Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2005-04, Vol.23 (10), p.2310-2317
Hauptverfasser: Stahl, Michael, Stuschke, Martin, Lehmann, Nils, Meyer, Hans-Joachim, Walz, Martin K, Seeber, Siegfried, Klump, Bodo, Budach, Wilfried, Teichmann, Reinhard, Schmitt, Marcus, Schmitt, Gerd, Franke, Claus, Wilke, Hansjochen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2317
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2310
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 23
creator Stahl, Michael
Stuschke, Martin
Lehmann, Nils
Meyer, Hans-Joachim
Walz, Martin K
Seeber, Siegfried
Klump, Bodo
Budach, Wilfried
Teichmann, Reinhard
Schmitt, Marcus
Schmitt, Gerd
Franke, Claus
Wilke, Hansjochen
description Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus were randomly allocated to either induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (40 Gy) followed by surgery (arm A), or the same induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (at least 65 Gy) without surgery (arm B). Primary outcome was overall survival time. The median observation time was 6 years. The analysis of 172 eligible, randomized patients (86 patients per arm) showed overall survival to be equivalent between the two treatment groups (log-rank test for equivalence, P < .05). Local progression-free survival was better in the surgery group (2-year progression-free survival, 64.3%; 95% CI, 52.1% to 76.5%) than in the chemoradiotherapy group (2-year progression-free survival, 40.7%; 95% CI, 28.9% to 52.5%; hazard ratio [HR] for arm B v arm A, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P = .003). Treatment-related mortality was significantly increased in the surgery group than in the chemoradiotherapy group (12.8% v 3.5%, respectively; P = .03). Cox regression analysis revealed clinical tumor response to induction chemotherapy to be the single independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P < .0001). Adding surgery to chemoradiotherapy improves local tumor control but does not increase survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. Tumor response to induction chemotherapy identifies a favorable prognostic group within these high-risk patients, regardless of the treatment group.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67567470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67567470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74fce4bc2d0963ac30a6fc72e33c28d6b81bd2645c3d73cd1159b4707f4736bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LwzAYxoMoOqdnb5KTnjrz2dSjFD8ZTFDRW0iTdI20zUxaZf-9mRt4et7D7314-AFwhtEME4SunsrFLCWfITRDlO2BCeZEZEJwvg8mSFCS4YJ-HIHjGD8Rwqyg_BAcYV4gRAmegFA2tvNBGacG53v47oYGqt78HX4c4MsYljasoevhc0JsP8QtNPdate0a3phv1Wtr4MvXqDo_RljatoWlCtr1vlPQ13BoLLyNftWo5RhPwEGt2mhPdzkFb3e3r-VDNl_cP5Y380wzzIZMsFpbVmli0HVOlaZI5bUWxFKqSWHyqsCVITnjmhpBtcGYX1dMIFEzQfPK0Cm42Paugv8abRxk56JO21Rv00yZC56L9JDAqy2og48x2FqugutUWEuM5EazTJrlRrNMd9KcPs531WPVWfPP77wm4HILNG7Z_LhgZeySrYQT-ak9oZtqQjGiv5mLhms</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67567470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology</source><creator>Stahl, Michael ; Stuschke, Martin ; Lehmann, Nils ; Meyer, Hans-Joachim ; Walz, Martin K ; Seeber, Siegfried ; Klump, Bodo ; Budach, Wilfried ; Teichmann, Reinhard ; Schmitt, Marcus ; Schmitt, Gerd ; Franke, Claus ; Wilke, Hansjochen</creator><creatorcontrib>Stahl, Michael ; Stuschke, Martin ; Lehmann, Nils ; Meyer, Hans-Joachim ; Walz, Martin K ; Seeber, Siegfried ; Klump, Bodo ; Budach, Wilfried ; Teichmann, Reinhard ; Schmitt, Marcus ; Schmitt, Gerd ; Franke, Claus ; Wilke, Hansjochen</creatorcontrib><description>Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus were randomly allocated to either induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (40 Gy) followed by surgery (arm A), or the same induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (at least 65 Gy) without surgery (arm B). Primary outcome was overall survival time. The median observation time was 6 years. The analysis of 172 eligible, randomized patients (86 patients per arm) showed overall survival to be equivalent between the two treatment groups (log-rank test for equivalence, P &lt; .05). Local progression-free survival was better in the surgery group (2-year progression-free survival, 64.3%; 95% CI, 52.1% to 76.5%) than in the chemoradiotherapy group (2-year progression-free survival, 40.7%; 95% CI, 28.9% to 52.5%; hazard ratio [HR] for arm B v arm A, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P = .003). Treatment-related mortality was significantly increased in the surgery group than in the chemoradiotherapy group (12.8% v 3.5%, respectively; P = .03). Cox regression analysis revealed clinical tumor response to induction chemotherapy to be the single independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P &lt; .0001). Adding surgery to chemoradiotherapy improves local tumor control but does not increase survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. Tumor response to induction chemotherapy identifies a favorable prognostic group within these high-risk patients, regardless of the treatment group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15800321</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration &amp; dosage ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Etoposide - administration &amp; dosage ; Female ; Fluorouracil - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Leucovorin - administration &amp; dosage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2005-04, Vol.23 (10), p.2310-2317</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74fce4bc2d0963ac30a6fc72e33c28d6b81bd2645c3d73cd1159b4707f4736bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74fce4bc2d0963ac30a6fc72e33c28d6b81bd2645c3d73cd1159b4707f4736bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15800321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stahl, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuschke, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Nils</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walz, Martin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeber, Siegfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klump, Bodo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budach, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichmann, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franke, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Hansjochen</creatorcontrib><title>Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus were randomly allocated to either induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (40 Gy) followed by surgery (arm A), or the same induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (at