How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?
Abstract The purpose of this study was to describe the intra- and inter-observer variability of the registration of bony landmarks and alignment axes on a Computed Axial Tomography (CT) scan. Six cadaver specimens were scanned. Three-dimensional surface models of the knee were created. Three observe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The knee 2009-10, Vol.16 (5), p.358-365 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 365 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 358 |
container_title | The knee |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Victor, J Van Doninck, D Labey, L Innocenti, B Parizel, P.M Bellemans, J |
description | Abstract The purpose of this study was to describe the intra- and inter-observer variability of the registration of bony landmarks and alignment axes on a Computed Axial Tomography (CT) scan. Six cadaver specimens were scanned. Three-dimensional surface models of the knee were created. Three observers marked anatomic surface landmarks and alignment landmarks. The intra- and inter-observer variability of the point and axis registration was performed. Mean intra-observer precision ranks around 1 mm for all landmarks. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-observer variability ranked higher than 0.98 for all landmarks. The highest recorded intra- and inter-observer variability was 1.3 mm and 3.5 mm respectively and was observed for the lateral femoral epicondyle. The lowest variability in the determination of axes was found for the femoral mechanical axis (intra-observer 0.12° and inter-observer 0.19°) and for the tibial mechanical axis (respectively 0.15° and 0.28°). In the horizontal plane the lowest variability was observed for the posterior condylar line of the femur (intra-observer 0.17° and inter-observer 0.78°) and for the transverse axis (respectively 1.89° and 2.03) on the tibia. This study demonstrates low intra- and inter-observer variability in the CT registration of landmarks that define the coordinate system of the femur and the tibia. In the femur, the horizontal plane projections of the posterior condylar line and the surgical and anatomical transepicondylar axis can be determined precisely on a CT scan, using the described methodology. In the tibia, the best result is obtained for the tibial transverse axis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.knee.2009.01.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67619836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S096801600900012X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2745338601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-994aca4b2c6ed9daea3001e4bd42ffe827f6350f4d4f1b49eaf6eb79c446c85a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFDEYxoNU7Lb6BTxIoOBtxjczmewExCJL1woFD1bwFjLJG8zubLIms8p-ezPsQqEHT-_l9z48fwh5y6BmwMSHTb0NiHUDIGtgNQB7QRasX7ZV1wNckAVI0VeFhEtylfMGAITk3StyySSTXS_Fgqzv41-6T2h8Rmp0oEMMRzrqYHc6bTMdkFqcMO18QEtjoJquHmmeyejo9Avp7OH2NXnp9Jjxzflekx_ru8fVffXw7cvX1eeHynQgp0pKro3mQ2MEWmk16ra4Rj5Y3jiHfbN0ou3AccsdG7hE7QQOS2k4F6bvdHtN3p909yn-PmCe1M5ng2MxjPGQlVgKJvtWFPDmGbiJhxSKN8Wg7RgTfTNTzYkyKeac0Kl98iX4sUBq7lht1JxPzR0rYKq4LU_vztKHYYf26eVcagE-ngAsTfzxmFQ2HoNB60vRk7LR_1__07N3M_rgjR63eMT8lEPlRoH6Pq88jwyyDMyan-0_7cygkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035116826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Victor, J ; Van Doninck, D ; Labey, L ; Innocenti, B ; Parizel, P.M ; Bellemans, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Victor, J ; Van Doninck, D ; Labey, L ; Innocenti, B ; Parizel, P.M ; Bellemans, J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to describe the intra- and inter-observer variability of the registration of bony landmarks and alignment axes on a Computed Axial Tomography (CT) scan. Six cadaver specimens were scanned. Three-dimensional surface models of the knee were created. Three observers marked anatomic surface landmarks and alignment landmarks. The intra- and inter-observer variability of the point and axis registration was performed. Mean intra-observer precision ranks around 1 mm for all landmarks. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-observer variability ranked higher than 0.98 for all landmarks. The highest recorded intra- and inter-observer variability was 1.3 mm and 3.5 mm respectively and was observed for the lateral femoral epicondyle. The lowest variability in the determination of axes was found for the femoral mechanical axis (intra-observer 0.12° and inter-observer 0.19°) and for the tibial mechanical axis (respectively 0.15° and 0.28°). In the horizontal plane the lowest variability was observed for the posterior condylar line of the femur (intra-observer 0.17° and inter-observer 0.78°) and for the transverse axis (respectively 1.89° and 2.03) on the tibia. This study demonstrates low intra- and inter-observer variability in the CT registration of landmarks that define the coordinate system of the femur and the tibia. In the femur, the horizontal plane projections of the posterior condylar line and the surgical and anatomical transepicondylar axis can be determined precisely on a CT scan, using the described methodology. In the tibia, the best result is obtained for the tibial transverse axis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.01.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19195896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alignment ; Female ; Femur - anatomy & histology ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Imaging ; Knee ; Knee Joint - anatomy & histology ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Observer Variation ; Orthopedics ; Reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tibia - anatomy & histology ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2009-10, Vol.16 (5), p.358-365</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-994aca4b2c6ed9daea3001e4bd42ffe827f6350f4d4f1b49eaf6eb79c446c85a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-994aca4b2c6ed9daea3001e4bd42ffe827f6350f4d4f1b49eaf6eb79c446c85a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096801600900012X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19195896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Victor, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Doninck, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labey, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innocenti, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parizel, P.