Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation
PURPOSE:To compare the postoperative refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study of 90 consecutive patients (95 eyes) with cataract with or without co-existing glaucoma who h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of glaucoma 2006-02, Vol.15 (1), p.26-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | Journal of glaucoma |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Chan, Jonathan C. H Lai, Jimmy S. M Tham, Clement C. Y |
description | PURPOSE:To compare the postoperative refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.
METHODS:A retrospective comparative study of 90 consecutive patients (95 eyes) with cataract with or without co-existing glaucoma who had undergone uncomplicated phacotrabeculectomy or phacoemulsification by a single surgeon. The biometry prediction error was determined for each case by the difference between the actual postoperative refraction and the preoperative predicted refractive outcome, in spherical equivalent. This was followed by a comparative analysis of the mean biometry prediction error, and the number of cases with error >0.50 D or 1.00 D. All biometry measurements were performed by one of the two qualified optometrists.
RESULTS:The mean and absolute mean biometry prediction error of the 25 eyes that received phacotrabeculectomy (+0.20 D, absolute error 0.96 D) was comparable to the 70 eyes that received phacoemulsification (−0.14 D, absolute error 0.68 D), P = 0.18 (absolute error, P = 0.12). The proportion of cases with prediction error >0.50 D or 1.00 D was 60% or 40% for phacotrabeculectomy, and 44% or 17% for phacoemulsification, respectively. Phacotrabeculectomy was more likely to have a prediction error >1.00 D (P = 0.02) and a myopic shift of >0.50 D or 1.00 D (P = 0.03 or 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were found with regard to the frequency of hyperopic shift or prediction error >0.50 D. There was no significant difference in either the mean error or the frequency of the different types of error for the different biometry operators, types of glaucoma, or postoperative intraocular pressure control success status.
CONCLUSION:Myopically shifted prediction error was significantly more frequent following posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with phacotrabeculectomy compared with phacoemulsification, even when surgery was uncomplicated and performed by the same surgeon. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.ijg.0000196620.41991.b6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67590230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67590230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3627-55b48df0a54c22873b4308d692affec8463c2c2636ad895ce098ed642b07f6a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkVuL3SAUhUNpmftfKNKHviWz1cRo38qhlwMHZigtnTcxZqdxmsRUkw7zN_qL67nA-OJC1lp745dl7ygUFFR9C7Rwj78KSIcqIRgUJVWKFo14lV3Qiou8lPThddJQ1TlIps6zyxgfARgwRs-ycyp4LYGWF9m_jR9nE1z0E_Edufdx8TMGs7i_SL5hF4w9yLt1sX5E4iZy3xvrl2AatOuAdvHjMzFTe3zHcR2i65xNDanyp1v6QykG5wPZ9GZsMJDtlPI-xU0gO5wi2Y7zYKblELrO3nRmiHhzuq-yH58_fd98zXd3X7abj7vccsHqvKqaUrYdmKq0jMmaNyUH2QrFTNehlaXgllkmuDCtVJVFUBJbUbIG6k4Y4FfZ-2PvHPyfFeOiRxctDmkR9GvUoq4UML43fjgabfAxBuz0HNxowrOmoPdENFCdiOgXIvpARDcihd-epqzNiO1L9IQgGcqj4ckP6Zvi72F9wqB7NMPS7ysFpUrmLInEDyDfT6n5f9isnAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67590230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Chan, Jonathan C. H ; Lai, Jimmy S. M ; Tham, Clement C. Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jonathan C. H ; Lai, Jimmy S. M ; Tham, Clement C. Y</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE:To compare the postoperative refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.
METHODS:A retrospective comparative study of 90 consecutive patients (95 eyes) with cataract with or without co-existing glaucoma who had undergone uncomplicated phacotrabeculectomy or phacoemulsification by a single surgeon. The biometry prediction error was determined for each case by the difference between the actual postoperative refraction and the preoperative predicted refractive outcome, in spherical equivalent. This was followed by a comparative analysis of the mean biometry prediction error, and the number of cases with error >0.50 D or 1.00 D. All biometry measurements were performed by one of the two qualified optometrists.
