EMG and MMG of agonist and antagonist muscles as a function of age and joint angle

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of elbow joint position on electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) activities of agonist and antagonist muscles in young and old women. Surface EMG and MMG were recorded from the triceps and biceps brachii, and brachioradialis muscles dur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electromyography and kinesiology 2006-02, Vol.16 (1), p.89-102
Hauptverfasser: Jaskólska, Anna, Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz, Brzenczek-Owczarzak, Wioletta, Yue, Guang H., Jaskólski, Artur
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 1
container_start_page 89
container_title Journal of electromyography and kinesiology
container_volume 16
creator Jaskólska, Anna
Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz
Brzenczek-Owczarzak, Wioletta
Yue, Guang H.
Jaskólski, Artur
description The aim of this study was to determine the effect of elbow joint position on electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) activities of agonist and antagonist muscles in young and old women. Surface EMG and MMG were recorded from the triceps and biceps brachii, and brachioradialis muscles during isometric elbow extensions in young and old women. The measurements were carried out at an optimal joint angle ( A o), as well as at smaller ( A s = A o − 30°) and larger ( A l = A o + 30°) angles. The normalized to force EMG amplitude (RMS-EMG/ F) was smaller in old women compared to young in all muscles. The RMS-EMG/ F of the triceps brachii muscle was not affected by muscle length while that of the biceps brachii and brachioradialis muscles increased at shortest muscle length in both groups. The normalized to force MMG amplitude (RMS-MMG/ F) was smaller in old than in young in the triceps brachii muscle only. There was an increase in RMS-MMG/ F with triceps brachii and biceps brachii muscle shortening in both groups, and in the brachioradialis muscle – in young only. Compared to young, older women exhibited a bigger force fluctuation during maximum voluntary contraction, but these did not contribute significantly to the RMS-MMG. Skinfold thickness accounted for the RMS-EMG/ F and RMS-MMG/ F differences seen between old and young women in the biceps brachii muscle only. It is concluded that, the EMG and MMG response to muscles length change in agonist and antagonist muscles is generally similar in old and young women but the optimal angle shifts toward a bigger value in older women.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.05.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67582612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1050641105000751</els_id><sourcerecordid>67582612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-8d08e17ac515bc20bb5d43500e918db4720d4e5f87b59139105ed2e966b5234c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-BCUnb4kzSTZ_TiKlVqFFED0vye6kbEw2NZsIfnuTNuJReDCzw-_tMI-xawQPAaO70iupog9tPB-Ae6MgOGFzTOLA5THi6dADBzcKEWfswtoSAGNI4JzNMII0xTiYs9fVdu1kRjnboTaFk-0ao213GGWm-33WvZUVWScb5BS9kZ1uzJGnA1s22oyuXUWX7KzIKktXU12w98fV2_LJ3bysn5cPG1eGftq5iYKEMM4kR55LH_KcqzDgAJRiovIw9kGFxIskznmKQTocQ8qnNIpy7gehDBbs9vjvvm0-e7KdqLWVVFWZoaa3Iop54kfoDyA_grJtrG2pEPtW11n7LRDEGKYoxRSmGMMUoyAYfDfTgj6vSf25pvQG4P4I0HDml6ZWWKnJSFK6JdkJ1eh_VvwAS8uGSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67582612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EMG and MMG of agonist and antagonist muscles as a function of age and joint angle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Jaskólska, Anna ; Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz ; Brzenczek-Owczarzak, Wioletta ; Yue, Guang H. ; Jaskólski, Artur</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaskólska, Anna ; Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz ; Brzenczek-Owczarzak, Wioletta ; Yue, Guang H. ; Jaskólski, Artur</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of elbow joint position on electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) activities of agonist and antagonist muscles in young and old women. Surface EMG and MMG were recorded from the triceps and biceps brachii, and brachioradialis muscles during isometric elbow extensions in young and old women. The measurements were carried out at an optimal joint angle ( A o), as well as at smaller ( A s = A o − 30°) and larger ( A l = A o + 30°) angles. The normalized to force EMG amplitude (RMS-EMG/ F) was smaller in old women compared to young in all muscles. The RMS-EMG/ F of the triceps brachii muscle was not affected by muscle length while that of the biceps brachii and brachioradialis muscles increased at shortest