Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”

Humans routinely complete partly occluded objects to recognize the whole objects. However, a number of studies using geometrical figures and even conspecific images have shown that pigeons fail to do so. In the present study, we tested whether pigeons complete partially occluded objects in a situati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural processes 2005-04, Vol.69 (1), p.67-78
Hauptverfasser: Ushitani, Tomokazu, Fujita, Kazuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 78
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
container_title Behavioural processes
container_volume 69
creator Ushitani, Tomokazu
Fujita, Kazuo
description Humans routinely complete partly occluded objects to recognize the whole objects. However, a number of studies using geometrical figures and even conspecific images have shown that pigeons fail to do so. In the present study, we tested whether pigeons complete partially occluded objects in a situation simulating a natural feeding context. In Experiment 1, we trained pigeons to peck at any photograph of food and not to peck at any containing a non-food object. At test, we presented both photos of food partly occluded by pigeon's feather and photos simply truncated at the same part. We predicted that if the pigeons perceptually completed the occluded portion, then they would discriminate the photos of occluded food better than the truncated photos. The result was that the pigeons pecked at the truncated photos earlier than the occluded photos. Placing the occluder next to all of the stimuli in Experiment 2 or substituting indented lozenge for the feather in Experiment 3 did not affect the results. Thus, even in a simulated ecologically significant situation, pigeons continued to not show evidence of perceptual completion.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67555638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635705000197</els_id><sourcerecordid>17869356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-fbe9980420e6ea20d74096e975b3ddf5071f31c1f22bb6218f8ac9919fab554b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EosvCGyDkC9wS7Dh2HA5IqKKAVAkOcLYce9zNyomD7RT11gehL9cnwcuu1BucLFvfzPyeD6GXlNSUUPF2Xw-wxGDqhhBeE1oT0jxCGyq7ppKMyMdoQ1gnKsF4d4aepbQnhFBJxFN0RnnXc9LRDfr1bbyCMCdsA55DxgtEA0tetfc32IRp8ZABLzrmcg_G-NWCxcsu5JBwcNiFYN9hPWMwwYer0WiP9VJyabPDOeC8A3x_-3v5OwWX98HDdH979xw9cdoneHE6t-jHxcfv55-ry6-fvpx_uKxM29BcuQH6XpK2ISBAN8R2LekF9B0fmLXu8AfHqKGuaYZBNFQ6qU3f097pgfN2YFv05ti3jP65QspqGpMB7_UMYU1KdJxzweR_QdpJ0bOCblF7BE0MKUVwaonjpOONokQdzKi9OppRBzOKUFXMlLJXp_7rMIF9KDqpKMDrE6BT2aKLejZjeuCEkIzRQ9D3Rw7K2q5HiCqZEWYDdoxgsrJh_HeSPxFlsVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17869356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ushitani, Tomokazu ; Fujita, Kazuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ushitani, Tomokazu ; Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><description>Humans routinely complete partly occluded objects to recognize the whole objects. However, a number of studies using geometrical figures and even conspecific images have shown that pigeons fail to do so. In the present study, we tested whether pigeons complete partially occluded objects in a situation simulating a natural feeding context. In Experiment 1, we trained pigeons to peck at any photograph of food and not to peck at any containing a non-food object. At test, we presented both photos of food partly occluded by pigeon's feather and photos simply truncated at the same part. We predicted that if the pigeons perceptually completed the occluded portion, then they would discriminate the photos of occluded food better than the truncated photos. The result was that the pigeons pecked at the truncated photos earlier than the occluded photos. Placing the occluder next to all of the stimuli in Experiment 2 or substituting indented lozenge for the feather in Experiment 3 did not affect the results. Thus, even in a simulated ecologically significant situation, pigeons continued to not show evidence of perceptual completion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15795071</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BPRODA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Amodal completion ; Animal ethology ; Animals ; Appetitive Behavior ; Attention ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Columbidae ; Conditioning, Operant ; Discrimination Learning ; Ecological validity ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Female ; Food ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perceptual Closure ; Perceptual completion ; Perceptual Masking ; Pigeon perception ; Pigeons ; Priority of response ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Vertebrata ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2005-04, Vol.69 (1), p.67-78</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-fbe9980420e6ea20d74096e975b3ddf5071f31c1f22bb6218f8ac9919fab554b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-fbe9980420e6ea20d74096e975b3ddf5071f31c1f22bb6218f8ac9919fab554b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3548,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16683318$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15795071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ushitani, Tomokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><title>Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>Humans routinely complete partly occluded objects to recognize the whole objects. However, a number of studies using geometrical figures and even conspecific images have shown that pigeons fail to do so. In the present study, we tested whether pigeons complete partially occluded objects in a situation simulating a natural feeding context. In Experiment 1, we trained pigeons to peck at any photograph of food and not to peck at any containing a non-food object. At test, we presented both photos of food partly occluded by pigeon's feather and photos simply truncated at the same part. We predicted that if the pigeons perceptually completed the occluded portion, then they would discriminate the photos of occluded food better than the truncated photos. The result was that the pigeons pecked at the truncated photos earlier than the occluded photos. Placing the occluder next to all of the stimuli in Experiment 2 or substituting indented lozenge for the feather in Experiment 3 did not affect the results. Thus, even in a simulated ecologically significant situation, pigeons continued to not show evidence of perceptual completion.