Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”
Humans routinely complete partly occluded objects to recognize the whole objects. However, a number of studies using geometrical figures and even conspecific images have shown that pigeons fail to do so. In the present study, we tested whether pigeons complete partially occluded objects in a situati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioural processes 2005-04, Vol.69 (1), p.67-78 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 78 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Behavioural processes |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Ushitani, Tomokazu Fujita, Kazuo |
description | Humans routinely complete partly occluded objects to recognize the whole objects. However, a number of studies using geometrical figures and even conspecific images have shown that pigeons fail to do so. In the present study, we tested whether pigeons complete partially occluded objects in a situation simulating a natural feeding context. In Experiment 1, we trained pigeons to peck at any photograph of food and not to peck at any containing a non-food object. At test, we presented both photos of food partly occluded by pigeon's feather and photos simply truncated at the same part. We predicted that if the pigeons perceptually completed the occluded portion, then they would discriminate the photos of occluded food better than the truncated photos. The result was that the pigeons pecked at the truncated photos earlier than the occluded photos. Placing the occluder next to all of the stimuli in Experiment 2 or substituting indented lozenge for the feather in Experiment 3 did not affect the results. Thus, even in a simulated ecologically significant situation, pigeons continued to not show evidence of perceptual completion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67555638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635705000197</els_id><sourcerecordid>17869356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-fbe9980420e6ea20d74096e975b3ddf5071f31c1f22bb6218f8ac9919fab554b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EosvCGyDkC9wS7Dh2HA5IqKKAVAkOcLYce9zNyomD7RT11gehL9cnwcuu1BucLFvfzPyeD6GXlNSUUPF2Xw-wxGDqhhBeE1oT0jxCGyq7ppKMyMdoQ1gnKsF4d4aepbQnhFBJxFN0RnnXc9LRDfr1bbyCMCdsA55DxgtEA0tetfc32IRp8ZABLzrmcg_G-NWCxcsu5JBwcNiFYN9hPWMwwYer0WiP9VJyabPDOeC8A3x_-3v5OwWX98HDdH979xw9cdoneHE6t-jHxcfv55-ry6-fvpx_uKxM29BcuQH6XpK2ISBAN8R2LekF9B0fmLXu8AfHqKGuaYZBNFQ6qU3f097pgfN2YFv05ti3jP65QspqGpMB7_UMYU1KdJxzweR_QdpJ0bOCblF7BE0MKUVwaonjpOONokQdzKi9OppRBzOKUFXMlLJXp_7rMIF9KDqpKMDrE6BT2aKLejZjeuCEkIzRQ9D3Rw7K2q5HiCqZEWYDdoxgsrJh_HeSPxFlsVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17869356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ushitani, Tomokazu ; Fujita, Kazuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ushitani, Tomokazu ; Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><description>Humans routinely complete partly occluded objects to recognize the whole objects. However, a number of studies using geometrical figures and even conspecific images have shown that pigeons fail to do so. In the present study, we tested whether pigeons complete partially occluded objects in a situation simulating a natural feeding context. In Experiment 1, we trained pigeons to peck at any photograph of food and not to peck at any containing a non-food object. At test, we presented both photos of food partly occluded by pigeon's feather and photos simply truncated at the same part. We predicted that if the pigeons perceptually completed the occluded portion, then they would discriminate the photos of occluded food better than the truncated photos. The result was that the pigeons pecked at the truncated photos earlier than the occluded photos. Placing the occluder next to all of the stimuli in Experiment 2 or substituting indented lozenge for the feather in Experiment 3 did not affect the results. Thus, even in a simulated ecologically significant situation, pigeons continued to not show evidence of perceptual completion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15795071</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BPRODA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Amodal completion ; Animal ethology ; Animals ; Appetitive Behavior ; Attention ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Columbidae ; Conditioning, Operant ; Discrimination Learning ; Ecological validity ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Female ; Food ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perceptual Closure ; Perceptual completion ; Perceptual Masking ; Pigeon perception ; Pigeons ; Priority of response ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Vertebrata ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2005-04, Vol.69 (1), p.67-78</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-fbe9980420e6ea20d74096e975b3ddf5071f31c1f22bb6218f8ac9919fab554b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-fbe9980420e6ea20d74096e975b3ddf5071f31c1f22bb6218f8ac9919fab554b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3548,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16683318$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15795071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ushitani, Tomokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><title>Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>Humans routinely complete partly occluded objects to recognize the whole objects. However, a number of studies using geometrical figures and even conspecific images have shown that pigeons fail to do so. In the present study, we tested whether pigeons complete partially occluded objects in a situation simulating a natural feeding context. In Experiment 1, we trained pigeons to peck at any photograph of food and not to peck at any containing a non-food object. At test, we presented both photos of food partly occluded by pigeon's feather and photos simply truncated at the same part. We predicted that if the pigeons perceptually completed the occluded portion, then they would discriminate the photos of occluded food better than the truncated photos. The result was that the pigeons pecked at the truncated photos earlier than the occluded photos. Placing the occluder next to all of the stimuli in Experiment 2 or substituting indented lozenge for the feather in Experiment 3 did not affect the results. Thus, even in a simulated ecologically significant situation, pigeons continued to not show evidence of perceptual completion.