Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation

We tested the hypothesis that AH Plus and Roeko Seal Automix (RSA) sealers alone are no less effective in preventing coronal microleakage than gutta-percha compacted with sealer. Freshly prepared sheep incisor root canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha alone, AHPlus or RSA alone, or warm gutt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2005-04, Vol.31 (4), p.280-282
Hauptverfasser: Martin Whitworth, John, Baco, Lina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 282
container_issue 4
container_start_page 280
container_title Journal of endodontics
container_volume 31
creator Martin Whitworth, John
Baco, Lina
description We tested the hypothesis that AH Plus and Roeko Seal Automix (RSA) sealers alone are no less effective in preventing coronal microleakage than gutta-percha compacted with sealer. Freshly prepared sheep incisor root canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha alone, AHPlus or RSA alone, or warm gutta-percha with AH Plus or RSA ( n = 20 each group). Coronal leakage was assessed under vacuum conditions with Indian ink and tooth clearing. Sealer-only backfills with AH Plus and RSA yielded significantly more dye-free canals than backfills of gutta-percha alone or with sealer (p < 0.001). Warm gutta-percha with or without sealer kept no more canals sealer free than the positive control. Mean dye penetration was 0.92% of canal length for AH Plus and RSA backfills, 27.42% for gutta-percha only backfills, 26.47% for gutta-percha with RSA and 13.92% for gutta-percha with AH Plus. Sealer only backfills allowed significantly less leakage than those including warm gutta-percha (p < 0.001). Sealer-only backfills may be a viable alternative to traditional gutta-percha and sealer compaction methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.don.0000155229.80400.fa
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67555611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099239905601550</els_id><sourcerecordid>67555611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-b9f4b7047c7e2a03f38f93dc0456cbb0c4f357ce2277d088c90fe0740ea7ed303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtOxDAQRS0EguXxCyiioEsYx_Y6pkGwPKWVKHi0luOMkcEbg51F4u8J7Eq0TDPNuXc0h5AjChUFJU-AVl3sKxiHClHXqmqAA1TObJAJbWRTMiH4JpkAKFXWTKkdspvz64hLxuQ22aFCKsYaPiFns5hib0IxR_NmXrCIrnhAEzCV9334Ki6MfXM-hNPivC_u-uLZDykWV58mLM3gY79PtpwJGQ_We488XV89zm7L-f3N3ex8Xlou2VC2yvFWApdWYm2AOdY4xToLXExt24Lljglpsa6l7KBprAKHIDmgkdgxYHvkeNX7nuLHEvOgFz5bDMH0GJdZT6UQYkrpCJ6uQJtizgmdfk9-YdKXpqB_9GmgetSn__TpX33amTF8uL6ybBfY_UXXvkbgcgXg-Ounx6Sz9dhb7HxCO4zF_j93vgF57YGr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67555611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Martin Whitworth, John ; Baco, Lina</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin Whitworth, John ; Baco, Lina</creatorcontrib><description>We tested the hypothesis that AH Plus and Roeko Seal Automix (RSA) sealers alone are no less effective in preventing coronal microleakage than gutta-percha compacted with sealer. Freshly prepared sheep incisor root canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha alone, AHPlus or RSA alone, or warm gutta-percha with AH Plus or RSA ( n = 20 each group). Coronal leakage was assessed under vacuum conditions with Indian ink and tooth clearing. Sealer-only backfills with AH Plus and RSA yielded significantly more dye-free canals than backfills of gutta-percha alone or with sealer (p &lt; 0.001). Warm gutta-percha with or without sealer kept no more canals sealer free than the positive control. Mean dye penetration was 0.92% of canal length for AH Plus and RSA backfills, 27.42% for gutta-percha only backfills, 26.47% for gutta-percha with RSA and 13.92% for gutta-percha with AH Plus. Sealer only backfills allowed significantly less leakage than those including warm gutta-percha (p &lt; 0.001). Sealer-only backfills may be a viable alternative to traditional gutta-percha and sealer compaction methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.don.0000155229.80400.fa</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15793384</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>AHPlus ; Animals ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Coronal leakage ; Dental Cements ; Dental Leakage - prevention &amp; control ; Dentistry ; Epoxy Resins ; Gutta-Percha ; Random Allocation ; Roekoseal ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Root Canal Obturation - methods ; sealer backfill ; Sheep ; Sheep, Domestic ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Tooth Crown</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2005-04, Vol.31 (4), p.280-282</ispartof><rights>2005 The American Association of Endodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-b9f4b7047c7e2a03f38f93dc0456cbb0c4f357ce2277d088c90fe0740ea7ed303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-b9f4b7047c7e2a03f38f93dc0456cbb0c4f357ce2277d088c90fe0740ea7ed303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000155229.80400.fa$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15793384$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin Whitworth, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baco, Lina</creatorcontrib><title>Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>We tested the hypothesis that AH Plus and Roeko Seal Automix (RSA) sealers alone are no less effective in preventing coronal microleakage than gutta-percha compacted with sealer. Freshly prepared sheep incisor root canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha alone, AHPlus or RSA alone, or warm gutta-percha with AH Plus or RSA ( n = 20 each group). Coronal leakage was assessed under vacuum conditions with Indian ink and tooth clearing. Sealer-only backfills with AH Plus and RSA yielded significantly more dye-free canals than backfills of gutta-percha alone or with sealer (p &lt; 0.001). Warm gutta-percha with or without sealer kept no more canals sealer free than the positive control. Mean dye penetration was 0.92% of canal length for AH Plus and RSA backfills, 27.42% for gutta-percha only backfills, 26.47% for gutta-percha with RSA and 13.92% for gutta-percha with AH Plus. Sealer only backfills allowed significantly less leakage than those including warm gutta-percha (p &lt; 0.001). Sealer-only backfills may be a viable alternative to traditional gutta-percha and sealer compaction methods.