Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation
We tested the hypothesis that AH Plus and Roeko Seal Automix (RSA) sealers alone are no less effective in preventing coronal microleakage than gutta-percha compacted with sealer. Freshly prepared sheep incisor root canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha alone, AHPlus or RSA alone, or warm gutt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 2005-04, Vol.31 (4), p.280-282 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 282 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 280 |
container_title | Journal of endodontics |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Martin Whitworth, John Baco, Lina |
description | We tested the hypothesis that AH Plus and Roeko Seal Automix (RSA) sealers alone are no less effective in preventing coronal microleakage than gutta-percha compacted with sealer. Freshly prepared sheep incisor root canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha alone, AHPlus or RSA alone, or warm gutta-percha with AH Plus or RSA (
n = 20 each group). Coronal leakage was assessed under vacuum conditions with Indian ink and tooth clearing. Sealer-only backfills with AH Plus and RSA yielded significantly more dye-free canals than backfills of gutta-percha alone or with sealer (p < 0.001). Warm gutta-percha with or without sealer kept no more canals sealer free than the positive control. Mean dye penetration was 0.92% of canal length for AH Plus and RSA backfills, 27.42% for gutta-percha only backfills, 26.47% for gutta-percha with RSA and 13.92% for gutta-percha with AH Plus. Sealer only backfills allowed significantly less leakage than those including warm gutta-percha (p < 0.001). Sealer-only backfills may be a viable alternative to traditional gutta-percha and sealer compaction methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.don.0000155229.80400.fa |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67555611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099239905601550</els_id><sourcerecordid>67555611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-b9f4b7047c7e2a03f38f93dc0456cbb0c4f357ce2277d088c90fe0740ea7ed303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtOxDAQRS0EguXxCyiioEsYx_Y6pkGwPKWVKHi0luOMkcEbg51F4u8J7Eq0TDPNuXc0h5AjChUFJU-AVl3sKxiHClHXqmqAA1TObJAJbWRTMiH4JpkAKFXWTKkdspvz64hLxuQ22aFCKsYaPiFns5hib0IxR_NmXrCIrnhAEzCV9334Ki6MfXM-hNPivC_u-uLZDykWV58mLM3gY79PtpwJGQ_We488XV89zm7L-f3N3ex8Xlou2VC2yvFWApdWYm2AOdY4xToLXExt24Lljglpsa6l7KBprAKHIDmgkdgxYHvkeNX7nuLHEvOgFz5bDMH0GJdZT6UQYkrpCJ6uQJtizgmdfk9-YdKXpqB_9GmgetSn__TpX33amTF8uL6ybBfY_UXXvkbgcgXg-Ounx6Sz9dhb7HxCO4zF_j93vgF57YGr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67555611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Martin Whitworth, John ; Baco, Lina</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin Whitworth, John ; Baco, Lina</creatorcontrib><description>We tested the hypothesis that AH Plus and Roeko Seal Automix (RSA) sealers alone are no less effective in preventing coronal microleakage than gutta-percha compacted with sealer. Freshly prepared sheep incisor root canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha alone, AHPlus or RSA alone, or warm gutta-percha with AH Plus or RSA (
n = 20 each group). Coronal leakage was assessed under vacuum conditions with Indian ink and tooth clearing. Sealer-only backfills with AH Plus and RSA yielded significantly more dye-free canals than backfills of gutta-percha alone or with sealer (p < 0.001). Warm gutta-percha with or without sealer kept no more canals sealer free than the positive control. Mean dye penetration was 0.92% of canal length for AH Plus and RSA backfills, 27.42% for gutta-percha only backfills, 26.47% for gutta-percha with RSA and 13.92% for gutta-percha with AH Plus. Sealer only backfills allowed significantly less leakage than those including warm gutta-percha (p < 0.001). Sealer-only backfills may be a viable alternative to traditional gutta-percha and sealer compaction methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.don.0000155229.80400.fa</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15793384</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>AHPlus ; Animals ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Coronal leakage ; Dental Cements ; Dental Leakage - prevention & control ; Dentistry ; Epoxy Resins ; Gutta-Percha ; Random Allocation ; Roekoseal ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Root Canal Obturation - methods ; sealer backfill ; Sheep ; Sheep, Domestic ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Tooth Crown</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2005-04, Vol.31 (4), p.280-282</ispartof><rights>2005 The American Association of Endodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-b9f4b7047c7e2a03f38f93dc0456cbb0c4f357ce2277d088c90fe0740ea7ed303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-b9f4b7047c7e2a03f38f93dc0456cbb0c4f357ce2277d088c90fe0740ea7ed303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000155229.80400.fa$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15793384$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin Whitworth, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baco, Lina</creatorcontrib><title>Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>We tested the hypothesis that AH Plus and Roeko Seal Automix (RSA) sealers alone are no less effective in preventing coronal microleakage than gutta-percha compacted with sealer. Freshly prepared sheep incisor root canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha alone, AHPlus or RSA alone, or warm gutta-percha with AH Plus or RSA (