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellemans, J</creatorcontrib><title>How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to describe the intra- and inter-observer variability of the registration of bony landmarks and alignment axes on a Computed Axial Tomography (CT) scan. Six cadaver specimens were scanned. Three-dimensional surface models of the knee were created. Three observers marked anatomic surface landmarks and alignment landmarks. The intra- and inter-observer variability of the point and axis registration was performed. Mean intra-observer precision ranks around 1 mm for all landmarks. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-observer variability ranked higher than 0.98 for all landmarks. The highest recorded intra- and inter-observer variability was 1.3 mm and 3.5 mm respectively and was observed for the lateral femoral epicondyle. The lowest variability in the determination of axes was found for the femoral mechanical axis (intra-observer 0.12° and inter-observer 0.19°) and for the tibial mechanical axis (respectively 0.15° and 0.28°). In the horizontal plane the lowest variability was observed for the posterior condylar line of the femur (intra-observer 0.17° and inter-observer 0.78°) and for the transverse axis (respectively 1.89° and 2.03) on the tibia. This study demonstrates low intra- and inter-observer variability in the CT registration of landmarks that define the coordinate system of the femur and the tibia. In the femur, the horizontal plane projections of the posterior condylar line and the surgical and anatomical transepicondylar axis can be determined precisely on a CT scan, using the described methodology. In the tibia, the best result is obtained for the tibial transverse axis.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tibia - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFDEYxoNU7Lb6BTxIoOBtxjczmewExCJL1woFD1bwFjLJG8zubLIms8p-ezPsQqEHT-_l9z48fwh5y6BmwMSHTb0NiHUDIGtgNQB7QRasX7ZV1wNckAVI0VeFhEtylfMGAITk3StyySSTXS_Fgqzv41-6T2h8Rmp0oEMMRzrqYHc6bTMdkFqcMO18QEtjoJquHmmeyejo9Avp7OH2NXnp9Jjxzflekx_ru8fVffXw7cvX1eeHynQgp0pKro3mQ2MEWmk16ra4Rj5Y3jiHfbN0ou3AccsdG7hE7QQOS2k4F6bvdHtN3p909yn-PmCe1M5ng2MxjPGQlVgKJvtWFPDmGbiJhxSKN8Wg7RgTfTNTzYkyKeac0Kl98iX4sUBq7lht1JxPzR0rYKq4LU_vztKHYYf26eVcagE-ngAsTfzxmFQ2HoNB60vRk7LR_1__07N3M_rgjR63eMT8lEPlRoH6Pq88jwyyDMyan-0_7cygkw</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Victor, J</creator><creator>Van Doninck, D</creator><creator>Labey, L</creator><creator>Innocenti, B</creator><creator>Parizel, P.M</creator><creator>Bellemans, J</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?</title><author>Victor, J ; Van Doninck, D ; Labey, L ; Innocenti, B ; Parizel, P.M ; Bellemans, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-994aca4b2c6ed9daea3001e4bd42ffe827f6350f4d4f1b49eaf6eb79c446c85a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tibia - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Victor, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Doninck, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labey, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innocenti, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parizel, P.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellemans, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Victor, J</au><au>Van Doninck, D</au><au>Labey, L</au><au>Innocenti, B</au><au>Parizel, P.M</au><au>Bellemans, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>358</spage><epage>365</epage><pages>358-365</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Abstract The purpose of this study was to describe the intra- and inter-observer variability of the registration of bony landmarks and alignment axes on a Computed Axial Tomography (CT) scan. Six cadaver specimens were scanned. Three-dimensional surface models of the knee were created. Three observers marked anatomic surface landmarks and alignment landmarks. The intra- and inter-observer variability of the point and axis registration was performed. Mean intra-observer precision ranks around 1 mm for all landmarks. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-observer variability ranked higher than 0.98 for all landmarks. The highest recorded intra- and inter-observer variability was 1.3 mm and 3.5 mm respectively and was observed for the lateral femoral epicondyle. The lowest variability in the determination of axes was found for the femoral mechanical axis (intra-observer 0.12° and inter-observer 0.19°) and for the tibial mechanical axis (respectively 0.15° and 0.28°). In the horizontal plane the lowest variability was observed for the posterior condylar line of the femur (intra-observer 0.17° and inter-observer 0.78°) and for the transverse axis (respectively 1.89° and 2.03) on the tibia. This study demonstrates low intra- and inter-observer variability in the CT registration of landmarks that define the coordinate system of the femur and the tibia. In the femur, the horizontal plane projections of the posterior condylar line and the surgical and anatomical transepicondylar axis can be determined precisely on a CT scan, using the described methodology. In the tibia, the best result is obtained for the tibial transverse axis.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>19195896</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2009.01.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0968-0160 |
ispartof | The knee, 2009-10, Vol.16 (5), p.358-365 |
issn | 0968-0160 1873-5800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67619836 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Alignment Female Femur - anatomy & histology Femur - diagnostic imaging Humans Imaging Knee Knee Joint - anatomy & histology Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging Male Observer Variation Orthopedics Reproducibility Reproducibility of Results Tibia - anatomy & histology Tibia - diagnostic imaging Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T08%3A26%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20precise%20can%20bony%20landmarks%20be%20determined%20on%20a%20CT%20scan%20of%20the%20knee?&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Victor,%20J&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=358&rft.epage=365&rft.pages=358-365&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2009.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2745338601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035116826&rft_id=info:pmid/19195896&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S096801600900012X&rfr_iscdi=true |