Lidocaine 10% spray reduces pain during hysterosalpingography: A randomized controlled trial

Aim:  The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of lidocaine 10% spray was effective in pain control during hysterosalpingography (HSG). Methods:  A total of 81 patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1, 10 mg lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray; Group 2, 20 mg lidocaine hyd...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2009-04, Vol.35 (2), p.354-358
Hauptverfasser: Karasahin, Emre, Alanbay, Ibrahim, Keskin, Ugur, Gezginc, Kazim, Baser, Iskender
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 358
container_issue 2
container_start_page 354
container_title The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
container_volume 35
creator Karasahin, Emre
Alanbay, Ibrahim
Keskin, Ugur
Gezginc, Kazim
Baser, Iskender
description Aim:  The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of lidocaine 10% spray was effective in pain control during hysterosalpingography (HSG). Methods:  A total of 81 patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1, 10 mg lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray; Group 2, 20 mg lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray; and Group 3, Placebo. We used a standard 10 cm Visual Analog Scale for pain scoring. The ‘0 cm’ end corresponded to ‘no pain’, and the ‘10 cm’ end represented the ‘worst pain ever’. We asked the patients to mark their pre‐HSG pain expectancies initially, then to mark their pain during uterine traction after the tenaculum has been applied. Finally, they were asked to mark their pain during contrast medium injection. Results:  In Group1, the mean anticipated pain (AP) score was 64.51 ± 12.62, the mean pain (MP) score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 57.48 ± 11.32 (P: 0.011), and the MP score during contrast medium injection was 46.22 ± 13.00 (P: 0.005). In Group 2 the mean AP score was 66.44 ± 12.02, the MP score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 48.03 ± 13.44 (P: 0.001), and the MP during contrast medium injection was 46.25 ± 11.57 (P: 0.001). In Group 3 the mean AP score was 61.8 ± 18.5, the MP score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 59.5 (P: 0.07), and the MP during contrast medium injection was 57.5 ± 14.5) (P: 0.304). Conclusion:  Topical lidocaine spray is a practical and effective analgesic for decreasing pain perception scores during the HSG procedure. A 10 mg dose is comparable to a 20 mg dose in pain reduction with less chance of side effects and better cost‐effectiveness.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00938.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67606719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67606719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-b37510a336636c838b5db0f0e1a57af9cf5d17487edd0d36b5d9d46541e397373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF9v2yAUxdG0akmzfYWJl-3N7mWYP572UmVr2ipaXlK1D5UQMTghc2wXYjXupx9povS1vHDg3nPg_hDCBFIS18U6JVkmEhCMpz8AZAqQU5nuPqDhqfAxapqRRILgA3QewhqAiJzIT2hAckqZBBiix6kzTaFdbWP4Nxxar3vsrekKG3Ab77HpvKuXeNWHrfVN0FUbj83S63bV_8SX2OvaNBv3Yg0umnrrm6qKcuudrj6js1JXwX457iN0d_VnPr5OprPJzfhymhQZEzJZUMEIaEo5p7yQVC6YWUAJlmgmdJkXJTNEZFJYY8BQHsu5yTjLiKW5oIKO0PdDbuubp86Grdq4UNiq0rVtuqC44MBFHHqE5KGxiJMEb0vVerfRvlcE1J6sWqs9QLUHqPZk1StZtYvWr8c3usXGmjfjEWVs-HVoeHaV7d8drG5nkyiiPTnYXeS8O9m1_xe_HwGp-78Tlcn5XIwfmPpN_wMVAZZ1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67606719</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lidocaine 10% spray reduces pain during hysterosalpingography: A randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Karasahin, Emre ; Alanbay, Ibrahim ; Keskin, Ugur ; Gezginc, Kazim ; Baser, Iskender</creator><creatorcontrib>Karasahin, Emre ; Alanbay, Ibrahim ; Keskin, Ugur ; Gezginc, Kazim ; Baser, Iskender</creatorcontrib><description>Aim:  The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of lidocaine 10% spray was effective in pain control during hysterosalpingography (HSG). Methods:  A total of 81 patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1, 10 mg lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray; Group 2, 20 mg lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray; and Group 3, Placebo. We used a standard 10 cm Visual Analog Scale for pain scoring. The ‘0 cm’ end corresponded to ‘no pain’, and the ‘10 cm’ end represented the ‘worst pain ever’. We asked the patients to mark their pre‐HSG pain expectancies initially, then to mark their pain during uterine traction after the tenaculum has been applied. Finally, they were asked to mark their pain during contrast medium injection. Results:  In Group1, the mean anticipated pain (AP) score was 64.51 ± 12.62, the mean pain (MP) score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 57.48 ± 11.32 (P: 0.011), and the MP score during contrast medium injection was 46.22 ± 13.00 (P: 0.005). In Group 2 the mean AP score was 66.44 ± 12.02, the MP score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 48.03 ± 13.44 (P: 0.001), and the MP during contrast medium injection was 46.25 ± 11.57 (P: 0.001). In Group 3 the mean AP score was 61.8 ± 18.5, the MP score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 59.5 (P: 0.07), and the MP during contrast medium injection was 57.5 ± 14.5) (P: 0.304). Conclusion:  Topical lidocaine spray is a practical and effective analgesic for decreasing pain perception scores during the HSG procedure. A 10 mg dose is comparable to a 20 mg dose in pain reduction with less chance of side effects and better cost‐effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-8076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1447-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00938.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19335800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Female ; Humans ; hysterosalpingography (HSG) ; Hysterosalpingography - methods ; lidocaine ; Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage ; pain ; Pain - drug therapy ; transcervical</subject><ispartof>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2009-04, Vol.35 (2), p.354-358</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-b37510a336636c838b5db0f0e1a57af9cf5d17487edd0d36b5d9d46541e397373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-b37510a336636c838b5db0f0e1a57af9cf5d17487edd0d36b5d9d46541e397373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1447-0756.2008.00938.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1447-0756.2008.00938.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19335800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karasahin, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alanbay, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keskin, Ugur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gezginc, Kazim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baser, Iskender</creatorcontrib><title>Lidocaine 10% spray reduces pain during hysterosalpingography: A randomized controlled trial</title><title>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Res</addtitle><description>Aim:  The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of lidocaine 10% spray was effective in pain control during hysterosalpingography (HSG). Methods:  A total of 81 patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1, 10 mg lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray; Group 2, 20 mg lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray; and Group 3, Placebo. We used a standard 10 cm Visual Analog Scale for pain scoring. The ‘0 cm’ end corresponded to ‘no pain’, and the ‘10 cm’ end represented the ‘worst pain ever’. We asked the patients to mark their pre‐HSG pain expectancies initially, then to mark their pain during uterine traction after the tenaculum has been applied. Finally, they were asked to mark their pain during contrast medium injection. Results:  In Group1, the mean anticipated pain (AP) score was 64.51 ± 12.62, the mean pain (MP) score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 57.48 ± 11.32 (P: 0.011), and the MP score during contrast medium injection was 46.22 ± 13.00 (P: 0.005). In Group 2 the mean AP score was 66.44 ± 12.02, the MP score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 48.03 ± 13.44 (P: 0.001), and the MP during contrast medium injection was 46.25 ± 11.57 (P: 0.001). In Group 3 the mean AP score was 61.8 ± 18.5, the MP score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 59.5 (P: 0.07), and the MP during contrast medium injection was 57.5 ± 14.5) (P: 0.304). Conclusion:  Topical lidocaine spray is a practical and effective analgesic for decreasing pain perception scores during the HSG procedure. A 10 mg dose is comparable to a 20 mg dose in pain reduction with less chance of side effects and better cost‐effectiveness.