Defining subjects at risk for psychosis: A comparison of two approaches
The ability to detect individuals at high risk for developing schizophrenia before they express the disease will lead to targeted early intervention. It has been proposed that subjects at risk share a core deficit with people who already have schizophrenia. This includes cognitive impairment, affect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Schizophrenia research 2006, Vol.81 (1), p.83-90 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 90 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 83 |
container_title | Schizophrenia research |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Simon, Andor E. Dvorsky, Diane N. Boesch, Jakob Roth, Binia Isler, Emanuel Schueler, Petra Petralli, Carlo Umbricht, Daniel |
description | The ability to detect individuals at high risk for developing schizophrenia before they express the disease will lead to targeted early intervention. It has been proposed that subjects at risk share a core deficit with people who already have schizophrenia. This includes cognitive impairment, affective symptoms, social isolation and decline in social functioning. In a sample of 104 help-seeking patients from a specialised outpatient clinic we investigated how well two different sets of criteria define the at-risk group and capture this core deficit. One set of criteria is the well-established ultra high-risk model of McGlashan et al. [McGlashan 2001 (SIPS) McGlashan, T. H., Miller, T. J., Woods, S. W., et al. (2001) Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (Version 3.0, unpublished manuscript). New Haven, Connecticut: PRIME Research Clinic, Yale School of Medicine.]; the other criteria were those defined by Cornblatt et al. [Cornblatt, B., Lencz, T., Smith, C.W., Correll, C.U., Auther, A., Nakayama, E., 2003. The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Schizophr. Bull. 29, 633–651.]. There was considerable overlap in the two sets of criteria. However, when the basic symptoms of Klosterkötter [Klosterkötter, J., Hellmich, M., Steinmeyer, E.M., Schultze-Lutter, F., 2001a. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 58, 158–164.] were included in the McGlashan et al. model, a more narrow and homogeneous group was defined. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.schres.2005.10.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67595143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0920996405004731</els_id><sourcerecordid>67595143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-711cd147838a1455eae6e497bbb1d063a60b6cbe4d236098b4ab735918f351bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtvEzEQgC0EakPpP0DIF7htGK8fG3NAqgotSJW4tGfL9s4Sh2S9eDZU_fc4SqTeehpp5pvXx9h7AUsBwnzeLCmuC9KyBdA1tQQwr9hC6E42rQb7mi3AttBYa9Q5e0u0AQChoTtj58K0ttPWLtjtNxzSmMbfnPZhg3Em7mdeEv3hQy58oqe4zpToC7_iMe8mX0t55Hng82PmfppK9nGN9I69GfyW8PIUL9jDzff76x_N3a_bn9dXd02UFuamEyL2QnUrufJCaY0eDSrbhRBED0Z6A8HEgKpvpQG7CsqHTmorVoPUIkR5wT4d59bFf_dIs9slirjd-hHznpypb2mhZAXVEYwlExUc3FTSzpcnJ8AdBLqNOwp0B4GHbBVY2z6c5u_DDvvnppOxCnw8AZ6i3w7FjzHRM9dJa7RSlft65LDa-Jew1G0Jx4h9KlWz63N6-ZL_DdaQAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67595143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining subjects at risk for psychosis: A comparison of two approaches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Simon, Andor E. ; Dvorsky, Diane N. ; Boesch, Jakob ; Roth, Binia ; Isler, Emanuel ; Schueler, Petra ; Petralli, Carlo ; Umbricht, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Simon, Andor E. ; Dvorsky, Diane N. ; Boesch, Jakob ; Roth, Binia ; Isler, Emanuel ; Schueler, Petra ; Petralli, Carlo ; Umbricht, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to detect individuals at high risk for developing schizophrenia before they express the disease will lead to targeted early intervention. It has been proposed that subjects at risk share a core deficit with people who already have schizophrenia. This includes cognitive impairment, affective symptoms, social isolation and decline in social functioning. In a sample of 104 help-seeking patients from a specialised outpatient clinic we investigated how well two different sets of criteria define the at-risk group and capture this core deficit. One set of criteria is the well-established ultra high-risk model of McGlashan et al. [McGlashan 2001 (SIPS) McGlashan, T. H., Miller, T. J., Woods, S. W., et al. (2001) Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (Version 3.0, unpublished manuscript). New Haven, Connecticut: PRIME Research Clinic, Yale School of Medicine.]; the other criteria were those defined by Cornblatt et al. [Cornblatt, B., Lencz, T., Smith, C.W., Correll, C.U., Auther, A., Nakayama, E., 2003. The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Schizophr. Bull. 29, 633–651.]