</description><subject>AHPlus</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Coronal leakage</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dental Leakage - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Epoxy Resins</subject><subject>Gutta-Percha</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Roekoseal</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials</subject><subject>Root Canal Obturation - methods</subject><subject>sealer backfill</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep, Domestic</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Tooth Crown</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkLtOxDAQRS0EguXxCyiioEsYx_Y6pkGwPKWVKHi0luOMkcEbg51F4u8J7Eq0TDPNuXc0h5AjChUFJU-AVl3sKxiHClHXqmqAA1TObJAJbWRTMiH4JpkAKFXWTKkdspvz64hLxuQ22aFCKsYaPiFns5hib0IxR_NmXrCIrnhAEzCV9334Ki6MfXM-hNPivC_u-uLZDykWV58mLM3gY79PtpwJGQ_We488XV89zm7L-f3N3ex8Xlou2VC2yvFWApdWYm2AOdY4xToLXExt24Lljglpsa6l7KBprAKHIDmgkdgxYHvkeNX7nuLHEvOgFz5bDMH0GJdZT6UQYkrpCJ6uQJtizgmdfk9-YdKXpqB_9GmgetSn__TpX33amTF8uL6ybBfY_UXXvkbgcgXg-Ounx6Sz9dhb7HxCO4zF_j93vgF57YGr</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Martin Whitworth, John</creator><creator>Baco, Lina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation</title><author>Martin Whitworth, John ; Baco, Lina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-b9f4b7047c7e2a03f38f93dc0456cbb0c4f357ce2277d088c90fe0740ea7ed303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>AHPlus</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Coronal leakage</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dental Leakage - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Epoxy Resins</topic><topic>Gutta-Percha</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Roekoseal</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials</topic><topic>Root Canal Obturation - methods</topic><topic>sealer backfill</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep, Domestic</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Tooth Crown</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin Whitworth, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baco, Lina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin Whitworth, John</au><au>Baco, Lina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>280-282</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>We tested the hypothesis that AH Plus and Roeko Seal Automix (RSA) sealers alone are no less effective in preventing coronal microleakage than gutta-percha compacted with sealer. Freshly prepared sheep incisor root canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha alone, AHPlus or RSA alone, or warm gutta-percha with AH Plus or RSA ( n = 20 each group). Coronal leakage was assessed under vacuum conditions with Indian ink and tooth clearing. Sealer-only backfills with AH Plus and RSA yielded significantly more dye-free canals than backfills of gutta-percha alone or with sealer (p &lt; 0.001). Warm gutta-percha with or without sealer kept no more canals sealer free than the positive control. Mean dye penetration was 0.92% of canal length for AH Plus and RSA backfills, 27.42% for gutta-percha only backfills, 26.47% for gutta-percha with RSA and 13.92% for gutta-percha with AH Plus. Sealer only backfills allowed significantly less leakage than those including warm gutta-percha (p &lt; 0.001). Sealer-only backfills may be a viable alternative to traditional gutta-percha and sealer compaction methods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15793384</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.don.0000155229.80400.fa</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-2399
ispartof Journal of endodontics, 2005-04, Vol.31 (4), p.280-282
issn 0099-2399
1878-3554
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67555611
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects AHPlus
Animals
Chi-Square Distribution
Coronal leakage
Dental Cements
Dental Leakage - prevention & control
Dentistry
Epoxy Resins
Gutta-Percha
Random Allocation
Roekoseal
Root Canal Filling Materials
Root Canal Obturation - methods
sealer backfill
Sheep
Sheep, Domestic
Statistics, Nonparametric
Tooth Crown
title Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A49%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coronal%20Leakage%20of%20Sealer-Only%20Backfill:%20An%20In%20Vitro%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Martin%20Whitworth,%20John&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=280-282&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.don.0000155229.80400.fa&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67555611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67555611&rft_id=info:pmid/15793384&rft_els_id=S0099239905601550&rfr_iscdi=true