Directed forgetting in direct and indirect tests of memory: Seeking evidence of retrieval inhibition using electrophysiological measures

We investigated whether directed forgetting as elicited by the item-cueing method results solely from differential rehearsal of to-be-remembered vs. to-be-forgotten words or, additionally, from inhibitory processes that actively impair retrieval of to-be-forgotten words. During study, participants (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain and cognition 2009-11, Vol.71 (2), p.153-164
Hauptverfasser: Van Hooff, Johanna C., Whitaker, T. Aisling, Ford, Ruth M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue 2
container_start_page 153
container_title Brain and cognition
container_volume 71
creator Van Hooff, Johanna C.
Whitaker, T. Aisling
Ford, Ruth M.
description We investigated whether directed forgetting as elicited by the item-cueing method results solely from differential rehearsal of to-be-remembered vs. to-be-forgotten words or, additionally, from inhibitory processes that actively impair retrieval of to-be-forgotten words. During study, participants ( N = 24) were instructed to remember half of a series of presented words (TBR) and to forget the other half (TBF), as indicated by an instruction cue shown shortly after each word. During test, accuracy and reaction time measures from lexical decisions (indirect memory test) followed by recognition-memory judgements (direct memory test) were supplemented with event-related potential (ERP) recordings. Results from the behavioural measures revealed directed forgetting in the recognition-memory test but not the lexical-decision test. ERPs obtained during recognition indicated that TBR words elicited a larger parietal old/new effect than TBF words overall, suggesting that remember/forget instructions impaired conscious recollection processes more severely than familiarity processes. Moreover, TBF words that were successfully forgotten elicited less parietal activity than correctly rejected new words ( the reversed old/ new effect; Nowicka, A., Jednorórog, K., Wypych, M., & Marchewka, A. (2009). Reversed old/new effect for intentionally forgotten words: An ERP study of directed forgetting. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 97–102). This was taken to implicate that inhibitory processes likely affected these items. Enhanced negativities for successfully forgotten TBF words relative to new words were observed in the lexical-decision task at early (150–250 ms) and late (800–1000 ms) time windows, suggesting that inhibitory influences disrupt more than just conscious recollection when memory retrieval is tested indirectly.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.05.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67602376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ852787</ericid><els_id>S0278262609000839</els_id><sourcerecordid>67602376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-daf8d4f1b3f8e7bd714ab784eacd60d66f729029f9d627657affc294ea5117a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd-O1CAUh4nRuOPqE2hMb_Su9UBbaE28MOv6L5t4oV4TCodZxrbMQjvJvIGPLZ1p1ju9IvD7zgHOR8hzCgUFyt_sik6NRhcMoC2gLgDoA7Kh0ELOaCUekg0w0eSMM35BnsS4gwRWjD0mF7Staw5VsyG_P7iAekKTWR-2OE1u3GZuzMzpOEsXpN26mTBOMfM2G3Dw4fg2-474a-Hx4AyOGpcs4BQcHlSf6m5d5ybnx2yOJ6xPXYLf3x6j873fOp2oAVWcA8an5JFVfcRn63pJfn68_nH1Ob_59unL1fubXFdlO-VG2cZUlnalbVB0RtBKdaKpUGnDwXBuBWuBtbY1nAleC2WtZm3Ka0qFgvKSvD733Qd_N6cfycFFjX2vRvRzlFxwYKXg_wUZpQy4qBNYnkEdfIwBrdwHN6hwlBTkYkru5MmUXExJqGUylaperu3nbkDzt2ZVk4BXK6BiGpQNatQu3nOMtlDVbOFenDkMTt_H11-bOtkXKX63xmmoB4dBRu0WWWep0nj3z3f-AcjHvw8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21120675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Directed forgetting in direct and indirect tests of memory: Seeking evidence of retrieval inhibition using electrophysiological measures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Van Hooff, Johanna C. ; Whitaker, T. Aisling ; Ford, Ruth M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Hooff, Johanna C. ; Whitaker, T. Aisling ; Ford, Ruth M.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated whether directed forgetting as elicited by the item-cueing method results solely from differential rehearsal of to-be-remembered vs. to-be-forgotten words or, additionally, from inhibitory processes that actively impair retrieval of to-be-forgotten words. During study, participants ( N = 24) were instructed to remember half of a series of presented words (TBR) and to forget the other half (TBF), as indicated by an instruction cue shown shortly after each word. During test, accuracy and reaction time measures from lexical decisions (indirect memory test) followed by recognition-memory judgements (direct memory test) were supplemented with event-related potential (ERP) recordings. Results from the behavioural measures revealed directed forgetting in the recognition-memory test but not the lexical-decision test. ERPs obtained during recognition indicated that TBR words elicited a larger parietal old/new effect than TBF words overall, suggesting that remember/forget instructions impaired conscious recollection processes more severely than familiarity processes. Moreover, TBF words that were successfully forgotten elicited less parietal activity than correctly rejected new words ( the reversed old/ new effect; Nowicka, A., Jednorórog, K., Wypych, M., &amp; Marchewka, A. (2009). Reversed old/new effect for intentionally forgotten words: An ERP study of directed forgetting. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 97–102). This was taken to implicate that inhibitory processes likely affected these items. Enhanced negativities for successfully forgotten TBF words relative to new words were observed in the lexical-decision task at early (150–250 ms) and late (800–1000 ms) time windows, suggesting that inhibitory influences disrupt more than just conscious recollection when memory retrieval is tested indirectly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.05.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19556048</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRCOEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>2S Albumins, Plant - physiology ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Antigens, Plant - physiology ; Attention ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain ; Cues ; Decision Making ; Diagnostic Tests ; Directed forgetting ; Electroencephalography ; Electrophysiology ; Event-related potentials ; Evoked Potentials ; Familiarity ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Inhibition ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Learning. Memory ; Lexical decision ; Male ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Old/new effect ; Photic Stimulation ; Physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Recognition ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Selective rehearsal ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Task Analysis ; Tests ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Brain and cognition, 2009-11, Vol.71 (2), p.153-164</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-daf8d4f1b3f8e7bd714ab784eacd60d66f729029f9d627657affc294ea5117a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-daf8d4f1b3f8e7bd714ab784eacd60d66f729029f9d627657affc294ea5117a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.05.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ852787$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21904528$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19556048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Hooff, Johanna C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, T. Aisling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Ruth M.</creatorcontrib><title>Directed forgetting in direct and indirect tests of memory: Seeking evidence of retrieval inhibition using electrophysiological measures</title><title>Brain and cognition</title><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><description>We investigated whether directed forgetting as elicited by the item-cueing method results solely from differential rehearsal of to-be-remembered vs. to-be-forgotten words or, additionally, from inhibitory processes that actively impair retrieval of to-be-forgotten words. During study, participants ( N = 24) were instructed to remember half of a series of presented words (TBR) and to forget the other half (TBF), as indicated by an instruction cue shown shortly after each word. During test, accuracy and reaction time measures from lexical decisions (indirect memory test) followed by recognition-memory judgements (direct memory test) were supplemented with event-related potential (ERP) recordings. Results from the behavioural measures revealed directed forgetting in the recognition-memory test but not the lexical-decision test. ERPs obtained during recognition indicated that TBR words elicited a larger parietal old/new effect than TBF words overall, suggesting that remember/forget instructions impaired conscious recollection processes more severely than familiarity processes. Moreover, TBF words that were successfully forgotten elicited less parietal activity than correctly rejected new words ( the reversed old/ new effect; Nowicka, A., Jednorórog, K., Wypych, M., &amp; Marchewka, A. (2009). Reversed old/new effect for intentionally forgotten words: An ERP study of directed forgetting. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 97–102). This was taken to implicate that inhibitory processes likely affected these items. Enhanced negativities for successfully forgotten TBF words relative to new words were observed in the lexical-decision task at early (150–250 ms) and late (800–1000 ms) time windows, suggesting that inhibitory influences disrupt more than just conscious recollection when memory retrieval is tested indirectly.</description><subject>2S Albumins, Plant - physiology</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antigens, Plant - physiology</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests</subject><subject>Directed forgetting</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Lexical decision</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Old/new effect</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Selective rehearsal</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>0278-2626</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd-O1CAUh4nRuOPqE2hMb_Su9UBbaE28MOv6L5t4oV4TCodZxrbMQjvJvIGPLZ1p1ju9IvD7zgHOR8hzCgUFyt_sik6NRhcMoC2gLgDoA7Kh0ELOaCUekg0w0eSMM35BnsS4gwRWjD0mF7Staw5VsyG_P7iAekKTWR-2OE1u3GZuzMzpOEsXpN26mTBOMfM2G3Dw4fg2-474a-Hx4AyOGpcs4BQcHlSf6m5d5ybnx2yOJ6xPXYLf3x6j873fOp2oAVWcA8an5JFVfcRn63pJfn68_nH1Ob_59unL1fubXFdlO-VG2cZUlnalbVB0RtBKdaKpUGnDwXBuBWuBtbY1nAleC2WtZm3Ka0qFgvKSvD733Qd_N6cfycFFjX2vRvRzlFxwYKXg_wUZpQy4qBNYnkEdfIwBrdwHN6hwlBTkYkru5MmUXExJqGUylaperu3nbkDzt2ZVk4BXK6BiGpQNatQu3nOMtlDVbOFenDkMTt_H11-bOtkXKX63xmmoB4dBRu0WWWep0nj3z3f-AcjHvw8</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Van Hooff, Johanna C.