NAUGHTON, Thomas J ; SHERIDAN, John T</creator><creatorcontrib>MONAGHAN, David S ; GOPINATHAN, Unnikrishnan ; SITU, Guohai ; NAUGHTON, Thomas J ; SHERIDAN, John T</creatorcontrib><description>The amplitude-encoding case of the double random phase encoding technique is examined by defining a cost function as a metric to compare an attempted decryption against the corresponding original input image. For the case when a cipher-text pair has been obtained and the correct decryption key is unknown, an iterative attack technique can be employed to ascertain the key. During such an attack the noise in the output field for an attempted decryption can be used as a measure of a possible decryption key's correctness. For relatively small systems, i.e., systems involving fewer than 5x5 pixels, the output decryption of every possible key can be examined to evaluate the distribution of the keys in key space in relation to their relative performance when carrying out decryption. However, in order to do this for large systems, checking every single key is currently impractical. One metric used to quantify the correctness of a decryption key is the normalized root mean squared (NRMS) error. The NRMS is a measure of the cumulative intensity difference between the input and decrypted images. We identify a core term in the NRMS, which we refer to as the difference parameter, d. Expressions for the expected value (or mean) and variance of d are derived in terms of the mean and variance of the output field noise, which is shown to be circular Gaussian. These expressions assume a large sample set (number of pixels and keys). We show that as we increase the number of samples used, the decryption error obeys the statistically predicted characteristic values. Finally, we corroborate previously reported simulations in the literature by using the statistically derived expressions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1084-7529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8532</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.26.002033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19721689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Optical Society of America</publisher><subject>Computers in experimental physics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fourier optics ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Image processing ; Imaging and optical processing ; Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy ; Optics ; Physics</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision, 2009-09, Vol.26 (9), p.2033-2042</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a3df0ef7b47dcba267e3f9fa6ad975a85a4242877f9fcc6bc4ae587cf1e035163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a3df0ef7b47dcba267e3f9fa6ad975a85a4242877f9fcc6bc4ae587cf1e035163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3245,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21979824$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19721689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MONAGHAN, David S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOPINATHAN, Unnikrishnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SITU, Guohai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAUGHTON, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHERIDAN, John T</creatorcontrib><title>Statistical investigation of the double random phase encoding technique</title><title>Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision</title><addtitle>J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis</addtitle><description>The amplitude-encoding case of the double random phase encoding technique is examined by defining a cost function as a metric to compare an attempted decryption against the corresponding original input image. For the case when a cipher-text pair has been obtained and the correct decryption key is unknown, an iterative attack technique can be employed to ascertain the key. During such an attack the noise in the output field for an attempted decryption can be used as a measure of a possible decryption key's correctness. For relatively small systems, i.e., systems involving fewer than 5x5 pixels, the output decryption of every possible key can be examined to evaluate the distribution of the keys in key space in relation to their relative performance when carrying out decryption. However, in order to do this for large systems, checking every single key is currently impractical. One metric used to quantify the correctness of a decryption key is the normalized root mean squared (NRMS) error. The NRMS is a measure of the cumulative intensity difference between the input and decrypted images. We identify a core term in the NRMS, which we refer to as the difference parameter, d. Expressions for the expected value (or mean) and variance of d are derived in terms of the mean and variance of the output field noise, which is shown to be circular Gaussian. These expressions assume a large sample set (number of pixels and keys). We show that as we increase the number of samples used, the decryption error obeys the statistically predicted characteristic values. Finally, we corroborate previously reported simulations in the literature by using the statistically derived expressions.