. There was considerable overlap in the two sets of criteria. However, when the basic symptoms of Klosterkötter [Klosterkötter, J., Hellmich, M., Steinmeyer, E.M., Schultze-Lutter, F., 2001a. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 58, 158–164.] were included in the McGlashan et al. model, a more narrow and homogeneous group was defined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.10.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16297599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; At-risk state ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catchment Area (Health) ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - epidemiology ; Early recognition ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Prodrome ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia - diagnosis ; Schizophrenia - epidemiology ; Switzerland - epidemiology ; Ultra high-risk</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2006, Vol.81 (1), p.83-90</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-711cd147838a1455eae6e497bbb1d063a60b6cbe4d236098b4ab735918f351bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-711cd147838a1455eae6e497bbb1d063a60b6cbe4d236098b4ab735918f351bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2005.10.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17396544$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16297599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simon, Andor E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvorsky, Diane N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boesch, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Binia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isler, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schueler, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petralli, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umbricht, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Defining subjects at risk for psychosis: A comparison of two approaches</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>The ability to detect individuals at high risk for developing schizophrenia before they express the disease will lead to targeted early intervention. It has been proposed that subjects at risk share a core deficit with people who already have schizophrenia. This includes cognitive impairment, affective symptoms, social isolation and decline in social functioning. In a sample of 104 help-seeking patients from a specialised outpatient clinic we investigated how well two different sets of criteria define the at-risk group and capture this core deficit. One set of criteria is the well-established ultra high-risk model of McGlashan et al. [McGlashan 2001 (SIPS) McGlashan, T. H., Miller, T. J., Woods, S. W., et al. (2001) Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (Version 3.0, unpublished manuscript). New Haven, Connecticut: PRIME Research Clinic, Yale School of Medicine.]; the other criteria were those defined by Cornblatt et al. [Cornblatt, B., Lencz, T., Smith, C.W., Correll, C.U., Auther, A., Nakayama, E., 2003. The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Schizophr. Bull. 29, 633–651.]. There was considerable overlap in the two sets of criteria. However, when the basic symptoms of Klosterkötter [Klosterkötter, J., Hellmich, M., Steinmeyer, E.M., Schultze-Lutter, F., 2001a. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 58, 158–164.] were included in the McGlashan et al. model, a more narrow and homogeneous group was defined.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>At-risk state</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catchment Area (Health)</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Early recognition</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Prodrome</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Switzerland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ultra high-risk</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtvEzEQgC0EakPpP0DIF7htGK8fG3NAqgotSJW4tGfL9s4Sh2S9eDZU_fc4SqTeehpp5pvXx9h7AUsBwnzeLCmuC9KyBdA1tQQwr9hC6E42rQb7mi3AttBYa9Q5e0u0AQChoTtj58K0ttPWLtjtNxzSmMbfnPZhg3Em7mdeEv3hQy58oqe4zpToC7_iMe8mX0t55Hng82PmfppK9nGN9I69GfyW8PIUL9jDzff76x_N3a_bn9dXd02UFuamEyL2QnUrufJCaY0eDSrbhRBED0Z6A8HEgKpvpQG7CsqHTmorVoPUIkR5wT4d59bFf_dIs9slirjd-hHznpypb2mhZAXVEYwlExUc3FTSzpcnJ8AdBLqNOwp0B4GHbBVY2z6c5u_DDvvnppOxCnw8AZ6i3w7FjzHRM9dJa7RSlft65LDa-Jew1G0Jx4h9KlWz63N6-ZL_DdaQAA</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Simon, Andor E.</creator><creator>Dvorsky, Diane N.