Ultrasonography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Breast Tumors

Background: Papillary lesions of the breast are considered diagnostically challenging for various reasons. A relatively high malignancy rate in final pathological analysis has in many cases necessitated excision of these lesions, regardless of core needle biopsy (CNB). Purpose: To assess mammographi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta radiologica (1987) 2009-09, Vol.50 (7), p.722-729
Hauptverfasser: Bode, M. K., Rissanen, T., Apaja-Sarkkinen, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 729
container_issue 7
container_start_page 722
container_title Acta radiologica (1987)
container_volume 50
creator Bode, M. K.
Rissanen, T.
Apaja-Sarkkinen, M.
description Background: Papillary lesions of the breast are considered diagnostically challenging for various reasons. A relatively high malignancy rate in final pathological analysis has in many cases necessitated excision of these lesions, regardless of core needle biopsy (CNB). Purpose: To assess mammographic, sonographic, and CNB findings of papillary lesions, and to correlate them with final histology obtained by surgical excision. Material and Methods: From 2000-2006, 29 benign and 19 malignant papillary tumors examined with CNB were surgically removed. Mammographic, sonographic, and CNB results were analyzed and correlated with final histology. Results: On ultrasonography (US), 69% (20/29) of the benign lesions were solid and 31% (9/29) were cystic, and 47% of the malignant lesions (9/19) were solid and 53% (10/19) were cystic. The mammographic findings were nonspecific, although most of the malignant tumors (67%, 12/18) were categorized as BI-RADS 4 lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the core needle biopsy histology was 32% (6/19), 100% (29/29), and 100% (6/6), respectively, for papillary carcinoma. A negative predictive value of 91% (21/23) for malignancy and 48% (11/23) for either atypia or malignancy was shown. Of the lesions with CNB diagnosis of benign papillary lesion with atypia, 58% (11/19) turned out to be malignant and 11% (2/19) were benign on surgery. Conclusion: The probability of malignancy is low when the CNB result shows a benign papillary lesion with no atypia. However, the only way to reliably diagnose atypical papillary lesions is to surgically remove all papillary tumors, irrespective of the CNB result. Differentiation between benign and malignant lesions or malignant noninvasive and invasive tumors is not possible based on sonographic or mammographic appearance.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02841850902977963
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67602496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_02841850902977963</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67602496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdc85fbfbc7fe6246fe902b4c4f939747d76e9cad3178a6a095bfcc5308b5b823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1u1DAURi1ERYcpD8AGeQO7tHbi-Ees6AAtUlVYtNtGN871jKskDnaymLevqxnRBRJiZVk-3-d7DyHvOTvnTLMLVmrBdc0MK41SRlavyIpLxgom6vo1WT2_Fxngp-RtSo-M8VLV_A055UZorQ1bkYf7fo6Qwhi2EabdvrhafIcd3YSI9Bax65Fe-jClPfUj_eqdw4jj7KHPF9iOIflEg6O_YPJ9D3FPLyNCmundMoSYzsiJgz7hu-O5Jvffv91troubn1c_Nl9uCiu0nIu2s7p2rWutcihLIR3mnVphhTOVUUJ1SqKx0FVcaZDATN06a-uK6bZudVmtyadD7xTD7wXT3Aw-WcwTjRiW1EglWSmyoTXhB9DGkFJE10zRD3nuhrPmWWrzl9Sc-XAsX9oBu5fE0WIGPh4BSBZ6F2G0Pv3hSq5zDROZOz9wCbbYPIYljlnKP3_-fAj40YU4wA6hn3cW4n-lnwBn1Z-q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67602496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasonography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Breast Tumors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Bode, M. K. ; Rissanen, T. ; Apaja-Sarkkinen, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bode, M. K. ; Rissanen, T. ; Apaja-Sarkkinen, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Papillary lesions of the breast are considered diagnostically challenging for various reasons. A relatively high malignancy rate in final pathological analysis has in many cases necessitated excision of these lesions, regardless of core needle biopsy (CNB). Purpose: To assess mammographic, sonographic, and CNB findings of papillary lesions, and to correlate them with final histology obtained by surgical excision. Material and Methods: From 2000-2006, 29 benign and 19 malignant papillary tumors examined with CNB were surgically removed. Mammographic, sonographic, and CNB results were analyzed and correlated with final histology. Results: On ultrasonography (US), 69% (20/29) of the benign lesions were solid and 31% (9/29) were cystic, and 47% of the malignant lesions (9/19) were solid and 53% (10/19) were cystic. The mammographic findings were nonspecific, although most of the malignant tumors (67%, 12/18) were categorized as BI-RADS 4 lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the core needle biopsy histology was 