Trends in Clinic Visits and Diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections After the Introduction of a Copayment in a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic

Background: To meet their sexually transmitted infection (STI) control mission, STI clinics most often offer services at no or minimal cost to clients. However, there is little knowledge about the effects of charging service fees on clinic attendance and STI identification. As a result of budget sho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexually transmitted diseases 2005-04, Vol.32 (4), p.243-246
Hauptverfasser: RIETMEIJER, CORNELIS A., ALFONSI, GRACE A., DOUGLAS, JOHN M., LLOYD, LAURA V., RICHARDSON, DOUGLAS B., JUDSON, FRANKLYN N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 246
container_issue 4
container_start_page 243
container_title Sexually transmitted diseases
container_volume 32
creator RIETMEIJER, CORNELIS A.
ALFONSI, GRACE A.
DOUGLAS, JOHN M.
LLOYD, LAURA V.
RICHARDSON, DOUGLAS B.
JUDSON, FRANKLYN N.
description Background: To meet their sexually transmitted infection (STI) control mission, STI clinics most often offer services at no or minimal cost to clients. However, there is little knowledge about the effects of charging service fees on clinic attendance and STI identification. As a result of budget shortfalls, a clinic fee of $15 for Denver residents (up to $65 for nonresidents) was introduced in the Denver Metro Health (STI) Clinic (DMHC) in December 2002. We evaluated the effects of the fee on clinic utilization and diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) infections. Methods: Using the DMHC computerized medical record system, we compared clinic visits and CT/GC diagnoses between the first 3 quarters of 2002 and 2003. We also compared CT/GC cases reported by DMHC with those reported by other Denver providers during 2002 and 2003. Results: Compared with 2002, there were 3250 fewer visits (-28.5%) to DMHC in 2003 with no variance across quarters. CT diagnoses declined by 427 cases (-28.1%), disproportionately affecting women (-40%) and those under 20 (-42%). In addition, there were 332 fewer GC diagnoses (-38.1%) with no clear demographic preponderance. Although there were some decreases in non-DMHC CT/GC reports, the ratio of DMHC to non-DMHC reports declined from 0.42 to 0.33 (-21.4%) for CT and from 0.94 to 0.61 (-35.1%) for GC. Conclusions: Even a modest fee for service appears to have a major impact on the use of STI clinic services and may result in a significant effect on the ability to diagnose CT/GC infections, especially among those at highest risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.olq.0000149851.97269.91
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67552378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44969482</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44969482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-143d5acc1d21775d2e8619fa983aaace403d2ce3358611a1b8672bfb11d3fd8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQhlcIREPhEUBWD9wSPPbu2uZWBQqVKjgQuFqTtbdxtGuntldqHos3rNNErcQFXyz9880_Y_9VdQF0AVSJTxQWYbhb0HKgVrKBhRKsVQsFL6oZNFzM64bBy2pWynLeCBBn1ZuUtgdcUnhdnUEjpFSsnlV_V9F6k4jzZDk47zryxyWXE0FvyBeHtz4ka8hyM-C4Nw5JjthtwojZHZkf1qVkY6ncBh9i3ASLllz73nbZBZ_IZZ9tJHlzEHMMZnrUSegJkmXY4X60Ph_mI_ll7ycchj1ZRfRpdDmX0U9WpwXfVq96HJJ9d7rPq99XX1fL7_Obn9-ul5c3866uVZ5DzU2DXQeGgRCNYVa2oHpUkiNiZ2vKDess503RAWEtW8HW_RrA8N5I5OfVx6PvLoa7yaasR5c6OwzobZiSbkXTMC7kf0EQtaKU0wJe_ANuwxR9eYRmrFi1TB2gz0eoiyGlaHu9i27EuNdA9SF-TUGX-PVz_Poxfq2gNH84TZjWozXPrae8C_D-CGxTDvGpXn6sVbVk_AE2FblV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222376290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in Clinic Visits and Diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections After the Introduction of a Copayment in a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>RIETMEIJER, CORNELIS A. ; ALFONSI, GRACE A. ; DOUGLAS, JOHN M. ; LLOYD, LAURA V. ; RICHARDSON, DOUGLAS B. ; JUDSON, FRANKLYN N.</creator><creatorcontrib>RIETMEIJER, CORNELIS A. ; ALFONSI, GRACE A. ; DOUGLAS, JOHN M. ; LLOYD, LAURA V. ; RICHARDSON, DOUGLAS B. ; JUDSON, FRANKLYN N.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: To meet their sexually transmitted infection (STI) control mission, STI clinics most often offer services at no or minimal cost to clients. However, there is little knowledge about the effects of charging service fees on clinic attendance and STI identification. As a result of budget shortfalls, a clinic fee of $15 for Denver residents (up to $65 for nonresidents) was introduced in the Denver Metro Health (STI) Clinic (DMHC) in December 2002. We evaluated the effects of the fee on clinic utilization and diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) infections. Methods: Using the DMHC computerized medical record system, we compared clinic visits and CT/GC diagnoses between the first 3 quarters of 2002 and 2003. We also compared CT/GC cases reported by DMHC with those reported by other Denver providers during 2002 and 2003. Results: Compared with 2002, there were 3250 fewer visits (-28.5%) to DMHC in 2003 with no variance across quarters. CT diagnoses declined by 427 cases (-28.1%), disproportionately affecting women (-40%) and those under 20 (-42%). In addition, there were 332 fewer GC diagnoses (-38.1%) with no clear demographic preponderance. Although there were some decreases in non-DMHC CT/GC reports, the ratio of DMHC to non-DMHC reports declined from 0.42 to 0.33 (-21.4%) for CT and from 0.94 to 0.61 (-35.1%) for GC. Conclusions: Even a modest fee for service appears to have a major impact on the use of STI clinic services and may result in a significant effect on the ability to diagnose CT/GC infections, especially among those at highest risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-5717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-4521</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000149851.97269.91</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15788924</identifier><identifier>CODEN: STRDDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Ambulatory Care Facilities - economics ; Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics & numerical data ; Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology ; Chlamydia Infections - etiology ; Chlamydia Infections - prevention & control ; Chlamydia trachomatis ; Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation & purification ; Colorado - epidemiology ; Fees & charges ; Fees, Medical ; Female ; Gonorrhea - epidemiology ; Gonorrhea - etiology ; Gonorrhea - prevention & control ; Health services utilization ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neisseria gonorrhoeae ; Neisseria gonorrhoeae - isolation & purification ; Office Visits - economics ; Office Visits - statistics & numerical data ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - etiology ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - prevention & control ; STD ; Trends ; Utilization Review]]></subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted diseases, 2005-04, Vol.32 (4), p.243-246</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-143d5acc1d21775d2e8619fa983aaace403d2ce3358611a1b8672bfb11d3fd8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-143d5acc1d21775d2e8619fa983aaace403d2ce3358611a1b8672bfb11d3fd8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44969482$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44969482$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,30980,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15788924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RIETMEIJER, CORNELIS A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALFONSI, GRACE A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOUGLAS, JOHN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LLOYD, LAURA V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICHARDSON, DOUGLAS B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUDSON, FRANKLYN N.</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in Clinic Visits and Diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections After the Introduction of a Copayment in a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic</title><title>Sexually transmitted diseases</title><addtitle>Sex Transm Dis</addtitle><description>Background: To meet their sexually transmitted infection (STI) control mission, STI clinics most often offer services at no or minimal cost to clients. However, there is little knowledge about the effects of charging service fees on clinic attendance and STI identification. As a result of budget shortfalls, a clinic fee of $15 for Denver residents (up to $65 for nonresidents) was introduced in the Denver Metro Health (STI) Clinic (DMHC) in December 2002. We evaluated the effects of the fee on clinic utilization and diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) infections. Methods: Using the DMHC computerized medical record system, we compared clinic visits and CT/GC diagnoses between the first 3 quarters of 2002 and 2003. We also compared CT/GC cases reported by DMHC with those reported by other Denver providers during 2002 and 2003. Results: Compared with 2002, there were 3250 fewer visits (-28.5%) to DMHC in 2003 with no variance across quarters. CT diagnoses declined by 427 cases (-28.1%), disproportionately affecting women (-40%) and those under 20 (-42%). In addition, there were 332 fewer GC diagnoses (-38.1%) with no clear demographic preponderance. Although there were some decreases in non-DMHC CT/GC reports, the ratio of DMHC to non-DMHC reports declined from 0.42 to 0.33 (-21.4%) for CT and from 0.94 to 0.61 (-35.1%) for GC. Conclusions: Even a modest fee for service appears to have a major impact on the use of STI clinic services and may result in a significant effect on the ability to diagnose CT/GC infections, especially among those at highest risk.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities - economics</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis</subject><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Colorado - epidemiology</subject><subject>Fees &amp; charges</subject><subject>Fees, Medical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gonorrhea - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gonorrhea - etiology</subject><subject>Gonorrhea - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Health services utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</subject><subject>Neisseria gonorrhoeae - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Office Visits - economics</subject><subject>Office Visits - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Utilization Review</subject><issn>0148-5717</issn><issn>1537-4521</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQhlcIREPhEUBWD9wSPPbu2uZWBQqVKjgQuFqTtbdxtGuntldqHos3rNNErcQFXyz9880_Y_9VdQF0AVSJTxQWYbhb0HKgVrKBhRKsVQsFL6oZNFzM64bBy2pWynLeCBBn1ZuUtgdcUnhdnUEjpFSsnlV_V9F6k4jzZDk47zryxyWXE0FvyBeHtz4ka8hyM-C4Nw5JjthtwojZHZkf1qVkY6ncBh9i3ASLllz73nbZBZ_IZZ9tJHlzEHMMZnrUSegJkmXY4X60Ph_mI_ll7ycchj1ZRfRpdDmX0U9WpwXfVq96HJJ9d7rPq99XX1fL7_Obn9-ul5c3866uVZ5DzU2DXQeGgRCNYVa2oHpUkiNiZ2vKDess503RAWEtW8HW_RrA8N5I5OfVx6PvLoa7yaasR5c6OwzobZiSbkXTMC7kf0EQtaKU0wJe_ANuwxR9eYRmrFi1TB2gz0eoiyGlaHu9i27EuNdA9SF-TUGX-PVz_Poxfq2gNH84TZjWozXPrae8C_D-CGxTDvGpXn6sVbVk_AE2FblV</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>RIETMEIJER, CORNELIS A.</creator><creator>ALFONSI, GRACE A.</creator><creator>DOUGLAS, JOHN M.</creator><creator>LLOYD, LAURA V.</creator><creator>RICHARDSON, DOUGLAS B.</creator><creator>JUDSON, FRANKLYN N.