</creator><creator>Boesch, Jakob</creator><creator>Roth, Binia</creator><creator>Isler, Emanuel</creator><creator>Schueler, Petra</creator><creator>Petralli, Carlo</creator><creator>Umbricht, Daniel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Defining subjects at risk for psychosis: A comparison of two approaches</title><author>Simon, Andor E. ; Dvorsky, Diane N. ; Boesch, Jakob ; Roth, Binia ; Isler, Emanuel ; Schueler, Petra ; Petralli, Carlo ; Umbricht, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-711cd147838a1455eae6e497bbb1d063a60b6cbe4d236098b4ab735918f351bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>At-risk state</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catchment Area (Health)</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Early recognition</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Prodrome</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Switzerland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ultra high-risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simon, Andor E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvorsky, Diane N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boesch, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Binia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isler, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schueler, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petralli, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umbricht, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simon, Andor E.</au><au>Dvorsky, Diane N.</au><au>Boesch, Jakob</au><au>Roth, Binia</au><au>Isler, Emanuel</au><au>Schueler, Petra</au><au>Petralli, Carlo</au><au>Umbricht, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining subjects at risk for psychosis: A comparison of two approaches</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>83-90</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>The ability to detect individuals at high risk for developing schizophrenia before they express the disease will lead to targeted early intervention. It has been proposed that subjects at risk share a core deficit with people who already have schizophrenia. This includes cognitive impairment, affective symptoms, social isolation and decline in social functioning. In a sample of 104 help-seeking patients from a specialised outpatient clinic we investigated how well two different sets of criteria define the at-risk group and capture this core deficit. One set of criteria is the well-established ultra high-risk model of McGlashan et al. [McGlashan 2001 (SIPS) McGlashan, T. H., Miller, T. J., Woods, S. W., et al. (2001) Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (Version 3.0, unpublished manuscript). New Haven, Connecticut: PRIME Research Clinic, Yale School of Medicine.]; the other criteria were those defined by Cornblatt et al. [Cornblatt, B., Lencz, T., Smith, C.W., Correll, C.U., Auther, A., Nakayama, E., 2003. The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Schizophr. Bull. 29, 633–651.]. There was considerable overlap in the two sets of criteria. However, when the basic symptoms of Klosterkötter [Klosterkötter, J., Hellmich, M., Steinmeyer, E.M., Schultze-Lutter, F., 2001a. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 58, 158–164.] were included in the McGlashan et al. model, a more narrow and homogeneous group was defined.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>16297599</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.schres.2005.10.006</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0920-9964 |
ispartof | Schizophrenia research, 2006, Vol.81 (1), p.83-90 |
issn | 0920-9964 1573-2509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67595143 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies At-risk state Biological and medical sciences Catchment Area (Health) Cognition Disorders - diagnosis Cognition Disorders - epidemiology Early recognition Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Medical sciences Prodrome Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychoses Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology Risk Assessment Risk Factors Schizophrenia Schizophrenia - diagnosis Schizophrenia - epidemiology Switzerland - epidemiology Ultra high-risk |
title | Defining subjects at risk for psychosis: A comparison of two approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A03%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20subjects%20at%20risk%20for%20psychosis:%20A%20comparison%20of%20two%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Simon,%20Andor%20E.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=83-90&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.schres.2005.10.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67595143%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67595143&rft_id=info:pmid/16297599&rft_els_id=S0920996405004731&rfr_iscdi=true |