Evaluation of six aerator modules built on venturi air injectors using clean water test
Six aerator modules constructed using venturi air injectors connected in either series or parallel were evaluated and compared for their oxygen transfer coefficients (OTC), standard oxygen transfer rate (SOTR), and standard oxygenation efficiency (SOE) determined by clean water tests. Modules in ser...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 2009-01, Vol.60 (5), p.1353-1359 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1359 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1353 |
container_title | Water science and technology |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Dong, C Zhu, J Miller, C F |
description | Six aerator modules constructed using venturi air injectors connected in either series or parallel were evaluated and compared for their oxygen transfer coefficients (OTC), standard oxygen transfer rate (SOTR), and standard oxygenation efficiency (SOE) determined by clean water tests. Modules in series (module a, b, c) included one, two, and three venturi injectors, respectively. The aerator module with two (module d) and three (module e, f) venturi injectors in parallel were used, while module f had less friction and more even flow rate in each line compared with module e. The results showed that the OTC, SOTR, and SOE for the six different module configurations (module a, b, c, d, e, f) were 4.54, 3.79, 3.58, 8.37, 5.93 and 11.87 h(-1); 0.10, 0.09, 0.09, 0.18, 0.15, and 0.31 kgO(2)/h; and 0.07, 0.06, 0.06, 0.12, 0.10, and 0.21 kgO(2)/kWh, respectively. The observations indicate that a 3-fold increase in SOTR and 3.5-fold increase in SOE can be obtained by simply changing the way that venturi air injectors are connected, which suggests that it is possible to improve the aeration efficiency of a venturi type aeration system by innovative aerator module designs. In view of the situation that the venturi aeration systems currently used for swine manure lagoons need significant improvement in their performance in order to match the cost-effective requirement, more research in aerator module development is needed so that effective control of odor from liquid swine manure lagoons can be achieved at an affordable cost. The technology such developed can also be applied to other livestock species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2009.420 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67621306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20965993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-fae0071d2853b82f96d10fd89ebe30ca80777e2e4d606c1e751712ebe43744c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctKAzEUgOEgiq3VnWsJCK6cmluTyVJKvUDBjeIypDNnJGU6U3Ox-vamtCC40VUW5-Mk4UfonJIxo1LebEIcM0L0WDBygIZUa1loxdkhGhKmeEEZ4wN0EsKSEKK4IMdoQLWiSjMxRK-zD9smG13f4b7BwX1iC97G3uNVX6cWAl4k10ac5x_QxeQdts5j1y2hyirgFFz3hqsWbIc3NoLHEUI8RUeNbQOc7c8RermbPU8fivnT_eP0dl5UXOlYNBbyo2jNyglflKzRsqakqUsNC-CksiVRSgEDUUsiKwpqQhVleSi4EqJifISudnvXvn9P-WKzcqGCtrUd9CkYqSSjnMg_ISNalpL_D0605hle_oLLPvku_9ZQLbiUpVA6q-udqnwfgofGrL1bWf9lKDHbgCYHNNuAJgfM_GK_NC1WUP_gfTH-DYKEleg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943668479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of six aerator modules built on venturi air injectors using clean water test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Dong, C ; Zhu, J ; Miller, C F</creator><creatorcontrib>Dong, C ; Zhu, J ; Miller, C F</creatorcontrib><description>Six aerator modules constructed using venturi air injectors connected in either series or parallel were evaluated and compared for their oxygen transfer coefficients (OTC), standard oxygen transfer rate (SOTR), and standard oxygenation efficiency (SOE) determined by clean water tests. Modules in series (module a, b, c) included one, two, and three venturi injectors, respectively. The aerator module with two (module d) and three (module e, f) venturi injectors in parallel were used, while module f had less friction and more even flow rate in each line compared with module e. The results showed that the OTC, SOTR, and SOE for the six different module configurations (module a, b, c, d, e, f) were 4.54, 3.79, 3.58, 8.37, 5.93 and 11.87 h(-1); 0.10, 0.09, 0.09, 0.18, 0.15, and 0.31 kgO(2)/h; and 0.07, 0.06, 0.06, 0.12, 0.10, and 0.21 kgO(2)/kWh, respectively. The observations indicate that a 3-fold increase in SOTR and 3.5-fold increase in SOE can be obtained by simply changing the way that venturi air injectors are connected, which suggests that it is possible to improve the aeration efficiency of a venturi type aeration system by innovative aerator module designs. In view of the situation that the venturi aeration systems currently used for swine manure lagoons need significant improvement in their performance in order to match the cost-effective requirement, more research in aerator module development is needed so that effective control of odor from liquid swine manure lagoons can be achieved at an affordable cost. The technology such developed can also be applied to other livestock species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.420</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19717924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Aeration ; Aerators ; Air ; Air - analysis ; Animals ; Coefficients ; Evaluation ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Injections ; Injectors ; Lagoons ; Livestock ; Manure ; Manures ; Modules ; Odor control ; Odorants ; Odour ; Oxygen ; Oxygen - analysis ; Oxygen - metabolism ; Oxygen transfer ; Oxygenation ; Phosphorus ; Pig manure ; Swine ; Waste Management - methods ; Water - analysis ; Water - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2009-01, Vol.60 (5), p.1353-1359</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing May 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-fae0071d2853b82f96d10fd89ebe30ca80777e2e4d606c1e751712ebe43744c23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19717924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dong, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, C F</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of six aerator modules built on venturi air injectors using clean water test</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Six aerator modules constructed using venturi air injectors connected in either series or parallel were evaluated and compared for their oxygen transfer coefficients (OTC), standard oxygen transfer rate (SOTR), and standard oxygenation efficiency (SOE) determined by clean water tests. Modules in series (module a, b, c) included one, two, and three venturi injectors, respectively. The aerator module with two (module d) and three (module e, f) venturi injectors in parallel were used, while module f had less friction and more even flow rate in each line compared with