Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection
BackgroundE5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis MethodsWe tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in E...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of infectious diseases 2006-03, Vol.193 (5), p.634-644 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 644 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 634 |
container_title | The Journal of infectious diseases |
container_volume | 193 |
creator | Solomon, Steven B. Cui, Xizhong Gerstenberger, Eric Danner, Robert L. Fitz, Yvonne Banks, Steven M. Natanson, Charles Eichacker, Peter Q. |
description | BackgroundE5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis MethodsWe tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli–challenged rats ResultsAll E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)—lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h) ConclusionThese findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/500147 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67622873</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30086485</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1086/500147</oup_id><sourcerecordid>30086485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fe8574d62bdb5a11e53953c5919e81c1e720dec2d83cb74bf6ccdd56fd0d33c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1DAYhYso7rjqP1Cygt5V89Ek7eWwO7orBXEdQbwpafJ2J2Ob1KQVvfSf29mWHRDEq1w8T84L5yTJU4JfE5yLNxxjksl7yYpwJlMhCLufrDCmNCV5UZwkj2LcY4wzJuTD5ISIjDPK81Xye9M0oAf7A9CFj9bdIN-g0vbWoDVaO9X6mxHQhnORIevQtRoiuoAenInIOzTsAG1tt_zbBlBDB25Ayplbdu3HAQ5oE_UOgtU7q5D2rUVX7vaud4-TB41qIzxZ3tPk89vN9vwyLT-8uzpfl6nOOBnSvIGcy8wIWpuaK0KAs4IzzQtSQE40AUmxAU1NznQts7oRWhvDRWOwYUyz0-TVnNsH_32EOFSdjRraVjnwY6yEFJTmkv1XJBIXmFExiS_-Evd-DFNnsaKUTbXLvDim6eBjDNBUfbCdCr8qgqvDdNU83SQ-X9LGugNz1JatJuHlIqioVdsE5bSNR09OVWTFIehs9vzY__vYs9nZx8GHO4vhyclyPvF05jYO8POOq_Bt6olJXl1--Vpx8f7Tx3JbVpj9AbakwPM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223899789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Solomon, Steven B. ; Cui, Xizhong ; Gerstenberger, Eric ; Danner, Robert L. ; Fitz, Yvonne ; Banks, Steven M. ; Natanson, Charles ; Eichacker, Peter Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Steven B. ; Cui, Xizhong ; Gerstenberger, Eric ; Danner, Robert L. ; Fitz, Yvonne ; Banks, Steven M. ; Natanson, Charles ; Eichacker, Peter Q.</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundE5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis MethodsWe tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli–challenged rats ResultsAll E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)—lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h) ConclusionThese findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/500147</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16453258</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDIAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood ; Blood Chemical Analysis ; Blood Circulation - physiology ; Boluses ; Bronchoalveolar lavage ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dosage ; Endotoxins ; Endotoxins - analysis ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli Infections - blood ; Escherichia coli Infections - drug therapy ; Escherichia coli Infections - physiopathology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Leukocyte Count ; Lipid A - administration & dosage ; Lipid A - analogs & derivatives ; Lipid A - pharmacology ; Lipid A - therapeutic use ; Lipids ; Lipopolysaccharides - antagonists & inhibitors ; Lung - pathology ; Medical sciences ; Microbiology ; Placebos ; Random Allocation ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Sepsis ; Sepsis - blood ; Sepsis - drug therapy ; Sepsis - physiopathology ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - analysis</subject><ispartof>The Journal of infectious diseases, 2006-03, Vol.193 (5), p.634-644</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Infectious Diseases Society of America</rights><rights>2006</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Press Mar 1, 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fe8574d62bdb5a11e53953c5919e81c1e720dec2d83cb74bf6ccdd56fd0d33c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30086485$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30086485$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17591497$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16453258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Steven B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Xizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstenberger, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danner, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitz, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natanson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichacker, Peter Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection</title><title>The Journal of infectious diseases</title><addtitle>The Journal of Infectious Diseases</addtitle><addtitle>The Journal of Infectious Diseases</addtitle><description>BackgroundE5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis MethodsWe tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli–challenged rats ResultsAll E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)—lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h) ConclusionThese findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Chemical Analysis</subject><subject>Blood Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>Boluses</subject><subject>Bronchoalveolar lavage</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Endotoxins</subject><subject>Endotoxins - analysis</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - blood</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - physiopathology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Leukocyte Count</subject><subject>Lipid A - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Lipid A - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Lipid A - pharmacology</subject><subject>Lipid A - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides - antagonists & inhibitors</subject><subject>Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - blood</subject><subject>Sepsis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Sepsis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - analysis</subject><issn>0022-1899</issn><issn>1537-6613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1DAYhYso7rjqP1Cygt5V89Ek7eWwO7orBXEdQbwpafJ2J2Ob1KQVvfSf29mWHRDEq1w8T84L5yTJU4JfE5yLNxxjksl7yYpwJlMhCLufrDCmNCV5UZwkj2LcY4wzJuTD5ISIjDPK81Xye9M0oAf7A9CFj9bdIN-g0vbWoDVaO9X6mxHQhnORIevQtRoiuoAenInIOzTsAG1tt_zbBlBDB25Ayplbdu3HAQ5oE_UOgtU7q5D2rUVX7vaud4-TB41qIzxZ3tPk89vN9vwyLT-8uzpfl6nOOBnSvIGcy8wIWpuaK0KAs4IzzQtSQE40AUmxAU1NznQts7oRWhvDRWOwYUyz0-TVnNsH_32EOFSdjRraVjnwY6yEFJTmkv1XJBIXmFExiS_-Evd-DFNnsaKUTbXLvDim6eBjDNBUfbCdCr8qgqvDdNU83SQ-X9LGugNz1JatJuHlIqioVdsE5bSNR09OVWTFIehs9vzY__vYs9nZx8GHO4vhyclyPvF05jYO8POOq_Bt6olJXl1--Vpx8f7Tx3JbVpj9AbakwPM</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Solomon, Steven B.</creator><creator>Cui, Xizhong</creator><creator>Gerstenberger, Eric</creator><creator>Danner, Robert L.</creator><creator>Fitz, Yvonne</creator><creator>Banks, Steven M.</creator><creator>Natanson, Charles</creator><creator>Eichacker, Peter Q.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection</title><author>Solomon, Steven B. ; Cui, Xizhong ; Gerstenberger, Eric ; Danner, Robert L. ; Fitz, Yvonne ; Banks, Steven M. ; Natanson, Charles ; Eichacker, Peter Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fe8574d62bdb5a11e53953c5919e81c1e720dec2d83cb74bf6ccdd56fd0d33c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Chemical Analysis</topic><topic>Blood Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>Boluses</topic><topic>Bronchoalveolar lavage</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Endotoxins</topic><topic>Endotoxins - analysis</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - blood</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - physiopathology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Leukocyte Count</topic><topic>Lipid A - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Lipid A - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Lipid A - pharmacology</topic><topic>Lipid A - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides - antagonists & inhibitors</topic><topic>Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - blood</topic><topic>Sepsis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Sepsis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Steven B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Xizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstenberger, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danner, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitz, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natanson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichacker, Peter Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solomon, Steven B.</au><au>Cui, Xizhong</au><au>Gerstenberger, Eric</au><au>Danner, Robert L.</au><au>Fitz, Yvonne</au><au>Banks, Steven M.</au><au>Natanson, Charles</au><au>Eichacker, Peter Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>The Journal of Infectious Diseases</stitle><addtitle>The Journal of Infectious Diseases</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>193</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>634</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>634-644</pages><issn>0022-1899</issn><eissn>1537-6613</eissn><coden>JIDIAQ</coden><abstract>BackgroundE5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis MethodsWe tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli–challenged rats ResultsAll E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)—lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h) ConclusionThese findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>16453258</pmid><doi>10.1086/500147</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1899 |
ispartof | The Journal of infectious diseases, 2006-03, Vol.193 (5), p.634-644 |
issn | 0022-1899 1537-6613 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67622873 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Bacteria Biological and medical sciences Blood Blood Chemical Analysis Blood Circulation - physiology Boluses Bronchoalveolar lavage Colony Count, Microbial Disease Models, Animal Dosage Endotoxins Endotoxins - analysis Escherichia coli Escherichia coli Infections - blood Escherichia coli Infections - drug therapy Escherichia coli Infections - physiopathology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Infections Infectious diseases Leukocyte Count Lipid A - administration & dosage Lipid A - analogs & derivatives Lipid A - pharmacology Lipid A - therapeutic use Lipids Lipopolysaccharides - antagonists & inhibitors Lung - pathology Medical sciences Microbiology Placebos Random Allocation Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Sepsis Sepsis - blood Sepsis - drug therapy Sepsis - physiopathology Survival Analysis Time Factors Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - analysis |
title | Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A23%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effective%20Dosing%20of%20Lipid%20A%20Analogue%20E5564%20in%20Rats%20Depends%20on%20the%20Timing%20of%20Treatment%20and%20the%20Route%20of%20Escherichia%20coli%20Infection&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Solomon,%20Steven%20B.&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=634&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=634-644&rft.issn=0022-1899&rft.eissn=1537-6613&rft.coden=JIDIAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/500147&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30086485%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223899789&rft_id=info:pmid/16453258&rft_jstor_id=30086485&rft_oup_id=10.1086/500147&rfr_iscdi=true |