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Trends in Clinic Visits and Diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections After the Introduction of a Copayment in a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic</title><author>RIETMEIJER, CORNELIS A. ; ALFONSI, GRACE A. ; DOUGLAS, JOHN M. ; LLOYD, LAURA V. ; RICHARDSON, DOUGLAS B. ; JUDSON, FRANKLYN N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-143d5acc1d21775d2e8619fa983aaace403d2ce3358611a1b8672bfb11d3fd8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities - economics</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis</topic><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Colorado - epidemiology</topic><topic>Fees &amp; charges</topic><topic>Fees, Medical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gonorrhea - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gonorrhea - etiology</topic><topic>Gonorrhea - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Health services utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</topic><topic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Office Visits - economics</topic><topic>Office Visits - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Utilization Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RIETMEIJER, CORNELIS A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALFONSI, GRACE A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOUGLAS, JOHN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LLOYD, LAURA V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICHARDSON, DOUGLAS B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUDSON, FRANKLYN N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sexually transmitted diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RIETMEIJER, CORNELIS A.</au><au>ALFONSI, GRACE A.</au><au>DOUGLAS, JOHN M.</au><au>LLOYD, LAURA V.</au><au>RICHARDSON, DOUGLAS B.</au><au>JUDSON, FRANKLYN N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in Clinic Visits and Diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections After the Introduction of a Copayment in a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Transm Dis</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>243-246</pages><issn>0148-5717</issn><eissn>1537-4521</eissn><coden>STRDDM</coden><abstract>Background: To meet their sexually transmitted infection (STI) control mission, STI clinics most often offer services at no or minimal cost to clients. However, there is little knowledge about the effects of charging service fees on clinic attendance and STI identification. As a result of budget shortfalls, a clinic fee of $15 for Denver residents (up to $65 for nonresidents) was introduced in the Denver Metro Health (STI) Clinic (DMHC) in December 2002. We evaluated the effects of the fee on clinic utilization and diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) infections. Methods: Using the DMHC computerized medical record system, we compared clinic visits and CT/GC diagnoses between the first 3 quarters of 2002 and 2003. We also compared CT/GC cases reported by DMHC with those reported by other Denver providers during 2002 and 2003. Results: Compared with 2002, there were 3250 fewer visits (-28.5%) to DMHC in 2003 with no variance across quarters. CT diagnoses declined by 427 cases (-28.1%), disproportionately affecting women (-40%) and those under 20 (-42%). In addition, there were 332 fewer GC diagnoses (-38.1%) with no clear demographic preponderance. Although there were some decreases in non-DMHC CT/GC reports, the ratio of DMHC to non-DMHC reports declined from 0.42 to 0.33 (-21.4%) for CT and from 0.94 to 0.61 (-35.1%) for GC. Conclusions: Even a modest fee for service appears to have a major impact on the use of STI clinic services and may result in a significant effect on the ability to diagnose CT/GC infections, especially among those at highest risk.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>15788924</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.olq.0000149851.97269.91</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-5717
ispartof Sexually transmitted diseases, 2005-04, Vol.32 (4), p.243-246
issn 0148-5717
1537-4521
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67552378
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Adult
Ambulatory Care Facilities - economics
Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics & numerical data
Chlamydia Infections - epidemiology
Chlamydia Infections - etiology
Chlamydia Infections - prevention & control
Chlamydia trachomatis
Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation & purification
Colorado - epidemiology
Fees & charges
Fees, Medical
Female
Gonorrhea - epidemiology
Gonorrhea - etiology
Gonorrhea - prevention & control
Health services utilization
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Neisseria gonorrhoeae - isolation & purification
Office Visits - economics
Office Visits - statistics & numerical data
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - etiology
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - prevention & control
STD
Trends
Utilization Review
title Trends in Clinic Visits and Diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections After the Introduction of a Copayment in a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A20%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20Clinic%20Visits%20and%20Diagnosed%20Chlamydia%20trachomatis%20and%20Neisseria%20gonorrhoeae%20Infections%20After%20the%20Introduction%20of%20a%20Copayment%20in%20a%20Sexually%20Transmitted%20Infection%20Clinic&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20diseases&rft.au=RIETMEIJER,%20CORNELIS%20A.&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=243-246&rft.issn=0148-5717&rft.eissn=1537-4521&rft.coden=STRDDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.olq.0000149851.97269.91&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44969482%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222376290&rft_id=info:pmid/15788924&rft_jstor_id=44969482&rfr_iscdi=true