muscle length in both groups. The normalized to force MMG amplitude (RMS-MMG/ F) was smaller in old than in young in the triceps brachii muscle only. There was an increase in RMS-MMG/ F with triceps brachii and biceps brachii muscle shortening in both groups, and in the brachioradialis muscle – in young only. Compared to young, older women exhibited a bigger force fluctuation during maximum voluntary contraction, but these did not contribute significantly to the RMS-MMG. Skinfold thickness accounted for the RMS-EMG/ F and RMS-MMG/ F differences seen between old and young women in the biceps brachii muscle only. It is concluded that, the EMG and MMG response to muscles length change in agonist and antagonist muscles is generally similar in old and young women but the optimal angle shifts toward a bigger value in older women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-6411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.05.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16099173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Arm ; Elbow extensor ; Elbow flexor ; Elbow Joint - physiology ; Electromyography ; Female ; Humans ; Mechanomyography ; Middle Aged ; Movement - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; MVC force fluctuation ; Myography ; Skinfold ; Skinfold Thickness</subject><ispartof>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2006-02, Vol.16 (1), p.89-102</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-8d08e17ac515bc20bb5d43500e918db4720d4e5f87b59139105ed2e966b5234c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-8d08e17ac515bc20bb5d43500e918db4720d4e5f87b59139105ed2e966b5234c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.05.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16099173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaskólska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brzenczek-Owczarzak, Wioletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Guang H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaskólski, Artur</creatorcontrib><title>EMG and MMG of agonist and antagonist muscles as a function of age and joint angle</title><title>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</title><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of elbow joint position on electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) activities of agonist and antagonist muscles in young and old women. Surface EMG and MMG were recorded from the triceps and biceps brachii, and brachioradialis muscles during isometric elbow extensions in young and old women. The measurements were carried out at an optimal joint angle ( A o), as well as at smaller ( A s = A o − 30°) and larger ( A l = A o + 30°) angles. The normalized to force EMG amplitude (RMS-EMG/ F) was smaller in old women compared to young in all muscles. The RMS-EMG/ F of the triceps brachii muscle was not affected by muscle length while that of the biceps brachii and brachioradialis muscles increased at shortest muscle length in both groups. The normalized to force MMG amplitude (RMS-MMG/ F) was smaller in old than in young in the triceps brachii muscle only. There was an increase in RMS-MMG/ F with triceps brachii and biceps brachii muscle shortening in both groups, and in the brachioradialis muscle – in young only. Compared to young, older women exhibited a bigger force fluctuation during maximum voluntary contraction, but these did not contribute significantly to the RMS-MMG. Skinfold thickness accounted for the RMS-EMG/ F and RMS-MMG/ F differences seen between old and young women in the biceps brachii muscle only. It is concluded that, the EMG and MMG response to muscles length change in agonist and antagonist muscles is generally similar in old and young women but the optimal angle shifts toward a bigger value in older women.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arm</subject><subject>Elbow extensor</subject><subject>Elbow flexor</subject><subject>Elbow Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mechanomyography</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>MVC force fluctuation</subject><subject>Myography</subject><subject>Skinfold</subject><subject>Skinfold Thickness</subject><issn>1050-6411</issn><issn>1873-5711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-BCUnb4kzSTZ_TiKlVqFFED0vye6kbEw2NZsIfnuTNuJReDCzw-_tMI-xawQPAaO70iupog9tPB-Ae6MgOGFzTOLA5THi6dADBzcKEWfswtoSAGNI4JzNMII0xTiYs9fVdu1kRjnboTaFk-0ao213GGWm-33WvZUVWScb5BS9kZ1uzJGnA1s22oyuXUWX7KzIKktXU12w98fV2_LJ3bysn5cPG1eGftq5iYKEMM4kR55LH_KcqzDgAJRiovIw9kGFxIskznmKQTocQ8qnNIpy7gehDBbs9vjvvm0-e7KdqLWVVFWZoaa3Iop54kfoDyA_grJtrG2pEPtW11n7LRDEGKYoxRSmGMMUoyAYfDfTgj6vSf25pvQG4P4I0HDml6ZWWKnJSFK6JdkJ1eh_VvwAS8uGSg</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Jaskólska, Anna</creator><creator>Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz</creator><creator>Brzenczek-Owczarzak, Wioletta</creator><creator>Yue, Guang H.