In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods
Bracket debonding strength related to diverse debonding methods and enamel demage has not been assessed in vivo. The study hypothetized a direct relationship between these three parameters. Debonding strength was measured clinically in the wings method and base method on 50 patients in a split mouth...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2005-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1107-1113 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1113 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1107 |
| container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Brosh, Tamar Kaufman, Assaf Balabanovsky, Alex Vardimon, Alexander D. |
| description | Bracket debonding strength related to diverse debonding methods and enamel demage has not been assessed in vivo. The study hypothetized a direct relationship between these three parameters. Debonding strength was measured clinically in the wings method and base method on 50 patients in a split mouth method using a calibrated debonding plier. Brackets from 30 of these patients were scanned in SEM and EDAX for adhesive remnant index and enamel calcium remnants. Base method debonding force was significantly greater than wings method (163.5±68.7N, 106.1±66.2N, respectively, p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.025 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67565817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929004002647</els_id><sourcerecordid>17326157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9e8d7c68b837b12db33bfdc4b2f12b50ef2f23a12d9d2f35860daee1ff1d89e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModq3-hRIQvJsxH5vJ5E4pVguFUtDrkI-T3Qw7SU1mV_z3zbIrije9Cpw87zmc8yB0RUlPCR0-Tv1kY57BbXtGyLonoidMvEArOkreMT6Sl2hFCKOdYopcoDe1ToQQuZbqNbqgQiopFFuhh9uED_GQsQebk49pg-tSIG2WLTbJY0hmhh32ZjYbwDHh5VfGuSzb7HNaovsnN8OxWt-iV8HsKrw7v5fox82X79ffurv7r7fXn-86t2Zi6RSMXrphtCOXljJvObfBu7VlgTIrCAQWGDftR3kWuBgH4g0ADYH6UYHil-jDqe9jyT_3UBc9x-pgtzMJ8r7qQYpBjFQ-CzaEDe0iDXz_HzjlfUltCU0JF5QKylijhhPlSq61QNCPJc6m_G6QPrrRk_7jRh_daCJ0c9OCV-f2ezuD_xs7y2jApxMA7WyHCEVXFyE58LGAW7TP8bkZTyvMo4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035115122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brosh, Tamar ; Kaufman, Assaf ; Balabanovsky, Alex ; Vardimon, Alexander D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brosh, Tamar ; Kaufman, Assaf ; Balabanovsky, Alex ; Vardimon, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><description>Bracket debonding strength related to diverse debonding methods and enamel demage has not been assessed in vivo. The study hypothetized a direct relationship between these three parameters. Debonding strength was measured clinically in the wings method and base method on 50 patients in a split mouth method using a calibrated debonding plier. Brackets from 30 of these patients were scanned in SEM and EDAX for adhesive remnant index and enamel calcium remnants. Base method debonding force was significantly greater than wings method (163.5±68.7N, 106.1±66.2N, respectively, p<0.001). A positive adhesive remnant index score was found in both methods (68.7%, 66.7%, respectively). Debonding strength vs. adhesive remnant index or calcium index scores were not correlated. However, the latter two were significantly correlated (0.524<R<0.895, p<0.031). Half of the debonding failures developed at the adhesive enamel interface. The results warnts the potential of enamel damage during debonding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15797592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adhesiveness ; Adolescent ; ARI ; Brackets ; Cementation - methods ; Debonding force ; Debonding strength ; Dental Debonding - adverse effects ; Dental Debonding - methods ; Dental Enamel - injuries ; Dental Enamel - pathology ; Dental Enamel - physiopathology ; Enamel damage ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Stress, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2005-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1107-1113</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9e8d7c68b837b12db33bfdc4b2f12b50ef2f23a12d9d2f35860daee1ff1d89e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9e8d7c68b837b12db33bfdc4b2f12b50ef2f23a12d9d2f35860daee1ff1d89e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929004002647$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15797592$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brosh, Tamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Assaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balabanovsky, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vardimon, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Bracket debonding strength related to diverse debonding methods and enamel demage has not been assessed in vivo. The study hypothetized a direct relationship between these three parameters. Debonding strength was measured clinically in the wings method and base method on 50 patients in a split mouth method using a calibrated debonding plier. Brackets from 30 of these patients were scanned in SEM and EDAX for adhesive remnant index and enamel calcium remnants. Base method debonding force was significantly greater than wings method (163.5±68.7N, 106.1±66.2N, respectively, p<0.001). A positive adhesive remnant index score was found in both methods (68.7%, 66.7%, respectively). Debonding strength vs. adhesive remnant index or calcium index scores were not correlated. However, the latter two were significantly correlated (0.524<R<0.895, p<0.031). Half of the debonding failures developed at the adhesive enamel interface. The results warnts the potential of enamel damage during debonding.