Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus
Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical oncology 2005-04, Vol.23 (10), p.2310-2317 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2317 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2310 |
container_title | Journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Stahl, Michael Stuschke, Martin Lehmann, Nils Meyer, Hans-Joachim Walz, Martin K Seeber, Siegfried Klump, Bodo Budach, Wilfried Teichmann, Reinhard Schmitt, Marcus Schmitt, Gerd Franke, Claus Wilke, Hansjochen |
description | Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown.
Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus were randomly allocated to either induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (40 Gy) followed by surgery (arm A), or the same induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (at least 65 Gy) without surgery (arm B). Primary outcome was overall survival time.
The median observation time was 6 years. The analysis of 172 eligible, randomized patients (86 patients per arm) showed overall survival to be equivalent between the two treatment groups (log-rank test for equivalence, P < .05). Local progression-free survival was better in the surgery group (2-year progression-free survival, 64.3%; 95% CI, 52.1% to 76.5%) than in the chemoradiotherapy group (2-year progression-free survival, 40.7%; 95% CI, 28.9% to 52.5%; hazard ratio [HR] for arm B v arm A, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P = .003). Treatment-related mortality was significantly increased in the surgery group than in the chemoradiotherapy group (12.8% v 3.5%, respectively; P = .03). Cox regression analysis revealed clinical tumor response to induction chemotherapy to be the single independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P < .0001).
Adding surgery to chemoradiotherapy improves local tumor control but does not increase survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. Tumor response to induction chemotherapy identifies a favorable prognostic group within these high-risk patients, regardless of the treatment group. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67567470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67567470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74fce4bc2d0963ac30a6fc72e33c28d6b81bd2645c3d73cd1159b4707f4736bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LwzAYxoMoOqdnb5KTnjrz2dSjFD8ZTFDRW0iTdI20zUxaZf-9mRt4et7D7314-AFwhtEME4SunsrFLCWfITRDlO2BCeZEZEJwvg8mSFCS4YJ-HIHjGD8Rwqyg_BAcYV4gRAmegFA2tvNBGacG53v47oYGqt78HX4c4MsYljasoevhc0JsP8QtNPdate0a3phv1Wtr4MvXqDo_RljatoWlCtr1vlPQ13BoLLyNftWo5RhPwEGt2mhPdzkFb3e3r-VDNl_cP5Y380wzzIZMsFpbVmli0HVOlaZI5bUWxFKqSWHyqsCVITnjmhpBtcGYX1dMIFEzQfPK0Cm42Paugv8abRxk56JO21Rv00yZC56L9JDAqy2og48x2FqugutUWEuM5EazTJrlRrNMd9KcPs531WPVWfPP77wm4HILNG7Z_LhgZeySrYQT-ak9oZtqQjGiv5mLhms</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67567470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology</source><creator>Stahl, Michael ; Stuschke, Martin ; Lehmann, Nils ; Meyer, Hans-Joachim ; Walz, Martin K ; Seeber, Siegfried ; Klump, Bodo ; Budach, Wilfried ; Teichmann, Reinhard ; Schmitt, Marcus ; Schmitt, Gerd ; Franke, Claus ; Wilke, Hansjochen</creator><creatorcontrib>Stahl, Michael ; Stuschke, Martin ; Lehmann, Nils ; Meyer, Hans-Joachim ; Walz, Martin K ; Seeber, Siegfried ; Klump, Bodo ; Budach, Wilfried ; Teichmann, Reinhard ; Schmitt, Marcus ; Schmitt, Gerd ; Franke, Claus ; Wilke, Hansjochen</creatorcontrib><description>Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown.
Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus were randomly allocated to either induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (40 Gy) followed by surgery (arm A), or the same induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (at least 65 Gy) without surgery (arm B). Primary outcome was overall survival time.
The median observation time was 6 years. The analysis of 172 eligible, randomized patients (86 patients per arm) showed overall survival to be equivalent between the two treatment groups (log-rank test for equivalence, P < .05). Local progression-free survival was better in the surgery group (2-year progression-free survival, 64.3%; 95% CI, 52.1% to 76.5%) than in the chemoradiotherapy group (2-year progression-free survival, 40.7%; 95% CI, 28.9% to 52.5%; hazard ratio [HR] for arm B v arm A, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P = .003). Treatment-related mortality was significantly increased in the surgery group than in the chemoradiotherapy group (12.8% v 3.5%, respectively; P = .03). Cox regression analysis revealed clinical tumor response to induction chemotherapy to be the single independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P < .0001).
Adding surgery to chemoradiotherapy improves local tumor control but does not increase survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. Tumor response to induction chemotherapy identifies a favorable prognostic group within these high-risk patients, regardless of the treatment group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15800321</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Cisplatin - administration & dosage ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Etoposide - administration & dosage ; Female ; Fluorouracil - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Leucovorin - administration & dosage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2005-04, Vol.23 (10), p.2310-2317</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74fce4bc2d0963ac30a6fc72e33c28d6b81bd2645c3d73cd1159b4707f4736bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74fce4bc2d0963ac30a6fc72e33c28d6b81bd2645c3d73cd1159b4707f4736bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15800321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stahl, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuschke, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Nils</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walz, Martin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeber, Siegfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klump, Bodo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budach, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichmann, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franke, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Hansjochen</creatorcontrib><title>Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown.
Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus were randomly allocated to either induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (40 Gy) followed by surgery (arm A), or the same induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (at least 65 Gy) without surgery (arm B). Primary outcome was overall survival time.
