Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection

BackgroundE5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis MethodsWe tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in E...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of infectious diseases 2006-03, Vol.193 (5), p.634-644
Hauptverfasser: Solomon, Steven B., Cui, Xizhong, Gerstenberger, Eric, Danner, Robert L., Fitz, Yvonne, Banks, Steven M., Natanson, Charles, Eichacker, Peter Q.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 644
container_issue 5
container_start_page 634
container_title The Journal of infectious diseases
container_volume 193
creator Solomon, Steven B.
Cui, Xizhong
Gerstenberger, Eric
Danner, Robert L.
Fitz, Yvonne
Banks, Steven M.
Natanson, Charles
Eichacker, Peter Q.
description BackgroundE5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis MethodsWe tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli–challenged rats ResultsAll E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)—lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h) ConclusionThese findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection
doi_str_mv 10.1086/500147
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67622873</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30086485</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1086/500147</oup_id><sourcerecordid>30086485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fe8574d62bdb5a11e53953c5919e81c1e720dec2d83cb74bf6ccdd56fd0d33c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1DAYhYso7rjqP1Cygt5V89Ek7eWwO7orBXEdQbwpafJ2J2Ob1KQVvfSf29mWHRDEq1w8T84L5yTJU4JfE5yLNxxjksl7yYpwJlMhCLufrDCmNCV5UZwkj2LcY4wzJuTD5ISIjDPK81Xye9M0oAf7A9CFj9bdIN-g0vbWoDVaO9X6mxHQhnORIevQtRoiuoAenInIOzTsAG1tt_zbBlBDB25Ayplbdu3HAQ5oE_UOgtU7q5D2rUVX7vaud4-TB41qIzxZ3tPk89vN9vwyLT-8uzpfl6nOOBnSvIGcy8wIWpuaK0KAs4IzzQtSQE40AUmxAU1NznQts7oRWhvDRWOwYUyz0-TVnNsH_32EOFSdjRraVjnwY6yEFJTmkv1XJBIXmFExiS_-Evd-DFNnsaKUTbXLvDim6eBjDNBUfbCdCr8qgqvDdNU83SQ-X9LGugNz1JatJuHlIqioVdsE5bSNR09OVWTFIehs9vzY__vYs9nZx8GHO4vhyclyPvF05jYO8POOq_Bt6olJXl1--Vpx8f7Tx3JbVpj9AbakwPM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223899789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Solomon, Steven B. ; Cui, Xizhong ; Gerstenberger, Eric ; Danner, Robert L. ; Fitz, Yvonne ; Banks, Steven M. ; Natanson, Charles ; Eichacker, Peter Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Steven B. ; Cui, Xizhong ; Gerstenberger, Eric ; Danner, Robert L. ; Fitz, Yvonne ; Banks, Steven M. ; Natanson, Charles ; Eichacker, Peter Q.</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundE5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis MethodsWe tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli–challenged rats ResultsAll E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)—lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h) ConclusionThese findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/500147</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16453258</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDIAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood ; Blood Chemical Analysis ; Blood Circulation - physiology ; Boluses ; Bronchoalveolar lavage ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Disease Models, Animal ; Dosage ; Endotoxins ; Endotoxins - analysis ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli Infections - blood ; Escherichia coli Infections - drug therapy ; Escherichia coli Infections - physiopathology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Leukocyte Count ; Lipid A - administration &amp; dosage ; Lipid A - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Lipid A - pharmacology ; Lipid A - therapeutic use ; Lipids ; Lipopolysaccharides - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Lung - pathology ; Medical sciences ; Microbiology ; Placebos ; Random Allocation ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Sepsis ; Sepsis - blood ; Sepsis - drug therapy ; Sepsis - physiopathology ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - analysis</subject><ispartof>The Journal of infectious diseases, 2006-03, Vol.193 (5), p.634-644</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Infectious Diseases Society of America</rights><rights>2006</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Press Mar 1, 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fe8574d62bdb5a11e53953c5919e81c1e720dec2d83cb74bf6ccdd56fd0d33c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30086485$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30086485$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17591497$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16453258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Steven B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Xizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstenberger, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danner, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitz, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natanson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichacker, Peter Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection</title><title>The Journal of infectious diseases</title><addtitle>The Journal of Infectious Diseases</addtitle><addtitle>The Journal of Infectious Diseases</addtitle><description>BackgroundE5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis MethodsWe tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli–challenged rats ResultsAll E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)—lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h) ConclusionThese findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Chemical Analysis</subject><subject>Blood Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>Boluses</subject><subject>Bronchoalveolar lavage</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Endotoxins</subject><subject>Endotoxins - analysis</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - blood</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - physiopathology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Leukocyte