RESULTS:The mean and absolute mean biometry prediction error of the 25 eyes that received phacotrabeculectomy (+0.20 D, absolute error 0.96 D) was comparable to the 70 eyes that received phacoemulsification (−0.14 D, absolute error 0.68 D), P = 0.18 (absolute error, P = 0.12). The proportion of cases with prediction error >0.50 D or 1.00 D was 60% or 40% for phacotrabeculectomy, and 44% or 17% for phacoemulsification, respectively. Phacotrabeculectomy was more likely to have a prediction error >1.00 D (P = 0.02) and a myopic shift of >0.50 D or 1.00 D (P = 0.03 or 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were found with regard to the frequency of hyperopic shift or prediction error >0.50 D. There was no significant difference in either the mean error or the frequency of the different types of error for the different biometry operators, types of glaucoma, or postoperative intraocular pressure control success status.
CONCLUSION:Myopically shifted prediction error was significantly more frequent following posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with phacotrabeculectomy compared with phacoemulsification, even when surgery was uncomplicated and performed by the same surgeon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-0829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-481X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000196620.41991.b6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16378014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biometry ; Cataract - complications ; Female ; Glaucoma - complications ; Humans ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Male ; Phacoemulsification - methods ; Postoperative Period ; Refraction, Ocular - physiology ; Refractive Errors - physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Trabeculectomy - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of glaucoma, 2006-02, Vol.15 (1), p.26-29</ispartof><rights>2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3627-55b48df0a54c22873b4308d692affec8463c2c2636ad895ce098ed642b07f6a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3627-55b48df0a54c22873b4308d692affec8463c2c2636ad895ce098ed642b07f6a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16378014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jonathan C. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Jimmy S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, Clement C. Y</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation</title><title>Journal of glaucoma</title><addtitle>J Glaucoma</addtitle><description>PURPOSE:To compare the postoperative refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.
METHODS:A retrospective comparative study of 90 consecutive patients (95 eyes) with cataract with or without co-existing glaucoma who had undergone uncomplicated phacotrabeculectomy or phacoemulsification by a single surgeon. The biometry prediction error was determined for each case by the difference between the actual postoperative refraction and the preoperative predicted refractive outcome, in spherical equivalent. This was followed by a comparative analysis of the mean biometry prediction error, and the number of cases with error >0.50 D or 1.00 D. All biometry measurements were performed by one of the two qualified optometrists.
RESULTS:The mean and absolute mean biometry prediction error of the 25 eyes that received phacotrabeculectomy (+0.20 D, absolute error 0.96 D) was comparable to the 70 eyes that received phacoemulsification (−0.14 D, absolute error 0.68 D), P = 0.18 (absolute error, P = 0.12). The proportion of cases with prediction error >0.50 D or 1.00 D was 60% or 40% for phacotrabeculectomy, and 44% or 17% for phacoemulsification, respectively. Phacotrabeculectomy was more likely to have a prediction error >1.00 D (P = 0.02) and a myopic shift of >0.50 D or 1.00 D (P = 0.03 or 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were found with regard to the frequency of hyperopic shift or prediction error >0.50 D. There was no significant difference in either the mean error or the frequency of the different types of error for the different biometry operators, types of glaucoma, or postoperative intraocular pressure control success status.