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hysterosalpingography (HSG)</subject><subject>Hysterosalpingography - methods</subject><subject>lidocaine</subject><subject>Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>transcervical</subject><issn>1341-8076</issn><issn>1447-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF9v2yAUxdG0akmzfYWJl-3N7mWYP572UmVr2ipaXlK1D5UQMTghc2wXYjXupx9povS1vHDg3nPg_hDCBFIS18U6JVkmEhCMpz8AZAqQU5nuPqDhqfAxapqRRILgA3QewhqAiJzIT2hAckqZBBiix6kzTaFdbWP4Nxxar3vsrekKG3Ab77HpvKuXeNWHrfVN0FUbj83S63bV_8SX2OvaNBv3Yg0umnrrm6qKcuudrj6js1JXwX457iN0d_VnPr5OprPJzfhymhQZEzJZUMEIaEo5p7yQVC6YWUAJlmgmdJkXJTNEZFJYY8BQHsu5yTjLiKW5oIKO0PdDbuubp86Grdq4UNiq0rVtuqC44MBFHHqE5KGxiJMEb0vVerfRvlcE1J6sWqs9QLUHqPZk1StZtYvWr8c3usXGmjfjEWVs-HVoeHaV7d8drG5nkyiiPTnYXeS8O9m1_xe_HwGp-78Tlcn5XIwfmPpN_wMVAZZ1</recordid><startdate>200904</startdate><enddate>200904</enddate><creator>Karasahin, Emre</creator><creator>Alanbay, Ibrahim</creator><creator>Keskin, Ugur</creator><creator>Gezginc, Kazim</creator><creator>Baser, Iskender</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200904</creationdate><title>Lidocaine 10% spray reduces pain during hysterosalpingography: A randomized controlled trial</title><author>Karasahin, Emre ; Alanbay, Ibrahim ; Keskin, Ugur ; Gezginc, Kazim ; Baser, Iskender</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-b37510a336636c838b5db0f0e1a57af9cf5d17487edd0d36b5d9d46541e397373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hysterosalpingography (HSG)</topic><topic>Hysterosalpingography - methods</topic><topic>lidocaine</topic><topic>Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>transcervical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karasahin, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alanbay, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keskin, Ugur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gezginc, Kazim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baser, Iskender</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karasahin, Emre</au><au>Alanbay, Ibrahim</au><au>Keskin, Ugur</au><au>Gezginc, Kazim</au><au>Baser, Iskender</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lidocaine 10% spray reduces pain during hysterosalpingography: A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Res</addtitle><date>2009-04</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>354-358</pages><issn>1341-8076</issn><eissn>1447-0756</eissn><abstract>Aim:  The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of lidocaine 10% spray was effective in pain control during hysterosalpingography (HSG). Methods:  A total of 81 patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1, 10 mg lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray; Group 2, 20 mg lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray; and Group 3, Placebo. We used a standard 10 cm Visual Analog Scale for pain scoring. The ‘0 cm’ end corresponded to ‘no pain’, and the ‘10 cm’ end represented the ‘worst pain ever’. We asked the patients to mark their pre‐HSG pain expectancies initially, then to mark their pain during uterine traction after the tenaculum has been applied. Finally, they were asked to mark their pain during contrast medium injection. Results:  In Group1, the mean anticipated pain (AP) score was 64.51 ± 12.62, the mean pain (MP) score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 57.48 ± 11.32 (P: 0.011), and the MP score during contrast medium injection was 46.22 ± 13.00 (P: 0.005). In Group 2 the mean AP score was 66.44 ± 12.02, the MP score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 48.03 ± 13.44 (P: 0.001), and the MP during contrast medium injection was 46.25 ± 11.57 (P: 0.001). In Group 3 the mean AP score was 61.8 ± 18.5, the MP score during cervical traction with uterine tenaculum was 59.5 (P: 0.07), and the MP during contrast medium injection was 57.5 ± 14.5) (P: 0.304). Conclusion:  Topical lidocaine spray is a practical and effective analgesic for decreasing pain perception scores during the HSG procedure. A 10 mg dose is comparable to a 20 mg dose in pain reduction with less chance of side effects and better cost‐effectiveness.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>19335800</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00938.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1341-8076
ispartof The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2009-04, Vol.35 (2), p.354-358
issn 1341-8076
1447-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67606719
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Female
Humans
hysterosalpingography (HSG)
Hysterosalpingography - methods
lidocaine
Lidocaine - administration & dosage
pain
Pain - drug therapy
transcervical
title Lidocaine 10% spray reduces pain during hysterosalpingography: A randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T03%3A12%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lidocaine%2010%25%20spray%20reduces%20pain%20during%20hysterosalpingography:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology%20research&rft.au=Karasahin,%20Emre&rft.date=2009-04&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=354-358&rft.issn=1341-8076&rft.eissn=1447-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00938.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67606719%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67606719&rft_id=info:pmid/19335800&rfr_iscdi=true