Count</subject><subject>Lipid A - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Lipid A - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Lipid A - pharmacology</subject><subject>Lipid A - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - blood</subject><subject>Sepsis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Sepsis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - analysis</subject><issn>0022-1899</issn><issn>1537-6613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1DAYhYso7rjqP1Cygt5V89Ek7eWwO7orBXEdQbwpafJ2J2Ob1KQVvfSf29mWHRDEq1w8T84L5yTJU4JfE5yLNxxjksl7yYpwJlMhCLufrDCmNCV5UZwkj2LcY4wzJuTD5ISIjDPK81Xye9M0oAf7A9CFj9bdIN-g0vbWoDVaO9X6mxHQhnORIevQtRoiuoAenInIOzTsAG1tt_zbBlBDB25Ayplbdu3HAQ5oE_UOgtU7q5D2rUVX7vaud4-TB41qIzxZ3tPk89vN9vwyLT-8uzpfl6nOOBnSvIGcy8wIWpuaK0KAs4IzzQtSQE40AUmxAU1NznQts7oRWhvDRWOwYUyz0-TVnNsH_32EOFSdjRraVjnwY6yEFJTmkv1XJBIXmFExiS_-Evd-DFNnsaKUTbXLvDim6eBjDNBUfbCdCr8qgqvDdNU83SQ-X9LGugNz1JatJuHlIqioVdsE5bSNR09OVWTFIehs9vzY__vYs9nZx8GHO4vhyclyPvF05jYO8POOq_Bt6olJXl1--Vpx8f7Tx3JbVpj9AbakwPM</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Solomon, Steven B.</creator><creator>Cui, Xizhong</creator><creator>Gerstenberger, Eric</creator><creator>Danner, Robert L.</creator><creator>Fitz, Yvonne</creator><creator>Banks, Steven M.</creator><creator>Natanson, Charles</creator><creator>Eichacker, Peter Q.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection</title><author>Solomon, Steven B. ; Cui, Xizhong ; Gerstenberger, Eric ; Danner, Robert L. ; Fitz, Yvonne ; Banks, Steven M. ; Natanson, Charles ; Eichacker, Peter Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fe8574d62bdb5a11e53953c5919e81c1e720dec2d83cb74bf6ccdd56fd0d33c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Chemical Analysis</topic><topic>Blood Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>Boluses</topic><topic>Bronchoalveolar lavage</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Endotoxins</topic><topic>Endotoxins - analysis</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - blood</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - physiopathology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Leukocyte Count</topic><topic>Lipid A - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Lipid A - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Lipid A - pharmacology</topic><topic>Lipid A - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - blood</topic><topic>Sepsis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Sepsis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Steven B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Xizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstenberger, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danner, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitz, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natanson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichacker, Peter Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solomon, Steven B.</au><au>Cui, Xizhong</au><au>Gerstenberger, Eric</au><au>Danner, Robert L.</au><au>Fitz, Yvonne</au><au>Banks, Steven M.</au><au>Natanson, Charles</au><au>Eichacker, Peter Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>The Journal of Infectious Diseases</stitle><addtitle>The Journal of Infectious Diseases</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>193</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>634</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>634-644</pages><issn>0022-1899</issn><eissn>1537-6613</eissn><coden>JIDIAQ</coden><abstract>BackgroundE5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis MethodsWe tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli–challenged rats ResultsAll E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)—lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h) ConclusionThese findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>16453258</pmid><doi>10.1086/500147</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1899
ispartof The Journal of infectious diseases, 2006-03, Vol.193 (5), p.634-644
issn 0022-1899
1537-6613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67622873
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Bacteria
Biological and medical sciences
Blood
Blood Chemical Analysis
Blood Circulation - physiology
Boluses
Bronchoalveolar lavage
Colony Count, Microbial
Disease Models, Animal
Dosage
Endotoxins
Endotoxins - analysis
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli Infections - blood
Escherichia coli Infections - drug therapy
Escherichia coli Infections - physiopathology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Infections
Infectious diseases
Leukocyte Count
Lipid A - administration & dosage
Lipid A - analogs & derivatives
Lipid A - pharmacology
Lipid A - therapeutic use
Lipids
Lipopolysaccharides - antagonists & inhibitors
Lung - pathology
Medical sciences
Microbiology
Placebos
Random Allocation
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Sepsis
Sepsis - blood
Sepsis - drug therapy
Sepsis - physiopathology
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - analysis
title Effective Dosing of Lipid A Analogue E5564 in Rats Depends on the Timing of Treatment and the Route of Escherichia coli Infection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A23%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effective%20Dosing%20of%20Lipid%20A%20Analogue%20E5564%20in%20Rats%20Depends%20on%20the%20Timing%20of%20Treatment%20and%20the%20Route%20of%20Escherichia%20coli%20Infection&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Solomon,%20Steven%20B.&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=634&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=634-644&rft.issn=0022-1899&rft.eissn=1537-6613&rft.coden=JIDIAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/500147&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30086485%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223899789&rft_id=info:pmid/16453258&rft_jstor_id=30086485&rft_oup_id=10.1086/500147&rfr_iscdi=true