A vector-based, 5-electrode, 12-lead monitoring ECG (EASI) is equivalent to conventional 12-lead ECG for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes

The conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram (cECG) derived from 10 electrodes using a cardiograph is the gold standard for diagnosing myocardial ischemia. This study tested the hypothesis that a new 5-electrode 12-lead vector-based ECG (EASI; Philips Medical Systems, formerly Hewlett Packard Co, Boeb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electrocardiology 2006, Vol.39 (1), p.22-28
Hauptverfasser: Wehr, Gabriele, Peters, Ron J., Khalifé, Khalifé, Banning, Adrian P., Kuehlkamp, Volker, Rickards, Anthony F., Sechtem, Udo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 22
container_title Journal of electrocardiology
container_volume 39
creator Wehr, Gabriele
Peters, Ron J.
Khalifé, Khalifé
Banning, Adrian P.
Kuehlkamp, Volker
Rickards, Anthony F.
Sechtem, Udo
description The conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram (cECG) derived from 10 electrodes using a cardiograph is the gold standard for diagnosing myocardial ischemia. This study tested the hypothesis that a new 5-electrode 12-lead vector-based ECG (EASI; Philips Medical Systems, formerly Hewlett Packard Co, Boeblingen, Germany) patient monitoring system is equivalent to cECG in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Electrocardiograms (EASI and cECG) were obtained in 203 patients with chest pain on admission and 4 to 8 hours later. Both types of ECGs were graded as ST-elevation myocardial infarction if at least 1 of the 2 consecutive recordings showed ST elevation more than 0.2 mV, as ACS if one or both showed ST elevation less than 0.2 mV, T-wave inversion, or ST depression. Otherwise, the ECG was graded negative. Final diagnosis was identical in 177 patients (87%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-91%; κ = 0.81; SE = 0.035). ST-elevation myocardial infarction was correctly identified or excluded by EASI with a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 89%-97%) and a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 86%-97%; using cECG as the gold standard). Of 118 patients with enzyme elevations, an almost identical number (72 [61% by EASI] and 73 [62% by cECG]) had ST elevations. Both techniques were equivalent in predicting subsequent enzyme elevation (identical, 108/143; 75% of ACS and ST-elevation myocardial infarction ECGs by EASI and cECG). Thus, both ECG methods had exactly the same specificity of 59% (95% CI, 48%-69%) and sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 85%-96%) for detecting myocardial injury. EASI is equivalent to cECG for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.08.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67600556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022073605002323</els_id><sourcerecordid>979653701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-55e6e04734f7882c977957aecc02c353b60714ddb3c7e1e01eefea371b3c64e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFq3DAQhk1paTZpX6GIHEoDsTuSLMnObdlu00Cgh7ZnoZXGQca2EsleyEv0matll7b01NMMw_f_w8xfFJcUKgpUfuyrHge0cwzWRFcxAFFBUwHIF8WKCs7KpubwslgBMFaC4vKsOE-pB4CWKfa6OKOSNwpqsSp-rsk-W4VY7kxCd01EefJ2eE0oKwc0joxh8pnx0wPZbm7Jh-36290V8Yng0-L3ZsBpJnMgNkz73PowmeG39iDoQiTOm4cppCwKHTF2mTHzMaPxmaTnycUwYnpTvOrMkPDtqV4UPz5vv2--lPdfb-826_vS1iDmUgiUCLXidaeahtlWqVYog9YCs1zwnQRFa-d23CqkCBSxQ8MVzQNZY8svivdH38cYnhZMsx59sjgMZsKwJC2VzF8VMoOX_4B9WGK-L2lGJYO2pTxDN0fIxpBSxE4_Rj_mwzQFfYhM9_rvyPQhMg2NzpFl8bvThmU3ovsjPWWUgU9HAPND9h6jTtbjZNH5mC21C_5_9vwCu1-tiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216209913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A vector-based, 5-electrode, 12-lead monitoring ECG (EASI) is equivalent to conventional 12-lead ECG for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wehr, Gabriele ; Peters, Ron J. ; Khalifé, Khalifé ; Banning, Adrian P. ; Kuehlkamp, Volker ; Rickards, Anthony F. ; Sechtem, Udo</creator><creatorcontrib>Wehr, Gabriele ; Peters, Ron J. ; Khalifé, Khalifé ; Banning, Adrian P. ; Kuehlkamp, Volker ; Rickards, Anthony F. ; Sechtem, Udo</creatorcontrib><description>The conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram (cECG) derived from 10 electrodes using a cardiograph is the gold standard for diagnosing myocardial ischemia. This study tested the hypothesis that a new 5-electrode 12-lead vector-based ECG (EASI; Philips Medical Systems, formerly Hewlett Packard Co, Boeblingen, Germany) patient monitoring system is equivalent to cECG in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Electrocardiograms (EASI and cECG) were obtained in 203 patients with chest pain on admission and 4 to 8 hours later. Both types of ECGs were graded as ST-elevation myocardial infarction if at least 1 of the 2 consecutive recordings showed ST elevation more than 0.2 mV, as ACS if one or both showed ST elevation less than 0.2 mV, T-wave inversion, or ST depression. Otherwise, the ECG was graded negative. Final diagnosis was identical in 177 patients (87%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-91%; κ = 0.81; SE = 0.035). ST-elevation myocardial infarction was correctly identified or excluded by EASI with a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 89%-97%) and a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 86%-97%; using cECG as the gold standard). Of 118 patients with enzyme elevations, an almost identical number (72 [61% by EASI] and 73 [62% by cECG]) had ST elevations. Both techniques were equivalent in predicting subsequent enzyme elevation (identical, 108/143; 75% of ACS and ST-elevation myocardial infarction ECGs by EASI and cECG). Thus, both ECG methods had exactly the same specificity of 59% (95% CI, 48%-69%) and sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 85%-96%) for detecting myocardial injury. EASI is equivalent to cECG for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.08.