</description><subject>Adhesiveness</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>ARI</subject><subject>Brackets</subject><subject>Cementation - methods</subject><subject>Debonding force</subject><subject>Debonding strength</subject><subject>Dental Debonding - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dental Debonding - methods</subject><subject>Dental Enamel - injuries</subject><subject>Dental Enamel - pathology</subject><subject>Dental Enamel - physiopathology</subject><subject>Enamel damage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliances, Removable</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModq3-hRIQvJsxH5vJ5E4pVguFUtDrkI-T3Qw7SU1mV_z3zbIrije9Cpw87zmc8yB0RUlPCR0-Tv1kY57BbXtGyLonoidMvEArOkreMT6Sl2hFCKOdYopcoDe1ToQQuZbqNbqgQiopFFuhh9uED_GQsQebk49pg-tSIG2WLTbJY0hmhh32ZjYbwDHh5VfGuSzb7HNaovsnN8OxWt-iV8HsKrw7v5fox82X79ffurv7r7fXn-86t2Zi6RSMXrphtCOXljJvObfBu7VlgTIrCAQWGDftR3kWuBgH4g0ADYH6UYHil-jDqe9jyT_3UBc9x-pgtzMJ8r7qQYpBjFQ-CzaEDe0iDXz_HzjlfUltCU0JF5QKylijhhPlSq61QNCPJc6m_G6QPrrRk_7jRh_daCJ0c9OCV-f2ezuD_xs7y2jApxMA7WyHCEVXFyE58LGAW7TP8bkZTyvMo4s</recordid><startdate>200505</startdate><enddate>200505</enddate><creator>Brosh, Tamar</creator><creator>Kaufman, Assaf</creator><creator>Balabanovsky, Alex</creator><creator>Vardimon, Alexander D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200505</creationdate><title>In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods</title><author>Brosh, Tamar ; Kaufman, Assaf ; Balabanovsky, Alex ; Vardimon, Alexander D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9e8d7c68b837b12db33bfdc4b2f12b50ef2f23a12d9d2f35860daee1ff1d89e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adhesiveness</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>ARI</topic><topic>Brackets</topic><topic>Cementation - methods</topic><topic>Debonding force</topic><topic>Debonding strength</topic><topic>Dental Debonding - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dental Debonding - methods</topic><topic>Dental Enamel - injuries</topic><topic>Dental Enamel - pathology</topic><topic>Dental Enamel - physiopathology</topic><topic>Enamel damage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliances, Removable</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brosh, Tamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Assaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balabanovsky, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vardimon, Alexander D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brosh, Tamar</au><au>Kaufman, Assaf</au><au>Balabanovsky, Alex</au><au>Vardimon, Alexander D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2005-05</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1107</spage><epage>1113</epage><pages>1107-1113</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Bracket debonding strength related to diverse debonding methods and enamel demage has not been assessed in vivo. The study hypothetized a direct relationship between these three parameters. Debonding strength was measured clinically in the wings method and base method on 50 patients in a split mouth method using a calibrated debonding plier. Brackets from 30 of these patients were scanned in SEM and EDAX for adhesive remnant index and enamel calcium remnants. Base method debonding force was significantly greater than wings method (163.5±68.7N, 106.1±66.2N, respectively, p<0.001). A positive adhesive remnant index score was found in both methods (68.7%, 66.7%, respectively). Debonding strength vs. adhesive remnant index or calcium index scores were not correlated. However, the latter two were significantly correlated (0.524<R<0.895, p<0.031). Half of the debonding failures developed at the adhesive enamel interface. The results warnts the potential of enamel damage during debonding.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15797592</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.025</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
| ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2005-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1107-1113 |
| issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67565817 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adhesiveness Adolescent ARI Brackets Cementation - methods Debonding force Debonding strength Dental Debonding - adverse effects Dental Debonding - methods Dental Enamel - injuries Dental Enamel - pathology Dental Enamel - physiopathology Enamel damage Female Humans Male Orthodontic Appliances, Removable Orthodontic Brackets Stress, Mechanical |
| title | In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A44%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20debonding%20strength%20and%20enamel%20damage%20in%20two%20orthodontic%20debonding%20methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Brosh,%20Tamar&rft.date=2005-05&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1107&rft.epage=1113&rft.pages=1107-1113&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17326157%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035115122&rft_id=info:pmid/15797592&rft_els_id=S0021929004002647&rfr_iscdi=true |