Just scratching the surface: varied coagulation effects of polymer containers on TEG variables
Summary Background and objective: Different types of polymer surfaces affect the activation of platelets and coagulation pathway containers depending on their surface qualities. Importantly, this could produce variability of coagulation results obtained with thrombelastographical analysis. We assess...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of anaesthesiology 2006-01, Vol.23 (1), p.45-49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 49 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | European journal of anaesthesiology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Roche, A. M. James, M. F. M. Grocott, M. P. W. Mythen, M. G. |
description | Summary Background and objective: Different types of polymer surfaces affect the activation of platelets and coagulation pathway containers depending on their surface qualities. Importantly, this could produce variability of coagulation results obtained with thrombelastographical analysis. We assessed the effects of blood storage on thrombelastograph, TEG®, variables using polypropylene and polycarbonate containers. Methods: An in vitro experiment was performed, with eight volunteers in each limb. Fresh whole blood was stored in polypropylene or polycarbonate tubes prior to TEG® analysis, to assess the role of these plastics in the TEG® results obtained. Results: The polycarbonate tubes displayed slower onset of coagulation and greater variability of data for all four basic TEG variables (r-time, k-time, α-angle and maximum amplitude, P < 0.05). Polycarbonate results fell outside manufacturer reference ranges. Conclusions: It is likely that this is due to the altered surface properties and charge effects of the containers affecting proteins and platelets differently. Caution should be used in choosing which containers are used for storage of fresh blood prior to coagulation assessment, as variable results will follow where different types of plastic containers are employed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0265021505001754 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67606630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0265021505001754</cupid><sourcerecordid>1495543341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3678-577cc4dbb11d320eefb9e5d2cb315f16cbc3451d02fa61192ef950798448a3223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoaTZpP0AuRfSQm9ORZMnr3krIXwI9NL1WyPJo16lsbSU5Id8-2u5CoKUnMfN-b3g8EXLC4IwBaz5_B64kcCZBQpllfUAWTChZcVGrN2SxlautfkiOUnoAAFl878ghU6IFqeSC_LydU6bJRpPtephWNK-Rpjk6Y_ELfTRxwJ7aYFazN3kIE0Xn0OZEg6Ob4J9HjEWeshkmjGU70fuLqz8-03lM78lbZ3zCD_v3mPy4vLg_v67uvl3dnH-9q6xQzbKSTWNt3XcdY73ggOi6FmXPbSeYdEzZzopash64M4qxlqNrJTTtsq6XRnAujsnp7u4mht8zpqzHIVn03kwY5qRVo0ApAQX89Bf4EOY4lWyaM6WAN6IpENtBNoaUIjq9icNo4rNmoLfN63-aL56P-8NzN2L_6thXXYB6BzwFn0tXv_z8hFGv0fi81uVvQKhaVBxAAStTtV0ti03ss5ixi0O_wtfE_0_zAhV7nBU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216602737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Just scratching the surface: varied coagulation effects of polymer containers on TEG variables</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Roche, A. M. ; James, M. F. M. ; Grocott, M. P. W. ; Mythen, M. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roche, A. M. ; James, M. F. M. ; Grocott, M. P. W. ; Mythen, M. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background and objective: Different types of polymer surfaces affect the activation of platelets and coagulation pathway containers depending on their surface qualities. Importantly, this could produce variability of coagulation results obtained with thrombelastographical analysis. We assessed the effects of blood storage on thrombelastograph, TEG®, variables using polypropylene and polycarbonate containers. Methods: An in vitro experiment was performed, with eight volunteers in each limb. Fresh whole blood was stored in polypropylene or polycarbonate tubes prior to TEG® analysis, to assess the role of these plastics in the TEG® results obtained. Results: The polycarbonate tubes displayed slower onset of coagulation and greater variability of data for all four basic TEG variables (r-time, k-time, α-angle and maximum amplitude, P < 0.05). Polycarbonate results fell outside manufacturer reference ranges. Conclusions: It is likely that this is due to the altered surface properties and charge effects of the containers affecting proteins and platelets differently. Caution should be used in choosing which containers are used for storage of fresh blood prior to coagulation assessment, as variable results will follow where different types of plastic containers are