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16387045</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECAB4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiac care unit ; Chest Pain - etiology ; Electrocardiography - instrumentation ; Electrocardiography - methods ; Electrodes ; Humans ; Myocardial ischemia ; Myocardial Ischemia - blood ; Myocardial Ischemia - diagnosis ; Physiological monitoring ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; ST-segment changes ; Vector ECG</subject><ispartof>Journal of electrocardiology, 2006, Vol.39 (1), p.22-28</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Churchill Livingstone Inc., Medical Publishers Jan 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-55e6e04734f7882c977957aecc02c353b60714ddb3c7e1e01eefea371b3c64e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-55e6e04734f7882c977957aecc02c353b60714ddb3c7e1e01eefea371b3c64e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022073605002323$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,4009,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16387045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wehr, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ron J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalifé, Khalifé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banning, Adrian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehlkamp, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickards, Anthony F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sechtem, Udo</creatorcontrib><title>A vector-based, 5-electrode, 12-lead monitoring ECG (EASI) is equivalent to conventional 12-lead ECG for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes</title><title>Journal of electrocardiology</title><addtitle>J Electrocardiol</addtitle><description>The conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram (cECG) derived from 10 electrodes using a cardiograph is the gold standard for diagnosing myocardial ischemia. This study tested the hypothesis that a new 5-electrode 12-lead vector-based ECG (EASI; Philips Medical Systems, formerly Hewlett Packard Co, Boeblingen, Germany) patient monitoring system is equivalent to cECG in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Electrocardiograms (EASI and cECG) were obtained in 203 patients with chest pain on admission and 4 to 8 hours later. Both types of ECGs were graded as ST-elevation myocardial infarction if at least 1 of the 2 consecutive recordings showed ST elevation more than 0.2 mV, as ACS if one or both showed ST elevation less than 0.2 mV, T-wave inversion, or ST depression. Otherwise, the ECG was graded negative. Final diagnosis was identical in 177 patients (87%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-91%; κ = 0.81; SE = 0.035). ST-elevation myocardial infarction was correctly identified or excluded by EASI with a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 89%-97%) and a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 86%-97%; using cECG as the gold standard). Of 118 patients with enzyme elevations, an almost identical number (72 [61% by EASI] and 73 [62% by cECG]) had ST elevations. Both techniques were equivalent in predicting subsequent enzyme elevation (identical, 108/143; 75% of ACS and ST-elevation myocardial infarction ECGs by EASI and cECG). Thus, both ECG methods had exactly the same specificity of 59% (95% CI, 48%-69%) and sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 85%-96%) for detecting myocardial injury. EASI is equivalent to cECG for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia.</description><subject>Cardiac care unit</subject><subject>Chest Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Myocardial ischemia</subject><subject>Myocardial Ischemia - blood</subject><subject>Myocardial Ischemia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Physiological monitoring</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ST-segment changes</subject><subject>Vector ECG</subject><issn>0022-0736</issn><issn>1532-8430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFq3DAQhk1paTZpX6GIHEoDsTuSLMnObdlu00Cgh7ZnoZXGQca2EsleyEv0matll7b01NMMw_f_w8xfFJcUKgpUfuyrHge0cwzWRFcxAFFBUwHIF8WKCs7KpubwslgBMFaC4vKsOE-pB4CWKfa6OKOSNwpqsSp-rsk-W4VY7kxCd01EefJ2eE0oKwc0joxh8pnx0wPZbm7Jh-36290V8Yng0-L3ZsBpJnMgNkz73PowmeG39iDoQiTOm4cppCwKHTF2mTHzMaPxmaTnycUwYnpTvOrMkPDtqV4UPz5vv2--lPdfb-826_vS1iDmUgiUCLXidaeahtlWqVYog9YCs1zwnQRFa-d23CqkCBSxQ8MVzQNZY8svivdH38cYnhZMsx59sjgMZsKwJC2VzF8VMoOX_4B9WGK-L2lGJYO2pTxDN0fIxpBSxE4_Rj_mwzQFfYhM9_rvyPQhMg2NzpFl8bvThmU3ovsjPWWUgU9HAPND9h6jTtbjZNH5mC21C_5_9vwCu1-tiw</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Wehr, Gabriele</creator><creator>Peters, Ron J.</creator><creator>Khalifé, Khalifé</creator><creator>Banning, Adrian P.