n = 20 each group). Coronal leakage was assessed under vacuum conditions with Indian ink and tooth clearing. Sealer-only backfills with AH Plus and RSA yielded significantly more dye-free canals than backfills of gutta-percha alone or with sealer (p < 0.001). Warm gutta-percha with or without sealer kept no more canals sealer free than the positive control. Mean dye penetration was 0.92% of canal length for AH Plus and RSA backfills, 27.42% for gutta-percha only backfills, 26.47% for gutta-percha with RSA and 13.92% for gutta-percha with AH Plus. Sealer only backfills allowed significantly less leakage than those including warm gutta-percha (p < 0.001). Sealer-only backfills may be a viable alternative to traditional gutta-percha and sealer compaction methods.</description><subject>AHPlus</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Coronal leakage</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dental Leakage - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Epoxy Resins</subject><subject>Gutta-Percha</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Roekoseal</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials</subject><subject>Root Canal Obturation - methods</subject><subject>sealer backfill</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep, Domestic</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Tooth Crown</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkLtOxDAQRS0EguXxCyiioEsYx_Y6pkGwPKWVKHi0luOMkcEbg51F4u8J7Eq0TDPNuXc0h5AjChUFJU-AVl3sKxiHClHXqmqAA1TObJAJbWRTMiH4JpkAKFXWTKkdspvz64hLxuQ22aFCKsYaPiFns5hib0IxR_NmXrCIrnhAEzCV9334Ki6MfXM-hNPivC_u-uLZDykWV58mLM3gY79PtpwJGQ_We488XV89zm7L-f3N3ex8Xlou2VC2yvFWApdWYm2AOdY4xToLXExt24Lljglpsa6l7KBprAKHIDmgkdgxYHvkeNX7nuLHEvOgFz5bDMH0GJdZT6UQYkrpCJ6uQJtizgmdfk9-YdKXpqB_9GmgetSn__TpX33amTF8uL6ybBfY_UXXvkbgcgXg-Ounx6Sz9dhb7HxCO4zF_j93vgF57YGr</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Martin Whitworth, John</creator><creator>Baco, Lina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation</title><author>Martin Whitworth, John ; Baco, Lina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-b9f4b7047c7e2a03f38f93dc0456cbb0c4f357ce2277d088c90fe0740ea7ed303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>AHPlus</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Coronal leakage</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dental Leakage - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Epoxy Resins</topic><topic>Gutta-Percha</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Roekoseal</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials</topic><topic>Root Canal Obturation - methods</topic><topic>sealer backfill</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep, Domestic</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Tooth Crown</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin Whitworth, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baco, Lina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin Whitworth, John</au><au>Baco, Lina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>280-282</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>We tested the hypothesis that AH Plus and Roeko Seal Automix (RSA) sealers alone are no less effective in preventing coronal microleakage than gutta-percha compacted with sealer. Freshly prepared sheep incisor root canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha alone, AHPlus or RSA alone, or warm gutta-percha with AH Plus or RSA (
n = 20 each group). Coronal leakage was assessed under vacuum conditions with Indian ink and tooth clearing. Sealer-only backfills with AH Plus and RSA yielded significantly more dye-free canals than backfills of gutta-percha alone or with sealer (p < 0.001). Warm gutta-percha with or without sealer kept no more canals sealer free than the positive control. Mean dye penetration was 0.92% of canal length for AH Plus and RSA backfills, 27.42% for gutta-percha only backfills, 26.47% for gutta-percha with RSA and 13.92% for gutta-percha with AH Plus. Sealer only backfills allowed significantly less leakage than those including warm gutta-percha (p < 0.001). Sealer-only backfills may be a viable alternative to traditional gutta-percha and sealer compaction methods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15793384</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.don.0000155229.80400.fa</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0099-2399 |
ispartof | Journal of endodontics, 2005-04, Vol.31 (4), p.280-282 |
issn | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67555611 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | AHPlus Animals Chi-Square Distribution Coronal leakage Dental Cements Dental Leakage - prevention & control Dentistry Epoxy Resins Gutta-Percha Random Allocation Roekoseal Root Canal Filling Materials Root Canal Obturation - methods sealer backfill Sheep Sheep, Domestic Statistics, Nonparametric Tooth Crown |
title | Coronal Leakage of Sealer-Only Backfill: An In Vitro Evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A49%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coronal%20Leakage%20of%20Sealer-Only%20Backfill:%20An%20In%20Vitro%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Martin%20Whitworth,%20John&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=280-282&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.don.0000155229.80400.fa&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67555611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67555611&rft_id=info:pmid/15793384&rft_els_id=S0099239905601550&rfr_iscdi=true |