</creator><creator>Whitaker, T. Aisling</creator><creator>Ford, Ruth M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Directed forgetting in direct and indirect tests of memory: Seeking evidence of retrieval inhibition using electrophysiological measures</title><author>Van Hooff, Johanna C. ; Whitaker, T. Aisling ; Ford, Ruth M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-daf8d4f1b3f8e7bd714ab784eacd60d66f729029f9d627657affc294ea5117a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>2S Albumins, Plant - physiology</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antigens, Plant - physiology</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests</topic><topic>Directed forgetting</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Lexical decision</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Old/new effect</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Selective rehearsal</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Hooff, Johanna C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, T. Aisling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Ruth M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Hooff, Johanna C.</au><au>Whitaker, T. Aisling</au><au>Ford, Ruth M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ852787</ericid><atitle>Directed forgetting in direct and indirect tests of memory: Seeking evidence of retrieval inhibition using electrophysiological measures</atitle><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>153-164</pages><issn>0278-2626</issn><eissn>1090-2147</eissn><coden>BRCOEI</coden><abstract>We investigated whether directed forgetting as elicited by the item-cueing method results solely from differential rehearsal of to-be-remembered vs. to-be-forgotten words or, additionally, from inhibitory processes that actively impair retrieval of to-be-forgotten words. During study, participants ( N = 24) were instructed to remember half of a series of presented words (TBR) and to forget the other half (TBF), as indicated by an instruction cue shown shortly after each word. During test, accuracy and reaction time measures from lexical decisions (indirect memory test) followed by recognition-memory judgements (direct memory test) were supplemented with event-related potential (ERP) recordings. Results from the behavioural measures revealed directed forgetting in the recognition-memory test but not the lexical-decision test. ERPs obtained during recognition indicated that TBR words elicited a larger parietal old/new effect than TBF words overall, suggesting that remember/forget instructions impaired conscious recollection processes more severely than familiarity processes. Moreover, TBF words that were successfully forgotten elicited less parietal activity than correctly rejected new words ( the reversed old/ new effect; Nowicka, A., Jednorórog, K., Wypych, M., &amp; Marchewka, A. (2009). Reversed old/new effect for intentionally forgotten words: An ERP study of directed forgetting. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 97–102). This was taken to implicate that inhibitory processes likely affected these items. Enhanced negativities for successfully forgotten TBF words relative to new words were observed in the lexical-decision task at early (150–250 ms) and late (800–1000 ms) time windows, suggesting that inhibitory influences disrupt more than just conscious recollection when memory retrieval is tested indirectly.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19556048</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bandc.2009.05.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2626
ispartof Brain and cognition, 2009-11, Vol.71 (2), p.153-164
issn 0278-2626
1090-2147
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67602376
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects 2S Albumins, Plant - physiology
Adolescent
Adult
Antigens, Plant - physiology
Attention
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain
Cues
Decision Making
Diagnostic Tests
Directed forgetting
Electroencephalography
Electrophysiology
Event-related potentials
Evoked Potentials
Familiarity
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Inhibition
Inhibition (Psychology)
Learning. Memory
Lexical decision
Male
Memory
Memory - physiology
Old/new effect
Photic Stimulation
Physiology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology
Reaction Time
Recognition
Recognition (Psychology)
Selective rehearsal
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Task Analysis
Tests
Vocabulary
title Directed forgetting in direct and indirect tests of memory: Seeking evidence of retrieval inhibition using electrophysiological measures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T11%3A37%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Directed%20forgetting%20in%20direct%20and%20indirect%20tests%20of%20memory:%20Seeking%20evidence%20of%20retrieval%20inhibition%20using%20electrophysiological%20measures&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Van%20Hooff,%20Johanna%20C.&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=153-164&rft.issn=0278-2626&rft.eissn=1090-2147&rft.coden=BRCOEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67602376%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21120675&rft_id=info:pmid/19556048&rft_ericid=EJ852787&rft_els_id=S0278262609000839&rfr_iscdi=true