</creator><creator>Kuehlkamp, Volker</creator><creator>Rickards, Anthony F.</creator><creator>Sechtem, Udo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>A vector-based, 5-electrode, 12-lead monitoring ECG (EASI) is equivalent to conventional 12-lead ECG for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes</title><author>Wehr, Gabriele ; Peters, Ron J. ; Khalifé, Khalifé ; Banning, Adrian P. ; Kuehlkamp, Volker ; Rickards, Anthony F. ; Sechtem, Udo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-55e6e04734f7882c977957aecc02c353b60714ddb3c7e1e01eefea371b3c64e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Cardiac care unit</topic><topic>Chest Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Myocardial ischemia</topic><topic>Myocardial Ischemia - blood</topic><topic>Myocardial Ischemia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Physiological monitoring</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ST-segment changes</topic><topic>Vector ECG</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wehr, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ron J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalifé, Khalifé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banning, Adrian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehlkamp, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickards, Anthony F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sechtem, Udo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of electrocardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wehr, Gabriele</au><au>Peters, Ron J.</au><au>Khalifé, Khalifé</au><au>Banning, Adrian P.</au><au>Kuehlkamp, Volker</au><au>Rickards, Anthony F.</au><au>Sechtem, Udo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A vector-based, 5-electrode, 12-lead monitoring ECG (EASI) is equivalent to conventional 12-lead ECG for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electrocardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Electrocardiol</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>22-28</pages><issn>0022-0736</issn><eissn>1532-8430</eissn><coden>JECAB4</coden><abstract>The conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram (cECG) derived from 10 electrodes using a cardiograph is the gold standard for diagnosing myocardial ischemia. This study tested the hypothesis that a new 5-electrode 12-lead vector-based ECG (EASI; Philips Medical Systems, formerly Hewlett Packard Co, Boeblingen, Germany) patient monitoring system is equivalent to cECG in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Electrocardiograms (EASI and cECG) were obtained in 203 patients with chest pain on admission and 4 to 8 hours later. Both types of ECGs were graded as ST-elevation myocardial infarction if at least 1 of the 2 consecutive recordings showed ST elevation more than 0.2 mV, as ACS if one or both showed ST elevation less than 0.2 mV, T-wave inversion, or ST depression. Otherwise, the ECG was graded negative. Final diagnosis was identical in 177 patients (87%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-91%; κ = 0.81; SE = 0.035). ST-elevation myocardial infarction was correctly identified or excluded by EASI with a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 89%-97%) and a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 86%-97%; using cECG as the gold standard). Of 118 patients with enzyme elevations, an almost identical number (72 [61% by EASI] and 73 [62% by cECG]) had ST elevations. Both techniques were equivalent in predicting subsequent enzyme elevation (identical, 108/143; 75% of ACS and ST-elevation myocardial infarction ECGs by EASI and cECG). Thus, both ECG methods had exactly the same specificity of 59% (95% CI, 48%-69%) and sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 85%-96%) for detecting myocardial injury. EASI is equivalent to cECG for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16387045</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.08.006</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0736
ispartof Journal of electrocardiology, 2006, Vol.39 (1), p.22-28
issn 0022-0736
1532-8430
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67600556
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cardiac care unit
Chest Pain - etiology
Electrocardiography - instrumentation
Electrocardiography - methods
Electrodes
Humans
Myocardial ischemia
Myocardial Ischemia - blood
Myocardial Ischemia - diagnosis
Physiological monitoring
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
ST-segment changes
Vector ECG
title A vector-based, 5-electrode, 12-lead monitoring ECG (EASI) is equivalent to conventional 12-lead ECG for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T06%3A25%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20vector-based,%205-electrode,%2012-lead%20monitoring%20ECG%20(EASI)%20is%20equivalent%20to%20conventional%2012-lead%20ECG%20for%20diagnosis%20of%20acute%20coronary%20syndromes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electrocardiology&rft.au=Wehr,%20Gabriele&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=22-28&rft.issn=0022-0736&rft.eissn=1532-8430&rft.coden=JECAB4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.08.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E979653701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216209913&rft_id=info:pmid/16387045&rft_els_id=S0022073605002323&rfr_iscdi=true