</description><subject>Amodal completion</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Columbidae</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Ecological validity</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perceptual Closure</subject><subject>Perceptual completion</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Pigeon perception</subject><subject>Pigeons</subject><subject>Priority of response</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EosvCGyDkC9wS7Dh2HA5IqKKAVAkOcLYce9zNyomD7RT11gehL9cnwcuu1BucLFvfzPyeD6GXlNSUUPF2Xw-wxGDqhhBeE1oT0jxCGyq7ppKMyMdoQ1gnKsF4d4aepbQnhFBJxFN0RnnXc9LRDfr1bbyCMCdsA55DxgtEA0tetfc32IRp8ZABLzrmcg_G-NWCxcsu5JBwcNiFYN9hPWMwwYer0WiP9VJyabPDOeC8A3x_-3v5OwWX98HDdH979xw9cdoneHE6t-jHxcfv55-ry6-fvpx_uKxM29BcuQH6XpK2ISBAN8R2LekF9B0fmLXu8AfHqKGuaYZBNFQ6qU3f097pgfN2YFv05ti3jP65QspqGpMB7_UMYU1KdJxzweR_QdpJ0bOCblF7BE0MKUVwaonjpOONokQdzKi9OppRBzOKUFXMlLJXp_7rMIF9KDqpKMDrE6BT2aKLejZjeuCEkIzRQ9D3Rw7K2q5HiCqZEWYDdoxgsrJh_HeSPxFlsVw</recordid><startdate>20050429</startdate><enddate>20050429</enddate><creator>Ushitani, Tomokazu</creator><creator>Fujita, Kazuo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050429</creationdate><title>Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”</title><author>Ushitani, Tomokazu ; Fujita, Kazuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-fbe9980420e6ea20d74096e975b3ddf5071f31c1f22bb6218f8ac9919fab554b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Amodal completion</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Columbidae</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Ecological validity</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perceptual Closure</topic><topic>Perceptual completion</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Pigeon perception</topic><topic>Pigeons</topic><topic>Priority of response</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ushitani, Tomokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ushitani, Tomokazu</au><au>Fujita, Kazuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2005-04-29</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>67-78</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><coden>BPRODA</coden><abstract>Humans routinely complete partly occluded objects to recognize the whole objects. However, a number of studies using geometrical figures and even conspecific images have shown that pigeons fail to do so. In the present study, we tested whether pigeons complete partially occluded objects in a situation simulating a natural feeding context. In Experiment 1, we trained pigeons to peck at any photograph of food and not to peck at any containing a non-food object. At test, we presented both photos of food partly occluded by pigeon's feather and photos simply truncated at the same part. We predicted that if the pigeons perceptually completed the occluded portion, then they would discriminate the photos of occluded food better than the truncated photos. The result was that the pigeons pecked at the truncated photos earlier than the occluded photos. Placing the occluder next to all of the stimuli in Experiment 2 or substituting indented lozenge for the feather in Experiment 3 did not affect the results. Thus, even in a simulated ecologically significant situation, pigeons continued to not show evidence of perceptual completion.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15795071</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.002</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-6357 |
ispartof | Behavioural processes, 2005-04, Vol.69 (1), p.67-78 |
issn | 0376-6357 1872-8308 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67555638 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Amodal completion Animal ethology Animals Appetitive Behavior Attention Aves Biological and medical sciences Columbidae Conditioning, Operant Discrimination Learning Ecological validity Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision Female Food Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Male Pattern Recognition, Visual Perceptual Closure Perceptual completion Perceptual Masking Pigeon perception Pigeons Priority of response Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Vertebrata Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem” |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A09%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pigeons%20do%20not%20perceptually%20complete%20partly%20occluded%20photos%20of%20food:%20an%20ecological%20approach%20to%20the%20%E2%80%9Cpigeon%20problem%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=Ushitani,%20Tomokazu&rft.date=2005-04-29&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=67-78&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft.coden=BPRODA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17869356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17869356&rft_id=info:pmid/15795071&rft_els_id=S0376635705000197&rfr_iscdi=true |