Evaluation of a new automated, enzymatic inulin assay using d-fructose dehydrogenase

Background Inulin clearance (Cin) is widely considered to be a gold-standard assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Although inulin concentrations are commonly determined by the anthrone method, this method has several disadvantages, including a hazardous heating procedure using a strong ac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental nephrology 2009-08, Vol.13 (4), p.341-349
Hauptverfasser: Kimata, Shinsuke, Mizuguchi, Katsuhiko, Hattori, Shizuo, Teshima, Shinichi, Orita, Yoshimasa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 349
container_issue 4
container_start_page 341
container_title Clinical and experimental nephrology
container_volume 13
creator Kimata, Shinsuke
Mizuguchi, Katsuhiko
Hattori, Shizuo
Teshima, Shinichi
Orita, Yoshimasa
description Background Inulin clearance (Cin) is widely considered to be a gold-standard assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Although inulin concentrations are commonly determined by the anthrone method, this method has several disadvantages, including a hazardous heating procedure using a strong acid, as well as a nonspecific reaction and being influenced by other saccharides such as glucose. Method Here, we report the development of a new automated, enzymatic inulin assay. This method uses d -fructose dehydrogenase (EC1.1.99.11), which does not require NAD or NADP as the electron acceptor, and utilizes oxygen transfer from hydrogen peroxide to an electron acceptor in a sensitive chromophoric system. This method allows rapid and accurate determination of inulin concentrations, and takes only 15 min on automated analyzers. We evaluated this new assay and compared it with the anthrone method. Results The detection limit value and linearity of the new method were 5 mg/l and up to 300 mg/l, respectively. The within-run precision coefficient of variations (CVs) for serum and for urine were 2.05 ± 0.79% (mean ± SEM; n  = 3) and 0.92 ± 0.24%, respectively, and the between-run precision CVs for serum and for urine were 1.91 ± 0.72% and 1.86 ± 0.17%, respectively. No influence of glucose was observed with the new method, while a positive influence of 38.7% was observed with the anthrone method. However, neither method was influenced by fructose (3.0 mg/l in serum or 30 mg/l in urine). The analytical recovery rates of inulin were 97.8 ± 0.7% (mean ± SEM; n  = 6) in serum and 99.0 ± 0.4% in urine using the enzymatic method. We compared results for the enzymatic method and the anthrone method using 46 serum samples and 46 urine samples. Bland–Altman plots showed no significant difference between the two methods for the serum samples. However, inulin recovery in the urine samples measured by the enzymatic method was about 5% higher than that obtained by the anthrone method. Conclusion The new enzymatic assay offers a more convenient and more accurate measurement of inulin and may be suitable for routine procedures by automated analyzers in clinical laboratories.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10157-009-0174-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67559074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67559074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-2f717a0dda351a17aa50a4fa43718cb7f07fa62b992f8bac430d3427f22cce6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1rXCEUhqU05GOSH9BNkS66isnxer2OyxLSpjDQTbKWM35Mb7ijqV4bJr--hhkIFLLyBZ_z6nkI-cThigOo68KBS8UANAOuejZ8IKe8F4oppfXHlkXfMa4kPyFnpTwCwFJLfUxOuBaDVNCfkvvbvzhVnMcUaQoUafTPFOuctjh7d0l9fNm1OFo6xjqNkWIpuKO1jHFDHQu52jkVT53_vXM5bXzE4s_JUcCp-IvDuSAP32_vb-7Y6tePnzffVszKXsysC4orBOdQSI4togTsA7YN-NKuVQAVcOjWWndhuUbbC3BtIxW6zlo_OLEgX_e9Tzn9qb7MZjsW66cJo0-1mEFJqUH1DfzyH_iYao7tb6bjSy6FEKpBfA_ZnErJPpinPG4x7wwH8-rb7H2b5tu8-jZDm_l8KK7rrXdvEwfBDej2QGlXcePz28vvt_4DsheLUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218153337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a new automated, enzymatic inulin assay using d-fructose dehydrogenase</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Kimata, Shinsuke ; Mizuguchi, Katsuhiko ; Hattori, Shizuo ; Teshima, Shinichi ; Orita, Yoshimasa</creator><creatorcontrib>Kimata, Shinsuke ; Mizuguchi, Katsuhiko ; Hattori, Shizuo ; Teshima, Shinichi ; Orita, Yoshimasa</creatorcontrib><description>Background Inulin clearance (Cin) is widely considered to be a gold-standard assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Although inulin concentrations are commonly determined by the anthrone method, this method has several disadvantages, including a hazardous heating procedure using a strong acid, as well as a nonspecific reaction and being influenced by other saccharides such as glucose. Method Here, we report the development of a new automated, enzymatic inulin assay. This method uses d -fructose dehydrogenase (EC1.1.99.11), which does not require NAD or NADP as the electron acceptor, and utilizes oxygen transfer from hydrogen peroxide to an electron acceptor in a sensitive chromophoric system. This method allows rapid and accurate determination of inulin concentrations, and takes only 15 min on automated analyzers. We evaluated this new assay and compared it with the anthrone method. Results The detection limit value and linearity of the new method were 5 mg/l and up to 300 mg/l, respectively. The within-run precision coefficient of variations (CVs) for serum and for urine were 2.05 ± 0.79% (mean ± SEM; n  = 3) and 0.92 ± 0.24%, respectively, and the between-run precision CVs for serum and for urine were 1.91 ± 0.72% and 1.86 ± 0.17%, respectively. No influence of glucose was observed with the new method, while a positive influence of 38.7% was observed with the anthrone method. However, neither method was influenced by fructose (3.0 mg/l in serum or 30 mg/l in urine). The analytical recovery rates of inulin were 97.8 ± 0.7% (mean ± SEM; n  = 6) in serum and 99.0 ± 0.4% in urine using the