CONCLUSION:Myopically shifted prediction error was significantly more frequent following posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with phacotrabeculectomy compared with phacoemulsification, even when surgery was uncomplicated and performed by the same surgeon.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biometry</subject><subject>Cataract - complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma - complications</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Refraction, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Refractive Errors - physiopathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Trabeculectomy - methods</subject><issn>1057-0829</issn><issn>1536-481X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkVuL3SAUhUNpmftfKNKHviWz1cRo38qhlwMHZigtnTcxZqdxmsRUkw7zN_qL67nA-OJC1lp745dl7ygUFFR9C7Rwj78KSIcqIRgUJVWKFo14lV3Qiou8lPThddJQ1TlIps6zyxgfARgwRs-ycyp4LYGWF9m_jR9nE1z0E_Edufdx8TMGs7i_SL5hF4w9yLt1sX5E4iZy3xvrl2AatOuAdvHjMzFTe3zHcR2i65xNDanyp1v6QykG5wPZ9GZsMJDtlPI-xU0gO5wi2Y7zYKblELrO3nRmiHhzuq-yH58_fd98zXd3X7abj7vccsHqvKqaUrYdmKq0jMmaNyUH2QrFTNehlaXgllkmuDCtVJVFUBJbUbIG6k4Y4FfZ-2PvHPyfFeOiRxctDmkR9GvUoq4UML43fjgabfAxBuz0HNxowrOmoPdENFCdiOgXIvpARDcihd-epqzNiO1L9IQgGcqj4ckP6Zvi72F9wqB7NMPS7ysFpUrmLInEDyDfT6n5f9isnAY</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Chan, Jonathan C. H</creator><creator>Lai, Jimmy S. M</creator><creator>Tham, Clement C. Y</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation</title><author>Chan, Jonathan C. H ; Lai, Jimmy S. M ; Tham, Clement C. Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3627-55b48df0a54c22873b4308d692affec8463c2c2636ad895ce098ed642b07f6a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biometry</topic><topic>Cataract - complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma - complications</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Refraction, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Refractive Errors - physiopathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Trabeculectomy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jonathan C. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Jimmy S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, Clement C. Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of glaucoma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Jonathan C. H</au><au>Lai, Jimmy S. M</au><au>Tham, Clement C. Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of glaucoma</jtitle><addtitle>J Glaucoma</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>26-29</pages><issn>1057-0829</issn><eissn>1536-481X</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE:To compare the postoperative refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.
METHODS:A retrospective comparative study of 90 consecutive patients (95 eyes) with cataract with or without co-existing glaucoma who had undergone uncomplicated phacotrabeculectomy or phacoemulsification by a single surgeon. The biometry prediction error was determined for each case by the difference between the actual postoperative refraction and the preoperative predicted refractive outcome, in spherical equivalent. This was followed by a comparative analysis of the mean biometry prediction error, and the number of cases with error >0.50 D or 1.00 D. All biometry measurements were performed by one of the two qualified optometrists.
RESULTS:The mean and absolute mean biometry prediction error of the 25 eyes that received phacotrabeculectomy (+0.20 D, absolute error 0.96 D) was comparable to the 70 eyes that received phacoemulsification (−0.14 D, absolute error 0.68 D), P = 0.18 (absolute error, P = 0.12). The proportion of cases with prediction error >0.50 D or 1.00 D was 60% or 40% for phacotrabeculectomy, and 44% or 17% for phacoemulsification, respectively. Phacotrabeculectomy was more likely to have a prediction error >1.00 D (P = 0.02) and a myopic shift of >0.50 D or 1.00 D (P = 0.03 or 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were found with regard to the frequency of hyperopic shift or prediction error >0.50 D. There was no significant difference in either the mean error or the frequency of the different types of error for the different biometry operators, types of glaucoma, or postoperative intraocular pressure control success status.
CONCLUSION:Myopically shifted prediction error was significantly more frequent following posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with phacotrabeculectomy compared with phacoemulsification, even when surgery was uncomplicated and performed by the same surgeon.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>16378014</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.ijg.0000196620.41991.b6</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-0829 |
ispartof | Journal of glaucoma, 2006-02, Vol.15 (1), p.26-29 |
issn | 1057-0829 1536-481X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67590230 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Biometry Cataract - complications Female Glaucoma - complications Humans Lens Implantation, Intraocular Lenses, Intraocular Male Phacoemulsification - methods Postoperative Period Refraction, Ocular - physiology Refractive Errors - physiopathology Retrospective Studies Trabeculectomy - methods |
title | Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A19%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Postoperative%20Refractive%20Outcome%20in%20Phacotrabeculectomy%20and%20Phacoemulsification%20With%20Posterior%20Chamber%20Intraocular%20Lens%20Implantation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20glaucoma&rft.au=Chan,%20Jonathan%20C.%20H&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=26-29&rft.issn=1057-0829&rft.eissn=1536-481X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.ijg.0000196620.41991.b6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67590230%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67590230&rft_id=info:pmid/16378014&rfr_iscdi=true |