32% (6/19), 100% (29/29), and 100% (6/6), respectively, for papillary carcinoma. A negative predictive value of 91% (21/23) for malignancy and 48% (11/23) for either atypia or malignancy was shown. Of the lesions with CNB diagnosis of benign papillary lesion with atypia, 58% (11/19) turned out to be malignant and 11% (2/19) were benign on surgery. Conclusion: The probability of malignancy is low when the CNB result shows a benign papillary lesion with no atypia. However, the only way to reliably diagnose atypical papillary lesions is to surgically remove all papillary tumors, irrespective of the CNB result. Differentiation between benign and malignant lesions or malignant noninvasive and invasive tumors is not possible based on sonographic or mammographic appearance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-1851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02841850902977963</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19488890</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACRAE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy, Needle ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Carcinoma, Papillary - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Papillary - pathology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Mammary gland diseases ; Mammography ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Tumors ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><ispartof>Acta radiologica (1987), 2009-09, Vol.50 (7), p.722-729</ispartof><rights>2009 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2009</rights><rights>Informa UK Ltd. (Informa Healthcare, Taylor &amp; Francis AS)</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdc85fbfbc7fe6246fe902b4c4f939747d76e9cad3178a6a095bfcc5308b5b823</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02841850902977963$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02841850902977963$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,61220,61401</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21896304$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19488890$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bode, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rissanen, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apaja-Sarkkinen, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasonography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Breast Tumors</title><title>Acta radiologica (1987)</title><addtitle>Acta Radiol</addtitle><description>Background: Papillary lesions of the breast are considered diagnostically challenging for various reasons. A relatively high malignancy rate in final pathological analysis has in many cases necessitated excision of these lesions, regardless of core needle biopsy (CNB). Purpose: To assess mammographic, sonographic, and CNB findings of papillary lesions, and to correlate them with final histology obtained by surgical excision. Material and Methods: From 2000-2006, 29 benign and 19 malignant papillary tumors examined with CNB were surgically removed. Mammographic, sonographic, and CNB results were analyzed and correlated with final histology. Results: On ultrasonography (US), 69% (20/29) of the benign lesions were solid and 31% (9/29) were cystic, and 47% of the malignant lesions (9/19) were solid and 53% (10/19) were cystic. The mammographic findings were nonspecific, although most of the malignant tumors (67%, 12/18) were categorized as BI-RADS 4 lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the core needle biopsy histology was 32% (6/19), 100% (29/29), and 100% (6/6), respectively, for papillary carcinoma. A negative predictive value of 91% (21/23) for malignancy and 48% (11/23) for either atypia or malignancy was shown. Of the lesions with CNB diagnosis of benign papillary lesion with atypia, 58% (11/19) turned out to be malignant and 11% (2/19) were benign on surgery. Conclusion: The probability of malignancy is low when the CNB result shows a benign papillary lesion with no atypia. However, the only way to reliably diagnose atypical papillary lesions is to surgically remove all papillary tumors, irrespective of the CNB result. Differentiation between benign and malignant lesions or malignant noninvasive and invasive tumors is not possible based on sonographic or mammographic appearance.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Papillary - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Papillary - pathology</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><issn>0284-1851</issn><issn>1600-0455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1u1DAURi1ERYcpD8AGeQO7tHbi-Ees6AAtUlVYtNtGN871jKskDnaymLevqxnRBRJiZVk-3-d7DyHvOTvnTLMLVmrBdc0MK41SRlavyIpLxgom6vo1WT2_Fxngp-RtSo-M8VLV_A055UZorQ1bkYf7fo6Qwhi2EabdvrhafIcd3YSI9Bax65Fe-jClPfUj_eqdw4jj7KHPF9iOIflEg6O_YPJ9D3FPLyNCmundMoSYzsiJgz7hu-O5Jvffv91troubn1c_Nl9uCiu0nIu2s7p2rWutcihLIR3mnVphhTOVUUJ1SqKx0FVcaZDATN06a-uK6bZudVmtyadD7xTD7wXT3Aw-WcwTjRiW1EglWSmyoTXhB9DGkFJE10zRD3nuhrPmWWrzl9Sc-XAsX9oBu5fE0WIGPh4BSBZ6F2G0Pv3hSq5zDROZOz9wCbbYPIYljlnKP3_-fAj40YU4wA6hn3cW4n-lnwBn1Z-q</recordid><startdate>200909</startdate><enddate>200909</enddate><creator>Bode, M. K.