least 65 Gy) without surgery (arm B). Primary outcome was overall survival time. The median observation time was 6 years. The analysis of 172 eligible, randomized patients (86 patients per arm) showed overall survival to be equivalent between the two treatment groups (log-rank test for equivalence, P &lt; .05). Local progression-free survival was better in the surgery group (2-year progression-free survival, 64.3%; 95% CI, 52.1% to 76.5%) than in the chemoradiotherapy group (2-year progression-free survival, 40.7%; 95% CI, 28.9% to 52.5%; hazard ratio [HR] for arm B v arm A, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P = .003). Treatment-related mortality was significantly increased in the surgery group than in the chemoradiotherapy group (12.8% v 3.5%, respectively; P = .03). Cox regression analysis revealed clinical tumor response to induction chemotherapy to be the single independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P &lt; .0001). Adding surgery to chemoradiotherapy improves local tumor control but does not increase survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. Tumor response to induction chemotherapy identifies a favorable prognostic group within these high-risk patients, regardless of the treatment group.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Etoposide - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leucovorin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1LwzAYxoMoOqdnb5KTnjrz2dSjFD8ZTFDRW0iTdI20zUxaZf-9mRt4et7D7314-AFwhtEME4SunsrFLCWfITRDlO2BCeZEZEJwvg8mSFCS4YJ-HIHjGD8Rwqyg_BAcYV4gRAmegFA2tvNBGacG53v47oYGqt78HX4c4MsYljasoevhc0JsP8QtNPdate0a3phv1Wtr4MvXqDo_RljatoWlCtr1vlPQ13BoLLyNftWo5RhPwEGt2mhPdzkFb3e3r-VDNl_cP5Y380wzzIZMsFpbVmli0HVOlaZI5bUWxFKqSWHyqsCVITnjmhpBtcGYX1dMIFEzQfPK0Cm42Paugv8abRxk56JO21Rv00yZC56L9JDAqy2og48x2FqugutUWEuM5EazTJrlRrNMd9KcPs531WPVWfPP77wm4HILNG7Z_LhgZeySrYQT-ak9oZtqQjGiv5mLhms</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Stahl, Michael</creator><creator>Stuschke, Martin</creator><creator>Lehmann, Nils</creator><creator>Meyer, Hans-Joachim</creator><creator>Walz, Martin K</creator><creator>Seeber, Siegfried</creator><creator>Klump, Bodo</creator><creator>Budach, Wilfried</creator><creator>Teichmann, Reinhard</creator><creator>Schmitt, Marcus</creator><creator>Schmitt, Gerd</creator><creator>Franke, Claus</creator><creator>Wilke, Hansjochen</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus</title><author>Stahl, Michael ; Stuschke, Martin ; Lehmann, Nils ; Meyer, Hans-Joachim ; Walz, Martin K ; Seeber, Siegfried ; Klump, Bodo ; Budach, Wilfried ; Teichmann, Reinhard ; Schmitt, Marcus ; Schmitt, Gerd ; Franke, Claus ; Wilke, Hansjochen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74fce4bc2d0963ac30a6fc72e33c28d6b81bd2645c3d73cd1159b4707f4736bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Etoposide - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leucovorin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stahl, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuschke, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Nils</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walz, Martin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeber, Siegfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klump, Bodo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budach, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichmann, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franke, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Hansjochen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stahl, Michael</au><au>Stuschke, Martin</au><au>Lehmann, Nils</au><au>Meyer, Hans-Joachim</au><au>Walz, Martin K</au><au>Seeber, Siegfried</au><au>Klump, Bodo</au><au>Budach, Wilfried</au><au>Teichmann, Reinhard</au><au>Schmitt, Marcus</au><au>Schmitt, Gerd</au><au>Franke, Claus</au><au>Wilke, Hansjochen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2310</spage><epage>2317</epage><pages>2310-2317</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus were randomly allocated to either induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (40 Gy) followed by surgery (arm A), or the same induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (at least 65 Gy) without surgery (arm B). Primary outcome was overall survival time. The median observation time was 6 years. The analysis of 172 eligible, randomized patients (86 patients per arm) showed overall survival to be equivalent between the two treatment groups (log-rank test for equivalence, P &lt; .05). Local progression-free survival was better in the surgery group (2-year progression-free survival, 64.3%; 95% CI, 52.1% to 76.5%) than in the chemoradiotherapy group (2-year progression-free survival, 40.7%; 95% CI, 28.9% to 52.5%; hazard ratio [HR] for arm B v arm A, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P = .003). Treatment-related mortality was significantly increased in the surgery group than in the chemoradiotherapy group (12.8% v 3.5%, respectively; P = .03). Cox regression analysis revealed clinical tumor response to induction chemotherapy to be the single independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P &lt; .0001). Adding surgery to chemoradiotherapy improves local tumor control but does not increase survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. Tumor response to induction chemotherapy identifies a favorable prognostic group within these high-risk patients, regardless of the treatment group.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>15800321</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2005-04, Vol.23 (10), p.2310-2317
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67567470
source Electronic Journals Library; MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology
subjects Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery
Cisplatin - administration & dosage
Combined Modality Therapy
Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Etoposide - administration & dosage
Female
Fluorouracil - administration & dosage
Humans
Leucovorin - administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Survival Analysis
title Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A52%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemoradiation%20With%20and%20Without%20Surgery%20in%20Patients%20With%20Locally%20Advanced%20Squamous%20Cell%20Carcinoma%20of%20the%20Esophagus&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Stahl,%20Michael&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2310&rft.epage=2317&rft.pages=2310-2317&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67567470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67567470&rft_id=info:pmid/15800321&rfr_iscdi=true