module e. The results showed that the OTC, SOTR, and SOE for the six different module configurations (module a, b, c, d, e, f) were 4.54, 3.79, 3.58, 8.37, 5.93 and 11.87 h(-1); 0.10, 0.09, 0.09, 0.18, 0.15, and 0.31 kgO(2)/h; and 0.07, 0.06, 0.06, 0.12, 0.10, and 0.21 kgO(2)/kWh, respectively. The observations indicate that a 3-fold increase in SOTR and 3.5-fold increase in SOE can be obtained by simply changing the way that venturi air injectors are connected, which suggests that it is possible to improve the aeration efficiency of a venturi type aeration system by innovative aerator module designs. In view of the situation that the venturi aeration systems currently used for swine manure lagoons need significant improvement in their performance in order to match the cost-effective requirement, more research in aerator module development is needed so that effective control of odor from liquid swine manure lagoons can be achieved at an affordable cost. The technology such developed can also be applied to other livestock species.</description><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Aerators</subject><subject>Air</subject><subject>Air - analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Injectors</subject><subject>Lagoons</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Manure</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Odor control</subject><subject>Odorants</subject><subject>Odour</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen - analysis</subject><subject>Oxygen - metabolism</subject><subject>Oxygen transfer</subject><subject>Oxygenation</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Pig manure</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Waste Management - methods</subject><subject>Water - analysis</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ctKAzEUgOEgiq3VnWsJCK6cmluTyVJKvUDBjeIypDNnJGU6U3Ox-vamtCC40VUW5-Mk4UfonJIxo1LebEIcM0L0WDBygIZUa1loxdkhGhKmeEEZ4wN0EsKSEKK4IMdoQLWiSjMxRK-zD9smG13f4b7BwX1iC97G3uNVX6cWAl4k10ac5x_QxeQdts5j1y2hyirgFFz3hqsWbIc3NoLHEUI8RUeNbQOc7c8RermbPU8fivnT_eP0dl5UXOlYNBbyo2jNyglflKzRsqakqUsNC-CksiVRSgEDUUsiKwpqQhVleSi4EqJifISudnvXvn9P-WKzcqGCtrUd9CkYqSSjnMg_ISNalpL_D0605hle_oLLPvku_9ZQLbiUpVA6q-udqnwfgofGrL1bWf9lKDHbgCYHNNuAJgfM_GK_NC1WUP_gfTH-DYKEleg</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Dong, C</creator><creator>Zhu, J</creator><creator>Miller, C F</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of six aerator modules built on venturi air injectors using clean water test</title><author>Dong, C ; Zhu, J ; Miller, C F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-fae0071d2853b82f96d10fd89ebe30ca80777e2e4d606c1e751712ebe43744c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Aerators</topic><topic>Air</topic><topic>Air - analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Injectors</topic><topic>Lagoons</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Manure</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Odor control</topic><topic>Odorants</topic><topic>Odour</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen - analysis</topic><topic>Oxygen - metabolism</topic><topic>Oxygen transfer</topic><topic>Oxygenation</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Pig manure</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Waste Management - methods</topic><topic>Water - analysis</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dong, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, C F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dong, C</au><au>Zhu, J</au><au>Miller, C F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of six aerator modules built on venturi air injectors using clean water test</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1353</spage><epage>1359</epage><pages>1353-1359</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>Six aerator modules constructed using venturi air injectors connected in either series or parallel were evaluated and compared for their oxygen transfer coefficients (OTC), standard oxygen transfer rate (SOTR), and standard oxygenation efficiency (SOE) determined by clean water tests. Modules in series (module a, b, c) included one, two, and three venturi injectors, respectively. The aerator module with two (module d) and three (module e, f) venturi injectors in parallel were used, while module f had less friction and more even flow rate in each line compared with module e. The results showed that the OTC, SOTR, and SOE for the six different module configurations (module a, b, c, d, e, f) were 4.54, 3.79, 3.58, 8.37, 5.93 and 11.87 h(-1); 0.10, 0.09, 0.09, 0.18, 0.15, and 0.31 kgO(2)/h; and 0.07, 0.06, 0.06, 0.12, 0.10, and 0.21 kgO(2)/kWh, respectively. The observations indicate that a 3-fold increase in SOTR and 3.5-fold increase in SOE can be obtained by simply changing the way that venturi air injectors are connected, which suggests that it is possible to improve the aeration efficiency of a venturi type aeration system by innovative aerator module designs. In view of the situation that the venturi aeration systems currently used for swine manure lagoons need significant improvement in their performance in order to match the cost-effective requirement, more research in aerator module development is needed so that effective control of odor from liquid swine manure lagoons can be achieved at an affordable cost. The technology such developed can also be applied to other livestock species.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>19717924</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2009.420</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
ispartof | Water science and technology, 2009-01, Vol.60 (5), p.1353-1359 |
issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67621306 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Aeration Aerators Air Air - analysis Animals Coefficients Evaluation Flow rates Flow velocity Injections Injectors Lagoons Livestock Manure Manures Modules Odor control Odorants Odour Oxygen Oxygen - analysis Oxygen - metabolism Oxygen transfer Oxygenation Phosphorus Pig manure Swine Waste Management - methods Water - analysis Water - chemistry |
title | Evaluation of six aerator modules built on venturi air injectors using clean water test |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A42%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20six%20aerator%20modules%20built%20on%20venturi%20air%20injectors%20using%20clean%20water%20test&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Dong,%20C&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1353&rft.epage=1359&rft.pages=1353-1359&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2009.420&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20965993%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943668479&rft_id=info:pmid/19717924&rfr_iscdi=true |