Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study)

Background:As with endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, the same transluminal access can be expanded to introduce an endoscope through the gastrointestinal wall into the retroperitoneum and remove infected pancreatic necroses under direct visual control. This study rep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2009-09, Vol.58 (9), p.1260-1266
Hauptverfasser: Seifert, H, Biermer, M, Schmitt, W, Jürgensen, C, Will, U, Gerlach, R, Kreitmair, C, Meining, A, Wehrmann, T, Rösch, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1266
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1260
container_title Gut
container_volume 58
creator Seifert, H
Biermer, M
Schmitt, W
Jürgensen, C
Will, U
Gerlach, R
Kreitmair, C
Meining, A
Wehrmann, T
Rösch, T
description Background:As with endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, the same transluminal access can be expanded to introduce an endoscope through the gastrointestinal wall into the retroperitoneum and remove infected pancreatic necroses under direct visual control. This study reports the first large series with long-term follow-up.Methods:Data for all patients undergoing transluminal endoscopic removal of (peri)pancreatic necroses between 1999 and 2005 in six different centres were collected retrospectively, and the patients were followed up prospectively until 2008. The initial patient and treatment outcome data were recorded, as were long-term results.Results:Ninety-three patients (63 men, 30 women; mean age 57 years) underwent a mean of six interventions starting at a mean of 43 days after an attack of severe acute pancreatitis. After establishment of transluminal access to the necrotic cavity and subsequent endoscopic necrosectomy, initial clinical success was obtained in 80% of the patients, with a 26% complication and a 7.5% mortality rate at 30 days. After a mean follow-up period of 43 months, 84% of the initially successfully treated patients had sustained clinical improvement, with 10% receiving further endoscopic and 4% receiving surgical treatment for recurrent cavities; 16% suffered recurrent pancreatitis.Conclusions:Direct transluminal endoscopic removal of pancreatic necroses is associated with good long-term maintenance of the high initial efficacy; complications can occur, with an associated mortality of around 7.5%. Further studies are necessary in order to optimise endotherapy and define its role in relation to surgery in the clinical management of such patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gut.2008.163733
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67583400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67583400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-ba2eb546ff6b516e2113b52ffcec5d8484c51dbd1fb52b110ebb682fc17e3f353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1rFDEYB-Agil2rZ28SEESF2SaTyUzGW1lrKxaVuoq3kGTetLOdmaz5oO7Fv90ssyh4MZdA8rz5eH8IPaVkSSmrT65TXJaEiCWtWcPYPbSgVS0KVgpxHy0IoU3Bm6o9Qo9C2JAMRUsfoiPalqJkpF6gX2uvpjCksZ_UgGHqXDBu2xs8gfEugIlu3GFlI3isTIqAt2oyHlTsYx_eYIXHNMTewBQ94BBTt8N3fbzBg5uui1w1YuuGwd0VaYtfxhvA52efT6_e4i97-uoxemDVEODJYT5GX9-drVcXxeWn8_er08tCVzWLhVYlaF7V1taa0xrK_HnNS2sNGN6JSlSG00531OZVTSkBrWtRWkMbYJZxdoxezOduvfuRIEQ59sHAMKgJXAqybrhgFSEZPv8HblzyuTdB0qZpWZUHzepkVvseBQ9Wbn0_Kr-TlMh9MDIHI_fByDmYXPHscG7SI3R__SGJDIoZ9CHCzz_7yt_mx7GGy4_fVvL7h3bNL65Kuc7-9ez1uPnv7b8Bh8ynoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779344441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Seifert, H ; Biermer, M ; Schmitt, W ; Jürgensen, C ; Will, U ; Gerlach, R ; Kreitmair, C ; Meining, A ; Wehrmann, T ; Rösch, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Seifert, H ; Biermer, M ; Schmitt, W ; Jürgensen, C ; Will, U ; Gerlach, R ; Kreitmair, C ; Meining, A ; Wehrmann, T ; Rösch, T</creatorcontrib><description>Background:As with endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, the same transluminal access can be expanded to introduce an endoscope through the gastrointestinal wall into the retroperitoneum and remove infected pancreatic necroses under direct visual control. This study reports the first large series with long-term follow-up.Methods:Data for all patients undergoing transluminal endoscopic removal of (peri)pancreatic necroses between 1999 and 2005 in six different centres were collected retrospectively, and the patients were followed up prospectively until 2008. The initial patient and treatment outcome data were recorded, as were long-term results.Results:Ninety-three patients (63 men, 30 women; mean age 57 years) underwent a mean of six interventions starting at a mean of 43 days after an attack of severe acute pancreatitis. After establishment of transluminal access to the necrotic cavity and subsequent endoscopic necrosectomy, initial clinical success was obtained in 80% of the patients, with a 26% complication and a 7.5% mortality rate at 30 days. After a mean follow-up period of 43 months, 84% of the initially successfully treated patients had sustained clinical improvement, with 10% receiving further endoscopic and 4% receiving surgical treatment for recurrent