enzymatic method. We compared results for the enzymatic method and the anthrone method using 46 serum samples and 46 urine samples. Bland–Altman plots showed no significant difference between the two methods for the serum samples. However, inulin recovery in the urine samples measured by the enzymatic method was about 5% higher than that obtained by the anthrone method. Conclusion The new enzymatic assay offers a more convenient and more accurate measurement of inulin and may be suitable for routine procedures by automated analyzers in clinical laboratories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1342-1751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-7799</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10157-009-0174-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19365704</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CENPFV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Anthracenes - chemistry ; Autoanalysis ; Biological Assay - standards ; Blood Glucose - metabolism ; Calibration ; Carbohydrate Dehydrogenases - metabolism ; Fructose - blood ; Fructose - urine ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous ; Inulin - administration &amp; dosage ; Inulin - blood ; Inulin - urine ; Kidney - metabolism ; Kidney - physiology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nephrology ; Original Article ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spectrophotometry ; Time Factors ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2009-08, Vol.13 (4), p.341-349</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society of Nephrology 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-2f717a0dda351a17aa50a4fa43718cb7f07fa62b992f8bac430d3427f22cce6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-2f717a0dda351a17aa50a4fa43718cb7f07fa62b992f8bac430d3427f22cce6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10157-009-0174-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10157-009-0174-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19365704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kimata, Shinsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizuguchi, Katsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Shizuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teshima, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orita, Yoshimasa</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a new automated, enzymatic inulin assay using d-fructose dehydrogenase</title><title>Clinical and experimental nephrology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Nephrol</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Nephrol</addtitle><description>Background Inulin clearance (Cin) is widely considered to be a gold-standard assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Although inulin concentrations are commonly determined by the anthrone method, this method has several disadvantages, including a hazardous heating procedure using a strong acid, as well as a nonspecific reaction and being influenced by other saccharides such as glucose. Method Here, we report the development of a new automated, enzymatic inulin assay. This method uses d -fructose dehydrogenase (EC1.1.99.11), which does not require NAD or NADP as the electron acceptor, and utilizes oxygen transfer from hydrogen peroxide to an electron acceptor in a sensitive chromophoric system. This method allows rapid and accurate determination of inulin concentrations, and takes only 15 min on automated analyzers. We evaluated this new assay and compared it with the anthrone method. Results The detection limit value and linearity of the new method were 5 mg/l and up to 300 mg/l, respectively. The within-run precision coefficient of variations (CVs) for serum and for urine were 2.05 ± 0.79% (mean ± SEM; n  = 3) and 0.92 ± 0.24%, respectively, and the between-run precision CVs for serum and for urine were 1.91 ± 0.72% and 1.86 ± 0.17%, respectively. No influence of glucose was observed with the new method, while a positive influence of 38.7% was observed with the anthrone method. However, neither method was influenced by fructose (3.0 mg/l in serum or 30 mg/l in urine). The analytical recovery rates of inulin were 97.8 ± 0.7% (mean ± SEM; n  = 6) in serum and 99.0 ± 0.4% in urine using the enzymatic method. We compared results for the enzymatic method and the anthrone method using 46 serum samples and 46 urine samples. Bland–Altman plots showed no significant difference between the two methods for the serum samples. However, inulin recovery in the urine samples measured by the enzymatic method was about 5% higher than that obtained by the anthrone method. Conclusion The new enzymatic assay offers a more convenient and more accurate measurement of inulin and may be suitable for routine procedures by automated analyzers in clinical laboratories.</description><subject>Anthracenes - chemistry</subject><subject>Autoanalysis</subject><subject>Biological Assay - standards</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - metabolism</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Carbohydrate Dehydrogenases - metabolism</subject><subject>Fructose - blood</subject><subject>Fructose - urine</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Inulin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Inulin - blood</subject><subject>Inulin - urine</subject><subject>Kidney - metabolism</subject><subject>Kidney - physiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1342-1751</issn><issn>1437-7799</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1rXCEUhqU05GOSH9BNkS66isnxer2OyxLSpjDQTbKWM35Mb7ijqV4bJr--hhkIFLLyBZ_z6nkI-cThigOo68KBS8UANAOuejZ8IKe8F4oppfXHlkXfMa4kPyFnpTwCwFJLfUxOuBaDVNCfkvvbvzhVnMcUaQoUafTPFOuctjh7d0l9fNm1OFo6xjqNkWIpuKO1jHFDHQu52jkVT53_vXM5bXzE4s_JUcCp-IvDuSAP32_vb-7Y6tePnzffVszKXsysC4orBOdQSI4togTsA7YN-NKuVQAVcOjWWndhuUbbC3BtIxW6zlo_OLEgX_e9Tzn9qb7MZjsW66cJo0-1mEFJqUH1DfzyH_iYao7tb6bjSy6FEKpBfA_ZnErJPpinPG4x7wwH8-rb7H2b5tu8-jZDm_l8KK7rrXdvEwfBDej2QGlXcePz28vvt_4DsheLUw</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Kimata, Shinsuke</creator><creator>Mizuguchi, Katsuhiko</creator><creator>Hattori, Shizuo</creator><creator>Teshima, Shinichi</creator><creator>Orita, Yoshimasa</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a