employed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-0215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2346</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0265021505001754</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16390565</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Blood Coagulation - drug effects ; Complex systems ; Contact angle ; Containers ; Drug Packaging ; Heart surgery ; Hemodialysis ; Hemophilia ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Investigations ; Mineral oils ; Original Article ; Platelet Activation - drug effects ; Polycarboxylate Cement - chemistry ; Polycarboxylate Cement - pharmacology ; Polymers - chemistry ; Polymers - pharmacology ; Polypropylenes - chemistry ; Polypropylenes - pharmacology ; Specimen Handling ; Surface Properties ; Thrombelastography</subject><ispartof>European journal of anaesthesiology, 2006-01, Vol.23 (1), p.45-49</ispartof><rights>2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Jan 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3678-577cc4dbb11d320eefb9e5d2cb315f16cbc3451d02fa61192ef950798448a3223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16390565$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roche, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, M. F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grocott, M. P. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mythen, M. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Just scratching the surface: varied coagulation effects of polymer containers on TEG variables</title><title>European journal of anaesthesiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Anaesthesiol</addtitle><description>Summary Background and objective: Different types of polymer surfaces affect the activation of platelets and coagulation pathway containers depending on their surface qualities. Importantly, this could produce variability of coagulation results obtained with thrombelastographical analysis. We assessed the effects of blood storage on thrombelastograph, TEG®, variables using polypropylene and polycarbonate containers. Methods: An in vitro experiment was performed, with eight volunteers in each limb. Fresh whole blood was stored in polypropylene or polycarbonate tubes prior to TEG® analysis, to assess the role of these plastics in the TEG® results obtained. Results: The polycarbonate tubes displayed slower onset of coagulation and greater variability of data for all four basic TEG variables (r-time, k-time, α-angle and maximum amplitude, P < 0.05). Polycarbonate results fell outside manufacturer reference ranges. Conclusions: It is likely that this is due to the altered surface properties and charge effects of the containers affecting proteins and platelets differently. Caution should be used in choosing which containers are used for storage of fresh blood prior to coagulation assessment, as variable results will follow where different types of plastic containers are employed.</description><subject>Blood Coagulation - drug effects</subject><subject>Complex systems</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Containers</subject><subject>Drug Packaging</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Hemophilia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Mineral oils</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Platelet Activation - drug effects</subject><subject>Polycarboxylate Cement - chemistry</subject><subject>Polycarboxylate Cement - pharmacology</subject><subject>Polymers - chemistry</subject><subject>Polymers - pharmacology</subject><subject>Polypropylenes - chemistry</subject><subject>Polypropylenes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Specimen Handling</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Thrombelastography</subject><issn>0265-0215</issn><issn>1365-2346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoaTZpP0AuRfSQm9ORZMnr3krIXwI9NL1WyPJo16lsbSU5Id8-2u5CoKUnMfN-b3g8EXLC4IwBaz5_B64kcCZBQpllfUAWTChZcVGrN2SxlautfkiOUnoAAFl878ghU6IFqeSC_LydU6bJRpPtephWNK-Rpjk6Y_ELfTRxwJ7aYFazN3kIE0Xn0OZEg6Ob4J9HjEWeshkmjGU70fuLqz8-03lM78lbZ3zCD_v3mPy4vLg_v67uvl3dnH-9q6xQzbKSTWNt3XcdY73ggOi6FmXPbSeYdEzZzopash64M4qxlqNrJTTtsq6XRnAujsnp7u4mht8zpqzHIVn03kwY5qRVo0ApAQX89Bf4EOY4lWyaM6WAN6IpENtBNoaUIjq9icNo4rNmoLfN63-aL56P-8NzN2L_6thXXYB6BzwFn0tXv_z8hFGv0fi81uVvQKhaVBxAAStTtV0ti03ss5ixi0O_wtfE_0_zAhV7nBU</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Roche, A. M.</creator><creator>James, M. F. M.</creator><creator>Grocott, M. P. W.</creator><creator>Mythen, M. G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>European Society of Anaesthesiology</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Just scratching the surface: varied coagulation effects of polymer containers on TEG variables</title><author>Roche, A. M. ; James, M. F. M. ; Grocott, M. P. W. ; Mythen, M. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3678-577cc4dbb11d320eefb9e5d2cb315f16cbc3451d02fa61192ef950798448a3223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Blood Coagulation - drug effects</topic><topic>Complex systems</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Containers</topic><topic>Drug Packaging</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Hemophilia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Mineral oils</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Platelet Activation - drug effects</topic><topic>Polycarboxylate Cement - chemistry</topic><topic>Polycarboxylate Cement - pharmacology</topic><topic>Polymers - chemistry</topic><topic>Polymers - pharmacology</topic><topic>Polypropylenes - chemistry</topic><topic>Polypropylenes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Specimen Handling</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Thrombelastography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roche, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, M. F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grocott, M. P. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mythen, M. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of anaesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roche, A. M.</au><au>James, M. F. M.</au><au>Grocott, M. P. W.</au><au>Mythen, M. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Just scratching the surface: varied coagulation effects of polymer containers on TEG variables</atitle><jtitle>European journal of anaesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Anaesthesiol</addtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>45-49</pages><issn>0265-0215</issn><eissn>1365-2346</eissn><abstract>Summary Background and objective: Different types of polymer surfaces affect the activation of platelets and coagulation pathway containers depending on their surface qualities. Importantly, this could produce variability of coagulation results obtained with thrombelastographical analysis. We assessed the effects of blood storage on thrombelastograph, TEG®, variables using polypropylene and polycarbonate containers. Methods: An in vitro experiment was performed, with eight volunteers in each limb. Fresh whole blood was stored in polypropylene or polycarbonate tubes prior to TEG® analysis, to assess the role of these plastics in the TEG® results obtained. Results: The polycarbonate tubes displayed slower onset of coagulation and greater variability of data for all four basic TEG variables (r-time, k-time, α-angle and maximum amplitude, P < 0.05). Polycarbonate results fell outside manufacturer reference ranges. Conclusions: It is likely that this is due to the altered surface properties and charge effects of the containers affecting proteins and platelets differently. Caution should be used in choosing which containers are used for storage of fresh blood prior to coagulation assessment, as variable results will follow where different types of plastic containers are employed.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>16390565</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0265021505001754</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0265-0215 |
ispartof | European journal of anaesthesiology, 2006-01, Vol.23 (1), p.45-49 |
issn | 0265-0215 1365-2346 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67606630 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Blood Coagulation - drug effects Complex systems Contact angle Containers Drug Packaging Heart surgery Hemodialysis Hemophilia Humans In Vitro Techniques Investigations Mineral oils Original Article Platelet Activation - drug effects Polycarboxylate Cement - chemistry Polycarboxylate Cement - pharmacology Polymers - chemistry Polymers - pharmacology Polypropylenes - chemistry Polypropylenes - pharmacology Specimen Handling Surface Properties Thrombelastography |
title | Just scratching the surface: varied coagulation effects of polymer containers on TEG variables |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A39%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Just%20scratching%20the%20surface:%20varied%20coagulation%20effects%20of%20polymer%20containers%20on%20TEG%20variables&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20anaesthesiology&rft.au=Roche,%20A.%20M.&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=45-49&rft.issn=0265-0215&rft.eissn=1365-2346&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0265021505001754&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1495543341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216602737&rft_id=info:pmid/16390565&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0265021505001754&rfr_iscdi=true |