Different Determinants of Residual Tricuspid Regurgitation after Tricuspid Annuloplasty: Comparison of Atrial Septal Defect and Mitral Valve Prolapse

We analyzed 20 patients with atrial septal defect (ASD) who underwent tricuspid valve (TV) annuloplasty and ASD closure, 21 patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) who underwent mitral valve (MV) and TV annuloplasty, and 20 healthy controls. Severity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was assessed by...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2009-08, Vol.22 (8), p.899-903
Hauptverfasser: Toyono, Manatomo, MD, PhD, Fukuda, Shota, MD, PhD, Gillinov, A. Marc, MD, Pettersson, Gosta B., MD, PhD, Matsumura, Yoshiki, MD, PhD, Wada, Nozomi, MD, Yamano, Tetsuhiro, MD, PhD, Takasaki, Kunitsugu, MD, PhD, Shiota, Takahiro, MD, PhD, FASE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We analyzed 20 patients with atrial septal defect (ASD) who underwent tricuspid valve (TV) annuloplasty and ASD closure, 21 patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) who underwent mitral valve (MV) and TV annuloplasty, and 20 healthy controls. Severity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was assessed by maximal TR jet area/RA area (%TR) using echocardiography before and early after surgery. Before surgery, 2 groups of patients showed significantly greater RA area, TV annulus diameter, RV systolic pressure, and %TR than controls. %TR was significantly decreased after surgery, whereas residual TR was shown in 19% of the MVP group and 25% of the ASD group. Preoperative TV tethering height and %TR were significantly associated with postoperative %TR in the MVP group, whereas preoperative RV fractional area change, RV spherical index, and RV systolic pressure were significantly associated with postoperative %TR in the ASD group. Risk stratification after TV annuloplasty should take the structural abnormality into consideration.
ISSN:0894-7317
1097-6795
DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2009.04.005