new automated, enzymatic inulin assay using d-fructose dehydrogenase</title><author>Kimata, Shinsuke ; Mizuguchi, Katsuhiko ; Hattori, Shizuo ; Teshima, Shinichi ; Orita, Yoshimasa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-2f717a0dda351a17aa50a4fa43718cb7f07fa62b992f8bac430d3427f22cce6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Anthracenes - chemistry</topic><topic>Autoanalysis</topic><topic>Biological Assay - standards</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - metabolism</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Carbohydrate Dehydrogenases - metabolism</topic><topic>Fructose - blood</topic><topic>Fructose - urine</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Inulin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Inulin - blood</topic><topic>Inulin - urine</topic><topic>Kidney - metabolism</topic><topic>Kidney - physiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kimata, Shinsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizuguchi, Katsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Shizuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teshima, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orita, Yoshimasa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kimata, Shinsuke</au><au>Mizuguchi, Katsuhiko</au><au>Hattori, Shizuo</au><au>Teshima, Shinichi</au><au>Orita, Yoshimasa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a new automated, enzymatic inulin assay using d-fructose dehydrogenase</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental nephrology</jtitle><stitle>Clin Exp Nephrol</stitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Nephrol</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>341-349</pages><issn>1342-1751</issn><eissn>1437-7799</eissn><coden>CENPFV</coden><abstract>Background Inulin clearance (Cin) is widely considered to be a gold-standard assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Although inulin concentrations are commonly determined by the anthrone method, this method has several disadvantages, including a hazardous heating procedure using a strong acid, as well as a nonspecific reaction and being influenced by other saccharides such as glucose. Method Here, we report the development of a new automated, enzymatic inulin assay. This method uses d -fructose dehydrogenase (EC1.1.99.11), which does not require NAD or NADP as the electron acceptor, and utilizes oxygen transfer from hydrogen peroxide to an electron acceptor in a sensitive chromophoric system. This method allows rapid and accurate determination of inulin concentrations, and takes only 15 min on automated analyzers. We evaluated this new assay and compared it with the anthrone method. Results The detection limit value and linearity of the new method were 5 mg/l and up to 300 mg/l, respectively. The within-run precision coefficient of variations (CVs) for serum and for urine were 2.05 ± 0.79% (mean ± SEM; n  = 3) and 0.92 ± 0.24%, respectively, and the between-run precision CVs for serum and for urine were 1.91 ± 0.72% and 1.86 ± 0.17%, respectively. No influence of glucose was observed with the new method, while a positive influence of 38.7% was observed with the anthrone method. However, neither method was influenced by fructose (3.0 mg/l in serum or 30 mg/l in urine). The analytical recovery rates of inulin were 97.8 ± 0.7% (mean ± SEM; n  = 6) in serum and 99.0 ± 0.4% in urine using the enzymatic method. We compared results for the enzymatic method and the anthrone method using 46 serum samples and 46 urine samples. Bland–Altman plots showed no significant difference between the two methods for the serum samples. However, inulin recovery in the urine samples measured by the enzymatic method was about 5% higher than that obtained by the anthrone method. Conclusion The new enzymatic assay offers a more convenient and more accurate measurement of inulin and may be suitable for routine procedures by automated analyzers in clinical laboratories.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>19365704</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10157-009-0174-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1342-1751
ispartof Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2009-08, Vol.13 (4), p.341-349
issn 1342-1751
1437-7799
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67559074
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Anthracenes - chemistry
Autoanalysis
Biological Assay - standards
Blood Glucose - metabolism
Calibration
Carbohydrate Dehydrogenases - metabolism
Fructose - blood
Fructose - urine
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Injections, Intravenous
Inulin - administration & dosage
Inulin - blood
Inulin - urine
Kidney - metabolism
Kidney - physiology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nephrology
Original Article
Reproducibility of Results
Spectrophotometry
Time Factors
Urology
title Evaluation of a new automated, enzymatic inulin assay using d-fructose dehydrogenase
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T14%3A34%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20new%20automated,%20enzymatic%20inulin%20assay%20using%20d-fructose%20dehydrogenase&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20nephrology&rft.au=Kimata,%20Shinsuke&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=341-349&rft.issn=1342-1751&rft.eissn=1437-7799&rft.coden=CENPFV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10157-009-0174-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67559074%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218153337&rft_id=info:pmid/19365704&rfr_iscdi=true