</creator><creator>Rissanen, T.</creator><creator>Apaja-Sarkkinen, M.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Royal Society of Medicine</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200909</creationdate><title>Ultrasonography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Breast Tumors</title><author>Bode, M. K. ; Rissanen, T. ; Apaja-Sarkkinen, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdc85fbfbc7fe6246fe902b4c4f939747d76e9cad3178a6a095bfcc5308b5b823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Papillary - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Papillary - pathology</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bode, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rissanen, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apaja-Sarkkinen, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bode, M. K.</au><au>Rissanen, T.</au><au>Apaja-Sarkkinen, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasonography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Breast Tumors</atitle><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Radiol</addtitle><date>2009-09</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>722</spage><epage>729</epage><pages>722-729</pages><issn>0284-1851</issn><eissn>1600-0455</eissn><coden>ACRAE3</coden><abstract>Background: Papillary lesions of the breast are considered diagnostically challenging for various reasons. A relatively high malignancy rate in final pathological analysis has in many cases necessitated excision of these lesions, regardless of core needle biopsy (CNB). Purpose: To assess mammographic, sonographic, and CNB findings of papillary lesions, and to correlate them with final histology obtained by surgical excision. Material and Methods: From 2000-2006, 29 benign and 19 malignant papillary tumors examined with CNB were surgically removed. Mammographic, sonographic, and CNB results were analyzed and correlated with final histology. Results: On ultrasonography (US), 69% (20/29) of the benign lesions were solid and 31% (9/29) were cystic, and 47% of the malignant lesions (9/19) were solid and 53% (10/19) were cystic. The mammographic findings were nonspecific, although most of the malignant tumors (67%, 12/18) were categorized as BI-RADS 4 lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the core needle biopsy histology was 32% (6/19), 100% (29/29), and 100% (6/6), respectively, for papillary carcinoma. A negative predictive value of 91% (21/23) for malignancy and 48% (11/23) for either atypia or malignancy was shown. Of the lesions with CNB diagnosis of benign papillary lesion with atypia, 58% (11/19) turned out to be malignant and 11% (2/19) were benign on surgery. Conclusion: The probability of malignancy is low when the CNB result shows a benign papillary lesion with no atypia. However, the only way to reliably diagnose atypical papillary lesions is to surgically remove all papillary tumors, irrespective of the CNB result. Differentiation between benign and malignant lesions or malignant noninvasive and invasive tumors is not possible based on sonographic or mammographic appearance.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>19488890</pmid><doi>10.1080/02841850902977963</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0284-1851
ispartof Acta radiologica (1987), 2009-09, Vol.50 (7), p.722-729
issn 0284-1851
1600-0455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67602496
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy, Needle
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Carcinoma, Papillary - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Papillary - pathology
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Genital system. Mammary gland
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Mammary gland diseases
Mammography
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Tumors
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Ultrasonography, Mammary
title Ultrasonography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Breast Tumors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A40%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasonography-Guided%20Core%20Needle%20Biopsy%20in%20Differential%20Diagnosis%20of%20Papillary%20Breast%20Tumors&rft.jtitle=Acta%20radiologica%20(1987)&rft.au=Bode,%20M.%20K.&rft.date=2009-09&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=722&rft.epage=729&rft.pages=722-729&rft.issn=0284-1851&rft.eissn=1600-0455&rft.coden=ACRAE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02841850902977963&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67602496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67602496&rft_id=info:pmid/19488890&rft_sage_id=10.1080_02841850902977963&rfr_iscdi=true