The median observation time was 6 years. The analysis of 172 eligible, randomized patients (86 patients per arm) showed overall survival to be equivalent between the two treatment groups (log-rank test for equivalence, P < .05). Local progression-free survival was better in the surgery group (2-year progression-free survival, 64.3%; 95% CI, 52.1% to 76.5%) than in the chemoradiotherapy group (2-year progression-free survival, 40.7%; 95% CI, 28.9% to 52.5%; hazard ratio [HR] for arm B v arm A, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P = .003). Treatment-related mortality was significantly increased in the surgery group than in the chemoradiotherapy group (12.8% v 3.5%, respectively; P = .03). Cox regression analysis revealed clinical tumor response to induction chemotherapy to be the single independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P < .0001).
Adding surgery to chemoradiotherapy improves local tumor control but does not increase survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. Tumor response to induction chemotherapy identifies a favorable prognostic group within these high-risk patients, regardless of the treatment group.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Cisplatin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Etoposide - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leucovorin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1LwzAYxoMoOqdnb5KTnjrz2dSjFD8ZTFDRW0iTdI20zUxaZf-9mRt4et7D7314-AFwhtEME4SunsrFLCWfITRDlO2BCeZEZEJwvg8mSFCS4YJ-HIHjGD8Rwqyg_BAcYV4gRAmegFA2tvNBGacG53v47oYGqt78HX4c4MsYljasoevhc0JsP8QtNPdate0a3phv1Wtr4MvXqDo_RljatoWlCtr1vlPQ13BoLLyNftWo5RhPwEGt2mhPdzkFb3e3r-VDNl_cP5Y380wzzIZMsFpbVmli0HVOlaZI5bUWxFKqSWHyqsCVITnjmhpBtcGYX1dMIFEzQfPK0Cm42Paugv8abRxk56JO21Rv00yZC56L9JDAqy2og48x2FqugutUWEuM5EazTJrlRrNMd9KcPs531WPVWfPP77wm4HILNG7Z_LhgZeySrYQT-ak9oZtqQjGiv5mLhms</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Stahl, Michael</creator><creator>Stuschke, Martin</creator><creator>Lehmann, Nils</creator><creator>Meyer, Hans-Joachim</creator><creator>Walz, Martin K</creator><creator>Seeber, Siegfried</creator><creator>Klump, Bodo</creator><creator>Budach, Wilfried</creator><creator>Teichmann, Reinhard</creator><creator>Schmitt, Marcus</creator><creator>Schmitt, Gerd</creator><creator>Franke, Claus</creator><creator>Wilke, Hansjochen</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus</title><author>Stahl, Michael ; Stuschke, Martin ; Lehmann, Nils ; Meyer, Hans-Joachim ; Walz, Martin K ; Seeber, Siegfried ; Klump, Bodo ; Budach, Wilfried ; Teichmann, Reinhard ; Schmitt, Marcus ; Schmitt, Gerd ; Franke, Claus ; Wilke, Hansjochen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74fce4bc2d0963ac30a6fc72e33c28d6b81bd2645c3d73cd1159b4707f4736bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Cisplatin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Etoposide - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leucovorin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stahl, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuschke, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Nils</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walz, Martin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeber, Siegfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klump, Bodo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budach, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teichmann, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franke, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Hansjochen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stahl, Michael</au><au>Stuschke, Martin</au><au>Lehmann, Nils</au><au>Meyer, Hans-Joachim</au><au>Walz, Martin K</au><au>Seeber, Siegfried</au><au>Klump, Bodo</au><au>Budach, Wilfried</au><au>Teichmann, Reinhard</au><au>Schmitt, Marcus</au><au>Schmitt, Gerd</au><au>Franke, Claus</au><au>Wilke, Hansjochen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2310</spage><epage>2317</epage><pages>2310-2317</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Combined chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery are widely accepted alternatives for the curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. The value of adding surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unknown.
Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus were randomly allocated to either induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (40 Gy) followed by surgery (arm A), or the same induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (at least 65 Gy) without surgery (arm B). Primary outcome was overall survival time.
The median observation time was 6 years. The analysis of 172 eligible, randomized patients (86 patients per arm) showed overall survival to be equivalent between the two treatment groups (log-rank test for equivalence, P < .05). Local progression-free survival was better in the surgery group (2-year progression-free survival, 64.3%; 95% CI, 52.1% to 76.5%) than in the chemoradiotherapy group (2-year progression-free survival, 40.7%; 95% CI, 28.9% to 52.5%; hazard ratio [HR] for arm B v arm A, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P = .003). Treatment-related mortality was significantly increased in the surgery group than in the chemoradiotherapy group (12.8% v 3.5%, respectively; P = .03). Cox regression analysis revealed clinical tumor response to induction chemotherapy to be the single independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P < .0001).
Adding surgery to chemoradiotherapy improves local tumor control but does not increase survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. Tumor response to induction chemotherapy identifies a favorable prognostic group within these high-risk patients, regardless of the treatment group.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>15800321</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0732-183X |
ispartof | Journal of clinical oncology, 2005-04, Vol.23 (10), p.2310-2317 |
issn | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67567470 |
source | Electronic Journals Library; MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology |
subjects | Adult Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery Cisplatin - administration & dosage Combined Modality Therapy Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery Etoposide - administration & dosage Female Fluorouracil - administration & dosage Humans Leucovorin - administration & dosage Male Middle Aged Neoadjuvant Therapy Survival Analysis |
title | Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A52%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemoradiation%20With%20and%20Without%20Surgery%20in%20Patients%20With%20Locally%20Advanced%20Squamous%20Cell%20Carcinoma%20of%20the%20Esophagus&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Stahl,%20Michael&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2310&rft.epage=2317&rft.pages=2310-2317&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67567470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67567470&rft_id=info:pmid/15800321&rfr_iscdi=true |