</description><subject>Computers in experimental physics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fourier optics</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Imaging and optical processing</subject><subject>Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><issn>1084-7529</issn><issn>1520-8532</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkDtPwzAURi0EouUxsyEvsKX128lYVVBAlToUZstx7NYoiUucIPHvMTSC6X66Ove70gHgBqMZpoLNXzbbxWJGxAwhgig9AVPMCcpyTslpyihnmeSkmICLGN8RQkzk8hxMcCEJFnkxBattr3sfe290DX37aVPcpU1oYXCw31tYhaGsLex0W4UGHvY6WmhbEyrf7mBvzb71H4O9AmdO19Fej_MSvD0-vC6fsvVm9bxcrDNDhegzTSuHrJMlk5UpNRHSUlc4LXRVSK5zrhlhJJcyLY0RpWHa8lwahy2iHAt6Ce6PvYcupLexV42Pxta1bm0YohJSEEo4TuD8CJouxNhZpw6db3T3pTBSP-7UrztFhDq6Sxe3Y_VQNrb650dZCbgbAR2TLpeUGB__OJLAIieMfgPwNng0</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>MONAGHAN, David S</creator><creator>GOPINATHAN, Unnikrishnan</creator><creator>SITU, Guohai</creator><creator>NAUGHTON, Thomas J</creator><creator>SHERIDAN, John T</creator><general>Optical Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Statistical investigation of the double random phase encoding technique</title><author>MONAGHAN, David S ; GOPINATHAN, Unnikrishnan ; SITU, Guohai ; NAUGHTON, Thomas J ; SHERIDAN, John T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a3df0ef7b47dcba267e3f9fa6ad975a85a4242877f9fcc6bc4ae587cf1e035163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Computers in experimental physics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fourier optics</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Imaging and optical processing</topic><topic>Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MONAGHAN, David S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOPINATHAN, Unnikrishnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SITU, Guohai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAUGHTON, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHERIDAN, John T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MONAGHAN, David S</au><au>GOPINATHAN, Unnikrishnan</au><au>SITU, Guohai</au><au>NAUGHTON, Thomas J</au><au>SHERIDAN, John T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Statistical investigation of the double random phase encoding technique</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision</jtitle><addtitle>J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2033</spage><epage>2042</epage><pages>2033-2042</pages><issn>1084-7529</issn><eissn>1520-8532</eissn><abstract>The amplitude-encoding case of the double random phase encoding technique is examined by defining a cost function as a metric to compare an attempted decryption against the corresponding original input image. For the case when a cipher-text pair has been obtained and the correct decryption key is unknown, an iterative attack technique can be employed to ascertain the key. During such an attack the noise in the output field for an attempted decryption can be used as a measure of a possible decryption key's correctness. For relatively small systems, i.e., systems involving fewer than 5x5 pixels, the output decryption of every possible key can be examined to evaluate the distribution of the keys in key space in relation to their relative performance when carrying out decryption. However, in order to do this for large systems, checking every single key is currently impractical. One metric used to quantify the correctness of a decryption key is the normalized root mean squared (NRMS) error. The NRMS is a measure of the cumulative intensity difference between the input and decrypted images. We identify a core term in the NRMS, which we refer to as the difference parameter, d. Expressions for the expected value (or mean) and variance of d are derived in terms of the mean and variance of the output field noise, which is shown to be circular Gaussian. These expressions assume a large sample set (number of pixels and keys). We show that as we increase the number of samples used, the decryption error obeys the statistically predicted characteristic values. Finally, we corroborate previously reported simulations in the literature by using the statistically derived expressions.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Optical Society of America</pub><pmid>19721689</pmid><doi>10.1364/JOSAA.26.002033</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1084-7529
ispartof Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision, 2009-09, Vol.26 (9), p.2033-2042
issn 1084-7529
1520-8532
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67623251
source Optica Publishing Group Journals
subjects Computers in experimental physics
Exact sciences and technology
Fourier optics
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Image processing
Imaging and optical processing
Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy
Optics
Physics
title Statistical investigation of the double random phase encoding technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A56%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Statistical%20investigation%20of%20the%20double%20random%20phase%20encoding%20technique&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Optical%20Society%20of%20America.%20A,%20Optics,%20image%20science,%20and%20vision&rft.au=MONAGHAN,%20David%20S&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2033&rft.epage=2042&rft.pages=2033-2042&rft.issn=1084-7529&rft.eissn=1520-8532&rft_id=info:doi/10.1364/JOSAA.26.002033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67623251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67623251&rft_id=info:pmid/19721689&rfr_iscdi=true