</creator><creator>Jaskólski, Artur</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>EMG and MMG of agonist and antagonist muscles as a function of age and joint angle</title><author>Jaskólska, Anna ; Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz ; Brzenczek-Owczarzak, Wioletta ; Yue, Guang H. ; Jaskólski, Artur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-8d08e17ac515bc20bb5d43500e918db4720d4e5f87b59139105ed2e966b5234c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arm</topic><topic>Elbow extensor</topic><topic>Elbow flexor</topic><topic>Elbow Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mechanomyography</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>MVC force fluctuation</topic><topic>Myography</topic><topic>Skinfold</topic><topic>Skinfold Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaskólska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brzenczek-Owczarzak, Wioletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Guang H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaskólski, Artur</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaskólska, Anna</au><au>Katarzyna Kisiel-Sajewicz</au><au>Brzenczek-Owczarzak, Wioletta</au><au>Yue, Guang H.</au><au>Jaskólski, Artur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EMG and MMG of agonist and antagonist muscles as a function of age and joint angle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>89-102</pages><issn>1050-6411</issn><eissn>1873-5711</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of elbow joint position on electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) activities of agonist and antagonist muscles in young and old women. Surface EMG and MMG were recorded from the triceps and biceps brachii, and brachioradialis muscles during isometric elbow extensions in young and old women. The measurements were carried out at an optimal joint angle ( A o), as well as at smaller ( A s = A o − 30°) and larger ( A l = A o + 30°) angles. The normalized to force EMG amplitude (RMS-EMG/ F) was smaller in old women compared to young in all muscles. The RMS-EMG/ F of the triceps brachii muscle was not affected by muscle length while that of the biceps brachii and brachioradialis muscles increased at shortest muscle length in both groups. The normalized to force MMG amplitude (RMS-MMG/ F) was smaller in old than in young in the triceps brachii muscle only. There was an increase in RMS-MMG/ F with triceps brachii and biceps brachii muscle shortening in both groups, and in the brachioradialis muscle – in young only. Compared to young, older women exhibited a bigger force fluctuation during maximum voluntary contraction, but these did not contribute significantly to the RMS-MMG. Skinfold thickness accounted for the RMS-EMG/ F and RMS-MMG/ F differences seen between old and young women in the biceps brachii muscle only. It is concluded that, the EMG and MMG response to muscles length change in agonist and antagonist muscles is generally similar in old and young women but the optimal angle shifts toward a bigger value in older women.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16099173</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.05.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-6411
ispartof Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2006-02, Vol.16 (1), p.89-102
issn 1050-6411
1873-5711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67582612
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Arm
Elbow extensor
Elbow flexor
Elbow Joint - physiology
Electromyography
Female
Humans
Mechanomyography
Middle Aged
Movement - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
MVC force fluctuation
Myography
Skinfold
Skinfold Thickness
title EMG and MMG of agonist and antagonist muscles as a function of age and joint angle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T18%3A27%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EMG%20and%20MMG%20of%20agonist%20and%20antagonist%20muscles%20as%20a%20function%20of%20age%20and%20joint%20angle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electromyography%20and%20kinesiology&rft.au=Jask%C3%B3lska,%20Anna&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=89-102&rft.issn=1050-6411&rft.eissn=1873-5711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.05.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67582612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67582612&rft_id=info:pmid/16099173&rft_els_id=S1050641105000751&rfr_iscdi=true