Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation

PURPOSE:To compare the postoperative refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study of 90 consecutive patients (95 eyes) with cataract with or without co-existing glaucoma who h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of glaucoma 2006-02, Vol.15 (1), p.26-29
Hauptverfasser: Chan, Jonathan C. H, Lai, Jimmy S. M, Tham, Clement C. Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Journal of glaucoma
container_volume 15
creator Chan, Jonathan C. H
Lai, Jimmy S. M
Tham, Clement C. Y
description PURPOSE:To compare the postoperative refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study of 90 consecutive patients (95 eyes) with cataract with or without co-existing glaucoma who had undergone uncomplicated phacotrabeculectomy or phacoemulsification by a single surgeon. The biometry prediction error was determined for each case by the difference between the actual postoperative refraction and the preoperative predicted refractive outcome, in spherical equivalent. This was followed by a comparative analysis of the mean biometry prediction error, and the number of cases with error >0.50 D or 1.00 D. All biometry measurements were performed by one of the two qualified optometrists. RESULTS:The mean and absolute mean biometry prediction error of the 25 eyes that received phacotrabeculectomy (+0.20 D, absolute error 0.96 D) was comparable to the 70 eyes that received phacoemulsification (−0.14 D, absolute error 0.68 D), P = 0.18 (absolute error, P = 0.12). The proportion of cases with prediction error >0.50 D or 1.00 D was 60% or 40% for phacotrabeculectomy, and 44% or 17% for phacoemulsification, respectively. Phacotrabeculectomy was more likely to have a prediction error >1.00 D (P = 0.02) and a myopic shift of >0.50 D or 1.00 D (P = 0.03 or 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were found with regard to the frequency of hyperopic shift or prediction error >0.50 D. There was no significant difference in either the mean error or the frequency of the different types of error for the different biometry operators, types of glaucoma, or postoperative intraocular pressure control success status. CONCLUSION:Myopically shifted prediction error was significantly more frequent following posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with phacotrabeculectomy compared with phacoemulsification, even when surgery was uncomplicated and performed by the same surgeon.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.ijg.0000196620.41991.b6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67590230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67590230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3627-55b48df0a54c22873b4308d692affec8463c2c2636ad895ce098ed642b07f6a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkVuL3SAUhUNpmftfKNKHviWz1cRo38qhlwMHZigtnTcxZqdxmsRUkw7zN_qL67nA-OJC1lp745dl7ygUFFR9C7Rwj78KSIcqIRgUJVWKFo14lV3Qiou8lPThddJQ1TlIps6zyxgfARgwRs-ycyp4LYGWF9m_jR9nE1z0E_Edufdx8TMGs7i_SL5hF4w9yLt1sX5E4iZy3xvrl2AatOuAdvHjMzFTe3zHcR2i65xNDanyp1v6QykG5wPZ9GZsMJDtlPI-xU0gO5wi2Y7zYKblELrO3nRmiHhzuq-yH58_fd98zXd3X7abj7vccsHqvKqaUrYdmKq0jMmaNyUH2QrFTNehlaXgllkmuDCtVJVFUBJbUbIG6k4Y4FfZ-2PvHPyfFeOiRxctDmkR9GvUoq4UML43fjgabfAxBuz0HNxowrOmoPdENFCdiOgXIvpARDcihd-epqzNiO1L9IQgGcqj4ckP6Zvi72F9wqB7NMPS7ysFpUrmLInEDyDfT6n5f9isnAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67590230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Chan, Jonathan C. H ; Lai, Jimmy S. M ; Tham, Clement C. Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jonathan C. H ; Lai, Jimmy S. M ; Tham, Clement C. Y</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE:To compare the postoperative refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study of 90 consecutive patients (95 eyes) with cataract with or without co-existing glaucoma who had undergone uncomplicated phacotrabeculectomy or phacoemulsification by a single surgeon. The biometry prediction error was determined for each case by the difference between the actual postoperative refraction and the preoperative predicted refractive outcome, in spherical equivalent. This was followed by a comparative analysis of the mean biometry prediction error, and the number of cases with error &gt;0.50 D or 1.00 D. All biometry measurements were performed by one of the two qualified optometrists. RESULTS:The mean and absolute mean biometry prediction error of the 25 eyes that received phacotrabeculectomy (+0.20 D, absolute error 0.96 D) was comparable to the 70 eyes that received phacoemulsification (−0.14 D, absolute error 0.68 D), P = 0.18 (absolute error, P = 0.12). The proportion of cases with prediction error &gt;0.50 D or 1.00 D was 60% or 40% for phacotrabeculectomy, and 44% or 17% for phacoemulsification, respectively. Phacotrabeculectomy was more likely to have a prediction error &gt;1.00 D (P = 0.02) and a myopic shift of &gt;0.50 D or 1.00 D (P = 0.03 or 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were found with regard to the frequency of hyperopic shift or prediction error &gt;0.50 D. There was no significant difference in either the mean error or the frequency of the different types of error for the different biometry operators, types of glaucoma, or postoperative intraocular pressure control success status. CONCLUSION:Myopically shifted prediction error was significantly more frequent following posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with phacotrabeculectomy compared with phacoemulsification, even when surgery was uncomplicated and performed by the same surgeon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-0829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-481X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000196620.41991.b6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16378014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biometry ; Cataract - complications ; Female ; Glaucoma - complications ; Humans ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Male ; Phacoemulsification - methods ; Postoperative Period ; Refraction, Ocular - physiology ; Refractive Errors - physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Trabeculectomy - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of glaucoma, 2006-02, Vol.15 (1), p.26-29</ispartof><rights>2006 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3627-55b48df0a54c22873b4308d692affec8463c2c2636ad895ce098ed642b07f6a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3627-55b48df0a54c22873b4308d692affec8463c2c2636ad895ce098ed642b07f6a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16378014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jonathan C. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Jimmy S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, Clement C. Y</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation</title><title>Journal of glaucoma</title><addtitle>J Glaucoma</addtitle><description>PURPOSE:To compare the postoperative refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study of 90 consecutive patients (95 eyes) with cataract with or without co-existing glaucoma who had undergone uncomplicated phacotrabeculectomy or phacoemulsification by a single surgeon. The biometry prediction error was determined for each case by the difference between the actual postoperative refraction and the preoperative predicted refractive outcome, in spherical equivalent. This was followed by a comparative analysis of the mean biometry prediction error, and the number of cases with error &gt;0.50 D or 1.00 D. All biometry measurements were performed by one of the two qualified optometrists. RESULTS:The mean and absolute mean biometry prediction error of the 25 eyes that received phacotrabeculectomy (+0.20 D, absolute error 0.96 D) was comparable to the 70 eyes that received phacoemulsification (−0.14 D, absolute error 0.68 D), P = 0.18 (absolute error, P = 0.12). The proportion of cases with prediction error &gt;0.50 D or 1.00 D was 60% or 40% for phacotrabeculectomy, and 44% or 17% for phacoemulsification, respectively. Phacotrabeculectomy was more likely to have a prediction error &gt;1.00 D (P = 0.02) and a myopic shift of &gt;0.50 D or 1.00 D (P = 0.03 or 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were found with regard to the frequency of hyperopic shift or prediction error &gt;0.50 D. There was no significant difference in either the mean error or the frequency of the different types of error for the different biometry operators, types of glaucoma, or postoperative intraocular pressure control success status. CONCLUSION:Myopically shifted prediction error was significantly more frequent following posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with phacotrabeculectomy compared with phacoemulsification, even when surgery was uncomplicated and performed by the same surgeon.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biometry</subject><subject>Cataract - complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma - complications</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Refraction, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Refractive Errors - physiopathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Trabeculectomy - methods</subject><issn>1057-0829</issn><issn>1536-481X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkVuL3SAUhUNpmftfKNKHviWz1cRo38qhlwMHZigtnTcxZqdxmsRUkw7zN_qL67nA-OJC1lp745dl7ygUFFR9C7Rwj78KSIcqIRgUJVWKFo14lV3Qiou8lPThddJQ1TlIps6zyxgfARgwRs-ycyp4LYGWF9m_jR9nE1z0E_Edufdx8TMGs7i_SL5hF4w9yLt1sX5E4iZy3xvrl2AatOuAdvHjMzFTe3zHcR2i65xNDanyp1v6QykG5wPZ9GZsMJDtlPI-xU0gO5wi2Y7zYKblELrO3nRmiHhzuq-yH58_fd98zXd3X7abj7vccsHqvKqaUrYdmKq0jMmaNyUH2QrFTNehlaXgllkmuDCtVJVFUBJbUbIG6k4Y4FfZ-2PvHPyfFeOiRxctDmkR9GvUoq4UML43fjgabfAxBuz0HNxowrOmoPdENFCdiOgXIvpARDcihd-epqzNiO1L9IQgGcqj4ckP6Zvi72F9wqB7NMPS7ysFpUrmLInEDyDfT6n5f9isnAY</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Chan, Jonathan C. H</creator><creator>Lai, Jimmy S. M</creator><creator>Tham, Clement C. Y</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation</title><author>Chan, Jonathan C. H ; Lai, Jimmy S. M ; Tham, Clement C. Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3627-55b48df0a54c22873b4308d692affec8463c2c2636ad895ce098ed642b07f6a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biometry</topic><topic>Cataract - complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma - complications</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Refraction, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Refractive Errors - physiopathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Trabeculectomy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Jonathan C. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Jimmy S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, Clement C. Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of glaucoma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Jonathan C. H</au><au>Lai, Jimmy S. M</au><au>Tham, Clement C. Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of glaucoma</jtitle><addtitle>J Glaucoma</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>26-29</pages><issn>1057-0829</issn><eissn>1536-481X</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE:To compare the postoperative refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study of 90 consecutive patients (95 eyes) with cataract with or without co-existing glaucoma who had undergone uncomplicated phacotrabeculectomy or phacoemulsification by a single surgeon. The biometry prediction error was determined for each case by the difference between the actual postoperative refraction and the preoperative predicted refractive outcome, in spherical equivalent. This was followed by a comparative analysis of the mean biometry prediction error, and the number of cases with error &gt;0.50 D or 1.00 D. All biometry measurements were performed by one of the two qualified optometrists. RESULTS:The mean and absolute mean biometry prediction error of the 25 eyes that received phacotrabeculectomy (+0.20 D, absolute error 0.96 D) was comparable to the 70 eyes that received phacoemulsification (−0.14 D, absolute error 0.68 D), P = 0.18 (absolute error, P = 0.12). The proportion of cases with prediction error &gt;0.50 D or 1.00 D was 60% or 40% for phacotrabeculectomy, and 44% or 17% for phacoemulsification, respectively. Phacotrabeculectomy was more likely to have a prediction error &gt;1.00 D (P = 0.02) and a myopic shift of &gt;0.50 D or 1.00 D (P = 0.03 or 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were found with regard to the frequency of hyperopic shift or prediction error &gt;0.50 D. There was no significant difference in either the mean error or the frequency of the different types of error for the different biometry operators, types of glaucoma, or postoperative intraocular pressure control success status. CONCLUSION:Myopically shifted prediction error was significantly more frequent following posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with phacotrabeculectomy compared with phacoemulsification, even when surgery was uncomplicated and performed by the same surgeon.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>16378014</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.ijg.0000196620.41991.b6</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-0829
ispartof Journal of glaucoma, 2006-02, Vol.15 (1), p.26-29
issn 1057-0829
1536-481X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67590230
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biometry
Cataract - complications
Female
Glaucoma - complications
Humans
Lens Implantation, Intraocular
Lenses, Intraocular
Male
Phacoemulsification - methods
Postoperative Period
Refraction, Ocular - physiology
Refractive Errors - physiopathology
Retrospective Studies
Trabeculectomy - methods
title Comparison of Postoperative Refractive Outcome in Phacotrabeculectomy and Phacoemulsification With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A19%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Postoperative%20Refractive%20Outcome%20in%20Phacotrabeculectomy%20and%20Phacoemulsification%20With%20Posterior%20Chamber%20Intraocular%20Lens%20Implantation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20glaucoma&rft.au=Chan,%20Jonathan%20C.%20H&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=26-29&rft.issn=1057-0829&rft.eissn=1536-481X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.ijg.0000196620.41991.b6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67590230%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67590230&rft_id=info:pmid/16378014&rfr_iscdi=true