</description><subject>Amodal completion</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Columbidae</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Ecological validity</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perceptual Closure</subject><subject>Perceptual completion</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Pigeon perception</subject><subject>Pigeons</subject><subject>Priority of response</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EosvCGyDkC9wS7Dh2HA5IqKKAVAkOcLYce9zNyomD7RT11gehL9cnwcuu1BucLFvfzPyeD6GXlNSUUPF2Xw-wxGDqhhBeE1oT0jxCGyq7ppKMyMdoQ1gnKsF4d4aepbQnhFBJxFN0RnnXc9LRDfr1bbyCMCdsA55DxgtEA0tetfc32IRp8ZABLzrmcg_G-NWCxcsu5JBwcNiFYN9hPWMwwYer0WiP9VJyabPDOeC8A3x_-3v5OwWX98HDdH979xw9cdoneHE6t-jHxcfv55-ry6-fvpx_uKxM29BcuQH6XpK2ISBAN8R2LekF9B0fmLXu8AfHqKGuaYZBNFQ6qU3f097pgfN2YFv05ti3jP65QspqGpMB7_UMYU1KdJxzweR_QdpJ0bOCblF7BE0MKUVwaonjpOONokQdzKi9OppRBzOKUFXMlLJXp_7rMIF9KDqpKMDrE6BT2aKLejZjeuCEkIzRQ9D3Rw7K2q5HiCqZEWYDdoxgsrJh_HeSPxFlsVw</recordid><startdate>20050429</startdate><enddate>20050429</enddate><creator>Ushitani, Tomokazu</creator><creator>Fujita, Kazuo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050429</creationdate><title>Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”</title><author>Ushitani, Tomokazu ; Fujita, Kazuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-fbe9980420e6ea20d74096e975b3ddf5071f31c1f22bb6218f8ac9919fab554b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Amodal completion</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Columbidae</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Ecological validity</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perceptual Closure</topic><topic>Perceptual completion</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Pigeon perception</topic><topic>Pigeons</topic><topic>Priority of response</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ushitani, Tomokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ushitani, Tomokazu</au><au>Fujita, Kazuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2005-04-29</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>67-78</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><coden>BPRODA</coden><abstract>Humans routinely complete partly occluded objects to recognize the whole objects. However, a number of studies using geometrical figures and even conspecific images have shown that pigeons fail to do so. In the present study, we tested whether pigeons complete partially occluded objects in a situation simulating a natural feeding context. In Experiment 1, we trained pigeons to peck at any photograph of food and not to peck at any containing a non-food object. At test, we presented both photos of food partly occluded by pigeon's feather and photos simply truncated at the same part. We predicted that if the pigeons perceptually completed the occluded portion, then they would discriminate the photos of occluded food better than the truncated photos. The result was that the pigeons pecked at the truncated photos earlier than the occluded photos. Placing the occluder next to all of the stimuli in Experiment 2 or substituting indented lozenge for the feather in Experiment 3 did not affect the results. Thus, even in a simulated ecologically significant situation, pigeons continued to not show evidence of perceptual completion.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15795071</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.002</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-6357
ispartof Behavioural processes, 2005-04, Vol.69 (1), p.67-78
issn 0376-6357
1872-8308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67555638
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Amodal completion
Animal ethology
Animals
Appetitive Behavior
Attention
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Columbidae
Conditioning, Operant
Discrimination Learning
Ecological validity
Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision
Female
Food
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Male
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Perceptual Closure
Perceptual completion
Perceptual Masking
Pigeon perception
Pigeons
Priority of response
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Vertebrata
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Pigeons do not perceptually complete partly occluded photos of food: an ecological approach to the “pigeon problem”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A09%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pigeons%20do%20not%20perceptually%20complete%20partly%20occluded%20photos%20of%20food:%20an%20ecological%20approach%20to%20the%20%E2%80%9Cpigeon%20problem%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=Ushitani,%20Tomokazu&rft.date=2005-04-29&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=67-78&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft.coden=BPRODA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17869356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17869356&rft_id=info:pmid/15795071&rft_els_id=S0376635705000197&rfr_iscdi=true