cavities; 16% suffered recurrent pancreatitis.Conclusions:Direct transluminal endoscopic removal of pancreatic necroses is associated with good long-term maintenance of the high initial efficacy; complications can occur, with an associated mortality of around 7.5%. Further studies are necessary in order to optimise endotherapy and define its role in relation to surgery in the clinical management of such patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.163733</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19282306</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GUTTAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abscesses ; Acute Disease ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Catheters ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cysts ; Drainage ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morphology ; Mortality ; Necrosis - surgery ; Pancreas - pathology ; Pancreas - surgery ; Pancreatitis ; Pancreatitis - mortality ; Pancreatitis - pathology ; Pancreatitis - surgery ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Postoperative Complications - pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Success ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2009-09, Vol.58 (9), p.1260-1266</ispartof><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-ba2eb546ff6b516e2113b52ffcec5d8484c51dbd1fb52b110ebb682fc17e3f353</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/58/9/1260.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/58/9/1260.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19282306$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seifert, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biermer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jürgensen, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Will, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreitmair, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meining, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wehrmann, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rösch, T</creatorcontrib><title>Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study)</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>Background:As with endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, the same transluminal access can be expanded to introduce an endoscope through the gastrointestinal wall into the retroperitoneum and remove infected pancreatic necroses under direct visual control. This study reports the first large series with long-term follow-up.Methods:Data for all patients undergoing transluminal endoscopic removal of (peri)pancreatic necroses between 1999 and 2005 in six different centres were collected retrospectively, and the patients were followed up prospectively until 2008. The initial patient and treatment outcome data were recorded, as were long-term results.Results:Ninety-three patients (63 men, 30 women; mean age 57 years) underwent a mean of six interventions starting at a mean of 43 days after an attack of severe acute pancreatitis. After establishment of transluminal access to the necrotic cavity and subsequent endoscopic necrosectomy, initial clinical success was obtained in 80% of the patients, with a 26% complication and a 7.5% mortality rate at 30 days. After a mean follow-up period of 43 months, 84% of the initially successfully treated patients had sustained clinical improvement, with 10% receiving further endoscopic and 4% receiving surgical treatment for recurrent cavities; 16% suffered recurrent pancreatitis.Conclusions:Direct transluminal endoscopic removal of pancreatic necroses is associated with good long-term maintenance of the high initial efficacy; complications can occur, with an associated mortality of around 7.5%. Further studies are necessary in order to optimise endotherapy and define its role in relation to surgery in the clinical management of such patients.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abscesses</subject><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Necrosis - surgery</subject><subject>Pancreas - pathology</subject><subject>Pancreas - surgery</subject><subject>Pancreatitis</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - mortality</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - pathology</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - pathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1rFDEYB-Agil2rZ28SEESF2SaTyUzGW1lrKxaVuoq3kGTetLOdmaz5oO7Fv90ssyh4MZdA8rz5eH8IPaVkSSmrT65TXJaEiCWtWcPYPbSgVS0KVgpxHy0IoU3Bm6o9Qo9C2JAMRUsfoiPalqJkpF6gX2uvpjCksZ_UgGHqXDBu2xs8gfEugIlu3GFlI3isTIqAt2oyHlTsYx_eYIXHNMTewBQ94BBTt8N3fbzBg5uui1w1YuuGwd0VaYtfxhvA52efT6_e4i97-uoxemDVEODJYT5GX9-drVcXxeWn8_er08tCVzWLhVYlaF7V1taa0xrK_HnNS2sNGN6JSlSG00531OZVTSkBrWtRWkMbYJZxdoxezOduvfuRIEQ59sHAMKgJXAqybrhgFSEZPv8HblzyuTdB0qZpWZUHzepkVvseBQ9Wbn0_Kr-TlMh9MDIHI_fByDmYXPHscG7SI3R__SGJDIoZ9CHCzz_7yt_mx7GGy4_fVvL7h3bNL65Kuc7-9ez1uPnv7b8Bh8ynoA</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Seifert, H</creator><creator>Biermer, M</creator><creator>Schmitt, W</creator><creator>Jürgensen, C</creator><creator>Will, U</creator><creator>Gerlach, R</creator><creator>Kreitmair, C</creator><creator>Meining, A</creator><creator>Wehrmann, T</creator><creator>Rösch, T</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study)</title><author>Seifert, H ; Biermer, M ; Schmitt, W ; Jürgensen, C ; Will, U ; Gerlach, R ; Kreitmair, C ; Meining, A ; Wehrmann, T ; Rösch, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b463t-ba2eb546ff6b516e2113b52ffcec5d8484c51dbd1fb52b110ebb682fc17e3f353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abscesses</topic><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Necrosis - surgery</topic><topic>Pancreas - pathology</topic><topic>Pancreas - surgery</topic><topic>Pancreatitis</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - mortality</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - pathology</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - pathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seifert, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biermer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jürgensen, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Will, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreitmair, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meining, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wehrmann, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rösch, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seifert, H</au><au>Biermer, M</au><au>Schmitt, W</au><au>Jürgensen, C</au><au>Will, U</au><au>Gerlach, R</au><au>Kreitmair, C</au><au>Meining, A</au><au>Wehrmann, T</au><au>Rösch, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study)</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1260</spage><epage>1266</epage><pages>1260-1266</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><coden>GUTTAK</coden><abstract>Background:As with endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, the same transluminal access can be expanded to introduce an endoscope through the gastrointestinal wall into the retroperitoneum and remove infected pancreatic necroses under direct visual control. This study reports the first large series with long-term follow-up.Methods:Data for all patients undergoing transluminal endoscopic removal of (peri)pancreatic necroses between 1999 and 2005 in six different centres were collected retrospectively, and the patients were followed up prospectively until 2008. The initial patient and treatment outcome data were recorded, as were long-term results.Results:Ninety-three patients (63 men, 30 women; mean age 57 years) underwent a mean of six interventions starting at a mean of 43 days after an attack of severe acute pancreatitis. After establishment of transluminal access to the necrotic cavity and subsequent endoscopic necrosectomy, initial clinical success was obtained in 80% of the patients, with a 26% complication and a 7.5% mortality rate at 30 days. After a mean follow-up period of 43 months, 84% of the initially successfully treated patients had sustained clinical improvement, with 10% receiving further endoscopic and 4% receiving surgical treatment for recurrent cavities; 16% suffered recurrent pancreatitis.Conclusions:Direct transluminal endoscopic removal of pancreatic necroses is associated with good long-term maintenance of the high initial efficacy; complications can occur, with an associated mortality of around 7.5%. Further studies are necessary in order to optimise endotherapy and define its role in relation to surgery in the clinical management of such patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><pmid>19282306</pmid><doi>10.1136/gut.2008.163733</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2009-09, Vol.58 (9), p.1260-1266
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67583400
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central
subjects Abdomen
Abscesses
Acute Disease
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Catheters
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
Cysts
Drainage
Endoscopy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Morphology
Mortality
Necrosis - surgery
Pancreas - pathology
Pancreas - surgery
Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis - mortality
Pancreatitis - pathology
Pancreatitis - surgery
Patients
Postoperative Complications - mortality
Postoperative Complications - pathology
Retrospective Studies
Stents
Success
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonic imaging
Young Adult
title Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T11%3A27%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transluminal%20endoscopic%20necrosectomy%20after%20acute%20pancreatitis:%20a%20multicentre%20study%20with%20long-term%20follow-up%20(the%20GEPARD%20Study)&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Seifert,%20H&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1260&rft.epage=1266&rft.pages=1260-1266&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft.coden=GUTTAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gut.2008.163733&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67583400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779344441&rft_id=info:pmid/19282306&rfr_iscdi=true